|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1635-1639
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Interventional Radiology, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria
Accepted for publication December 18, 2006.
* Address correspondence to Dr Czerny, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna A-1090, Austria (Email: martin.czerny{at}meduniwien.ac.at).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Within a 2-year period, we treated 6 patients with this pathology. Four patients required extension of the proximal landing zone (autologous double transposition, n = 2; subclavian-to-carotid artery transposition, n = 2) before stent-graft placement.
Results: Supra-aortic rerouting procedures and endovascular stent-graft placement were performed successfully in all patients. Closure of the primary entry tear, full expansion of the stent-graft, and eventually, thrombosis of the false lumen was achieved in 5 patients. In 1 patient with a short proximal landing zone, a persisting type Ia endoleak was observed. In all patients with successful primary entry closure, a reduction in aneurysm diameter occurred. Mean follow-up is 16 months (range, 4 to 25).
Conclusions: Endovascular stent-graft placement of aneurysms involving the descending aorta originating from chronic type B dissections may serve as a valuable treatment option in this complex pathology. The chronic dissection membrane can be successfully compressed against large areas of the native aortic wall. A sufficient proximal landing zone is mandatory for early and late success.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of endovascular stent-graft placement of aneurysms involving the descending aorta originating from chronic type B dissections.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preoperative Evaluation and Surgical Approach
Preoperative evaluation was by multisclice computed tomography scans to exclude major occlusive disease of the supra-aortic branches and of the aortoiliac axis. These studies assured later arterial access for stent-graft placement and the presence of a sufficient proximal neck of at least 1.5 cm. In 4 patients, supra-aortic rerouting procedures were necessary to create a sufficient proximal landing zone (autologous double transposition, n = 2; subclavian-to-carotid artery transposition, n = 2).
Autologous Double Transposition
The original method has been described in detail [10]. Through an upper hemisternotomy, the left common carotid artery is clamped, transversely dissected at its origin, and an end-to-side anastomosis is made between the left common carotid artery and the brachiocephalic trunk. An analogous procedure is carried out between the left subclavian artery and the transposed left common carotid artery.
Subclavian-to-Carotid Artery Transposition
Access is gained through a supraclavicular incision. The lateral insertion of the sternocleidomastoid muscle is transsected. After identification of the left vertebral artery, the subclavian artery is clamped and dissected at its origin, and an end-to-side anastomosis between the subclavian and left carotid artery is performed.
Stent-Graft Systems Used
Three different commercially available stent-graft systems were used. The Excluder (and later TAG) stent-graft (WL Gore, Flagstaff, Arizona) was used in 4 patients. The Talent endovascular stent-graft (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) was used in 1 patient. The Relay stent-graft (Bolton Medical, Sunrise, Florida) was used in another patient. For all systems, the diameter of the stent-graft was calculated from the largest diameter of the proximal or distal neck, and an oversizing factor of 10% to 20% was added.
Stent-Graft Placement
Stent-graft placement was performed during general anesthesia. In all patients, a common femoral artery access was chosen. Initially, a 5F pigtail catheter was advanced through the right brachial artery into the aortic arch to reconfirm the morphology and extent of the lesion. After systemic treatment with heparin 80 IU/kg bodyweight, an arteriotomy was made and the system was advanced under fluoroscopic guidance. Afterward, stent-grafts were deployed during systemic hypotension with a systolic pressure of 60 mm Hg.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Follow-Up Period
The mean follow-up period is 16 months (range, 4 to 25). Patients were readmitted for completion computed tomography scans after 3 months and biannually thereafter. In the 5, primarily successful, cases, full expansion of the stent-graft and thrombosis of the false lumen was achieved. In these patients, a reduction in aneurysm diameter was observed.
Figures 1, 2, and 3
show the course of a patient 6 years after acute type B dissection. After placement, the stent-graft is substantially compressed by the rigid chronic dissecting membrane. However, after 4 months, the stent-graft fully expanded, the true lumen enlarged, and the false lumen completely thrombosed in the thoracic aorta.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conventional surgical therapy for aneurysms involving the descending aorta originating from chronic type B dissections remains very invasive despite substantial improvements in extracorporeal and anesthesiologic algorithms [11]. Endovascular stent-graft placement has proven its effectiveness in acute, particularly complicated, type B dissections [79]. However, little information is available for patients with late aneurysm formation on the basis of a chronic type B dissection, although the feasibility of endostenting has been demonstrated in individual cases [12, 13].
In this study, we focused on patients at high risk for conventional surgical repair. Three patients had already undergone previous cardiovascular procedures. Furthermore, owing to distal arch involvement and to the size of the aneurysm, proximal application of a clamp to initiate left heart bypass would not have been feasible. Thus, repair would have required deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and an open distal arch anastomosis.
As reported previously, early and late success of endovascular stent-graft placement directly correlates with the length of the proximal landing zone [5]. Therefore, we applied rerouting procedures in 4 patients to create a sufficient proximal neck [10]. This concept turned out to be successful in the majority of patients.
The distal landing zone is far more complex, and two different hypotheses have some rationale. One hypothesis regards the pathology of a chronic type B dissecting aneurysm as that of an atherosclerotic aneurysm. This interpretation requires the distal landing zone to be at least 1.5 cm to obviate subsequent reintervention.
The other hypothesis regards the pathology of a chronic type B dissection to be that of a dissection. If so, the length of the distal landing zone is unimportant because blood flow is redirected into the true lumen by closing the primary entry tear, and the true lumen is decompressed. That closes the false lumen, and thrombosis occurs over time. The timeframe for thrombosis within the false lumen is not predictable as is the situation in acute type B dissections. As in acute type B dissections, however, thrombosis is expected, and in fact observed, opposite the stent-graft. Furthermore, because of the nature of the disease and the potential coverage, the threat posed by a type Ib endoleak is difficult to determine and is probably not the same as in an atherosclerotic aneurysm; thus there is no need for immediate therapy.
Presumably, both hypotheses are applicable to a variable degree according to each individual case. Without doubt, our proposed method performs best for an isolated distal arch aneurysm originating from a chronic type B dissection with a short dissection membrane and a regular diameter in the middle third of the descending aorta. In a complex thoracoabdominal aneurysm originating from a chronic type B dissection, however, our proposed method is doomed to failure.
The covered length of the dissected aorta also should be discussed. It is not possible to cover the entire length of the dissection as the majority extend to the iliac bifurcation. Coverage slightly caudal to the distal extent of the aneurysm may be sufficient, and this raises the question of patient selection. In our experience, distal arch aneurysms are most suitable for this approach. The more distally the aneurysm is located, the length of coverage, intercostal arterial supply, and effectiveness of mid- and long-term aneurysmal exclusion become more problematic.
With chronic dissections, one cannot expect to retain perfusion in the abdominal aortic segment and also to appose the dissection membrane against the aortic wall as occurs with acute dissections. Once the primary tear has been covered, however, blood flow is redirected into the true lumen and its branches, and thrombosis is encouraged in the false lumen. This goal does not define success of atherosclerotic aneurysms, but is consistent with the definition of success in dissections. It is self-explaining, however, that primarily proximal aortic pathologies should be treated by this approach at the very beginning of the experience of the scientific community unless the proof of principle is supplied by other centers.
In 1 patient, a persisting type Ia endoleak was found. This patient had already undergone two sternotomies because of ascending and hemiarch replacement due to an acute type A dissection and secondary rupture of the arch anastomosis. He had a common origin of the brachiocephalic trunk and the left common carotid artery. Therefore, merely subclavian-to-carotid artery transposition could be performed from an extrathoracic approach. A third sternotomy was deemed, for various reasons, too risky in this particular situation. This result underlines the importance of not compromising the length of the landing zone. Several other questions in addition to landing zones arise, when offering an endovascular treatment option to this particular subgroup of patients. Another concern is whether the self-expanding stent-graft is able to appose the fibrous, potentially rigid, chronic dissecting membrane against the native aortic wall. In this series, this effect was observed in all patients with successful initial closure of the primary entry tear. This effect evolves over time, however, and may take several months to fully expand the stent-graft.
Limitations of the Study
The number of patients is terribly small. We believe that current knowledge and experience are far too limited to provide percentages of effectiveness and timeframes to achieve complete apposition of the dissecting membrane to the aortic wall. These patients represent a subgroup of patients with aortic pathologies that were not thought suitable for an endovascular approach owing to lack of knowledge and lack of adequate devices. The issue deserves much attention in the future, and the experience of other groups involved in the field will either confirm our approach or will bring it into question.
Summarizing, endovascular stent-graft placement of aneurysms involving the descending aorta originating from chronic type B dissections may serve as a valuable treatment option in patients with complex pathology. The chronic dissection membrane can be successfully apposed to large areas of the native aortic wall. A sufficient proximal landing zone is mandatory for early and late success.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Parker and J. Golledge Outcome of endovascular treatment of acute type B aortic dissection. Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1707 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gottardi, D. Zimpfer, M. Funovics, M. Schoder, J. Lammer, E. Wolner, M. Czerny, and M. Grimm Mid-term results after endovascular stent-graft placement due to penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1019 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miyamoto, T. Ohata, M. Mitsuno, M. Yamamura, H. Tanaka, Y. Kobayashi, M. Ryomoto, and S. Fukui Long-term outcomes after entry closure and aneurysmal wall plication for type B aortic dissection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 33(2): 152 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Mitchell Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1640 - 1640. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |