|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1813-1816
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
b Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
c Department of Infectious Disease, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
d Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Accepted for publication February 17, 2002.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Gillinov, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation/F24, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
e-mail: gillinom{at}ccf.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. From 1986 to 2000, 22 patients were treated for endocarditis affecting a previously repaired mitral valve. Causes of mitral valve dysfunction that led to repair were degenerative (11 patients), ischemic (5 patients), endocarditic (3 patients), rheumatic (2 patients), and functional (1 patient). Endocarditis was active in 21 patients and healed in 1. Interval from initial mitral valve repair to onset of endocarditis ranged from 1 week to 10.3 years (median, 6 months). Pathology included leaflet vegetation (15), annuloplasty vegetation (4), leaflet perforation (5), and abscess (3). Mean follow-up was 3.9 ± 3.3 years.
Results. Fifteen patients underwent repeat mitral valve operations with freedom from mitral valve reoperation of 65%, 41%, and 26% at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years after onset of endocarditis. After a high early hazard, risk of reoperation fell to 10.8% per year. Seven patients, all with a leaflet vegetation, were treated with antibiotics alone. Antibiotics eradicated infection in all; however all had mitral regurgitation 2+ to 4+. Survival was 96%, 74%, and 68% at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years. Endocarditis recurred in 1 patient (92% free of event).
Conclusions. Most patients that have endocarditis develop after mitral valve repair require reoperation. However if infection is limited to a leaflet, early reoperation may be unnecessary because antibiotics alone can eradicate infection.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Putative sources of infection were pneumonia (3 patients), dental procedures (2 patients), intravenous drug use (2 patients), cystoscopy (1 patient), dialysis (1 patient), mediastinitis (1 patient), and unknown (12 patients). Characteristics of the infection are detailed in Table 2. Responsible organisms were staphylococcal species in the majority of patients. Of the 3 patients who had initial mitral valve repair for endocarditis, the organism at re-infection was the same in 1. Vegetations were the most common pathologic finding, with the majority of vegetations present on the leaflets rather than the annuloplasty band or ring. Seventeen patients (77%) had 3+ or 4+ mitral regurgitation.
|
2.8 years, 25%
7.4 years, and 10%
9.8 years. There were 85 patient-years of follow-up available for analysis.
Methods of analysis
Events after diagnosis of endocarditis were analyzed in a time-related manner. Nonparametric estimates were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and are presented with asymmetric confidence limits equivalent to 1 standard error (68%) [6]. A parametric method was used to resolve the number of phases of instantaneous risk of events (hazard functions) and to estimate their shaping values [7]. Both the parametric and hazard function estimates are presented with confidence limits equivalent to one standard error (68%). The small numbers of patients and events precluded identification of risk factors for various events.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fifteen patients underwent repeat mitral valve operations with freedom from mitral valve reoperation of 65%, 41%, and 26% at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years after onset of endocarditis (Fig 1A). Indications for surgical therapy included severe mitral regurgitation (87%), congestive heart failure (47%), persistent sepsis (13%), and thromboemboli (13%). After a high early hazard rate, risk of reoperation fell to 10.8% per year (Fig 1B). Only 3 patients with active endocarditis had an operation within 1 week of diagnosis. Mitral valve reoperations were mitral valve replacement in 11 patients and re-repair in 4. None of these patients required subsequent mitral valve operations.
|
Seven patients, all with a leaflet vegetation, were treated with antibiotics alone. Surgical therapy was withheld for several reasons. Three patients were turned down for operations because of comorbidities. Two patients, both intravenous drug users, chose not to have repeat operations. Two patients declined operations because they felt clinically well. Antibiotics eradicated infection in all patients; however all had grades of 2+ to 4+ mitral regurgitation. One of these patients required a subsequent mitral valve operation that is described as follows.
Late results
Survival after onset of endocarditis was 96%, 74%, and 68% at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years (Fig 2).
Endocarditis recurred in 1 patient (92% free of event). This patient had a second episode of streptococcal endocarditis 2 years after successful antibiotic therapy for a similar episode. She responded to antibiotic therapy again, but 1 year later had mitral valve replacement for severe mitral regurgitation.
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endocarditis affecting repaired mitral valves has elements of similarity to both native valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis. Leaflet vegetations are a common finding, resembling the pathology of native valve endocarditis [810]. However, the organisms identified are usually staphylococcal species, similar to those causing prosthetic valve endocarditis [11, 12].
Treatment strategy also lies somewhere between that for native and prosthetic valve endocarditis. Whereas native valve endocarditis can frequently be treated by medical therapy alone [11, 13, 14], prosthetic valve endocarditis usually requires early operation [1113, 15]. There is growing support for an aggressive surgical approach to patients with native left-sided endocarditis [16]. When an operation is indicated for native mitral valve infection, valve repair is often possible [810]. In these patients, mitral valve repair may confer a survival advantage compared with valve replacement [10]. The high probability of mitral valve repair supports an aggressive approach and early operations in patients with native valve endocarditis.
Treatment for endocarditis occurring after mitral valve repair begins with antibiotic therapy. The majority of patients eventually require operations for severe mitral valve dysfunction, and this usually entails valve replacement. However, an operation is rarely emergent. Antibiotic therapy alone can successfully sterilize many valves in which the only pathology is a leaflet vegetation. Therefore, in patients with a leaflet vegetation who have no clear surgical indication or relative contraindications to operations, a trial of antibiotic therapy alone is reasonable. It is important to note, however, that these patients will be left with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation.
Limitations
This is an observational clinical study examining presentation, treatment strategies, and results in a relatively small group of patients. We have made every effort to identify all patients that presented to The Cleveland Clinic Foundation with endocarditis affecting a repaired mitral valve; nevertheless, it is possible that the diagnosis was missed in some patients. The small numbers of patients and events and the study design do not permit conclusive statements concerning the superiority of medical or surgical therapy in patients with endocarditis after mitral valve repair. Furthermore, the choice of therapy and the timing of surgical intervention were determined by the team of physicians caring for each patient. Examination of this decision-making and the results of therapy permit general conclusions concerning treatment of this disease. No attempt was made to determine the incidence and risk factors for endocarditis after mitral valve repair. This information is provided elsewhere [2, 3].
In conclusion, the majority of patients with endocarditis after mitral valve repair require mitral reoperation. However when infection is limited to a leaflet, early operation may not be necessary, because antibiotic therapy alone can eradicate infection.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Fundaro, P. M Tartara, E. Villa, P. Fratto, S. Campisi, and E. O Vitali Mitral Valve Repair: Is There Still a Place for Suture Annuloplasty? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, August 1, 2007; 15(4): 351 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shibata, Y. Sasaki, H. Hirai, T. Fukui, M. Hosono, and S. Suehiro Early surgery for hospital-acquired and community-acquired active infective endocarditis Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2007; 6(3): 354 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Gammie, S. M. O'Brien, B. P. Griffith, and E. D. Peterson Surgical Treatment of Mitral Valve Endocarditis in North America Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2199 - 2204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |