|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1671-1676
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
b Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
c Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy
d Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA
Accepted for publication June 12, 2002.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Yim, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
e-mail: yimap{at}cuhk.edu.hk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: From December 2000 to December 2001, 25 patients (mean age, 54.8 years) with peripheral lung nodules planned for either diagnostic or therapeutic wedge resection were recruited for the study. When the nodule lay deep to a flat lung surface, video-assisted thoracic surgical resection using the modified Perelman technique with the Floating Ball (TissueLink Medical Inc) was preferred. In other patients, the Sealing Forceps (TissueLink Medical Inc) were used for video-assisted thoracic surgical wedge resection.
RESULTS: There were no mortality or major intraoperative complications. The Floating Ball was used exclusively in 11 patients; the Sealing Forceps were used in 9 patients; and a combination of the two devices was used in 5 patients. The mean operation time was 70.3 minutes. Average chest drain duration was 3.9 days, and postoperative hospital stay was 5.2 days. There were 2 patients with persistent air leak more than 1 week, one who resolved spontaneously, and the other who required reoperation for control. One patient had pulmonary embolism after a technically uneventful procedure. There have been no late complications after an average follow-up of 10 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The devices appear to be technically safe. The Floating Ball has definite advantages over the conventional diathermy and can be adapted to the Perelman procedure using the video-assisted thoracic surgical approach. The Sealing Forceps hold promise to reduce overall consumable costs compared with conventional staplers. These devices should complement the surgeons existing armamentarium. Comparative studies with conventional instruments are warranted to further define the role of these new devices in thoracic operations.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Drs Yim, Rendina, and Hazelrigg disclose that they have a financial relationship with TissueLink Medical, Inc.
|
Diathermy (from Greek origin: dia-through, thermy-heat) using the conversion of radiofrequency electrical energy to heat (to coagulate, ablate, or cut tissue) has long been accepted in almost every surgical discipline [1], including minimal access operations [2]. Bovie pioneered in its design in the late 1920s, and hence this technology came to carry its name. Diathermy as we know today, has three adjustable variables: (1) power output (rate of power delivered); (2) frequency modulation (cycles of changes of the current in 1 second), which gives the user the choice of a coagulation versus cutting mode; and (3) polarity (monopolar vs bipolar). The latter refers mainly to the distance between the electrical poles. For the monopolar mode, the second pole is the dispersive electrode plate far from the operative field, whereas for the bipolar mode, the two electrodes are only millimeters apart.
For over half a century, the basic design of diathermy units has not changed. However it was recently discovered that a continuous flow of electrically conductive saline between the tissue and the diathermy electrode could result in marked changes in the coagulative property of the diathermy on living tissue [36]. This novel technology was incorporated in the design of two new devices: (1) a monopolar Floating Ball device (TissueLink Medical Inc, Dover NH), and (2) a bipolar Sealing Forceps (TissueLink Medical Inc, Dover NH). After initial animal studies, both devices received Food and Drug Administration 510 (k) clearance. This article is the first report of our combined initial clinical experience from three centers with these first generation production devices.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
The Floating Ball device was primed with normal saline solution from an infusion pump running at a rate of about 240 mL/h. It is also connected to a conventional electrosurgical generator (Valleylab; Tyco Healthcare, Boulder, CO) set at 40 to 50 W.
A modified Perelman procedure was performed using the Floating Ball device. However, in contrast to conventional electrocautery, this device does not perforate or cut. Instead, the device was used to first coagulate and then shrink the lung tissue, to be followed by using scissors to cut into the coagulated tissue. Once the visceral pleura were incised circumferentially, the procedure could proceed fairly rapidly.
A small amount of steam is usually generated during the procedure, and it is advisable to keep a sucker close to the surgical field. This can also be used to exert counter-traction on the lung tissue to facilitate dissection. This procedure was recently posted on Yims [8] CTSNet Experts Techniques section.
An alternative technique was used by one of the investigators (SRH) on patients 18 to 20 with peripheral nodules 2 cm or less in size. A side-biting clamp was placed to completely exclude the nodule, which was then excised. The cut surface on the patients side (still held by the clamp) was painted with the Floating Ball.
Wedge resection using the bipolar sealing forceps
The intercostal strategy is exactly the same as with VATS wedge resection using a mechanical staple cutter [7]. The forceps are closed over the lung parenchyma to be divided. The device is designed to allow a continuous flow of normal saline from each jaw, so that when the electrodes are activated the current is not directly transformed into heat energy through the tissue, but there is a saline tissue interface that provides an even energy distribution and lowers the peak tissue temperature, similar to the Floating Ball. In this early model, the electrodes need to be activated for 2 to 3 minutes to obtain the desirable coagulative effort (Fig 4).
Blanching of the lung tissue next to the closed jaws is a useful indication of adequate coagulation. The coagulated lung can then be divided between the jaws using the internal blade. The generator setting is similar to that of the Floating Ball. Unlike staple transection in which the visceral pleural surfaces of the divided lung are reapproximated, there is usually a raw transected lung surface after the use of bipolar forceps. The raw surface is often completely hemostatic and pneumostatic. In those patients in which there were minor air leaks from the raw surface (on 5 occasions in this series), they were easily controlled using the Floating Ball to apply coagulation directly over the areas of air leakage.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
When the resected margin of the specimen was carefully examined for depth of thermal injury by microscope, the thermal spread averaged 2.5 mm (range, 2.2 to 3.6 mm). There was no difference in the depth of coagulative necrosis between the Floating Ball device or the Sealing Forceps.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, for larger nodules (>2 cm) and especially those lying deep to a flat lung surface, wedge resection using this technique is often difficult or even hazardous. Even if this could be done, it would almost certainly sacrifice more functional lung tissue than would be necessary or desirable. This could have a major impact on the recovery of patients who are elderly, and frail, with multiple comorbidities and borderline lung function. A solution was offered more than 20 years ago by the Russian surgeon, Dr Mikhail Perelman used electrocautery to achieve precise, nonanatomical lung resectionthis technique was subsequently popularized by Dr Joel Cooper [9]. However, this precision cautery excision, as it is often referred to, is not ideally suitable for the VATS approach. This technique requires the lung to be in an inflated state. Because electrocautery is often required to be turned up to a high setting, there is a moderate amount of smoke generation and charred tissue sticking to the electrode, which demands frequent cleaning. Finally, because the electrode can perforate a moderate-sized blood vessel (3-mm diameter or larger) before it gets coagulated, bleeding could be troublesome and difficult to control thoracoscopically.
Landreneau and colleagues [10] more recently advocated the use of the neodymium:yttrium-aluminum garnet laser, either alone or in combination with the mechanical stapler, to approach difficult nonanatomical resections using the VATS approach. The advantage of the laser appears to be its ability to achieve better hemostasis compared with electrocautery. However, the high initial cost for set up, coupled with the stringent safety requirements have deterred many surgeons from using this method.
The Floating Ball device described here has the ability to achieve good hemostasis (as it does not perforate vessels) without the high initial cost. However, like other new techniques and technology, there is an initial steep learning curve for the surgeon. As the surgeon is required to individually divide the coagulated vessels and bronchioles, more time has to be allowed for this procedure compared with the conventional electrocautery procedure. Also, as the operated lung is deflated, there is a tendency that the surgeon could remove more functional lung tissue than would be necessary or desirable. However, this can be overcome by experience. Also, pathologic interpretation of the resection margin is not a concern as we have shown that the depth of coagulative necrosis caused by thermal spread averaged only slightly more than 2 mm. This in fact compared favorably with the conventional technique using the staplers, which would require the staples to be removed (averaged more than 2 mm in depth) before sectioning can be done on the specimen.
With regard to the bipolar Sealing Forceps, it would be difficult to find a niche application similar to that of the Floating Ball device. The staplers, because of the speed, reliability, and ease in using this device remains the current gold standard for both wedge lung resections and comparisons made with other newer devices. However, reloadable cartridges for the staplers are expensive, and in developing countries, the high consumable costs could be a major deterrent to its use [11]. On the other hand, bipolar forceps hold promise to minimize consumable costs. These new devices are not meant to replace conventional diathermy, but rather complement the surgeons existing armamentarium.
In conclusion, this article represents the first detailed written report on the clinical application of a novel technology for lung operations. The devices appear to be technically safe. Nodulectomies performed using the monopolar Floating Ball device produce satisfactory results, with some added advantages over the conventional diathermy, including that the former could easily be adapted for the VATS approach. Peripheral wedge lung resections using the bipolar Sealing Forceps are technically feasible. The sealing forceps used in our study was from the first generation, and with further refinement, it holds promise to be an attractive alternative to staplers.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Sakuragi, Y. Okazaki, M. Mitsuoka, F. Yamasaki, M. Masuda, D. Mori, T. Satoh, and T. Itoh The utility of a reusable bipolar sealing instrument, BiClamp(R), for pulmonary resection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 505 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Fibla, L. Molins, C. Simon, J. Perez, and G. Vidal Early removal of chest drainage after videothoracoscopic lung biopsy Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2006; 5(5): 581 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Santini, G. Vicidomini, A. Baldi, G. Gallo, P. Laperuta, L. Busiello, M. P. Di Marino, and V. Pastore Use of an electrothermal bipolar tissue sealing system in lung surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 29(2): 226 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Molnar, I. Benko, Z. Szanto, T. Laszlo, and O. P. Horvath Lung biopsy using harmonic scalpel: a randomised single institute study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 28(4): 604 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Molnar, Z. Szanto, T. Laszlo, L. Lukacs, and O. P. Horvath Cutting lung parenchyma using the harmonic scalpel--an animal experiment Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 26(6): 1192 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Shigemura, A. Akashi, T. Nakagiri, M. Ohta, and H. Matsuda A new tissue-sealing technique using the ligasure system for nonanatomical pulmonary resection: preliminary results of sutureless and stapleless thoracoscopic surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1415 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |