ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Verdi J. DiSesa
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohiuddin, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by DiSesa, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohiuddin, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by DiSesa, V. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation - heart

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:740-745
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Long-term survival of cardiac xenografts in fully xenogeneic (mouse -> rat) bone marrow chimeras

Muhammad M. Mohiuddin, MDa, Yong Qin, MDa, Xiaohua Qian, MD, PhDa, Yuru Meng, MDa, Verdi J. DiSesa, MDa

a Department of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery, Rush Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Accepted for publication May 1, 2001.

Address reprint requests to Dr Mohiuddin, Department of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery, Rush Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkway, Chicago, IL 60612
e-mail: mmohiudd{at}rush.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. The shortage of human hearts remains a major barrier to the efficacy of heart transplantation for the treatment of end-stage heart disease. One potential solution to the supply problem would be the use of hearts from nonhuman donors (xenografts). We have established a model of mouse to rat xenogeneic bone marrow chimerism, and in this study we have hypothesized that such chimeric rats will accept both donor and recipient specific heart grafts while rejecting third-party mouse and rat grafts. We also investigated humoral responses in naïve and chimeric rats with and without donor murine cardiac grafts.

Methods. Recipient Lewis rats (n = 22) were given 1100 cGy lethal total body irradiation and the same day received 300 x 106 donor B10.BR mouse bone marrow cells intravenously. Peripheral blood of surviving rats (n = 18) was typed at 4 weeks and then monthly thereafter. Donor and recipient specific and third-party heterotopic heart transplantations were performed at 6 to 8 weeks after reconstitution with bone marrow.

Results. Multilineage bone marrow chimerism was produced in all experimental animals with complete replacement of recipient marrow by donor cells. Murine donor and rat recipient strain hearts transplanted in chimeric rats survived indefinitely. Third-party rat and mouse hearts were rejected, though at a slower rate than bone marrow matched naïve controls. High levels of antimouse antibodies were detected in rats with rejected hearts. These antibodies were absent in chimeric animals with long-term surviving heart grafts.

Conclusions. Long-term multilineage bone marrow chimerism can be produced in a mouse -> rat bone marrow transplant model. Long-term survival of donor specific and recipient specific vascularized cardiac grafts can be produced in these chimeric animals. These animals are clinically normal but show signs of subclinical immunosuppression regimen as they reject third-party hearts later than naïve animals. Our results suggest that antibodies also play a significant role in concordant xenograft rejection, and induction of bone marrow chimerism can overcome this barrier.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
As many as 50,000 patients in the United States might benefit from heart transplantation every year if an adequate supply of donor organs were available. However, only about 2,300 human hearts are transplanted each year and this number has been stable or declining for a decade. Even with the stringent recipient criteria that this shortage requires, severely ill patients wait months or even die before an adequate organ from a human donor becomes available. Studies have suggested that under optimal circumstances, 10,000 human donor hearts might be available in a given year. If this number of human donor organs were ever available, there still would remain a theoretical deficit of at least 40,000 hearts per year [1].

A nonhuman biological source of hearts for transplantation might solve this problem. This possibility has stimulated interest in using organs from animal species for human transplantation. Most investigators have focused on the pig as a likely donor because of its wide potential availability and the likelihood that the economic and ethical issues surrounding its use would be tractable [25]. The vigorous rejection response in the pig-to-human species combination [6], however, remains a major problem because it is not controlled by currently available immunosuppressive agents [7, 8].

Both our group and others are attempting to address some of the immunologic obstacles in a rodent model by producing stable xenogeneic bone marrow chimerism as a preparatory regimen to induce tolerance to cardiac xenografts [911]. We have previously shown that stable, complete, xenogeneic multilineage, hematopoietic chimerism with complete replacement by donor bone marrow can be induced in a mouse-to-rat model by lethally irradiating the recipient Lewis rats with 1,100 cGy and rescuing with 300 x 106 bone marrow cells from B10.BR mice [9, 12]. The technique of inducing bone marrow chimerism by lethal irradiation is not new. However, our mouse-to-rat model has only been reported once before. Because of the availability of a variety of reagents to study murine cells, this model is advantageous to the study of murine cell development in detail in the rat. In this study we examined the survival of cardiac xenografts in these complete xenogeneic mouse -> rat bone marrow chimeras to specifically determine if the xenograft tolerance produced by bone marrow chimerism is donor specific or in a generalized immunosuppressed state. We have assessed cardiac xenograft tolerance by examining length of graft survival and also by analysis of an in vitro immune response. Finally, we have studied the role of antibodies in the rejection of concordant cardiac xenografts in this model.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Animals
Male 4- to 6-week-old B10.BR-H2k H2-T18a/SgSnJ (B10.BR) mice were used as the donors of bone marrow and heart grafts. The C57BL/10Snj (B10) strain of inbred mice served as murine controls. All mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Male 6- to 8-week-old Lewis rats (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were used as murine bone marrow and heart graft recipients, and donors of heart grafts in some experiments. Male ACI rats were donors of third-party rat hearts. All animals received humane care in compliance with the guidelines set by the Association For Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. Animals were housed at the Comparative Research Center, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke’s Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Total body irradiation
Recipient rats were conditioned with a single dose of 1,100 cGy total body irradiation (Nordion Gamma Cell 40, Ontario, Canada) 4 to 6 hours before marrow infusion.

Bone marrow transplantation
Bone marrow was extracted from B10.BR mice and a cell suspension was made as previously described [13]. Briefly, B10.BR mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation and the long bones (tibia, femur, and humerus) were sterilely harvested. Bone marrow was flushed with Media 199 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) containing 0.2 µL/mL gentamicin (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) using a 21-guage needle, and it was filtered through sterile nylon mesh (Tetco, Kansas City, MO). Cells were washed, resuspended, and counted. Cells were diluted in Media 199 to allow the injection of the desired cell number in a 2 mL volume per animal. Bone marrow containing 300 x 106 cells was injected intravenously into each rat 4 to 6 hours after total body irradiation.

Monoclonal antibodies
Antirat RT1Aabl-FITC (B5), antimouse H2Kk-FITC or PE (36–7–5), were purchased from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA).

Characterization of chimeras by flow cytometry
Thirty days after reconstitution with donor marrow peripheral blood lymphocytes of surviving rats were typed using one- or two-color flow cytometry (FACS Calibur, Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) to determine the relative percentage of peripheral blood lymphocytes of host (RT1A) and donor (H2Kk) origin as described previously [13]. Briefly, peripheral blood from the tail vein was collected into heparinized vials and aliquots of 100 µL were incubated with FITC-labeled antirat-RT1A antibody or PE/FITC-labeled antimouse H2Kk antibody, or both, for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark. After washing with FACS media (prepared in the laboratory), red blood cells were lysed using ammonium chloride lysing buffer (ACK; prepared in the laboratory), and washed again with FACS media. Cells were fixed in 0.3 mL 2% paraformaldehyde (Tolousimis Research Corp, Rockville, MD) and analyzed using FACS Calibur. Rats were typed monthly until sacrificed at 4 to 6 months.

Measurement of antibody levels and antibody-induced cytotoxic assays
Sera from naïve rats or chimeric rats with or without cardiac grafts were collected. The levels of rat antimouse IgG and IgM in naïve rat or chimeric rat sera were determined by incubating B10.BR mouse bone marrow cells with rat sera, staining with fluorescein-conjugated mouse antirat isotypic-specific secondary antibodies (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), and analyzing them by using flow cytometry. The complement-dependent cytotoxicity of xeno-reactive antibodies in rats against mouse bone marrow cells was measured by a flow cytometry-based assay using propidium iodide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) as a marker of cell death.

Heart transplantation
Heterotopic heart transplantation was performed to the inguinal vessels of recipient rats using a technique modified from that described by Ono and Lindsey [14]. Transplantation of the first heart was always performed by end-to-side anastomosis of the donor aorta and pulmonary artery to the right femoral artery and vein, respectively. The second heart graft was either transplanted in the left inguinal region or in the abdomen to the aorta and inferior vena cava. Heart survival was monitored both visually and by palpation, and rejection was confirmed by histology.

Determination proliferation response in mixed lymphocyte reaction
Lymphocytes from chimeric and naïve mice were used as responders. Irradiated lymphocytes from naïve B10.BR mice, naïve Lewis rats, and third party C57BL/6 mice were used as stimulators. In a 96 well plate, 4 x105 stimulator and responder cells were incubated together for 4 days. Tritiated thymidine was added on day 4, the cells were harvested and counts per minutes were determined on a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Schaumburg, IL) after 16 hours of further incubation.

Determination of graft versus host disease
Animals were observed for changes in gross appearance such as wasting, diarrhea, and hair loss. Histologic evidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD), (which includes mononuclear cell infiltration with cells showing shrinkage, nuclear fragmentation, and eosinophilic cytoplasmic degeneration and necrosis), was sought on examination of postmortem tissues.

Statistical analysis
The survival of hearts was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Establishment of mouse to rat xenogeneic chimeras
Eighty percent of rats (18 of 22) survived indefinitely after total body irradiation and infusion of donor mouse bone marrow cells. Nonsurviving rats died due to failure of murine marrow engraftment. These rats were anemic and had hypocellular bone marrow. No gross or histologic evidence of GVHD was observed in either chimeric survivors or nonsurviving rats.

Peripheral blood lymphocytes typing of chimeras
Rats surviving 4 weeks (n = 18) were typed for donor chimerism using antirat RT1A and antimouse H2Kk antibodies (Fig 1). All surviving rats showed murine marrow engraftment with more than 99% expression of donor B10.BR mouse cells. Thereafter, these rats were typed monthly using antimouse and antirat Class I monoclonal antibodies until sacrifice at 4 to 6 months. All rats maintained greater than 99% donor chimerism for the length of survival.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes of one representative chimeric rat 30 days after reconstitution with donor marrow showing complete replacement with mouse donor cells: peripheral blood lymphocytes were stained by (A) FITC labeled antirat MHC Class I antibody (RT1AAVL) and (B) PE labeled mouse anti-Class I antibody (H2Kk). Unfilled histogram contains unstained cells and the filled histogram stained cells.

 
Cardiac graft survival
In naïve Lewis rats (n = 5), B10.BR hearts were rejected in 2 to 3 days. All (n = 5) B10.BR hearts grafted in chimeric rats survived indefinitely (p = 0.05 vs control). Recipient specific Lewis hearts (n = 4) also survived indefinitely in chimeric rats as expected. Third-party ACI rat hearts were rejected by chimeric rats in 70 to 150 days (n = 4), with one of the ACI hearts surviving for more than 200 days. It is not technically feasible to do control ACI rat to B10.BR mouse cardiac grafts. Third-party B10 mouse hearts (n = 4) were rejected by chimeric rats in 20 to 65 days (Fig 2 and Table 1), which is essentially identical to the rejection time of a B10 heart in a normal B10.BR mouse (which has the same marrow elements as the chimeric rats).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Percentage survival of cardiac grafts (Kaplan-Meier method).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Pretreatment and Cardiac Graft Survival: Naïve or Chimeric Rats Received Heart Grafts From Donor, Recipient, and Third-Party Mouse and Rat Strains

 
Mixed lymphocytic response
Lymphocytes from chimeric mice were hyporesponsive to cells from both donor specific B10.BR mice and recipient specific Lewis rats (Fig 3). Lymphocytes from chimeric mice did proliferate in response to cells from third-party strain B6 mice, which is consistent with a tolerant rather than an immunosuppressed state.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Proliferative response of lymphocytes from chimeric rats to irradiated stimulators.

 
Measurement of humoral antibody-response and antibody-induced cytotoxicity
As shown in Figure 4, levels of mouse reactive IgM and IgG in naïve rat (n = 5) sera significantly increased after transplantation of B10.BR hearts. The levels of IgM and IgG in sera from naïve rats (n = 5) and chimeric rats (n = 5), as well as those from chimeric rats with B10.BR hearts (n = 5), were comparable to the antibody levels in normal mouse serum. While sera from naïve rats after B10.BR murine heart transplantation had the highest specific lysis activity against B10.BR bone marrow cells (90.95% ± 12.8%), sera from naïve rats had significantly higher specific lysis activity as compared with those from chimeric rats (10% ± 4.5% vs 0.43% ± 0.4%; p < 0.05) (Fig 5).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Measurement of IgG and IgM antibody titers in the naïve, chimeric, and sensitized animals.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Antibody-mediated cytotoxicity.

 
Determination of graft versus host disease
No GVHD was observed. Mortality in our experiment was caused by loss of bone marrow engraftment. All dying animals had hypocellular bone marrow and were grossly anemic. No histologic evidence of GVHD was detected.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
For pluripotent hematopoietic cells to survive and repopulate multiple lineages in another species, conditioning of the recipient is required. There must be both adequate immunosuppression regimen to prevent immediate graft rejection and physiologic space for engraftment of donor marrow. These requirements may be met with conditioning regimens based on radiation alone in high dosage, or a combination of irradiation and suppression of host immunity by variable doses of chemotherapy cell [15, 16]. Using high dose radiation, we have produced xenogeneic bone marrow chimerism in a concordant mouse -> rat model and demonstrated development of functional mouse T cells in the rat environment without the concomitant presence of rat hematopoietic cells. All chimeric rats engrafted with more than 99% of donor cells and the level of engraftment was stable until the animals were sacrificed 6 months after marrow transplantation. In our earlier studies we have shown that all mouse hematopoietic cell lineages develop normally in the chimeric rat [9].

Our mouse-to-rat model is unique to the study of donor bone marrow elements in detail because multiple murine reagents are available. Furthermore, bone marrow cells from commercially available knockout and transgenic mice can be used to study other details of xeno-chimerism. On the other hand, the large number of mice (4 to 5 mice per rat) required to generate enough marrow cells to produce stable chimerism in one animal makes this model relatively expensive. Heart transplantation is technically easier to perform in this model, and viability of the heart can be monitored visually when it is transplanted in the inguinal region. This model does not mimic a clinically relevant human situation because of the presence of {alpha}-Gal epitopes on both recipient and donor cells and absence of anti-{alpha}-Gal antibodies. However, this model is relevant since once the {alpha}-Gal barrier is removed, cellular rejection will play an important role in xenograft rejection. Also, in recent experiments, we have observed that bone marrow chimerism can produce B-cell tolerance to {alpha}-Gal (unpublished data). Finally, this model provides an alternative to the widely used rat-to-mouse model that our results complement.

We observed no evidence of GVHD in chimeric animals. Other investigators who have reported GVHD have either used considerably higher numbers of bone marrow cells or a different immunosuppressive regimen [17]. We have seen GVHD when a marrow dose of more than 400 x 106 was used. It is our understanding that the incidence of GVHD is directly related to the numbers of mature T cells in the bone marrow inoculum, and our presumption is that the T cell number increases with increasing numbers of marrow cells.

In these experiments we have shown that long-term cardiac xenograft survival can be achieved in chimeric rats. All donor-specific mouse or rat recipient identical cardiac grafts survived indefinitely in mouse-rat chimeras. Indefinite survival of recipient specific Lewis heart grafts was also expected because the T cells developing in the rat environment should recognize both the recipient Lewis rat and B10.BR mouse tissues as self. Chimeric rats rejected third-party mouse and rat hearts, although in some instances at a delayed rate. Two rats failed to reject either third-party mouse or rat hearts. These findings suggest that some chimeric rats were not immune-competent, although they were free of clinical disease.

Our data also showed that lymphocytes from chimeric rats were hyporesponsive to both donor B10.BR mouse and recipient Lewis rat’s irradiated lymphocytes in vitro in a mixed lymphocyte reaction. A normal proliferative response was seen to be irradiated lymphocytes from third-party mouse or rat strains. In mixed lymphocyte reaction, we observed a difference in response between B10.BR and B6 mice. In our experience we always see a higher response with B10.BR mice than B6 mice. We do not have data to explain this difference. The response of irradiated B6 plus chimera lymphocytes was higher than the response of irradiated B6 plus naïve Lewis because the latter response is from Lewis rat lymphocytes to B6 cells, whereas the former is from the B10.BR lymphocytes that reconstitute the Lewis rat chimera.

Although the chimeric mice were significantly immunosuppressed, these results show that they maintained a normal response to lymphocytes from third-party mice. Also, all third-party heart grafts were ultimately rejected. Therefore, the long-term survival of donor- and recipient-specific cardiac grafts cannot be attributed to immunosuppression regimen alone. Previously, we have shown that mouse lymphocytes migrate to the rat thymus where they pass through normal developmental stages, including deletion of self-reactive T cells. During this process rats maintain the ability to react to foreign antigens, including third-party antigens. It is reasonable to conclude that the T cells reactive to third-party lymphocytes are not deleted because they are not exposed to these antigens during development, and this plays a significant role in rejecting third-party grafts.

Previously it has been shown that preformed antibodies are responsible for the resistance to bone marrow engraftment in a rat -> mouse xenograft model [18]. In these experiments, we have shown that xeno-reactive antibody levels are strongly associated with xenograft rejection in a mouse -> rat concordant heart transplant model and that these antibodies are cytotoxic to donor cells. Our data suggest that xenogeneic chimerism also induces humoral tolerance to xenografts because these antibody levels were low in chimeric rats, even after exposure to donor heart grafts.

In summary, we have produced xenogeneic mouse-to-rat complete bone marrow chimeras that exhibit durable engraftment and excellent survival. Our studies provide evidence that long-term cardiac xenograft survival can be achieved in chimeric animals that are apparently tolerant to organs from isogeneic donors to the marrow donors. Furthermore, the bone marrow grafts are tolerant of the recipient because GVHD was not seen. Although some chimeric animals are without clinical disease or other manifestations of immune suppression, they may not be fully immune-competent as illustrated by delayed rejection of third-party donor heart grafts. However, this was observed in a minority of chimeras.

Although the regimen of lethal irradiation and complete bone marrow replacement successfully demonstrates production of long-term survival of vascularized organ xenografts, it is not likely to be feasible in a clinical situation. Lethal total body irradiation is indicated for treatment of certain life-threatening malignancies. Its numerous toxicities preclude its use in other conditions. We are now attempting to modify our model to produce mixed xenogeneic chimerism without the requirement for lethal irradiation or long-term immunosuppressive agents. Such a regimen might be appropriate for use in patients with end-stage cardiac disease, and it may solve the problem of donor organ shortage and eliminate the complications presently associated with long-term nonspecific immunosuppression regimen.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Kauffman H.M., Mcbride M.A., Rosendale J.D., Ellison M.D., Daily O.P., Wolf J.S. Trends in organ donation, recovery and disposition - unos data for 1988–1996. Transplant Proc 1997;29:3303-3304.[Medline]
  2. Schmoeckel M., Bhatti F.N., Zaidi A., et al. Xenotransplantation of pig organs transgenic for human DAF: an update. Transplant Proc 1997;29:3157-3158.[Medline]
  3. Bach F.H., Winkler H., Wrighton C.J., Robson S.C., Stuhlmeier K., Ferran C. Xenotransplantation: a possible solution to the shortage of donor organs. Transplant Proc 1996;28:416-417.[Medline]
  4. Platt J.L. Xenotransplantation: a potential solution to the shortage of donor organs. Transplant Proc 1997;29:3324-3326.[Medline]
  5. Bach F.H. Xenotransplantation: problems and prospects. Annu Rev Med 1998;49:301-310.[Medline]
  6. Sachs D.H., Bach F.H. Immunology of xenograft rejection. Hum Immunol 1990;28:245-251.[Medline]
  7. Sablinski T., Gianello P.R., Bailin M., et al. Pig to monkey bone marrow and kidney xenotransplantation. Surgery 1997;121:381-391.[Medline]
  8. Bach F.H., Robson S.C., Winkler H., et al. Barriers to xenotransplantation. Nat Med 1995;1:869-873.[Medline]
  9. Mohiuddin M.M., Ildstad S.T., DiSesa V.J. Establishment of fully xenogeneic (mouse->rat) bone marrow chimeras: evidence for normal development and clonal deletion of mouse T cells. Transplantation 2000;69:731-736.[Medline]
  10. Nikolic B., Sykes M. Mixed hematopoietic chimerism and transplantation tolerance. Immunol Res 1997;16:217-228.[Medline]
  11. Ildstad S.T., Boggs S.S., Vecchini F., et al. Mixed xenogeneic chimeras (rat + mouse to mouse). Evidence of rat stem cell engraftment, strain-specific transplantation tolerance, and skin-specific antigens. Transplantation 1992;53:815-822.[Medline]
  12. Mohiuddin M.M., Qian X., DiSesa V.J. Induction of long term multilineage bone marrow chimerism leads to prolonged survival of donor specific cardiac xenografts in a mouse-rat chimeric model. Surg Forum 1999;50:163-164.
  13. Ildstad S.T., Sachs D.H. Reconstitution with syngeneic plus allogeneic or xenogeneic bone marrow leads to specific acceptance of allografts or xenografts. Nature 1984;307:168-170.[Medline]
  14. Ono K., Lindsey E.S. Improved technique of heart transplantation in rats. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969;57:225-229.[Medline]
  15. Nikolic B., Sykes M. Bone marrow chimerism and transplantation tolerance. Curr Opin Immunol 1997;9:634-640.[Medline]
  16. Sykes M., Sachs D.H. Bone marrow transplantation as a means of inducing tolerance. Semin Immunol 1990;2:401-417.[Medline]
  17. Li H., Selvaggi G., Ricordi C., Inverardi L. Bone marrow engraftment and GVHD following bone marrow transplantation across a concordant xenogeneic barrier (mouse to rat). Transplant Proc 1997;29:2190-2191.[Medline]
  18. Aksentijevich I., Sachs D.H., Sykes M. Natural antibodies can inhibit bone marrow engraftment in the rat-mouse species combination. J Immunol 1991;147:4140-4146.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. L. Colson, H. Xu, Y. Huang, and S. T. Ildstad
Mixed Xenogeneic Chimerism Induces Donor-Specific Humoral and Cellular Immune Tolerance for Cardiac Xenografts
J. Immunol., November 1, 2004; 173(9): 5827 - 5834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Verdi J. DiSesa
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohiuddin, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by DiSesa, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohiuddin, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by DiSesa, V. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation - heart


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS