ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piltz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fuerst, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piltz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fuerst, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1082-1087
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: general thoracic

Long-term results after pulmonary resection of renal cell carcinoma metastases

Stefan Piltz, MD*a, Georgios Meimarakis, MDa, Matthias W. Wichmann, MDa, Rudolf Hatz, MDa, Friedrich Wilhelm Schildberg, MDa, Heinrich Fuerst, MDa

a Department of Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany

Accepted for publication December 3, 2001.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Piltz, Department of Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
e-mail: spiltz{at}gch.med.uni-muenchen.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. Until now no conclusive data exist regarding the factors influencing long-term survival after pulmonary resection of renal cell carcinoma metastases. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to discover definitive prognostic factors for survival using a large and homogeneous single center patient cohort.

Methods. Between 1980 and 2000, 105 patients, after curative resection of lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma, were followed in this long-term study. These patients underwent a total of 150 surgical procedures. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed using the Cox multivariate proportional hazard model.

Results. Median survival after curative resection reached 43 months (range, 1 to 218 months). Survival at 3, 5, and 10 years was 54%, 40%, and 33%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that a complete resection, a less than 4-cm diameter of the metastases and tumor-free lymph nodes at the time of primary operation, were highly significant dependent prognostic factors (p < 0.001). These factors were also shown to be independent prognostic factors as suggested by multivariate analysis (p < 0.05).

Conclusions. The size of the metastatic nodule, the completeness of pulmonary resection, and the lymph node status at the time of nephrectomy are the most important prognostic factors that influence survival after resection of pulmonary metastases. Recurrence of resectable pulmonary metastases does not impair survival, thus favoring repeated resection in patients with recurrent disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases is an established treatment modality in patients with metastatic disease. Metastases of primary tumors that do not respond well to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of both therapies are especially best suited for surgical resection. Renal cell carcinoma is known to belong to this category of malignant disease. To date, reports in the literature do not adequately discern those factors that may have the highest impact on long-term survival after resection of lung metastases in renal cell carcinoma. A major problem of most studies is that the number of patients included does not allow for a proper statistical evaluation. A second problem is that patients with different primary tumors are recruited for these follow-up studies. The analysis of factors of possible prognostic relevance for survival is therefore questionable, as the different biological aspects of certain tumors were not considered in these studies [1, 2]. The present study, therefore, aimed to define prognostic factors that are of significant relevance for long-term survival after resection of pulmonary renal cell carcinoma metastases in a homogeneous and large single center patient series.


    Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Between January 1980 and January 2000, a total of 105 patients (73 men, 32 women) underwent thoracotomies for curative resection of pulmonary renal cell carcinoma metastases at our Department of Surgery. A total of 150 procedures were performed on these patients. The mean time period between the primary procedure on the kidney and pulmonary metastasectomy was 59 months. The median patient age at the time of metastasectomy was 59 years, with a range from 35 to 78 years. Histopathologic evaluation of the resected specimens revealed true renal cell carcinoma metastases in all patients. Complete resection for cure was defined as follows: the lung is the unique site of metastasis, no additional extrapulmonary sites of metastatic disease or locoregional recurrence in the preoperative examinations exist (roentgenogram, thoracic computed tomographic scan, ultrasound, or abdominal computed tomographic scan). Furthermore, no macroscopic tumor tissue is left behind and the tumor is not opened. Finally, tumor-free resection margins are required.

The following factors of potential prognostic significance were selected for statistical analysis: age, gender, diameter of the largest resected lung metastasis, TNM classification, tumor grading, number of lung metastases in each patient, and disease-free interval. Disease-free interval was defined as time period between curative primary operation on the kidney and first detection of a local recurrence or metastatic disease.

To evaluate the impact of complete surgical resection we compared our 105 patients with 17 patients undergoing operation without curative intention during the same period. The reason for incomplete resection in these patients was that microscopic (n = 3) or macroscopic (n = 8) amounts of malignant tissue were being left behind. Three operations with palliative intention (eg, for treatment of metastasis-related pneumonia) and three exploratory thoracotomies were done. Except for the calculation of the impact of completeness, statistical analyses are based on data obtained in patients treated for cure.

Follow-up was based on data provided by the Munich tumor register, by the regional general practitioners, as well as the hospitals participating in the Munich tumor center. All patients or their families were contacted by phone every second year.

Statistical analysis was done with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test [3, 4]. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed using the Cox multivariate proportional hazard model [5]. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
At the last follow-up evaluation (January 2000) 48 of the 105 patients were still alive (46%). Median survival was 99 months (range, 6 to 248 months) after resection of the primary renal cancer and 61 months after pulmonary metastastectomy. Fifty-seven patients had died after a median time period of 50 months after removal of their renal tumor and 19 months after resection of the pulmonary metastasis. All patients but one had died because of progressive renal cancer.

Operative procedures
Sixty-eight patients underwent unilateral thoracotomy for metastases that only affected one side and 28 patients with metastases on both sides had two sequential thoracotomies, within a time interval ranging from 2 to 6 weeks. Metastases on both sides were removed by midline sternotomy in 8 patients. In 1 patient exploration of the contralateral side was performed through a sternotomy, despite not having any preoperative proof of metastatic disease on both sides. This exploration did not reveal a malignant lesion. One hundred fifty procedures were performed on 105 patients. Of these procedures, 118 were performed as wedge resections (79%), in 9 patients as segmental resections, and in 23 major resections (19 lobectomies and 4 bilobectomies) were necessary. All patients undergoing resection for cure were operated on through an open thoracotomy.

Number of resected metastases
Forty-nine patients (47%) had a single lung metastasis, 14 patients had two metastases, 12 had three metastases, and 30 patients had more than three metastases. The median number of metastases resected was two. One patient in whom 32 histologically confirmed metastases were resected (20 on the right side, 12 on the left side) survived pulmonary metastasectomy for 132 months, and at his last clinical follow-up evaluation no metastases were detected.

Complications
In 16 procedures (of 150, 10.7%), a complication was observed. One patient had a rethoracotomy for postoperative bleeding from the chest wall, and 1 patient hemorrhaged and required a blood transfusion but no additional procedure. Three patients were reintubated because of respiratory insufficiency and one had prolonged respiratory support for more than 12 hours. Atelectasis occurred in 2 patients and required bronchoscopic clearance. Five patients had superficial wound infection that was resolved under local wound therapy. After a thoracotomy on the left side, 1 patient suffered from paralysis of the recurrent nerve. One patient (1 of 105; 0.95%) died at 34 days from severe sepsis after a lower bilobectomy and angioplastic resection of the pulmonary vein and a subsequent pleural empyema.

Adjuvant treatment regimens
Additional nonsurgical adjuvant treatment was administered to 44 patients (42%). Eighteen patients had radiotherapy alone. In 2 patients radiotherapy was combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy and 1 patient underwent chemoradiation. Seven patients were treated with chemotherapy only. A combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy was administered to 5 patients and another 11 patients received immunotherapy only.

Twelve percent (13 of 105) of all of the study patients underwent rethoracotomy. In 1 patient a thoracotomy was performed six times. The median time period until recurrence of pulmonary metastases was 10 months. The median survival time of patients who underwent a rethoracotomy was 46 months, which is longer than survival for patients after a single metastastectomy (median survival, 40 months). The difference, however, did not reach statistical significance.

Statistical analysis
The results of the univariate analysis are shown in Table 1. Highly significant differences (p < 0.001) were found for the following measures: complete versus incomplete resection of the metastases (Fig 1); size of the metastasis (<=4 cm versus >4 cm); and lymph node status at the time of the primary renal operation (Fig 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Univariate Analysis of Prognostic Variables for Survival

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Probabiltity of survival of the patients undergoing curative (n = 105) and incomplete pulmonary resection (n = 17) of renal cell carcinoma metastases. Zero on the x-axis represents the date of the first pulmonary resection (p < 0.001). (pat. = patients.)

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Probability of survival after complete resection according to involvement of regional lymph nodes (pN) at the time of primary renal operation. Patients with tumor-free lymph nodes have a highly significant better survival rate (p < 0.001) than patients with regional (local) lymph node metastases. (pat. = patients.)

 
Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for the number (<=2 versus >2; Fig 3) and the size (<=2 cm versus >2 cm; Fig 4) of the metastases. As shown in Table 1, other factors were found not to be significant.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Probability of survival after complete resection in relation to the number of resected pulmonary metastases (p = 0.029). (pat. = patients.)

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Probability of survival after complete resection in selection to the largest diameter of the resected pulmonary lesion. Patients with a metastasis smaller than 2 cm have a significantly better survival rate (p = 0.008). (pat. = patients.)

 
Multivariate analysis revealed that complete and incomplete resection of pulmonary metastasectomy (p = 0.0016; relative risk 3.56; odds ratio 1.61 to 7.83) as well as the lymph node status at the time of primary tumor operation (pN) (p = 0.031; relative risk 1.56; odds ratio 1.04 to 2.34) are independent prognosis factors. If only patients resected for cure are considered (n = 105) lymph node status at the time of primary operation (pN) (p = 0.049, relative risk 1.61; odds ratio 1.0 to 2.59) and the size of the metastasis (p = 0.0016; relative risk 2.42; odds ratio 1.40 to 4.20) are independent prognostic factors.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The selection of patients with metastatic disease to the lung who will profit from pulmonary metastasectomy and subsequently show a significant improvement in the survival rate is still a major issue of thoracic surgery. Some patients are refused proper surgical therapy, or the operation performed is not radical enough, whereas others are overtreated and the indication for operation is exaggerated. It appears that more than 50% of the patients with lung metastases originating from sarcomas, germ-line tumors, and pediatric tumors are considered for metastasectomy; such a broad indication for surgical treatment does not seem to exist for pulmonary metastases from epithelial tumors [6].

Preoperative diagnostic assessment must analyze functional operability of the patient as well as curative resectability of the metastases. Our data clearly indicate that, after pulmonary metastasectomy, residual tumor tissue prohibits long-term survival and there is no obvious benefit for the patient. The same holds true for extended resections (eg, partial resection of the chest wall or the diaphragm) where the tumor has to be completely resected and must not be opened. In our series none of the 17 patients with incomplete resection lived longer than 29 months as opposed to 62% of the patients after complete resection, who were still alive at that time. These data confirm the results of other investigators, who also observed significant survival benefits only for patients with complete resection of lung metastases [7, 8].

On the basis of our findings we cannot recommend video-assisted thorascopic surgery for metastases if curative resection is intended. Sufficient palpation of the lung in atelectasis cannot be guaranteed using thoracoscopic techniques that can result in a higher risk of missing the smaller lesions. In a prospective study Loehe and colleagues [9] demonstrated that even if a helical computed tomographic scan is used before operation one-third of all patients still suffer from additional undetected malignant lesions. These findings are also supported by other studies [6, 7, 1012]. In the future, intraoperative ultrasound may prove to be sufficient for the detection of additional metastases that were not seen on preoperative computed tomographic scans.

It is not generally accepted among thoracic surgeons to principally explore both lungs if metastases are discovered preoperatively only on one side [6, 7]. For the time being, we do not routinely perform bilateral exploration in patients with metastases from renal carcinoma as opposed to patients suffering from germ-line tumors or sarcomas. Ten of the 13 patients who underwent repeated thoracotomies suffered from ipsilateral recurrence, two recurrences were contralateral and one was bilateral. Our findings indicate that in most patients (11 of 13) recurrent metastases are found on the side that had already been completely explored during the previous operation. The survival data reported here (Table 2) support the notion that exploration may be limited to the affected side in patients with metastases from renal cancer. Until now, there is no report in the literature that a bilateral exploration performed in every patient may lead to an improvement in rate of survival. Furthermore, unnecessary thoracotomy leads to adhesions and radiologic artifacts that could limit the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tools such as computed tomographic scans during follow-up.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Survival Following Resection of Lung Metastases of Renal Cell Carcinoma

 
Our observations indicate that patients with a maximum metastasis diameter larger than 2 cm had a significantly shorter survival rate than did patients with smaller metastases. In a report by Cerfolio and associates [7], it was found that the size of the metastasis was of no prognostic significance. In an earlier study from the same group, Jett and colleagues [13] reported a significantly increased survival rate in patients with metastases larger than 3 cm. These reports are not in agreement with our observation that larger size metastases have a significant influence on long-term survival and this becomes even more obvious with metastases larger than 4 cm (p < 0.001).

A number of studies [6, 7, 14, 15] have shown cut-off values for disease-free interval ranging between 20 and 36 months with significantly improved survival in patients with a longer disease-free interval. In our series we were unable to confirm this effect of disease-free interval on survival. Two recent reports [8, 16] appear to support our results. Nonetheless, there is only one study that reports findings in a cohort with the same sample size and homogeneity as reported here [7].

Interestingly, we observed a significant relation between the existence of lymph node metastasis at the time of removal of the primary tumor and long-term survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastases at the time of primary cancer resection is an independent prognostic factor. A similar trend was observed by Fourquier and co-workers [8] in an earlier study. Due to the small patient number in this study the difference in survival did not reach statistical significance. These data confirm an autopsy study [17] of 554 persons in whom renal carcinoma had remained undiagnosed during their lifetimes. In 88 patients renal cancer was the cause of death. Lymphatogenous dissemination was detected in 91% of all these patients and 85% had additional, mostly multifocal metastatic spread. Therefore, it appears that tumors that metastasize into the lung through the bloodstream alone display better tumobiologic behavior than tumors that also metastasize by way of the lymphatics. Because the nodal status is a routine measure of primary cancer resection it should be considered in the decision-making process regarding operation for recurrent disease.

Univariate analysis of our data shows that the absolute number of resected metastases is a relevant prognostic factor. Patients with up to two metastases survived significantly longer than all other patients. Until now, only a few researchers analyzed the prognostic impact of the number of metastases being resected during operation. Most reports [7, 8, 13] limit their analysis to subgroups of patients with solitary versus multiple lesions. Our findings support the notion that differentiation into only two groups is not sufficient.

Furthermore, our data confirm the observation of other investigators [68, 14] who report that repeated curative lung resection in patients with recurrent disease is of benefit to the patient and that survival is not adversely affected by removal of recurrent metastases.

Adjuvant treatment regimens in this study did not seem to have a significant impact on survival. However, in our study the number of patients allocated into each single adjuvant treatment group was too small to allow for comparison between treatment groups.

In summary, the long-term follow-up data after resection for pulmonary renal carcinoma metastases indicate satisfying survival rates and, therefore, support an aggressive surgical approach in this particular metastatic disease. In contradiction to earlier studies that reported no cure after metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma the present analysis supports the contention that a cure is possible [18]. In view of the low perioperative morbidity and mortality rates and due to the lack of appropriate treatment alternatives we therefore recommend that metastasectomy should be performed whenever possible. In patients with unilateral distribution renal cell carcinoma metastases it appears safe to refrain from bilateral exploration. If the metastatic lesions cannot be completely resected, operation should only be performed in selected patients.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Rolf Weitkunat for his expert support in statistical analysis of our data. Furthermore, we are grateful for the superb editorial assistance of Margy Lynch (MSU, East Lansing, MI).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Schildberg F.W., Meyer G., Piltz S., Koebe H.G. Surgical treatment of tumor metastases: general considerations and results. Surg Today 1995;25:1-10.[Medline]
  2. Morrow C.E., Vassilopoulos P.P., Grage T.B. Surgical resection for metastatic neoplasms of the lung: experience at the University of Minnesota Hospitals. Cancer 1980;45:2981-2985.[Medline]
  3. Kaplan E.L., Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-481.
  4. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:163-170.[Medline]
  5. Cox D.R. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 1972;34:187-220.
  6. Pastorino U., Buyse M., Friedel G., et al. Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: prognostic analyses based on 5206 cases. The International Registry of Lung Metastases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:37-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cerfolio R.J., Allen M.S., Deschamps C., et al. Pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:339-344.[Abstract]
  8. Fourquier P., Regnard J.F., Rea S., Levi J.F., Levasseur P. Lung metastases of renal cell carcinoma: results of surgical resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:17-21.[Abstract]
  9. Loehe F., Kobinger S., Hatz R., Helmberger T., Loehrs U., Fuerst H. Value of systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:225-229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ambrogi V., Paci M., Pompeo E., Mineo T.C. Transxiphoid video-assisted pulmonary metastasectomy: relevance of helical computed tomography occult lesions. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1847-1852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. McCormack P.M., Bains M.S., Begg C.B., et al. Role of video-assisted thoracic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary metastases: results of a prospective trial. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:213-217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. McAfee M.K., Allen M.S., Trastek V.F., Ilstrup D.M., Deschamps C., Pairolero P.C. Colorectal lung metastases: results of surgical excision. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:780-785.[Abstract]
  13. Jett J.R., Hollinger C.G., Zinsmeister A.R., Pairolero P.C. Pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Chest 1983;84:442-445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kandioler D., Kromer E., Tuchler H., et al. Long-term results after repeated surgical removal of pulmonary metastases. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:909-912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Maldazys J.D., deKernion J.B. Prognostic factors in metastatic renal carcinoma. J Urol 1986;136:376-379.[Medline]
  16. Robert J.H., Ambrogi V., Mermillod B., Dahabreh D., Goldstraw P. Factors influencing long-term survival after lung metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:777-784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Johnsen J.A., Hellsten S. Lymphatogenous spread of renal cell carcinoma: an autopsy study. J Urol 1997;157:450-453.[Medline]
  18. Dineen M.K., Pastore R.D., Emrich L.J., Huben R.P. Results of surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma with solitary metastasis. J Urol 1988;140:277-279.[Medline]
  19. Pogrebniak H.W., Haas G., Linehan W.M., Rosenberg S.A., Pass H.I. Renal cell carcinoma: resection of solitary and multiple metastases. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:33-38.[Abstract]
  20. Kavolius J.P., Mastorakos D.P., Pavlovich C., Russo P., Burt M.E., Brady M.S. Resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2261-2266.[Abstract]
  21. Friedel G., Hurtgen M., Penzenstadler M., Kyriss T., Toomes H. Resection of pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 1999;19:1593-1596.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
N. Barbetakis, G. Samanidis, D. Paliouras, and C. Tsilikas
eComment: Surgery for pulmonary metastases of renal cell carcinoma. Video-assisted thoracoscopic or open procedure?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2008; 7(5): 828 - 828.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
F. Chen, T. Fujinaga, T. Shoji, R. Miyahara, T. Bando, K. Okubo, T. Hirata, and H. Date
Pulmonary resection for metastasis from renal cell carcinoma
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2008; 7(5): 825 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Assouad, E. Banu, E. Brian, D.-N.-M. Pham, A. Dujon, C. Foucault, and M. Riquet
Strategies and outcomes in pulmonary and extrapulmonary metastases from renal cell cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 794 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Assouad, B. Petkova, P. Berna, A. Dujon, C. Foucault, and M. Riquet
Renal Cell Carcinoma Lung Metastases Surgery: Pathologic Findings and Prognostic Factors
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1114 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Rena, E. Papalia, A. Oliaro, P. Filosso, E. Ruffini, G. Maggi, and C. Casadio
Pulmonary metastases from epithelial tumours: late results of surgical treatment.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 217 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. M. Clavero, C. Deschamps, S. D. Cassivi, M. S. Allen, F. C. Nichols III, B. A. Barrette, D. R. Larson, and P. C. Pairolero
Gynecologic Cancers: Factors Affecting Survival After Pulmonary Metastasectomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2004 - 2007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. J. Simon, D. E. Dupuy, and W. W. Mayo-Smith
Microwave Ablation: Principles and Applications
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2005; 25(suppl_1): S69 - S83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. C. Murthy, K. Kim, T. W. Rice, J. Rajeswaran, R. Bukowski, M. M. DeCamp, and E. H. Blackstone
Can We Predict Long-Term Survival After Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 996 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Hines-Peralta and S. N. Goldberg
Review of Radiofrequency Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 10(18): 6328S - 6334S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Monteiro, N. Arce, J. Bernardo, L. Eugenio, and M. J. Antunes
Surgical resection of lung metastases from epithelial tumors
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 431 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Shiono, J. Yoshida, M. Nishimura, J. Nitadori, G. Ishii, Y. Nishiwaki, and K. Nagai
Late Pulmonary Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Resected 25 Years after Nephrectomy
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2004; 34(1): 46 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piltz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fuerst, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piltz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fuerst, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS