ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albåge, A.
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albåge, A.
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:58-64
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Elevations in antidiuretic hormone and aldosterone as possible causes of fluid retention in the Maze procedure

Anders Albåge, MDa, Jan van der Linden, MD, PhDa, Lars Bengtsson, MD, PhDa, Dan Lindblom, MD, PhDa, Göran Kennebäck, MD, PhDb, Hans Berglund, MD, PhDb

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anesthesiology, Karolinska Institutet at Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
b Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet at Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Accepted for publication April 3, 2001.

Address reprint requests to Dr Albge, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anesthesiology, Huddinge University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
e-mail: anders.albage{at}thsurg.hs.sll.se


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. Reduced levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) has been suggested as a cause of fluid retention after combined Maze and valvular surgery. This study aimed to assess hormonal activation in the perioperative setting of isolated Maze procedures.

Methods. Changes in ANP, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), antidiuretic hormone (ADH), aldosterone, and angiotensin II were measured in 16 patients (mean age 53 ± 9 years) without concomitant heart disease undergoing the Maze (III) procedure. Ten matched patients (mean age 56 ± 9 years) undergoing multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting served as controls. Measurements with hemodynamic correlates were obtained at baseline and after ventricular pacing (100 stimulations/minute), directly preoperatively, postoperatively and the first postoperative day. Weight gain and diuretic requirements were recorded.

Results. The major differences in hormonal response were significantly higher plasma levels of ADH (Maze preoperative 1.1 ± 0.4, postoperative 24.9 ± 16.7 pmol/L; controls preoperative 1.1 ± 0.1, postoperative 3.7 ± 3.5 pmol/L) and aldosterone (Maze preoperative 106 ± 94, postoperative 678 ± 343 pmol/L; controls preoperative 124 ± 79, postoperative 171 ± 93 pmol/L) in the Maze group on the first postoperative day (p < 0.001). Preoperative baseline plasma levels of ANP and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP) were higher in the Maze group but this difference was abolished by pacing, and postoperatively, ANP levels changed in parallel to the PCWP in both groups. Diuretic requirements were significantly higher in the Maze group.

Conclusions. Substantial increases in ADH and aldosterone were observed after the Maze procedure, indicating these hormones as important determinants in postoperative fluid retention. The role for ANP in this setting may be a less prominent than previously reported.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The Maze procedure for treatment of atrial fibrillation has been shown to restore sinus rhythm in a vast majority of cases [13]. A commonly reported clinical observation is post-Maze fluid retention of varying severity [1, 2]. This has been attributed to postoperative changes in levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), a potent diuretic and vasodilating cardiac hormone, synthesized mainly in the atria. Observations in animal studies have suggested the atrial appendages as the major source of ANP content and secretion [4]. The Maze procedure, involving numerous transmural atrial incisions as well as excision of both atrial appendages, could theoretically deplete the ANP secretion from atrial myocytes. Consequently, this would contribute to water and sodium retention by disrupting the cardiorenal hormonal axis [5]. Plasma levels of ANP have been shown to be directly related to atrial stretch [6] and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP). Increases in levels of ANP can be provoked by ventricular pacing, which desynchronizes the interaction between the atria and the ventricles, leading to increased atrial pressures and stretching [7].

Thus, ANP is to date the most widely studied hormone in association with post-Maze fluid retention, and has been found to be significantly reduced both early [810] and late [8] postoperatively, in patients undergoing combined valvular and Maze procedures. However, involving solely patients with valvular heart disease and atrial fibrillation, these studies have been criticized for patient heterogeneity, obscuring the assessment of the effects of the Maze procedure per se. Furthermore, most of these studies have not addressed perioperative changes in other coexisting vasoactive hormones [8, 9]. Substantial increases in plasma levels of antidiuretic hormone (ADH) have been demonstrated after open heart operations [11, 12], possibly contributing to postoperative fluid balance changes. In addition, aldosterone, which promotes the retention of sodium and water in the kidneys, is considered to be a major actor in the pathophysiology of congestive heart failure [13].

The aim of this study was therefore to examine plasma levels of ANP, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), ADH, aldosterone, and angiotensin II, in a perioperative case-control setting and in relation to hemodynamic variables with and without ventricular pacing, in patients undergoing isolated Maze procedures for atrial fibrillation.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The study group comprised 14 men and 2 women, with a mean age of 53 ± 9 years (range 38 to 74 years) who were selected from 34 consecutive patients undergoing the Maze procedure due to medically refractive atrial fibrillation (AF). Three patients had paroxysmal AF and the remaining 13 patients were in chronic AF. Twelve patients were considered to have lone AF, whereas 2 patients had AF in association with hypertension and 2 with diabetes. All patients were hemodynamically and echocardiographically (transthoracic and transesophageal [TEE]) evaluated before the operation and only patients without significant concomitant heart disease, scheduled for isolated Maze (III) procedures [1] were included in the study. Eight patients had a mildly reduced left ventricular function (ejection fraction [EF] 0.35 to 0.50), the remainder were normal (EF more than 0.50).

Ten patients (8 men and 2 women), with a mean age of 56 ± 9 years (range 50 to 64 years) undergoing routine elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) served as controls. These patients were selected and matched for age and gender. Inclusion criteria were significant three-vessel disease requiring multiple bypass grafting, a normal left ventricular ejection fraction and absence of significant concomitant heart or systemic disease. All of these patients were preoperatively in sinus rhythm.

The study was approved by the local hospital ethics commitee and all patients expressed informed consent before inclusion.

Protocol
Anesthetic methods were identical in both patient groups. After induction of anesthesia, a Swan-Ganz catheter with paceport (Baxter Edwards Swan-Ganz Paceport catheter, model 93A 1H-7.5F, Irvine, CA) was placed transcutaneously through the internal jugular vein to the pulmonary artery for measurements of right atrial pressure (RAP), PCWP, and cardiac output through thermodilution. A radial arterial line was used for on-line blood pressure monitoring and for collecting arterial blood samples. Heart rate was registered via conventional surface electrocardiogram. Ventricular pacing was achieved through the paceport lead (Baxter Edwards transluminal V-pacing probe, model 98-100H).

Hemodynamic variables were measured and arterial blood samples withdrawn for subsequent analysis at five different occasions before and after the operation. The first measurements were done with the anesthesized patient in the supine position and in a hemodynamically stable condition, directly preoperatively before skin incision, at baseline (I) and after 6 minutes of ventricular pacing at 100 stimulations/minute (II). Subsequent measurements were then done directly postoperatively after skin closure with the patient in a clinically stable hemodynamic and respiratory condition, but still intubated (III), and on the first postoperative day with the patient extubated, at baseline (IV) and after ventricular pacing for 6 minutes (V). During measurements, the patient was disconnected briefly from the ventilator when intubated, to prevent influence from positive airway pressure breathing. Rapid ventricular pacing directly after the operation was not considered clinically safe and was therefore excluded from the protocol.

On-table TEE data for atrial size were collected before surgery (I), with the analyses performed by the same physician. Two different projections (two chamber long axis and right atrium/vena cavae long axis) were used for measurements of each atrium. Postoperative patient data were recorded regarding the change in weight postoperatively as compared to preoperative dry weight, and amounts of diuretics administered intraoperatively and during the first 3 days postoperatively. Departmental clinical routines for diuretic treatment were not altered by the study. The objective in both groups was to maintain an adequate urine output postoperatively (more than 1 mL/kg per hour) and have the patients return to preoperative weight within 3 to 5 days.

Arterial blood samples were drawn and collected into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-treated 10-mL tubes, stored in ice, immediately refrigirator centrifugated to separate the plasma (P) and preserved at -70°C. Radioimmunoassay (RIA) analysis of ANP, BNP, ADH (vasopressin), aldosterone, and angiotensin II were then subsequently performed on all arterial blood samples collected. P-ANP was measured with RIA using a polyclonal antiserum (Peninsula Laboratories, Inc., Belmont, CA) and iodinated ANP (Euro-Diagnostica, Malmö, Sweden) as tracer. ANP was extracted from a 1.0 mL sample using solid phase extraction (Sep-Pak, Waters, Milford, MA). BNP was measured using SHIONORA BNP solid-phase immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) (CIS Bio International, Gif-Sur-Yvette Cedex, France) based on two monoclonal antisera recognizing the C-terminal region and the intramolecular ring structure of BNP, respectively. The IRMA does not cross-react (much less than 0.01%) with hANP or other related peptides. The detection limit was 0.6 pmol/L, and the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation 3.7% and 3.9%, respectively, at 43 pmol/L. P-Vasopressin was measured with RIA (Euro-Diagnostica, Sweden). Vasopressin was extracted from a 0.8-mL sample with ethanol before RIA, all according to the manufacturer’s description. S-Aldosterone was measured with RIA (Coat-a-Count Aldosterone, DPC, Los Angeles, CA). P-Angiotensin II was measured with RIA (Angiotensin II RIA, Bulmann Laboratories AG, Switzerland). Angiotensin II was extracted from a 1.2-mL sample using solid phase extraction (Sep-Pak). Total coefficient of variation was typically less than 12% for vasopressin, aldosterone and angiotensin II, and less than 30% for ANP.

Statistics
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Baseline characteristics between groups were tested with unpaired t test. Peri- and postoperative changes were tested with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with group as between factor and data collected at the different time points as within factor. In case of a significant overall difference between groups, or interaction between group and the measured variable, contrasts were calculated for the specific time points in SuperANOVA (Abacus Concepts, Inc; Berkeley, CA). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
There was no hospital or late mortality in either group, and all patients could be discharged from the hospital within 1 to 4 weeks. All Maze patients were in either sinus or junctional rhythm, or were paced atrially from temporary external wires, immediately after the operation and during the first days postoperatively. All CABG patients were in sinus rhythm after the operation. There was one case of early severe fluid retention and acute renal failure in the Maze group. This patient had severe hemolysis intraoperatively as a possible cause of oliguria, and short-term dialysis was required. His urinary output responded promptly and well to treatment with a synthetic ANP-analogue (hANP). Another Maze patient had symptoms of moderate fluid retention 5 days after operation. There were no other major complications in either group.

Preoperative atrial size was significantly different between groups only in one of two measured diameters for each atrium (right atrial end-systolic cava-cava diameter: Maze 52 ± 9, controls 43 ± 6 mm, p < 0.05; left atrial end-systolic diameter dorsal left atrium-mitral annulus: Maze 37 ± 11, controls 27 ± 5 mm, p < 0.05). Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic occlusion time were significantly longer in the Maze group as compared to the CABG-group (170 ± 20 versus 88 ± 20 minutes and 77 ± 10 versus 43 ± 10 minutes, respectively).

Plasma levels of vasoactive hormones measured are presented in Table 1 and corresponding hemodynamic data in Table 2. The major hormonal responses postoperatively were significantly higher plasma levels of antidiuretic hormone (F = 17.1; p < 0.001) and aldosterone (F = 16.8; p < 0.001) in the Maze group as compared with the control group (Fig 1). Preoperative levels of these hormones were low and similar between groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Perioperative Hormone Data

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Perioperative Hemodynamic Data

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Perioperative changes in antidiuretic hormone levels and aldosterone levels (I = preoperative baseline, II = preoperative pace, III = directely postoperatively, IV = baseline first postoperative day, V = pace first postoperative day). *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. p values for the specific measurements were only calculated if there was a significant difference between groups in the repeated-measures ANOVA.

 
Although plasma levels of ANP and PCW pressures were slightly but significantly higher in the Maze group at baseline preoperatively, these differences were abolished by ventricular pacing, and there were no significant differences in ANP levels between groups postoperatively at baseline or after pacing (Fig 2A). In both groups, plasma ANP level variations were similar and in parallel to the changes in PCWP induced by the ventricular pacing (Fig 2B, C). Hemodynamically, there were no differences in mean blood pressure or cardiac output between groups at any given time of measurement. Perioperative plasma levels of BNP and angiotensin II did not differ significantly between groups at any time of measurement.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Perioperative changes in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). (A) Maze patients and coronary artery bypass grafting patients (controls); (B) in relation to changes in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP; Maze); and (C) in relation to changes in PCWP (Controls). (I = preoperative baseline, II = preoperative pace, III = directely postoperatively, IV = baseline first postoperative day, V = pace first postoperative day.) *p < 0.05. Baseline differences between groups were calculated with t test. There were significant changes within group regarding ANP and PCWP: Maze—ANP F = 4.6 and p = 0.003, PCWP F = 4.2 and p = 0.004; Controls—ANP F = 3.1 and p = 0.03, PCWP F = 10.8 and p < 0.001.

 
There was a significant difference between groups for weight change only on the third postoperative day when the Maze patients maintained a higher weight. The Maze group also required significantly higher amounts of furosemide during the first 3 days postoperatively (Table 3). As per protocol in our institution, all Maze patients received treatment with renal dose dopamine (1 to 3 µg/kg per minute) after their operation for a mean of 1.3 days (range 12 hours to 3 days) and oral spironolactone 50 to 100 mg daily, initiated on the first postoperative day but after hormone blood samples were drawn. The CABG patients, however, received 5 to 10 mg of amiloride daily, started on the first postoperative day, in combination with clinically required doses of furosemide.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Postoperative Weight Change and Diuretic Requirements

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
In contrast to previous reports [810], this study examined plasma levels of several vasoactive hormones with hemodynamic correlates perioperatively in patients without concomitant heart disease undergoing the Maze procedure exclusively for arrhythmia correction. In addition, a control group of patients underwent the same study protocol in connection with their CABG. Data regarding treatment of postoperative fluid retention were collected to add clinical relevance. A pacing protocol was included in the study to attempt release provocation of natriuretic hormones. The main findings, however, were substantial and highly significant increases in antidiuretic hormone and aldosterone levels in the Maze group as compared to the control group. This observation indicates an important role for other vasoactive hormones than ANP in connection with the Maze procedure.

Antidiuretic hormone (or arginine vasopressin) is involved in the homeostasis of blood volume and osmolality and conserves water by concentrating the urine, acting mainly on the collecting ducts of the kidneys [14]. In addition, high doses of ADH cause vasoconstriction, a response used in the treatment of severe vasodilatory hypotension after cardiac operations [15]. An increased ADH response during cardiac operation using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been found by several authors in adults [11] and children [12], with the postulated mechanisms being stress and relative hypotension. In one study comparing patients undergoing valvular operation or CABG, and with CPB times of approximately 150 minutes, the ADH increase was five fold during CPB and not different between groups [16]. Others authors studied 19 pediatric Fontan patients and found a 10-fold increase in ADH with a residual significant elevation up to 10 days postoperatively [12]. Interestingly, the children with the most severe fluid retention had the highest levels of ADH after operation. In the present study, the ADH response was twice as high in the Maze group directly postoperatively and continued to increase to 20-fold higher levels on the first postoperative day, whereas the ADH levels of the CABG group declined to within normal range. Thus, it is conceivable that physiologic actions of increased plasma levels of ADH play a significant role in observed fluid retention after the Maze procedure as well, although this probably represents a generalized stress response to any prolonged open heart procedure.

Aldosterone is an adrenal mineralocorticoid hormone involved in the renin-angiotensin axis for volume and blood pressure homeostasis. Its principal action is sodium and water retention as well as potassium and magnesium excretion in the distal convoluted tubules of the kidneys [14]. Recently, the hormone has gained renewed interest as a major actor in the compensatory mechanisms of heart failure [13]. In heart surgery, aldosterone has been found to increase significantly in adults [17] and in children [18]. Similarily, this is most likely another stress response to circulatory changes during cardiopulmonary bypass. In the present study, the aldosterone levels of the controls were elevated three fold early after operation but returned to normal levels after 1 day. In the Maze group, however, the aldosterone levels increased seven fold early postoperatively and were maintained at similar levels on the first postoperative day.

Spironolactone, an aldosterone receptor blocker, has recently been shown to have major positive effects in a heart failure population [13]. Cox and associates [1] used spironolactone empirically and successfully to treat fluid retention after the Maze procedure. Our data suggest that the reported effectiveness of this drug may be achieved through inhibition of elevated aldosterone levels. We have used spironolactone similarily in all Maze procedures, but the treatment was initiated after completion of the study protocol.

Regarding natriuretic peptide response, it is important to include hemodynamic correlates when release mechanisms are discussed. Throughout this study, variables such as mean blood pressure and cardiac output were similar between groups. Although ANP levels were higher in the Maze group preoperatively, which is consistent with a larger atrial size and with the effects of atrial fibrillation [7], this difference was abolished by ventricular pacing. Equalizing PCWP and heart rate between groups resulted in similar and parallel changes in ANP plasma levels (Fig 2). Significant elevations of ANP levels have been reported previously after cardiac valve and CABG operations [19], but a similar postoperative increase in relation to the measured PCWP was not evident in the present study. In contrast, significant reductions in ANP levels have been documented after combined Maze and valvular operations with an early lack of correlation between ANP levels and PCWP [810]. These data were not confirmed by the present study. It is possible that a more vigorous stimulation of ANP release or measurements during an extended time frame would have elicited a different response between groups. However, our data suggest that decreased levels of ANP may not be a factor of such importance as has previously been proposed in the setting of post-Maze fluid retention. It is conceivable that in the previous studies, the reduced levels of ANP could to some extent be associated with the correction of the valvular problem and improvement of congestive heart failure, rather than from the actual Maze incisions per se. In the present study, both groups of patients had the right atrial appendage either removed or ligated as part of their procedure so this variable should not be involved in the interpretation of the results.

The plasma levels of BNP did not differ significantly between the groups at any one time throughout the study, and its role in this operative situation is unclear. Angiotensin II is a very potent vasoconstrictor and extensively described in various papers on heart failure. In this study, however, there were no significant differences between groups and a major influence on the tendency of fluid retention in the Maze group is unlikely.

The major limitation in this study is associated with the comparison between the Maze group and the CABG group. Although differing in preoperative variables such as rhythm, left ventricular function and left atrial size, as well as procedure times, the two groups were similar in hemodynamic measurements throughout the study. The Maze group consisted basically of patients with lone atrial fibrillation, that is, without any other structural heart disease affecting atrial pressures or ventricular function. Similarily, for the control group, we wanted to avoid confounding factors from long-standing valvular heart disease. Hence, we believe that the similarities in hemodynamic variables justify the conclusions drawn from our observations. However, it is important to note that the elevated levels of ADH and aldosterone most likely are not specific for the Maze procedure but merely a reflection of a long and complex procedure.

Furthermore, fluid retention is a concept difficult to define or standardize. For simplicity, we elected to focus in this study on the clinically based requirements of diuretics in the early postoperative phase. The Maze group needed significantly more of diuretic therapy, probably reflecting a clinical alertness to maintain a continuous and adequate urine output and avoid fluid retention problems for several days postoperatively. As indicated by the weight changes for each group over time, the treating physicians were not overzealous.

Finally, other hormones than the ones studied might be involved as well. Urodilatin, another member of the natriuretic peptide family, was recently reported to have impact on renal excretion of sodium and water after cardiopulmonary bypass [20].

In conclusion, substantial perioperative increases in antidiuretic hormone and aldosterone indicate that these hormones are important determinants of the observed fluid retention after the isolated Maze procedure. In this study, atrial natriuretic peptide levels changed in parallel to the PCWP in both the Maze group and the control group suggesting a less prominent role for this hormone than has previously been reported.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Cox J.L., Boineau J.P., Schuessler R.B., Kater K.M., Lappas D.G. Five-year experience with the Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:814-824.[Abstract]
  2. McCarthy P.M., Castle L.W., Maloney J.D., et al. Initial experience with the Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:1077-1087.[Abstract]
  3. Albage A., Bengtsson L., van der Linden J., et al. The Maze operation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: early clinical experience in a Scandinavian institution. Scand Cardiovasc J 2000;34:480-485.[Medline]
  4. Perera S.A., Frame R., Brodman R.F., Zeballos G.A., Hintze T.H., Panetta T.F. Atrial natriuretic peptide replacement therapy in rats subjected to biatrial appendectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:976-980.[Abstract]
  5. DeBold A.J., Borensein H.B., Veress A.T., Sonnenberg H. A rapid and potent natriuretic response to intravenous injection of atrial myocardial extract in rats. Life Sci 1981;28:89-94.[Medline]
  6. Burnett J.C., Jr, Osborn M.J., Hammill S.C., Heublein D.M. The role of frequency of atrial contraction versus atrial pressure on atrial natriuretic peptide release. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989;69:881-884.[Abstract]
  7. Berglund H., Jensen-Urstad M., Theodorsson E., Bevegrd S. Plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide at rest and during exercise in heart failure-influence of cardiac rhythm and haemodynamics. Clin Physiol 1991;11:183-196.[Medline]
  8. Yoshihara F., Nishikimi T., Kosakai Y., et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide secretion and body fluid balance after bilateral atrial appendectomy by the Maze procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:213-219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kim K., Lee C., Kim C., Cha Y. Effect of the Cox Maze procedure on the secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:139-147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nakamura M., Niinuma H., Chiba M., et al. Effect of the Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation on atrial and brain natriuretic peptide. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:966-970.[Medline]
  11. Philbin D.M., Levine F.H., Emerson C.W., Coggins C.H., Buckley M.J., Austen W.G. Plasma vasopressin levels and urinary flow during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with valvular heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979;78:779-783.[Abstract]
  12. Stewart J.M., Gewitz M.H., Clark B.J., et al. The role of vasopressin and atrial natriuretic factor in postoperative fluid retention after the Fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:821-829.[Abstract]
  13. Pitt B., Zannad F., Remme W., et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Eng J Med 1999;341:709-717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 13th ed. Vol 2. McGraw-Hill, New York: 1994:1921–3; 1956–8.
  15. Argenziano M., Chen J.M., Choudhri A.F., et al. Management of vasodilatory shock after cardiac surgery: Identification of predisposing factors and use of a novel pressor agent. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:973-980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Oka Y., Wakayama S., Oyama T., et al. Cortisol and antidiuretic hormone responses to stress in cardiac surgical patients. Can Anaesth Soc J 1981;28:334-337.[Medline]
  17. Yoshitake T., Mizuno A., Saigusa M., Kato T. Relationship of plasma aldosterone concentration to electrolytes and acid-base balance in blood after open cardiac surgery. Ann Surg 1973;180:203-208.
  18. Burch M., Lum L., Elliott M., et al. Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass on water balance hormones in children. Br Heart J 1992;68:309-312.[Medline]
  19. Dewar M.L., Walsh G., Chiu R.C.-J., et al. Atrial natriuretic factor: response to cardiac operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96:266-270.[Abstract]
  20. Sehested J., Wacker B., Forssmann W.-G., Schmitzer E. Natriuresis after cardiopulmonary bypass: relationship of urodilatin, atrial natriuretic factor, antidiuretic hormone and aldosterone. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:666-671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Albage, G. Kenneback, J. van der Linden, and H. Berglund
Improved neurohormonal markers of ventricular function after restoring sinus rhythm by the Maze procedure
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 790 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
V. Vijay and J. P. Gold
Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 521 - 537.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albåge, A.
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albåge, A.
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS