ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
David J. Cohen
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest wall

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:745
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Invited commentary

David J. Cohen, MDa

a Colonel, Medical Corps, Brooke Army Medical Center MCHE-SDC, Cardiothoracic Surgery Service, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Bldg 3600, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6200, USA

e-mail: david.cohen{at}cen.amedd.army.mil

Expense, limited availability, and biological variability complicate the use of cadaver specimens for testing mechanical methods of sternal closure. The use of artificial polyurethane models has been common in the development and testing of orthopedic appliances. A simple polyurethane sternal model that stimulates cancellous or medullary bone has been developed for the testing of sternal closure techniques. More complex composite models, which mimic cortical bone applied to a medullary bony core, can be created, but they are more expensive and may provide little advantage.

The tests conducted in this study demonstrate a high level of consistency between the simple medullary sternal model and cadaver specimens. This study is very important in that it validates a simple and inexpensive method of testing a wide array of appliances, as well as other techniques of sternal closure. The validation of these models makes it cost effective to test sternal closure methods under a wide variety of conditions using the various destructive methods common in materials testing. Development of better methods of sternal closure will reduce the extreme disability and expense associated with sternal dehiscence.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
David J. Cohen
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest wall


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS