|
|
||||||||
Department of Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Accepted for publication July 5, 2007.
* Address correspondence to Dr Hölscher, Department of Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, Cologne, D-50937, Germany (Email: arnulf.hoelscher{at}uk-koeln.de).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Between February 1, 1997, and June 31, 2007, 355 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. A diaphragmatic hernia was detected in 9 patients (2.5%) after transthoracic esophagectomy. All patients were men, with a median age of 50 years. A retrospective analysis of clinicopathologic characteristics of these patients was performed.
Results: The median time between esophagectomy and diagnosis of herniation was 8 months. The 9 patients presented with different degrees of symptoms: 3 were asymptomatic, 2 had minor symptoms, and 4 had acute symptoms. All had a herniation of abdominal organs into the left hemithorax. One patient was asymptomatic, and no surgical repair was performed. Another patient refused the recommended reoperation. The other 7 patients underwent surgical repair of the diaphragmatic hernia by an abdominal approach. All had reduction of the herniated bowel into the abdominal cavity and closure of the hiatal defect. Resection of small bowel was performed in 1 patient for strangulation, and another patient underwent splenectomy for bleeding. Median hospital stay was 16 days. One patient died secondary to mediastinitis from an anastomotic leakage of the esophagogastrostomy.
Conclusions: Diaphragmatic herniation after esophagectomy mostly occurs into the left chest. Surgeons should be aware of this rare complication in patients presenting with symptoms of intestinal obstruction or respiratory complaints after esophagectomy.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of this retrospective study was to estimate the incidence of diaphragmatic herniation after transthoracic esophagectomy and to analyze clinical symptoms and surgical results.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Starting in December 2003, 187 patients underwent laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach, including the cardia and preparation of the gastric conduit. After a mean delay of 4 days (range, 3 to 7 days), a conventional right-sided transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy was performed under a second anesthesia. Reconstruction was done by gastric pull-up and high intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy. The hiatus was not routinely adjusted to the gastric conduit during the abdominal or thoracic parts of the operation. If the hiatus was merely too wide, sutures to narrow the diaphragmatic crura were placed. In the case of a narrow hiatus, we partially divided the right crura to allow an easy passage later on of the gastric tube through the hiatus and prevent gastric outlet obstruction.
The median patient age was 62 years (range, 19 to 81 years). Patients with advanced esophageal cancer (cT3/4, Nx, M0) received neoadjuvant radiotherapy (36 Gy, cisplatin, 5-FU) [6]. After discharge, patients were followed up at regularly scheduled intervals and routinely had esophagogastroscopy, chest roentgenogram, ultrasound imaging of the liver, and computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen. A diaphragmatic hernia was detected after transthoracic esophagectomy in 9 patients (2.5%): in 4 of the 168 patients (2.4%) undergoing the conventional one-stage en bloc esophagectomy and in 5 patients (2.7%) of the 187 who had undergone laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach conduit at a separate procedure from the intrathoracic operation (Figs 1 and 2).
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Surgical Repair
Seven patients had a reoperation: five were emergencies and two were elective. The seven operative procedures were performed by a transabdominal approach, and in all 7 patients, a herniation of the small bowel and colon occurred into the left chest. In addition, the spleen had also herniated into the left chest in one patient. The operative procedures consisted of reduction of the herniated bowel into the abdominal cavity, followed by posterior repair of the hiatal defect with primary closure in 6 patients and with an absorbable mesh in 1 patient.
Two patients required additional procedures at the time of the reoperation for the diaphragmatic hernia. Resection of an ischemic jejunal segment was performed in 1 patient for bowel strangulation. This patient also required a resection of the transverse colon with protective loop ileostomy because segmental ischemia of this area developed 2 days after repair of the diaphragmatic hernia. In another patient, a splenectomy was performed due to bleeding.
Two patients did not have operative repair of the diaphragmatic hernia. One patient was observed because he was completely asymptomatic. Another patient declined elective repair because he felt his symptoms were not bothersome (mild chest pressure).
Clinical Outcome
The median hospital stay of the 5 patients who were discharged home was 16 days (range, 8 to 28 days). These patients had no postoperative complications. In another patient, postoperative upper endoscopy was complicated by an aspiration event that required mechanical ventilation. He recovered without incident, was extubated, and was transferred after 18 days to the Department of Radiation Therapy to initiate therapy to his lumbar metastases.
The other patient died after a prolonged and complicated postoperative course. This patient actually underwent two reoperations after esophagectomy (revision of the anastomosis for leak, then takedown of the gastric pull-up for necrosis) before the diaphragmatic hernia developed. Another reoperation was performed to place a jejunal feeding tube, at which time an incidental large diaphragmatic hernia was detected with herniation of small bowel and left flexure of the colon and spleen into the left chest. This patient required splenectomy. The patient eventually died 8 weeks after the esophagectomy secondary to severe mediastinitis caused by the initial anastomotic leakage of the esophagogastrostomy.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
An interesting finding was that in all of our study patients, diaphragmatic herniation occurred into the left chest, which is consistent with the cases described so far (Table 2). At this point, we can only speculate about the underlying mechanisms for why herniation into the left chest occurs more often. Possibly, as an open space occurs in the left upper abdomen after gastric pull-up, small or large bowel can fall into this space and herniate into the left chest. Another possible explanation for the more frequent herniation into the left chest is simply that in the left-sided hiatal region, the plain serosal surface is located at the greater curvature of the gastric conduit, leading to less peritoneal adhesions than at the lesser curvature. The lesser curvature with fewer serosal surfaces and the gastric dissection plane probably induces more peritoneal adhesions. In addition, the right-sided hiatal region is covered by the lateral segment of the left lobe of the liver, which possibly prevents a herniation into the right chest.
The presence of symptoms in patients with herniation of intraabdominal organs into the chest is variable and to some extent depends on the specific organ that has herniated. Symptoms can therefore include respiratory distress, abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction, and gastrointestinal bleeding [8, 9, 15]. The main complaint in our patients was abdominal or thoracic pain.
When diaphragmatic herniation persists or increases, reoperation is usually recommended to prevent potential complications such as strangulation or perforation [8, 13]. Most published reports indicate a transabdominal approach is preferred, as was our preference. Others have advocated thoracotomy in cases of extensive abdominal adhesions [8, 10, 13, 19]. Finally, some have managed patients with diaphragmatic hernias expectantly with a "wait and see" approach [8, 12]. We believe surgical repair should only be waived in cases of small or asymptomatic hernias or if the patient has a short life expectancy due to progressive cancer.
Ideally, the best approach would be to prevent diaphragmatic herniation in the first place after esophagectomy [8, 13]. One of the critical steps in performing an esophagectomy is the enlargement of the hiatus to allow sufficient mobilization of the esophagus and to ease the transdiaphragmatic passage of the gastric conduit, which of course increases the risk of diaphragmatic herniation. If an intraoperative enlargement of the hiatus is necessary, Reich and colleagues [10] have suggested performing an anterior incision of the hiatus rather than a lateral incision of the diaphragma to lower risk of herniation. The size of the hiatus should also be adjusted to the gastric conduit or the colon interposition during both the abdominal as well as thoracic parts of the operation [22]. In particular, after gastric pull-up with intrathoracic anastomosis, the hiatus should be inspected, and if it is too wide, sutures to narrow the diaphragmatic crura should be placed [3]. Finally, others recommend placing sutures between the graft and the crura to prevent hiatal herniation [22]. We do not routinely suture the graft along the crura. In our opinion, this may indeed prevent herniation but it may disturb vascularization of the conduit. Thus, suturing the graft along the crura is much easier during the abdominal portion of the Ivor Lewis technique, which is not possible after abdominal closure. In contrast, tacking sutures between the graft and the crura during the thoracic approach is more difficult because one needs to avoid disturbing the vessels of the lesser and greater curvature of the conduit.
In conclusion, diaphragmatic hernia after esophagectomy is a rare but sometimes a severe complication. The herniation mostly develops into the left chest and contains small and sometimes large bowel. Surgical repair is recommended to reduce the herniated organs into the abdominal cavity, followed by the closure of the hiatal defect. Surgeons should be aware of this possible complication in patients presenting with symptoms of intestinal obstruction or respiratory complaints after esophagectomy.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Kent, J. D. Luketich, W. Tsai, P. Churilla, M. Federle, R. Landreneau, M. Alvelo-Rivera, and M. Schuchert Revisional Surgery After Esophagectomy: An Analysis of 43 Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 975 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. DeMeester Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1852 - 1853. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |