ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Pascal M. Dohmen
Wolfgang Konertz
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dohmen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Konertz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dohmen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Konertz, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:729-736
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Mid-Term Clinical Results Using a Tissue-Engineered Pulmonary Valve to Reconstruct the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract During the Ross Procedure

Pascal M. Dohmen, MD, PhDa,*, Alexander Lembcke, MDb, Sebastin Holinski, MDa, Dietmar Kivelitz, PhDb, Jan P. Braun, MDc, Axel Pruss, PhDd, Wolfgang Konertz, MD, PhDa

a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Hospital, Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
b Department of Radiology, Charité Hospital, Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
c Department of Anesthesiology, Charité Hospital, Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
d Tissue Bank, Charité Hospital, Medical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Accepted for publication April 16, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Dohmen, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité, Humboldt University Berlin, Luisenstraße 13, D-10117, Berlin (Email: pascal.dohmen{at}charite.de).

Presented at the Poster Session of the Forty-second Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Chicago, IL, Jan 30–Feb 1, 2006.


Drs Dohmen and Konertz disclose a financial relationship with AutoTissue Ltd.

 

    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background: The Ross procedure is mainly limited by the durability of the valve prostheses used to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract. This study was performed to collect prospective safety and effectiveness data of the Ross procedure using a tissue-engineered heart valve to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract.

Methods: Between May 2000 and February 2003, 23 patients received tissue-engineered heart valves. Two to four weeks before the Ross operation, a piece of forearm or saphenous vein was harvested to isolate, characterize, and expand endothelial cells. A pulmonary allograft (n = 11) or xenograft (n = 12) was decellularized, coated with fibronectin, and seeded with autologous vascular endothelial cells, using a specially developed bioreactor. Follow-up was performed by clinical evaluation, transthoracic echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and multislice computed tomography.

Results: The patient mean age was 44.0 ± 13.7 years. Cell seeding density was 1.1 x 105 ± 0.5 x 105 cells/cm2, with a viability of 90.2% ± 8.9%. All patients survived the operation. One patient died during follow-up, and 1 patient required reoperation. All surviving patients are currently in New York Heart Association functional class I. Transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation of the tissue-engineered heart valve showed a mean flow velocity of 0.9 ± 0.4 m/s at 5 years. Multislice computed tomography showed no calcification up to 5 years postoperatively.

Conclusions: Tissue-engineered heart valves showed excellent hemodynamic performance during mid-term follow-up. Decellularization of heart valves and seeding with autologous vascular endothelial cells may prevent tissue degeneration and improve valve durability.

Autografts are the only viable heart valves available during aortic valve operations. Commercially available glutaraldehyde bioprostheses are nonviable structures and therefore no remodeling or regeneration potential is given [1]. Cryopreserved allografts are at the most partially viable, but also carry a high bioburden [2]. Because of their allogenic origin, immunologic reactions are possible, resulting in degeneration and calcification of these bioprostheses [3]. Tissue engineering technology made it possible to create a viable heart valve with potential for growth, regeneration, and repair [4].

This study was designed to collect prospective safety and effectiveness data about a tissue-engineered (TE) heart valve to reduce tissue deterioration and assure excellent hemodynamic behavior. Modifications have been initially made to the regular cryopreserved pulmonary allograft, performing decellularization treatment and in vitro seeding with autologous vascular endothelial cells. Allografts have limited availability, and therefore, other sources needed to be evaluated to overcome this problem. Thus, we performed in a second step: a decellularized pulmonary xenograft was used as a scaffold to be seeded in vitro with autologous vascular endothelial cells to overcome allograft shortages.

Extensive evaluation was performed to exclude any risk for the patient [5] and after first results were available of the seeded decellularized allografts [6]. This study presents mid-term clinical results of the TE heart valve created by in vitro seeding of a decellularized pulmonary allograft or xenograft during the Ross procedure.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Study approval from the Humboldt University Berlin Ethics Committee was obtained as well as patient informed consent before the first implantation was performed in May 2000 [7]. This study also conformed to the guidelines of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki [8].

Valve Prosthesis
The scaffold used for tissue engineering in 11 patients was a commercially available cryopreserved pulmonary allograft (Cryolife Inc, Kennesaw, GA), and in 12 patients, a porcine heart valve (AutoTissue Ltd, Berlin, Germany) was used.

Preparation of the TE heart valve has been previously extensively described [5, 7]. In brief, a piece of autologous vein was prepared, and vascular endothelial cells were harvested, characterized, and expanded in the tissue laboratory. If a sufficient number of endothelial cells were available, a cryopreserved allograft or a fresh xenograft was decellularized [5]. The decellularized scaffolds were coated with Pronectine F (PAA, Laboratories GmbH, Coelbe, Germany) and seeded with vascular endothelial cells by using a special developed bioreactor. After seeding, quality control was performed, sterility was proven, and the TE heart valves were available for implantation.

Patients
Between May 2000 and February 2003, 23 consecutive patients received this TE heart valve. Selecting criteria for the Ross procedure were elective surgery, age younger that 65 years, acceptable life expectancy, and good quality of the native pulmonary valve. Additional selecting criteria to receive a TE heart valve were a patient-signed agreement, age older than 18 years, elective surgery with no risk of an additional 4 to 6 weeks of waiting time, and agreement for the additional harvesting a vein segment. The patient’s preoperative characteristics are listed in Table 1. Preoperatively, 6 patients (26.1%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III, and 17 (73.9%) were in class II.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Clinical Characteristics
 
Operative Technique
Midline sternotomy and normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass were performed in all patients. After aortic cross-clamping, warm antegrade blood cardioplegia was administered according to the Calafiori technique [9]. A transversal aortotomy was used to expose the diseased aortic valve. In addition, the pulmonary artery was transected, and the autologous pulmonary valve was evaluated, identifying leaflet fenestrations, atheroma, calcifications, or other pathologic findings. If gross examination showed a suitable pulmonary valve, preparation was started.

A subcoronary implantation technique was performed in 22 patients. One patient received aortic root replacement due to previous multiple interventional and surgical treatments. A running suture line was performed for all anastomoses, using a double-armed 4-0 polypropylene suture for the proximal and a 5-0 polypropylene suture for the distal anastomosis. Mean aortic cross clamp-time was 108.2 ± 13.5 minutes, and mean extracorporeal circulation time was 120.0 ± 25.1 minutes.

Three patients also underwent reconstruction of the ascending aorta.

Follow-Up
Patients were schedule for follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. During follow-up, patients were clinically evaluated and transthoracic echocardiography was performed. If echocardiography was difficult or suggestive of hemodynamic changes, magnetic resonance imaging was added. After 1-year of follow-up, multislice computed tomography (CT) was added to evaluate valve morphology.

Doppler Echocardiography
Transthoracic echocardiographic examination was performed preoperatively, at discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. A Hewlett Packard Sonos 5500 (Agilent Technologies Ltd., Boeblingen, Germany) with a 2.5-MHz transducer was used. During each echocardiographic examination, aortic and pulmonary regurgitation were measured by the length and the width of the jet into the right or left ventricular outflow tract. Gradation was 0 (none), 1+ (trivial), 2+ (mild), 3+ (moderate), and 4+ (severe). The mean aortic and pulmonary flow velocities were measured with continuous-wave Doppler. Pulsed-wave Doppler was used for localization of the pressure drop at the right ventricular outflow tract and the TE heart valve to determine the origin of any increased flow velocity. All measurements were performed during normal quiet respiration. Spectral recordings were stored on magneto optical disk. Doppler echocardiography measurements of all heartbeats in three complete consecutive respiratory cycles were analyzed.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Examinations were performed at 1.5T (Magnetom Vision, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), using a standardized protocol, which has been previously reported [10]. The maximum flow velocity encoding was set to 150 cm/s and increased to 250 cm/s if velocity aliasing was encountered. The standard electrocardiogram system provided by the magnetic resonance manufacturer was used.

Multislice Computed Tomography
Data were acquired on a multislice CT scanner (Aquilion16, Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan) using a standardized protocol, which has been previously reported [11].

Histologic Evaluation
After each seeding procedure was completed, a piece of the valve wall was fixed and histologically evaluated by performing a Giemsa staining as well as routine histologic staining (hematoxylin and eosin, von Gieson, Goldner staining). Immunohistochemical evaluation was performed by von Willebrand factor, CD31, and CD34.

Histologic evaluation of explanted heart valves was performed by routine histologic staining (hematoxylin and eosin, von Gieson, Goldner, von Kossa staining) and immunohistochemical staining (von Willebrand Factor, antifibroblast factor, CD31, CD34, and CD68 staining).

Data Analysis
Quantitative data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. For comparing the endothelial cell seeding density and cell viability between decellularized allografts and xenografts, unpaired Student t test with SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL) was used. The level for statistical significance was set at a p < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Valve Prosthesis
The quality control showed that all cultures were free from interstitial cell contamination, except in 1 patient in whom a second piece of vein was prepared. Trypan blue staining showed an endothelial cell viability of 90.2% ± 8.9%. In a comparison of the two different valve matrices, no differences in cell viability was seen, respectively, 93.4% ± 1.9% and 90.1% ± 7.2 %, which was not significant (p = 0.06).

Giemsa staining showed a monolayer of endothelial cells at the inner surface of the seeded heart valves (Fig 1). None of the samples taken from the TE heart valves, cell cultures, or from the final prepared heart valve showed a positive result for bacteriologic or fungal contamination.


Figure 1
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. A representative Giemsa-stained sample of a seeded valve wall shows effective in vitro endothelial cell seeding.

 
A piece of cephalic vein was harvested in the first 7 patients, and a piece of the greater saphenous vein was prepared from the other 16. Preparation of the saphenous vein made it possible to decrease the cell culture time from 4 to 2 weeks. In 1 patient, the autologous serum was not sufficient to allow endothelial cells growth because of an elevated plasma lipid concentration. Pooled donor serum was used for this patient.

After the second passage, a mean number of 6.5 x 106 ± 2.9 x 106 endothelial cells were available, which was considered to be sufficient to cover a decellularized valve scaffold. The mean number of endothelial cells remaining in the solution after seeding was 1.5 x 106 ± 1.4 x 106, which means the mean number of endothelial cells covering the valves was 5.1 x 106 ± 2.1 x 106. The seeding percentage of endothelial cells was 80.1% ± 14.7%, with a density of 1.1 x 105 ± 0.5 x 105 cells/cm2 after a 4-hour duration.

When the two different valve scaffolds were compared, no differences were found in the seeding density between the decellularized allograft and the decellularized xenograft, respectively, 1.05 x 105 ± 0.5 x 105 cells/cm2 and 1.2 x 105 ± 0.5 x 105 cells/cm2, which was not significant (p = 0.23). The seeding was considered complete after a 10-day maturation period in a humidified incubator (37°C, 5% carbon dioxide and 98% air saturation).

Follow-Up
Follow-up was 100% complete. Mean follow-up was 46.0 ± 12.1 months (range, 33 to 68 months). There were no operative deaths. One patient suddenly died 3 months after surgery because of arrhythmia. Two days before the event, however, transthoracic echocardiography showed a maximum flow velocity at the neoaortic valve of 1.3 m/s and a maximum flow velocity at the TE heart valve of 0.9 m/s. Regurgitation at the pulmonary and neoaortic heart valve was absent.

Increasing maximum flow velocity developed in a second patient, rising from 0.8 m/s at discharge to 3.5 m/s at 4 months of follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an external compression at the level of the distal anastomosis; however, no dilatation of the TE valve wall was seen (Fig 2). An inflammatory reaction was found intraoperatively, with fibrotic tissue and narrowing at the distal anastomosis. Although the valve leaflets looked smooth and pliable without degeneration, the valve was replaced.


Figure 2
View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Magnetic resonance imaging shows a distal anastomosis narrowing. There is absence of prestenotic dilatation of the valve wall.

 
One patient showed postoperative atrioventricular block grade III postoperatively, probably due to heavy calcification of the aortic annulus that extended into the left ventricular outflow tract. There was also echocardiographic evidence for a small ventricular septal defect that had been closed operatively 3 months after the initial procedure. The patient quickly recovered after the operation. All patients are currently in NYHA functional class I, without adverse events.

Histologic Examination
Histologic evaluation of the explanted TE heart valve with hematoxylin and eosin staining showed no structural deterioration but surrounding fibrotic tissue (Fig 3A). Goldner staining showed an excellent preservation of the extracellular matrix. Furthermore, the high pressure due to the stenosis at the distal anastomosis did not influence the extracellular matrix (Fig 3B). Von Kossa staining showed absence of calcification at the complete matrix, including the wall (Fig 3C) and the leaflets. Von Willebrand factor visualized a monolayer of endothelial cells at the leaflets. Similar results are found at the valve wall showing a monolayer of cells positive for CD31 (Fig 3D) and CD 34 (Fig 3E). Many cells positive for CD34 are present in the deeper layers of the media (Fig 3F). The cells show to be building channels, and erythrocytes can be seen with the hematoxylin and eosin staining. A minimal number of CD68-positive cells were found (Fig 3G). A part of the host cells, which grow into the decellularized matrix, are shown to be positive for antifibroblast staining (Fig 3H).


Figure 3
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 3. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining shows excellent preservation of the extracellular structures, surrounded by tissue fibrosis. (B) Goldner staining shows an unchanged extracellular matrix. (C) Von Kossa staining shows absence of tissue calcification. (D) The valve wall shows a monolayer of CD31-positive cells at the inner surface of the valve wall. (E) The cells at the inner surface are also CD34-positive cells. Some CD34-positive cells are identified within the superficial area of the wall media. (F) In the deeper layers of the wall media, many CD34 positive cells are identified, which shows new revascularization. (G) There are a few CD68-positive cells within the matrix, as shown in this photomicrograph. (H) The cells shown within the extracellular matrix are antifibroblast positive cells.

 
Doppler Echocardiography
Transthoracic echocardiography data show no increase of mean flow velocities during mid-term follow up (Fig 4A). The neoaortic valve at discharge and at the latest follow-up showed no regurgitation in any of the patients, and mean flow velocities during follow-up did not increase (Fig 4A). A comparison between the different matrices found no differences in hemodynamics (Fig 4B). At discharge, the TE heart valve showed no regurgitation in 22 patients and trivial central regurgitation in 1 patient. No functional regurgitation of the TE heart valve at up to 5 years of follow-up was seen.


Figure 4
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 4. (A) Average mean flow velocities at the tissue-engineered (TE) heart valve (triangles, dark line) and the neoaortic valve (diamonds, light line). (B) Average mean flow velocities of the allogenic (light line, squares) and xenogenic (dark line, triangle) matrices are used for construction of the TE heart valve. Data are presented with the standard deviation.

 
Multislice Computed Tomography
Multislice CT showed normal morphology of the wall and leaflets and absence of calcification or structural deterioration of the TE heart valves at up to 5 years of follow-up (Fig 5A and B). All of the leaflets of the TE heart valves were highly pliable and flexible, without evidence for retraction. The leaflets also showed a high coaptation area. There was no sign of dilatation of the valves was seen, including the TE valve with fibrous tissue surrounding it. No sign of wall thickening or thrombotic formation was seen at the inner surface of the TE heart valve.


Figure 5
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 5. Multislice computed tomography image shows normal morphology, without calcification, at the 5-year follow-up. (A) The leaflets of the tissue-engineered heart valve are completely opened. (B) The smooth and pliable leaflets are closed.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Advantages of the Ross Procedure
The Ross operation is an excellent option for aortic valve replacement in patients with extended live expectancy and maximum quality of life [12]. Since the first operation in 1967 by Donald Ross [13], many patients have been treated by this surgical technique. Although the procedure is complex because it involves a double valve replacement, several important advantages should be discussed. Doss and colleagues [14] showed in a prospective randomized trial that compared mechanical heart valves with the Ross procedure that hemodynamic performance are in favor for the Ross procedure. The effective orifice area of the implanted pulmonary autograft was significantly larger compared with the mechanical heart valve, respectively 2.5 ± 0.6 cm2 and 1.81 ± 0.3 cm2, although the implanted mean valve size was not significantly different, respectively, 24.9 ± 2.3 mm and 24.2 ± 1.7 mm.

Wang and colleagues [15] showed in a recently published study that pulmonary autografts are superior compared with aortic allografts at rest (respectively, 5 ± 2 mm Hg and 11 ± 4 mm Hg; p = 0.027) and at maximum exercise (respectively, 10 ± 5 mm Hg and 15 ± 5 mm Hg; p = 0.003). The pulmonary allograft used to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract, however, showed limiting results at rest and maximum exercise in these patients. The pressure gradient at rest was 14 ± 10 mm Hg compared with 3 ± 1 mm Hg in the patients who received the aortic allograft without pulmonary valve replacement. At maximum exercise, the difference became even more pronounced at, respectively, 25 ± 22 mm Hg and 5 ± 4 mm Hg.

In a similar study, Da Costa and colleagues [16] showed excellent results of the autologous pulmonary valve, with an average mean gradient of 1.8 ± 0.6 mm Hg at rest and 4.3 ± 2.5 mm Hg at maximum exercise. However, the pressure gradient at the pulmonary allograft increased during time at exercise at discharge and mean follow-up of 12.8 months, respectively, 10.4 ± 6.1 mm Hg and 26.0 ± 13.2 mm Hg. This study was able to show an increase of pressure gradient during follow=up, especially at exercise. Chambers and colleagues [17] showed again the excellent results of the pulmonary autograft at 20 years; however, there was a 20% rate of reoperation due to allograft failure of the right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction.

Limitations of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction
New heart valves are needed to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract. Several studies suggested that allograft degeneration is due to immunologic reactions [18, 19]. We performed a decellularization technique to eliminate all cells in regular available cryopreserved allografts to overcome immunogenicity. In vitro autologous vascular endothelial cell seeding was preferred for these decellularized matrices to protect the structure, because the vascular endothelium is characterized by anticoagulatory and profibrinolytic activities [20]. The Andrews and colleagues [21] study showed that glycoprotein Ib-IX-V and VI, two adhesion receptors that bind von Willebrand factor and collagen, are primarily responsible for regulating initial platelet adhesion and activation within the blood flow. The platelet adhesion that follows could lead to rapid signal transduction, with activation of integrins that support adhesion and aggregation. On the other hand, there is a natural cover of the collagen with autologous vascular endothelial cells to eventually overcome reactions against allogenic or xenogenic collagen.

In this study, autologous endothelial cells were used from the cephalic and the saphenous vein. An excellent study by Pascual and colleagues [22] showed that endothelial cells of vein origin can restore the function of arterial endothelial cells and create a functional platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM 1)–type junction between both cell types. Simon and colleagues [23] showed that human umbilical vein endothelial cells are also able to prevent platelet adhesions and activation and eliminate thrombogenicity. In another clinical study, Deutsch and colleagues [24] showed that vein endothelial cells can significantly increase patency rates of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts due to reduction of thrombogenicity. We therefore believe using vein endothelial cells of two different areas does not create a problem.

We used a porcine decellularized valve matrix in 12 patients. The reason for this change was the difficulty in getting a suitable allograft available at the time of the seeding. At the time enough endothelial cells are present, the seeding should be performed as soon as possible, because the seeded valve needs to maturate after seeding and sterility needs to be proven.

The second problem was that although cryopreserved allografts are the gold standard, Brockbank and colleagues [25] suggested a possible cause of tissue failure and calcification due to interstitial ice formation in cryopreserved allografts. Furthermore, Goffin and colleagues [26] have mentioned the importance of applying dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) as cryoprotective solution to the allograft and waiting at least 40 to 60 minutes to allow DMSO to penetrate completely into the tissue. The leaflets in this study showed ice crystals, so it would have been interesting to know what would have happened with the cryopreserved wall of these allografts.

A further important issue of this study would be to analyze the freezing curve. Goffin and colleagues [27] have always taken great care with this issue and used a grading scale for the quality of the allografts. Cryopreserved pulmonary allografts received a second grade quality due to the unsatisfactory freezing curve in 15%. If the current chamber temperature decreases too fast, the program should be corrected by hand. This, of course, does not always guarantee a perfect final freezing process. It seems that the authors of this recent study have had no cryopreservation failures.

We therefore preferred the use of a fresh valve matrix that has not been cryopreserved before decellularization and is in abundant in supply. Porcine matrices were used because several studies showed allergic reactions to bovine collagen, especially when the tissue was not cross-linked. Hanke and colleagues [28] showed abscesses persisting for days or weeks as a manifestation of hypersensitivity to bovine collagen in 4 of 10,000 cases. Periods of remission have been described up to 24 months afterwards. Local tissue necrosis occurred in 9 of 10,000 patients. Mehlisch [29] showed similar results with bovine collagen allergy in 6.5% of treated patients. No adverse reactions have been reported for porcine collagen, however.

Glutaraldehyde treatment has been believed for many years to reduce antigenicity of xenogenic collagen [30]. Those who argued for its use claimed that cross-link formation shields or modifies major antigenic situs, thus reducing the capacity to interact with antibodies. Courtman and colleagues [31] found in a more recent study that xenogenic grafts treated with glutaraldehyde actually showed increased antigenicity. Because previous studies showed complete decellularization of these valve matrices, they were used for TE heart valves [5].

We did not find any differences between the allogenic or xenogenic matrix when they were used. Hemodynamic behavior was not significantly different for either group, nor was seeding capacity; however, long-term follow-up will be needed to show if there is any difference between both matrices.

One seeded valve needed to be explanted because of distal anastomosis narrowing. Reconstruction of this valve was not possible because the anastomosis was too distal and it was technically impossible to perform a patch reconstruction. Histologic examination of this explanted valve, however, showed similar results as in experimental animals [6, 32]. The decellularized matrices withstand the high pressure due to the narrowing of the distal anastomosis, without dilatation and fragmentation of the collagen structures. In the animal model, we saw the matrix repopulating with interstitial cells as early as 3 months after implantation. We were able to demonstrate the persistence of endothelial cells to the blood flow on a seeded TE heart valve was explanted after 7 days. Similar results were found in this clinical case. The seeded endothelial cells persisted, and as a result of the blood flow, the deeper layers started to be recellularized with interstitial cells. Furthermore, we were able to see a revascularization similar to what we saw in valves we implanted in a juvenile sheep model [4].

This study also showed the impact of the applied decellularization technique. Simon and colleagues [33] reported early failure of a decellularized porcine heart valve (SynerGraft, CryoLife), due to severe foreign body reaction dominated by neutrophil granulocytes and macrophages in the early implants. At 1 year, a pronounced lymphocytic reaction could be seen. Histologic evaluation showed very early calcific deposits within the scaffold; furthermore, a pseudointimal layer at the inner surface was present. The changes seen in the SynerGraft xenogenic heart valve seemed to be due to incomplete decellularization, with a lot of cellular debris remaining in the scaffold and also damage to the collagen elastin scaffold caused by an inadequate decellularization method.

We have seen a pseudointimal layer in our experimental animal model only in cryopreserved allografts. Our decellularized porcine valve matrix never showed a pseudointima. At the inner surface, a smooth endothelial cell layer was seen, and interstitial cells had grown into the scaffold [4]. Bechtel and colleagues [34] showed in another study that decellularization of pulmonary allografts (SynerGrafts) showed absence of positive anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Hemodynamic behavior, however, was not positively influenced because transvalvular pressure gradients rose significantly during follow-up. It is evident that different decellularization techniques do not necessarily achieve similar results. Next to this, no transvalvular pressure increase was seen at up to 5 years of follow-up in this clinical study.

Study Limitations
Ideal would be a randomized study, using regular cryopreserved allografts and seeded decellularized allografts; however, experimental data and the safety and feasibility data of the initial three implantations were retrospectively analyzed and compared with previously used cryopreserved allografts implanted by the same surgeon. A different clinical course could be shown retrospectively, so the ongoing use of conventional cryopreserved allografts was considered obsolete. This was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. A patient selection was, unfortunately, made by the selection criteria because all patients were elective due to the waiting time until the TE valve was ready to be implanted.

Conclusion
Tissue-engineered heart valves showed excellent hemodynamic performance during mid-term follow-up, without increase of transvalvular flow velocity. Decellularization of heart valves and seeding with autologous vascular endothelial cells may prevent tissue degeneration and improve valve durability.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We would like to thank Katrin Krüger for her assistance with preparing and staining the histologic sections.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Harken DE. Heart valves: ten commandments and still counting Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:S18-S19.[Medline]
  2. Smith JD, Ogino H, Hunt D, Laylor RM, Rose ML, Yacoub MH. Humoral immune response to human aortic valve homografts Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S127-S130.[Medline]
  3. Costa FDA, Dohmen P, Duarte D, et al. Immunological and echocardiographic evaluation of decellularized versus cryopreserved homografts during Ross procedure Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:572-578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Dohmen PM, da Costa F, Lopes SV, et al. Is there a possibility for a glutaraldehyde-free porcine heart valve to grow? Eur Surg Res 2006;38:54-61.[Medline]
  5. Erdbruegger W, Posner S, Ellerbrock H, et al. Deoxycholic acid treatment offers improved prospects in heart valve replacement Tissue Eng 2006;8:1-11.[Medline]
  6. Dohmen PM, Ozaki S, Verbeken E, Yperman J, Flameng W, Konertz W. Tissue engineering of a pulmonary xenograft heart valve Asian Cardiovasc Thoracic Surg 2002;10:25-30.[Medline]
  7. Dohmen PM, Kivelitz D, Hotz H, Konertz W. Ross operation with a tissue engineered heart valve Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1438-1442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects JAMA 2000;284:3043-3045.[Free Full Text]
  9. Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Mezzetti A, et al. Intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:398-402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lembcke A, Dohmen PM, Dewey M, et al. Multislice computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of right ventricular volumes and function comparison with magnetic resonance imaging Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1344-1351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lembcke A, Dohmen PM, Dewey M, et al. Multislice computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of right ventricular volumes and function comparison with echocardiography Radiology 2005;236:47-55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Konertz W, Dohmen PM, Liu J, et al. Hemodynamic characteristics of the Matrix P decellularized xenograft for pulmonary valve replacement during the Ross operation J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:78-81.[Medline]
  13. Ross DN. Replacement of the aortic and mitral valve with a pulmonary autograft Lancet 1967;2:956-958.[Medline]
  14. Doss M, Wood JP, Martens S, Greinecker G, Moritz A. Do pulmonary autografts provide better outcomes than mechanical valves?A prospective randomised trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2194-2198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wang A, Jaggers J, Ungerleider RM, Lim CS, Ryan T. Exercise echocardiographic comparison of pulmonary autograft and aortic homograft replacements for aortic valve disease in adults J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:202-208.[Medline]
  16. Affonso da Costa FD, Pinton R, Haggi Filho H, et al. The Ross procedure: is it the ideal operation for the young with aortic valve disease? Heart Surg Forum 1998;1:116-124.[Medline]
  17. Chambers JC, Somerville J, Stone S, Ross DN. Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve diseaseLong-term results of the pioneer series. Circulation 1997;96:2206-2214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hoestra F, Knoop C, Jutte N, et al. Effect of cryopreservation and HLA-DR matching on the cellular immunogenicity of human cardiac valve allografts J Heart Lung Transplant 1994;13:1095-1098.[Medline]
  19. Baskett RJ, Ross DB, Nanton MA, Murphy DA. Factors in the early failure of cryopreserved homograft pulmonary valves in children: preserved immunogenicity? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1170-1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rodgers GM. Hemostatic properties of normal and perturbed vascular cells FASEB J 1988;2:116-123.[Abstract]
  21. Andrews RK, Berndt MC. Platelet physiology and thrombosis Thromb Res 2004;114:447-453.[Medline]
  22. Pascual G, Escudero C, Rodriguez M, et al. Restoring the endothelium of cryopreserved arterial grafts: co-culture of venous and arterial endothelial cells Cryobiol 2004;49:272-285.[Medline]
  23. Kasimir MT, Weigel G, Sharma J, et al. The decellularized porcine heart valve matrix in tissue engineering: platelet adhesion and activation Thromb Haemost 2005;94:462-467.
  24. Meinhart JG, Deutsch M, Fischlain T, Howanietz N, Froschl A, Zilla P. Clinical autologous in vitro endothelialization of 153 infrainguinal ePTFE-grafts Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S327-S331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Brockbank KG, Lightfoort FG, Song YC, Taylor MJ. Interstitial ice formation in cryopreserved homografts: a possible cause of tissue deterioration and calcification in vivo J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:200-206.[Medline]
  26. Goffin YA, Van Hoeck B, Jashari R, Soots G, Kalmar P. Banking of cryopreserved heart valves in Europe: assessment of a 10-year operation in the European Homograft Bank (EHB) J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:207-214.[Medline]
  27. Aidulis D, Pegg DE, Hunt CJ, et al. Processing of ovine cardiac valve allografts: 1. Effects of preservation method on structure and mechanical properties Cell Tissue Bank 2002;3:79-89.[Medline]
  28. Hanke CW, Higley HR, Jolivette DM, Swanson NA, Stegman SJ. Abscess formation and local necrosis after treatment with Zyderm or Zyplast collagen implant J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;25:319-326.[Medline]
  29. Mehlisch DR. Collagen/hydroxylapatite implant for augmenting deficient alveolar ridges: A 24 month clinical and histologic summary Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:505-514.[Medline]
  30. Speer DP, Chvapil M, Eskelson CD, Ulreich J. Biological effects of residual glutaraldehyde in glutaraldehyde-tanned collagen biomaterials J Biomed Mater Res 1980;14:753-764.[Medline]
  31. Courtman DW, Errett BF, Wilson GJ. The role of crosslinking in modification of the immune response elicited against xenogenic vascular acellular matrices J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:576-586.[Medline]
  32. Dohmen PM, Ozaki S, Yperman J, Flameng W, Konertz W. Results of tissue engineered auto-xenograft implanted in the juvenile sheep model Med Sci Monit 2003;9:BR97-BR107.[Medline]
  33. Simon P, Kasimir MT, Seebacher G, et al. Early failure of the tissue engineered procine heart valve SYNERGRAFT in pediatric patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:1002-1006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bechtel JF, Muller-Steinhardt M, Schmidtke C, Brunswik A, Stierle U, Sievers HH. Evalualtion of the decelluarized pulmonary valve homograft (SynerGraft) J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:734-739.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Gomez-Caro, E. Martinez, A. Rodriguez, D. Sanchez, J. Martorell, J. M. Gimferrer, A. Haverich, W. Harringer, J. L. Pomar, and P. Macchiarini
Cryopreserved Arterial Allograft Reconstruction After Excision of Thoracic Malignancies.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 1753 - 1761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Schreiber, A. Eicken, S. Seidl, and R. Lange
Unexpected Early Failure of a Decellularized Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Graft.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 2026 - 2027.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. J. Schoen
Evolving Concepts of Cardiac Valve Dynamics: The Continuum of Development, Functional Structure, Pathobiology, and Tissue Engineering
Circulation, October 28, 2008; 118(18): 1864 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. M. Dohmen and W. Konertz
Decellularization of xenogenic biologic tissue.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 2163 - 2163.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Vincentelli, F. Juthier, and B. Jude
Reply to the editor.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2008; 135(5): 1190 - 1190.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Pascal M. Dohmen
Wolfgang Konertz
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dohmen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Konertz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dohmen, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Konertz, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS