|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:986-988
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Louvain Medical School at Mont-Godinne University Hospital, B-5530, Yvoir, Belgium
b Department of Radiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Louvain Medical School at Mont-Godinne University Hospital, B-5530, Yvoir, Belgium
c Chest Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Louvain Medical School at Mont-Godinne University Hospital, Yvoir, Belgium
Accepted for publication October 18, 2000.
Address reprint requests to Dr Eucher, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Department, UCL Mont-Godinne, Av Therasse 5, B-5530 Yvoir, Belgium
e-mail: pheucher{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. A series of 14 patients underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery for removal of 15 pulmonary nodules situated in the outer third of the lung. Before operation, a radiopaque microcoil was injected just behind the lesion and then used to locate, under fluoroscopy, the area to be resected during thoracoscopy. The technique was evaluated for accuracy, reliability, and ease of use.
Results. Microcoil labeling of peripheral pulmonary nodules allowed in every case a complete resection and a histologic identification of the lesion. It is more stable and accurate than methylene blue dye marking, and it is as easy to perform as computed tomographic scanguided biopsy. The incidence of complication was small in spite of our inexperience with the technique.
Conclusions. Our experience with microcoil injection shows that it provides consistent and highly accurate marking of pulmonary nodules for video-assisted thoracic surgery, allowing secure resection with a safe margin.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the principal indications of video-assisted thoracic surgery is the diagnosis of lung nodules located at or very near the periphery [1], but the difficulty of palpating the nodule during the operation forces us to go back to radiologic labeling techniques [2] to be able to localize the lesion in the operating suite. With this in mind, several methods have been used for identification: methylene blue or barium injection under computed tomography (CT), hook wire localization, ultrasound localization, and so forth. We have resorted to marking nodules by placing a small metallic coil under CT scan guidance, immediately before operation, and herein report results using a technique first described by Asamura and colleagues in 1994 [3].
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Radiologic technique
The procedure is the same as a CT scanguided diagnostic biopsy, largely described in the literature [4]. The only preexamination evaluation needed is a coagulation test (prothrombin time and activated prothrombin time).
Access should be as simple as possible, although parietal structures can sometimes be a hindrance. To reduce the risk of creating a pneumothorax, we have improved the technique originally described by Asamura and associates [3] by using a 22-gauge 10-cm-long Chiba needle (William Cook Europe A/S, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) instead of an 18-gauge one. After the needle is placed in position, we inject a 0.018-inch coil (Microcoil Hilal, Cook), 15 mm long and 5 mm in diameter.
Nodules situated just under the pleural surface are the most difficult to label. In any case, to avoid the possibility of the coil slipping into the pleural cavity, the coil must be placed just slightly behind the nodule (Fig 1).
|
The resected nodule is extracted in a plastic bag (Lapsac, Cook, Spencer, IN) to avoid neoplastic cell dissemination at the port site.
The sample is split open in the operating room to ensure the presence of the entire nodule and the metallic coil, and then is sent to the anatomicopathologic laboratory for immediate analysis and confirmation of a safe resection margin. At the end of the procedure, we place two pleural drains, using the incision points of the thoracic ports.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In three cases (20%), a minor pneumothorax developed, but because the patients were asymptomatic and the operation imminent, pleural drainage was not necessary.
Surgical resection
In 14 patients, we successfully resected 15 lesions varying in size between 5 and 20 mm, located at depths of 5 to 30 mm. There was no perioperative and postoperative mortality resulting from the procedure, and no complications arose during the procedure. In one case (6.6%), we were forced to convert to thoracotomy because of adherences, but none of the procedures required an extension of the resected area.
Anatomopathology
Extemporaneous tissue analysis showed that in 8 cases the lesion was benign (2 fibrous scar nodules, 2 anthracosilicosis nodules, 2 granulomatous nodules, 1 histiocytoma, 1 sarcoid nodule). In the other 7 cases, the resected lesion was malignant (5 colonic adenocarcinoma metastases, 1 metastasis of a small cell parotid carcinoma, and a sheet of cells identified as a carcinoid tumor that was next to a granulomatous nodule), but no cases of lung carcinoma were found.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bronchoscopy is a first-line diagnostic tool, yet it is not useful for nodules in peripheral parenchyma. For this kind of lesion, TTNB is necessary, and indeed it is becoming more and more a routine procedure with excellent results having been largely described in the literature [5, 6]. Serious complications associated with TTNB must not be forgotten, however, such as pneumothorax, hemoptysis, and air embolism [6, 7]. Although very rare, these complications seem sometimes excessive to us when dealing with a small nodule, and furthermore this technique does not always produce a tissue sample large enough for proper analysis, thus perhaps increasing the risk of false-negative results. In any case, biopsy is contraindicated in patients with respiratory disorders such as emphysema or serious pulmonary hypertension, in which a pneumothorax could be fatal [6].
In these cases, we believe that video-assisted thoracic surgery resection is justified, but even if this technique is less invasive than the conventional thoracotomy, it is hindered by difficulties of localization of the nodule during the procedure, as digital palpation is not possible. Some authors localize lesions visually or by palpation with endoscopic instruments, but perioperative nodule identification can sometimes be impossible and the rate of conversion to thoracotomy with this technique is, in our opinion, too high [8], especially if one considers that this is a diagnostic procedure.
Every pulmonary nodule at a distance from the pleura of more than 10 mm and lesions of 10 mm in diameter or less and at a depth of more than 5 mm need preoperative labeling [8] and several techniques have been described. Marking with methylene blue [9], an inexpensive yet short-lasting method, requires that the procedure takes place within 3 hours [9] to be able to see the marking, which poses the problem of coordination between the radiologic and surgical services. Furthermore, the injection of an excessive amount of dye can result in its diffusion over a large surface of the lung, making localization of the nodule impossible. Some authors have described placing a hook-wire [10], a well-known technique for marking mammary nodules. There are, however, reports that respiratory dynamics favor the movement of the needle toward the pleural cavity [11]. In addition perioperative exsufflation can displace the hook-wire out of the target. Other described techniques include injection of barium contrast transthoracically [12], or during bronchoscopy [13], and using ultrasound guidance during the operation [14]. The latter, although well known, is limited to institutions that have the specific capability for the procedure, and the technique can be difficult if the ultrasound image is disturbed, as can be seen with incomplete pulmonary exsufflation or in emphysematous patients. Other authors describe the use of thoracoscopic palpation instruments [15] or tactile sensors [16].
In 1994, Asamura and colleagues [3] described an original technique for marking thoracic lesions, which we reproduced. This technique offers several advantages: (1) the simplicity of the radiologic procedure is the same as that of CT scanguided biopsy, (2) any pneumothorax occurring during marking may be treated immediately or subsequently during the surgical procedure, (3) the diagnostic procedure may become therapeutic for metastatic lesions, and (4) a safe resection margin around the lesion can easily be established by stapling several centimeters from the metallic label. In case of a primitive pulmonary lesion, one can complete the nodule resection with a more extensive procedure such as a lobectomy.
In our series, we marked lesions by injection of a metallic microcoil under CT scan guidance, which allowed us to localize and resect all the nodules in the series, as well as have complete histologic identification of the lesions. The use of a smaller gauge needle to inject the coil allowed us to reduce the incidence of pneumothorax; when it occurred, the amount of air was small, and respiration was not affected. The injection of the metallic coil deeper in the parenchyma than the tumor limited the risks of movement of the marker and permitted us to accurately resect the lesions with a sufficiently large margin.
In 6 cases we resected pulmonary metastases, and it has been shown that the removal of this kind of lesion, in the absence of other localizations, prolongs the survival of patients [17]. In one case of resection of a granulomatous lesion, we found sheets of metastatic carcinoid cancer cells around the nodule.
We are currently using this marking technique before thoracoscopic resection, and we believe that it will stay current because of its efficacy and dependability.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ohtsuka, K.-i. Watanabe, M. Kaji, T. Naruke, and K. Suemasu A clinicopathological study of resected pulmonary nodules with focal pure ground-glass opacity. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 160 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mattioli, F. D'Ovidio, N. Daddi, L. Ferruzzi, V. Pilotti, A. Ruffato, R. Bolzani, and G. Gavelli Transthoracic Endosonography for the Intraoperative Localization of Lung Nodules Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 443 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Eichfeld, A. Dietrich, R. Ott, and R. Kloeppel Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Pulmonary Nodules After Computed Tomography-Guided Marking With a Spiral Wire Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 313 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Booton, M Jones, and N Thatcher Lung cancer * 7: Management of lung cancer in elderly patients Thorax, August 1, 2003; 58(8): 711 - 720. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sugi, Y. Kaneda, K. Hirasawa, and N. Kunitani Radioisotope Marking Under CT Guidance and Localization Using a Handheld Gamma Probe for Small or Indistinct Pulmonary Lesions Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 155 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Partik, A. N. Leung, M. R. Muller, M. Breitenseher, F. Eckersberger, G. Dekan, T. H. Helbich, and V. Metz Using a Dedicated Lung-Marker System for Localization of Pulmonary Nodules Before Thoracoscopic Surgery Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 805 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Burdine, L. D. Joyce, M. B. Plunkett, S. Inampudi, M. G. Kaye, and D. H. Dunn Feasibility and Value of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Wedge Excision of Small Pulmonary Nodules in Patients With Malignancy Chest, October 1, 2002; 122(4): 1467 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nomori, H. Horio, T. Naruke, and K. Suemasu Fluoroscopy-assisted thoracoscopic resection of lung nodules marked with lipiodol Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 74(1): 170 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |