|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:479
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Heart and Lung Diseases, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Rikhospitalet, Sognsvannsv. 20, NO-0027 Oslo, Norway
e-mail: j.l.svennevig{at}rikshospitalet.no
This rather small study is well analyzed and the results are excellent with only 1.2% hospital mortality. What makes this study of special interest is that it differs from most of the experience from western countries with respect to the level of anticoagulation. The authors claim that the required level of anticoagulation in the Japanese population is of lower intensity than recommended by our guidelines [1, 2]. Thus, the authors used international normalized ratio (INR) levels of 1.5 to 2.1 and 1.6 to 2.8 for aortic valve replacement and mitral valve replacement/double valve replacement respectively. Freedom from thromboembolic events and bleeding at 7 years was high and valve thrombosis was not observed.
It would be of interest to know whether the reported "low incidence of valve-related events even under low intensity anticoagulation" really is valid only for the Japanese population?
References
Related Article
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |