ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Daniel R. Wong
Arvind K. Agnihotri
Gus J. Vlahakes
Cary W. Akins
Joren C. Madsen
Thomas E. MacGillivray
David F. Torchiana
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Torchiana, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Torchiana, D. F.

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:570-577
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: Cardiovascular

Long-Term Survival After Surgical Revascularization for Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Daniel R. Wong, MD, MPH a , b , Arvind K. Agnihotri, MD a , Judy W. Hung, MD c , Gus J. Vlahakes, MD a , Cary W. Akins, MD a , Alan D. Hilgenberg, MD a , Joren C. Madsen, MD, DPhil a , Thomas E. MacGillivray, MD a , Michael H. Picard, MD c , David F. Torchiana, MD a , *

a Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
c Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
b Maritime Heart Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Accepted for publication March 7, 2005.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Torchiana, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, BUL 209, Boston, MA02114 (Email: torchiana.david{at}mgh.harvard.edu).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize patient survival and degree of late mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients undergoing surgical revascularization with moderate ischemic MR.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 251 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery between 1991 and 2001 with 3+ ischemic MR, including 31 patients who had concomitant mitral annuloplasty. Univariate and multivariable testing was employed.

RESULTS: Actuarial 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 84.0%, 67.5%, and 37.1% in the overall group of 251 patients. Independent predictors of long-term mortality were age 70 years or more (hazard ratio 2.50 [95% confidence interval 1.82 to 3.44]), prior myocardial infarction (3.99 [2.15 to 7.39]), unstable angina (2.27 [1.69 to 3.04]), chronic renal failure (4.87 [3.13 to 7.58]), atrial fibrillation (2.21 [1.65 to 2.96]), left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft (0.28 [0.18 to 0.43]), preoperative ß-blocker (0.43 [0.28 to 0.67]), ejection fraction (0.71/10% [0.64 to 0.80]), left atrium size (0.88/mm [0.84 to 0.92]), diffuse wall motion abnormalities (2.83 [1.77 to 4.55]), and mitral leaflet restriction (3.85 [2.46 to 5.99]). The model controlled for the performance of annuloplasty, which did not emerge as an independent predictor. Patients undergoing annuloplasty did have less mean late MR than those having CABG alone (p = 0.005). Overall, 57.8% of patients (63 of 109) with follow-up echocardiograms had improvement in grade of MR compared with baseline. In 54 of 95 patients (56.8%), intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography downgraded the degree of MR compared with the preoperative study.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate ischemic MR undergoing CABG had relatively poor long-term survival, with significant differences when stratified according to preoperative characteristics. Performance of mitral annuloplasty reduced the degree of regurgitation but was not a predictor of long-term survival. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography frequently downgraded the degree of MR.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Myocardial damage from coronary artery disease may secondarily distort the mitral valve and produce mitral regurgitation. This syndrome of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is considered a marker for worsened prognosis after myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) [1–3]. As presently employed, the term IMR is really a misnomer as the syndrome is usually not related to acute ischemia. In most IMR patients, regurgitation occurs as a result of annular dilation or apical tethering, or both, of the mitral leaflets due to distortion in ventricular wall and papillary muscle geometry from myocardial injury and scarring [4, 5].

In addition to surgical revascularization, restrictive annuloplasty has become accepted as standard therapy for IMR [6]. While there is widespread agreement that trace or mild regurgitation is adequately treated by isolated CABG, and that mitral annuloplasty or replacement is appropriate for severe MR, the optimal surgical approach to moderate IMR remains controversial [7, 8]. It is in this gray zone of surgical decision-making that the long-term results of surgery and the influence of patient characteristics are most important to decipher. When the variability of IMR under different conditions of loading and ischemia is added to the fact that most studies group several grades of MR together with several approaches to therapy, it is not surprising that there is no clear consensus within the literature on what are the critical factors, including surgical approach, that influence outcomes.

In this report, we retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing CABG with or without annuloplasty who had moderate (3+) IMR and attempted to identify characteristics that influence long-term survival and degree of late MR.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Patients
Study group
Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. Between 1991 and 2001, 8,442 patients at our hospital underwent first-time CABG as determined by a prospectively collected institutional database of cardiac surgical procedures. By matching patients in this group with our echocardiographic database, 3,641 patients were found with a total of 7,799 echocardiography studies performed at this institution. Of these, 325 had moderate (3+) mitral regurgitation on a preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram within one month before surgery. After excluding myxomatous mitral disease, prolapse, chordal or papillary muscle rupture, mitral stenosis, vegetations, and other intrinsic valvular disease from the echocardiography and operative reports, 251 patients remained with moderate ischemic MR who underwent isolated CABG plus or minus concomitant mitral annuloplasty.

Surgical details
The use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and the decision to perform a mitral annuloplasty were at the discretion of the surgeon. The prevailing strategy at the beginning of this interval favored performing isolated CABG particularly when TEE showed downgrading of MR. Annuloplasty rings were generally not undersized in the early part of the series.

Patient characteristics and follow-up
Baseline demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and short-term in-hospital outcomes were extracted retrospectively. Echocardiographic follow-up was restricted to studies performed at this institution and was obtained similarly from chart review. Follow-up echocardiograms were performed as clinically indicated. Long-term survival was the primary outcome and was assessed by searching a national social security death index; it excluded 9 patients (3.6%) from outside the United States who were censored at discharge. Survival follow-up ended on October 1, 2003.

Data Analysis
Univariate analyses
All statistical analysis was performed using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Univariate analyses included two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum or t tests for continuous variables and {chi}2 or Fisher’s exact tests for discrete variables. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier technique, with log-rank tests to compare stratified groups. Tests are considered statistically significant at p less than 0.05. No correction for multiple analyses was utilized.

Multivariable analyses
Time-specific effects were estimated with parametric, multiphase (mixture distribution components) hazard regression, using analytical tools available from the Cleveland Clinic Heart Center Hazard website (available at: http://www.clevelandclinic.org/heartcenter/hazard/default.htm). Covariates were modeled in both discrete and continuous forms after assessing logistic plots of continuous and categorical variables. Missing values were assigned the mean for that covariate. Variable selection for the multivariable model was performed by first considering each potential covariate in each phase of the model univariately. Those significant to p less than 0.10 were considered for inclusion in the model using automated stepwise selection, with manual oversight of each step, using entry and stay criteria of p less than 0.10 and p less than 0.05, respectively. While not statistically significant itself, mitral annuloplasty was forced into both phases of the final model as a clinically relevant variable; it was not an important confounder (less than 10% change in the effect estimates for the other variables) but did reduce the power of the model slightly. With this model we were able to distinguish between risk factors that acted during (two) different phases of follow-up, and to avoid assumptions about the proportionality of hazards inherent to Cox modeling. Model validation of the significant predictors (not including annuloplasty) was performed by calculating estimates for the final model using 1,000 datasets, each containing 251 patients selected from the original set with replacement (bootstrap method); the standard deviations of the means of the bootstrap estimates were used to test the original parameter estimates from the final model by means of a {chi}2 test. Logistic regression was used for multivariable analysis of secondary echocardiographic outcomes.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Population Characteristics
Baseline demographic, comorbid, and operative data are detailed in Table 1. Overall, the mean age was 71.1 years, and there was a high frequency of diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and other comorbidities in the study population. At operation, most patients (88.0%) had three or more distal targets grafted, and 31 patients had mitral annuloplasty performed. Cardiopulmonary bypass times were longer with concomitant annuloplasty than CABG alone (161 versus 106 minutes, p < 0.0001), but otherwise there were no significant baseline differences between these subgroups. The incidence of mitral annuloplasty procedures increased over time, while the mean prosthesis size decreased from 32 mm in 1991 to 29 mm in 2001 (p = 0.23); 9 incomplete (Cosgrove-Edwards) rings were included in this series, and the remainder were rigid or semirigid complete rings. Results of preoperative transthoracic echocardiography are presented in Table 2. The preoperative echocardiography findings were similar for patients with and without annuloplasty.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Selected Baseline and Operative Characteristics (n = 251)
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Echocardiographic Characteristics
 
Intraoperative Downgrading
Over time, there was a trend toward greater rates of utilization of intraoperative TEE (p = 0.001), rising steadily from 1 (10.0%) in 1991 to 16 (61.5%) in 2001. There was considerable variability in the degree of measured MR on the intraoperative TEE (Table 2) despite all patients having 3+ MR measured preoperatively on the transthoracic echocardiogram. The degree of MR was downgraded (lower on this TEE study as compared with preoperative) in the majority of patients (54 of 95, 56.8%). Downgrading was more frequent in patients who went on to have CABG only (71.2%) compared with those for whom annuloplasty was performed (9.1%, p < 0.0001), an observation that is not unexpected as lack of downgrading was often factored into the intraoperative decision to perform annuloplasty. No preoperative characteristics were found to predict downgrading. Late survival was not significantly different between CABG only patients who downgraded and those who did not (p = 0.16).

Late Echocardiographic Results
Follow-up echocardiograms were performed at our institution in 109 patients (Table 2). All patients had at least 1+ MR at a median of 1 year. Overall, the mean grade of MR was lower than preoperatively, and the annuloplasty subgroup had less mitral regurgitation (mean of 2.0 versus 2.6 for CABG alone, p mean = 0.005). There was no association between death and either improvement (<3+, p = 0.40) or deterioration (>3+, p = 0.19) in the degree of MR at follow-up among the CABG only patients, and logistic regression analyses identified chronic renal failure (OR = 0.215; p = 0.02), left atrium size (0.87 per mm; p = 0.01), and inferior dysfunction (0.32; p = 0.06) as inversely associated with improvement in MR. There was no significant difference found in progression of the late grade of MR related to intraoperative downgrading (>3+ MR occurred in 2 of 6 [33.3%] nondowngrading patients versus 5 of 26 [19.2%] downgrading patients; p = 0.59).

Survival
Patients with 3+ IMR are sicker than the standard CABG population, and operative mortality was relatively high at 5.2% compared with standard CABG. There was no significant difference in mortality for concomitant annuloplasty compared with CABG only (p = 0.06; Table 3) although there was a trend, and annuloplasty patients did have more short-term complications, reoperation, and a longer postoperative length of stay. Over a median follow-up of 4.3 years, actuarial 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 84.0%, 67.5%, and 37.1% in the whole group of 251 patients. Two phases of hazard were resolved using a multiphase parametric model: a rapidly declining early phase of risk that gave way after the first year to a slowly rising late phase (Fig 1). Mortality was associated with a number of independent risk factors in the early and late phases: age 70 year or more, prior myocardial infarction, unstable angina, renal failure, atrial fibrillation, lack of left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft, lack of ß-blocker use, lower ejection fraction, smaller left atrium size, global wall motion abnormalities, and mitral leaflet restriction (Table 4). We controlled for mitral annuloplasty in this model, even though it was not independently associated with long-term survival (p = 0.52 for the early phase, p = 0.41 for the late phase). There were 83 deaths (37.7%) among CABG only patients and 13 (41.9%) in the annuloplasty group, so that 5- and 10-year actuarial survival estimates were 68.2% and 36.3% for CABG only, compared with 62.5% and 36.2% for concomitant annuloplasty (Fig 2). All of the significant predictors were validated by the bootstrap analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. In-Hospital Outcomes
 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Survival after surgery for all patients. Deaths are depicted as circles with 68.3% (1 SD) actuarial confidence limits at intervals of every 10 events (and the last event); actuarial survival estimates at 1, 5, and 10 years after surgery are given in the embedded table. The predicted survival from the parametric multiphase model is overlaid as a bold solid line in the same illustration, with a bold dashed line indicating 68.3% confidence limits. The thin solid line represents the hazard function (as deaths per month) for this model, with the dotted line indicating 68.3% confidence limits. The survival and hazard curves are truncated at 10 years of follow-up as no events occurred beyond this, and the size of the risk set is given in parentheses at 2-year intervals.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Independent Predictors of Long-Term Mortality
 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates stratified by coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) alone versus CABG plus mitral valve (MV) annuloplasty. The solid lines depict actuarial survival for the CABG alone (thin line) and CABG plus MV annuloplasty (thick line) groups; censored events are shown as circles; and the number at risk for each group is given in parentheses at 2-year intervals (normal type for CABG alone and bold type for CABG plus annuloplasty). The survival curves are truncated at 10 years of follow-up.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Results of Surgery for Moderate IMR
In this study, we examined a homogeneous group limited to 3+ IMR on preoperative echocardiogram. Patients presented with a high level of acuity, comorbidity, and risk. Operative mortality was 5.2% for the whole group. Reports in the literature have cited operative mortality between 1.8% and 4.5% for CABG with mild to moderate degrees of IMR [9–11]. Unadjusted in-hospital complication rates were worse with concomitant annuloplasty, consistent with some, but not all, contemporary studies [12, 13]. Late survival was poor, with long-term survival estimates (67.5% and 37.1% at 5 and 10 years) comparable with the literature (Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Operative Mortality and Long-Term Survival From Selected Studies in the Literature
 
We identified several patient characteristics that significantly influenced survival after CABG for IMR. The most critical was ventricular function, as evidenced by multiple risk factors like ejection fraction and related echocardiographic characteristics in the model. For instance, diffuse wall motion abnormalities and mitral leaflet restriction were associated with late mortality and are markers for left ventricular impairment and altered geometry. Other important predictors included comorbid conditions such as chronic renal failure and unstable angina. Left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft and ß-blocker use were identified as protective in the early phase in the model. Comparable risk factors for survival have been previously identified in the literature for patients with IMR [14]. In our study, performing isolated CABG appeared to produce long-term survival similar to that for CABG plus annuloplasty.

All of the available studies of CABG for IMR are retrospective and observational and therefore have flaws. They fall into three broad categories: (1) studies of CABG alone or with mitral surgery; (2) results of isolated CABG, with or without a non-IMR control group; and (3) annuloplasty series (Table 5).

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery with and without mitral surgery for IMR
One problem with prior reports examining CABG with and without annuloplasty is that eligibility was not limited to a single preoperative grade of MR, with the degree of MR being invariably lower in the CABG only patients. Unfortunately, this systematic difference between these two groups produces an important bias that in a retrospective study may not always be correctable by statistical adjustment. Furthermore, when a range of MR is included in such studies, the predominant approach selected tends to alter the results of surgery for the two groups. For example, where annuloplasty is aggressively favored, patients with lower degrees of MR and risk tend to fall into the annuloplasty group, making the outcomes in this group more favorable. Surgeons who are convinced of the value of this approach can then point to improving results as justification, basically a self-fulfilling prophecy. On the other hand, when annuloplasty is undertaken only at a higher threshold, the opposite is true—risk is higher in the annuloplasty group and the outcomes poorer—again affirming the wisdom of the original bias. By including only patients with 3+ MR, our study has less tendency toward bias in these two very important regards.

Despite these issues, our findings are generally consistent with the prior literature with regard to the impact of patient characteristics and of mitral annuloplasty. Most studies report high rates of late mortality, demonstrated the detriment of poor ventricular function and comorbidities, and did not find any difference in survival with and without annuloplasty [12, 13, 15, 16]. In contrast, Prifti and associates [17] showed improved 3-year survival with annuloplasty. This study, however, was restricted to a narrow range of low EF (17% to 30%) with 2 to 3+ IMR and is complicated by including complex repairs and replacement, as well as structural valve disease (prolapse in 8% to 10%, which was otherwise untreated in the CABG alone group).

Isolated CABG series
There are numerous studies that fall within the realm of one-operation reports, including those reporting the results of CABG in patients with and without IMR. While there are some compelling data that MR following CABG has a deleterious effect on survival [18], the results in the literature are mixed. In general, controlling for left ventricular function appeared to lessen or eliminate the effect of MR on survival: while on an unadjusted basis, IMR significantly increased 5-year mortality after CABG [19], several matched studies—all of which included ejection fraction or left ventricular grade as a matching variable—found no effect of MR on survival [10, 11, 20]. Similarly, Paparella and associates [21] found that MR did not emerge as an independent predictor after multivariable adjustment or stratification by left ventricular function. These results support the notion that ventricular function, not the manifestation (or absence) of MR itself, may be the critical operand influencing survival. In our study group, while there was an overall reduction in regurgitation after CABG, a fair degree of recurrent MR occurred in some patients. We did not find a convincing correlation between the improvement in MR and survival. There are small series of patients with IMR that report improved symptoms, EF, and grade of MR after CABG [22, 23].

Annuloplasty series
Recent experiences demonstrating low operative mortality for annuloplasty (as low as 4% [24, 25]) have been reported (versus more than 10% in other reports [18, 26]) in diverse patients including those with cardiomyopathy [27] and IMR [28]. Comparison with these studies is more difficult since CABG was not always performed, owing to combined repair and replacement procedures, or because of other differences in the patients studied including a broad range of severity of MR. The translation into a long-term survival advantage is also lacking.

Intraoperative Downgrading of MR
In our study a majority of patients downgraded to less than 3+MR, including 71% in the CABG only subgroup. After surgery, many (48%) went on to have persistent 3+ or greater MR on follow-up echocardiography when treated with CABG alone. Aklog and coworkers [29] previously reported an 89% frequency of downgrading followed by 40% recurrence of at least 3+ MR within 6 weeks in patients undergoing CABG with 3+ IMR preoperatively. This phenomenon has important implications for research and clinical practice, and the high frequency of its occurrence is worth emphasizing.

Limitations
Our analyses are limited by important considerations. Owing to our selective eligibility criteria (particularly the need for a preoperative echocardiogram at our institution), many patients who underwent CABG or mitral annuloplasty, or both, for IMR at Massachusetts General Hospital during this interval were not included in this report. This study was retrospective, which complicates risk adjustment, as statistical methods cannot adjust for unmeasured characteristics. Furthermore, the study design makes inferences from comparisons between nonrandomized CABG and CABG plus annuloplasty patients problematic as there may be some residual bias after multivariable adjustment. Therefore, even though it did not appear to be a significant predictor or confounder in our analyses, we still chose to include this variable in our model. It is possible that the annuloplasty patients would have fared worse, were it not for the benefit of their annuloplasty. In addition, by performing nonrestrictive annuloplasty during much of this era, annuloplasty was perhaps only partly effective and left more residual MR than one would like. Whether this has implications for late survival remains uncertain, particularly in light of animal studies that do not demonstrate benefit to prophylactic annuloplasty [30]. Not all patients had follow-up echocardiography studies, and there is a risk of measurement bias, with symptomatic patients and those with physical findings of heart failure more likely to be restudied, which would lead to a systematic overestimate of the severity of late MR. On the other hand, one could argue that the most severely afflicted patients might have died without returning for reevaluation, giving the opposite bias. Another limitation is small sample size for the annuloplasty group, true also of our other exploratory post-hoc analyses. Finally, this study did not examine rehospitalization, quality of life, functional status, or other important outcomes besides survival.

Patient Selection for Surgery for Moderate IMR
These results contribute to the ongoing discussion of the management of IMR by providing an analysis of the results of CABG restricted to patients with only one level of severity (3+) of IMR. Overall, long-term survival after revascularization in this population was poor, and MR recurred or persisted in many patients. Factors such as ventricular function and patient comorbidities appeared to be the most important predictors of long-term mortality, and survival was the same whether annuloplasty was performed or not. The challenge facing the surgeon and future investigators is to better identify those patients for whom each surgical strategy is most beneficial and to continue to develop novel, more effective approaches for treating IMR.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We are grateful for the research assistance provided by Eliza Gregory and Suyog Mokashi. Salary support (to DRW) was provided by the Maritime Heart Centre (Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Canada), a Killam Scholarship (Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada), and the Rosetti Fund (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Lamas GA, Mitchell GF, Flaker GC, et al. Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction Circulation 1997;96:827-833.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ellis SG, Whitlow PL, Raymond RE, Schneider JP. Impact of mitral regurgitation on long-term survival after percutaneous coronary intervention Am J Cardiol 2002;89:315-318.[Medline]
  3. Adler DS, Goldman L, O’Neil A, et al. Long-term survival of more than 2,000 patients after coronary artery bypass grafting Am J Cardiol 1986;58:195-202.[Medline]
  4. Levine RA, Hung J, Otsuji Y, et al. Mechanistic insights into functional mitral regurgitation Curr Cardiol Rep 2002;4:125-129.[Medline]
  5. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery—the "French correction" J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:323-337.[Medline]
  6. Miller DC. Ischemic mitral regurgitation—to repair or to replace? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:1059-1062.[Free Full Text]
  7. Byrne JG, Aklog L, Adams DH. Assessment and management of functional or ischaemic mitral regurgitation Lancet 2000;355:1743-1744.[Medline]
  8. Pinson CW, Cobanoglu A, Metzdorff MT, Grunkemeier GL, Kay PH, Starr A. Late surgical results for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Role of wall motion score and severity of regurgitation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;88:663-672.[Abstract]
  9. Arcidi Jr JM, Hebeler RF, Craver JM, Jones EL, Hatcher Jr CR, Guyton RA. Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;95:951-959.[Abstract]
  10. Mallidi HR, Pelletier MP, Lamb J, et al. Late outcomes in patients with uncorrected mild to moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:636-644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ryden T, Bech-Hanssen O, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Nilsson F, Svensson S, Jeppsson A. The importance of grade 2 ischemic mitral regurgitation in coronary artery bypass grafting Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:276-281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hickey MS, Smith LR, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Current prognosis of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Implications for future management Circulation 1988;78(Suppl):I51-I59.
  13. Czer LS, Maurer G, Bolger AF, DeRobertis M, Chaux A, Matloff JM. Revascularization alone or combined with suture annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Evaluation by color Doppler echocardiography Tex Heart Inst J 1996;23:270-278.[Medline]
  14. Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH, et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:1125-1141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Harris KM, Sundt III TM, Aeppli D, Sharma R, Barzilai B. Can late survival of patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be impacted by intervention on the valve? Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1468-1475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Trichon BH, Glower DD, Shaw LK, et al. Survival after coronary revascularization, with and without mitral valve surgery, in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation Circulation 2003;108(Suppl II):II103-II110.
  17. Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Giacomo F, et al. Should mild-to-moderate and moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be corrected in patients with impaired left ventricular function undergoing simultaneous coronary revascularization? J Card Surg 2001;16:473-483.[Medline]
  18. Lam BK, Gillinov MA, Blackstone EH, et al. Importance of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation Ann Thorac Surg 2005;69:462-470.
  19. Connolly MW, Gelbfish JS, Jacobowitz IJ, et al. Surgical results for mitral regurgitation from coronary artery disease J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;91:379-388.[Abstract]
  20. Duarte IG, Shen Y, MacDonald MJ, Jones EL, Craver JM, Guyton RA. Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary artery bypass alonelate results. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:426-430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Paparella D, Mickleborough LL, Carson S, Ivanov J. Mild to moderate mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graftingeffects on operative mortality and long-term significance. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1094-1100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Tolis GA, Korkolis DP, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Revascularization alone (without mitral valve repair) suffices in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy and mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1476-1481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Balu V, Hershowitz S, Zaki Masud AR, Bhayana JN, Dean DC. Mitral regurgitation in coronary artery disease Chest 1982;81:550-555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Bolling SF, Deeb GM, Bach DS. Mitral valve reconstruction in elderly, ischemic patients Chest 1996;109:35-40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gangemi JJ, Tribble CG, Ross SD, McPherson JA, Kern JA, Kron IL. Does the additive risk of mitral valve repair in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy prohibit surgical intervention? Ann Surg 2000;231:710-714.[Medline]
  26. Grossi EA, Bizekis CS, LaPietra A, et al. Late results of isolated mitral annuloplasty for "functional" ischemic mitral insufficiency J Card Surg 2001;16:328-332.[Medline]
  27. Chen FY, Adams DH, Aranki SF, et al. Mitral valve repair in cardiomyopathy Circulation 1998;98(Suppl 2):124-127.
  28. Dion R, Benetis R, Elias B, et al. Mitral valve procedures in ischemic regurgitation J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4(Suppl 2):124-129.
  29. Aklog L, Filsoufi F, Flores KQ, et al. Does coronary artery bypass grafting alone correct ischemic mitral regurgitation? Circulation 2001;104(Suppl 1):68-75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Guy TS, Moainie SL, Gorman JH, et al. Prevention of ischemic mitral regurgitation does not influence the outcome of remodeling after posterolateral myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:377-383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. B. Prucz, E. S. Weiss, N. D. Patel, L. U. Nwakanma, A. S. Shah, and J. V. Conte
The Impact of Surgical Ventricular Restoration on Mitral Valve Regurgitation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 726 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. A. Milano, M. A. Daneshmand, J. S. Rankin, E. Honeycutt, M. L. Williams, M. Swaminathan, L. Linblad, L. K. Shaw, D. D. Glower, and P. K. Smith
Survival Prognosis and Surgical Management of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 735 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. M. Calafiore, V. Mazzei, A. L. Iaco, M. Contini, A. Bivona, M. Gagliardi, P. Bosco, S. Gallina, and M. Di Mauro
Impact of ischemic mitral regurgitation on long-term outcome of patients with ejection fraction above 0.30 undergoing first isolated myocardial revascularization.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 458 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. M. Calafiore, A. L. Iaco, M. Contini, A. Bivona, E. Varone, P. Greco, and S. Scandura
Mitral Valve Repair for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Angiology, August 1, 2008; 59(2_suppl): 89S - 92S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. C. Waisbren, L.-M. Stevens, E. G. Avery, M. H. Picard, G. J. Vlahakes, and A. K. Agnihotri
Changes in mitral regurgitation after replacement of the stenotic aortic valve.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 56 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
E. Agricola, M. Oppizzi, M. Pisani, A. Meris, F. Maisano, and A. Margonato
Ischemic mitral regurgitation: mechanisms and echocardiographic classification
Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 207 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Braun, N. R. van de Veire, R. J.M. Klautz, M. I.M. Versteegh, E. R. Holman, J. J.M. Westenberg, E. Boersma, E. E. van der Wall, J. J. Bax, and R. A.E. Dion
Restrictive Mitral Annuloplasty Cures Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 430 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
W. Y. Szeto, R. C. Gorman, J. H. Gorman III, and M. A. Acker
Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 785 - 802.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. I. Fann, N. B. Ingels Jr., and D. C. Miller
Pathophysiology of Mitral Valve Disease
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 973 - 1012.
[Full Text]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. Sirivella and I. Gielchinsky
Results of Coronary Bypass and Valve Operations for Mitral Valve Regurgitation
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2007; 15(5): 396 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. R. Srivastava, A. Banerjee, S. Jacob, and J. Dunning
Should patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with mild to moderate ischaemic mitral regurgitation also undergo mitral valve repair or replacement?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2007; 6(4): 538 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. H. Jones
Adding Mitral Valve Annuloplasty to Surgical Revascularization Does Not Benefit Patients With Functional Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2007; 49(22): 2202 - 2203.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Mihaljevic, B.-K. Lam, J. Rajeswaran, M. Takagaki, M. S. Lauer, A. M. Gillinov, E. H. Blackstone, and B. W. Lytle
Impact of Mitral Valve Annuloplasty Combined With Revascularization in Patients With Functional Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2007; 49(22): 2191 - 2201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
S. Sirivella and I. Gielchinsky
Clinical outcomes of surgery of mitral valve regurgitation and coronary artery bypass grafting
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2006; 5(4): 392 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. A. Grossi, G. A. Crooke, P. L. DiGiorgi, C. F. Schwartz, U. Jorde, R. M. Applebaum, G. H. Ribakove, A. C. Galloway, J. B. Grau, and S. B. Colvin
Impact of Moderate Functional Mitral Insufficiency in Patients Undergoing Surgical Revascularization
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-573 - I-576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. H. Jones
The Year in Cardiovascular Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 16, 2006; 47(10): 2094 - 2107.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Borger, A. Alam, P. M. Murphy, T. Doenst, and T. E. David
Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Repair, Replace or Rethink?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 1153 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Daniel R. Wong
Arvind K. Agnihotri
Gus J. Vlahakes
Cary W. Akins
Joren C. Madsen
Thomas E. MacGillivray
David F. Torchiana
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Torchiana, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Torchiana, D. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS