HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jagoe, R. T. Articles by Gibson, G. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jagoe, R. T. Articles by Gibson, G. J. Related Collections Lung - cancer

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:936-943
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: general thoracic

The influence of nutritional status on complications after operations for lung cancer

^a Department of Respiratory Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
^b Department of Nephrology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Accepted for publication April 27, 2000.

Address reprint requests to Dr Jagoe, Department of Cell Biology, Building C1, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston MA 02115
e-mail: tjagoe{at}hotmail.com

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Background. Nutritional status is known to play an important role in determining outcome after many types of operations but its importance relative to nonnutritional indices in patients undergoing an operation for lung cancer is unclear.

Methods. Detailed nutritional and nonnutritional assessment of 52 patients undergoing surgical resection of lung cancer was performed. The frequency of postoperative complications and length of intercostal drainage time were recorded, and the relation between preoperative indices and postoperative outcome was assessed.

Results. Patients who died or needed reventilation had poorer nutritional status, worse lung function, and lower maximum expiratory pressures than those who did not. Using multiple logistic regression, the best model (R² = 0.39) to predict death combined operation type, preoperative carbon monoxide transfer factor (% predicted), and maximum expiratory pressure (% predicted). Operation type and the fat-free mass index (FFMI) alone were only slightly less informative (R² = 0.35). For reventilation the best model (R² = 0.80) combined operation type, body mass index (BMI), and maximum expiratory pressure (% predicted). Intercostal drainage time after lobectomy was significantly related only to preoperative lymphocyte count (p = 0.004) and subjective global assessment score (p = 0.02).

Conclusions. Impaired nutrition is an important predictor of death and the need for reventilation after an operation for lung cancer, and the selection of patients for lung resection might be improved by measuring simple nutritional indices such as BMI and the FFMI.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Studies of patients undergoing various types of operations have shown that nutritional depletion is associated with poor outcome and increased risk of complications, particularly postoperative infections [1]. Surgical treatment of early lung cancer remains the approach most likely to achieve cure, but is only possible in a minority. Some studies suggest that in those patients with operable disease, certain nutritional indices such as serum albumin concentration may predict complications after an operation [2]. We have shown that severe nutritional depletion is uncommon in those referred for thoracotomy for lung cancer [3]. However, it is still unclear whether lesser degrees of nutritional depletion have any influence on postoperative morbidity and mortality. Recognition of specific prognostic factors might lead to interventions or increased postoperative surveillance that would improve outcome. We have therefore prospectively assessed the prognostic value of nutritional and nonnutritional factors in determining outcome after potentially curative surgical procedures for lung cancer.

	Material and methods

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Patients
Patients were recruited after referral to the cardiothoracic surgeons at the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, between January 1995 and May 1997. All patients gave written informed consent and the local Ethics Committee approved the study. Only patients who had attempted curative resection for lung carcinoma are included in the present study. The decision to undertake surgical resection was made by the surgeon concerned using conventional clinical, radiologic, and spirometric criteria, without reference to the results of the nutritional assessment.

Surgical procedures
The routine surgical and anesthetic procedure included preoperative rigid bronchoscopy in the anesthetic room to confirm operability, and single lung ventilation using a Robertshaw dual lumen endobronchial tube during the operation. At the end of the procedure two intercostal drainage tubes were placed in the pleural cavity and attached to underwater seals. Patients were woken up and extubated on the operating table and spent their first 12 to 24 hours in a thoracic surgical high-dependency unit before moving to a thoracic surgical ward. All patients were given intravenous flucloxacillin (or clindamycin if allergic) on induction of anesthesia and for at least 48 hours after an operation. A thoracic paravertebral nerve block was performed after induction using a single injection of 20 ml 0.5% bupivicaine and early postoperative analgesia was usually achieved with a patient-controlled morphine infusion. Standard postoperative physiotherapy was performed with emphasis on full reexpansion of the remaining lung tissue by use of breathing exercises and early ambulation. Help with sputum clearance was given as necessary.

Nutritional measurements and dietary records
Nutritional assessments of patients were undertaken as described in the companion paper [3]. The assessments included anthropometric measurements: height, weight, skin-fold thickness, grip strength, and fat-free mass, serum protein concentrations, and absolute lymphocyte count. Patients also completed a 5-day prospective dietary record at home before admission that was analyzed to give average daily intake of energy, protein, and Vitamin C. A summary of the nutritional and dietary measurements is shown in Table 1. Geographic and time constraints meant that not all patients could complete all the nutritional tests before an operation.

Postoperative lung function was also estimated from the preoperative values and the number of segments resected [6]. The predicted postoperative (ppo) values for percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) (ppoFEV₁%) and T_LCO (ppoT_LCO%) were calculated as: .

Performance status, surrogate marker for cardiovascular disease and staging
Performance status was assessed using the World Health Organization scale, and medication being taken preoperatively was recorded. Those patients taking any medication for treatment of diabetes, cardiac or cardiovascular diseases were assigned to the cardiovascular risk group for analysis of complications. The staging reported here is based on information that included the histologic appearances of resected specimens [7].

Statistical methods
The data were analyzed using the Statview software (Version 5.0, SAS Inc, Cary, NC). Means were compared using Student’s t test or the Mann-Whitney U test, and proportions were compared using the ² or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Time-related outcomes were assessed using Cox’s proportional hazard model. Univariate analysis of preoperative variables versus postoperative outcome inevitably involved multiple significance testing. Therefore, for a result to be regarded as significant, agreement between the results of variables of similar type (eg different skin-fold thickness measurements) was required, in addition to a p value less than 0.05. The nonnutritional variables assessed were operation type (pneumonectomy versus lesser resection, hereafter called lobectomy), age, sex, smoking status (current versus ex-smoker or never smoked), lung function, maximum respiratory pressures, pathologic stage (I or II versus III or IV) [7], performance status, and evidence of cardiovascular disease.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of complications was performed using variables with p less than 0.05 in univariate analysis. A backwards-stepwise method was used with variables retained in the model if their logistic likelihood ratio p value was less than 0.05. Nonnutritional variables were entered first with the nutritional variables entered subsequently to see what additional explanatory effect they had. The combination of independent variables giving the best explanation of the outcome (using the R² statistic) was adopted.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Patients
Out of 60 patients undergoing thoracotomy [3] 8 patients were excluded from this study because they had did not have operable lung cancer. Of the remaining 52 patients, 6 had disease that proved to be nonresectable at the time of the operation, and 2 patients had benign disease on histologic examination of the operative specimens. Demographics, performance status, lung function, maximum respiratory pressures, operation type, and histologic details of the remaining 52 patients are shown in Table 3, and nutritional and dietary data are summarized in Table 1. Twelve patients had pneumonectomy (8 right, and 4 left) and 6 patients had bilobectomy including 2 patients with additional rib-resection.

Deaths, complications, and other outcomes
Seven patients died (see Table 4) including 2 patients that died more than 30 days postoperatively. The deaths included 4 of the 12 patients who had pneumonectomy (all right pneumonectomy), and 3 of the 40 patients who had lesser procedures. All patients who died had stage I or II disease. One patient (patient 2) died immediately after the operation; no specific cause of death was established at postmortem but an arrhythmia was suspected. Patient 4 had a lobectomy and was discharged after 9 days but was readmitted 5 days later with a broncho-pleural fistula and soiling of the contralateral lung. A completion pneumonectomy was performed but he died in the hospital 61 days after his original operation.

After lobectomy the median intercostal drainage time was 4 days (range, 1 to 17 days). The median hospital stay for the patients being discharged was 7 days (range, 4 to 34 days) with no significant difference between those patients having lobectomy (median, 7 days) or pneumonectomy (median, 7 days).

Univariate analysis for death and complications
Patients who died were more likely to have had lower indices of body weight, skin-fold thickness, respiratory function, and maximum expiratory pressures. These patients were also more likely to have been smokers, and to have undergone pneumonectomy (Table 5). Patients who needed reventilation after the operation were also more likely to have had lower indices of body weight, skin-fold thickness, respiratory function, and expiratory pressures, and to have undergone pneumonectomy (Table 5).

Multivariate analysis for death and reventilation
Nonnutritional factors were assessed first and the best model was obtained with a combination of operation type, T_LCO%, and MEP percent predicted (MEP%) (R² = 0.39). When each nutritional variable was added to this model in turn, the fat-free mass index had the strongest effect, and only the operation type remained significant when combined with the fat-free mass index (FFMI). However, there was no additional explanatory effect for the model overall: operation type and the FFMI (R² = 0.35) (Table 6).

When the factors predicting the need for reventilation were assessed in the same way, the best model again included operation type, T_LCO%, and MEP% (R² = 0.57). When nutritional variables were added, a large improvement in the overall model was observed. The best model included BMI, operation type, and MEP% (R² = 0.80) (Table 6).

Intercostal drainage time
Intercostal drainage after lobectomy was analyzed using Cox’s proportional hazards model. Only lymphocyte count (likelihood ratio test, p = 0.006), percent of predicted subscapular skin-fold thickness (p = 0.01), and subjective global assessment score (p = 0.02) were significantly related to drainage time individually. When these factors were combined, the lymphocyte count (p = 0.004) and subjective global assessment score (p = 0.02) remained significant independent predictors of time to removal of intercostal drains, although the dominant effect was from the lymphocyte count.

	Comment

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Although our patients with operable lung cancer had less severe nutritional depletion than reported in earlier studies [3], the findings show that nutritional status may, nonetheless, be an important factor in determining early postoperative outcome. For predicting death after an operation, the FFMI was approximately equivalent to the combined effect of preoperative T_LCO% and MEP%. Furthermore BMI was of overriding importance in determining the need for reventilation. Unlike previous studies [2], we found that reported weight loss, serum protein concentrations, and other indices, such as grip strength, did not predict outcome.

Many studies of nutrition in patients who have undergone operations have shown that nutritional status has an important influence on outcome [1]. Although most studies have related to gastrointestinal operations, an independent effect of nutritional status in predicting outcome has also been found in vascular [8], head and neck [9], orthopedic [10], and urologic [11] operations.

Factors affecting outcome after operations for lung cancer
The outcome of an operation for lung cancer is clearly related to the extent of the operation and to preoperative lung function. Other factors such as age, male sex, and previous severe cardiac or pulmonary disease are associated with a poorer outcome in some series [12–15].

Several studies have been performed in patients designated high risk for lung resection by conventional criteria, to establish whether some of these patients can be offered surgical treatment with acceptable risk. Many have used lung function calculated by using quantitative pulmonary scintigraphy [16] and the number of bronchopulmonary segments to be resected or both [6]. The ppoT_LCO% was the best predictor of death and respiratory failure in some series [12, 16], whereas others found the ppoFEV₁ (liters) [6] or the ppo product (ppoFEV₁% x ppoTLCO%) [17] better predictors of death. In some studies (including the present) the values were calculated after the operations [6, 12] and the prospective value of such estimates may have been overstated as a result.

The role of nutrition in predicting the outcome of operations for lung cancer has been addressed in only a few studies. Pierce and colleagues [17] found that BMI was the best predictor of respiratory complications in those having lobectomy or lesser resections. Busch and colleagues [2] retrospectively reviewed 103 consecutive patients and found that extended resection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, weight loss more than 10%, and serum albumin less than 37 g/L were associated with increased risk of complications. In multivariate analysis only extended resections (involving the chest wall) and serum albumin remained significant.

One mechanism by which nutritional status may influence outcome is by the effects on respiratory muscle strength. Nomori and colleagues [18] showed that those with lower maximum respiratory pressures had more pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery. In the present study, maximum expiratory pressure (MEP%) was important in determining death and the need for reventilation. One possible reason for its predictive value might be the importance of expiratory muscle strength in generation of an effective cough.

Comparing results of different studies is complicated by the variation in definitions. Arbitrary designation of complications into major and minor categories, different patient inclusion criteria, selective reporting of complications, and variations in frequency of adjuvant or perioperative treatments may all affect the results [15, 19].

Death rates
The overall death rate in the present study (7 out of 52) is similar to that of Pierce and colleagues [17]. Although higher than United Kingdom, national in-hospital mortality rates (lobectomy 2.6%, pneumonectomy 6.9%; D Watson, personal communication, 1999), the differences from our data are not statistically significant (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.62, 0.32, respectively). Furthermore we chose to include all deaths that occurred within 30 days of operation, as well as in-hospital deaths of patients who remained after 30 days. This is a more inclusive definition than used to generate the national statistics and by some other authors [13]; and some of the differences between different studies are attributable to varying definitions of mortality. Accurate data collection after discharge is difficult and there is a danger that in larger series, data on death rates after hospital discharge may be incomplete. In addition, all those patients who died after pneumonectomy in the present study had right pneumonectomy, which involves resection of the largest amount of lung tissue and in the elderly at least, this has a significantly higher mortality rate than left pneumonectomy [20].

Reventilation
Six patients required ventilation because of respiratory failure during recovery from the operation. The best overall model to predict need for reventilation combined operation type, BMI, and MEP%. Five of the 6 patients who needed reventilation died, usually after a prolonged period of intensive care. Thus the morbidity, mortality, and expense of this complication are substantial, and it is clear that identifying those at risk of needing reventilation is of major importance. The present study suggests that poor nutritional status has a considerable influence in determining the need for reventilation.

As mentioned previously, many nonnutritional factors were known to be important in determining the likelihood of death or complications, and the usefulness of additional information on nutritional status was unclear. To clarify this, the multivariate analysis was performed in a backwards-stepwise fashion with the nonnutritional variables entered first and the nutritional variables entered later, and they were only retained if they significantly added to the predictive power of the nonnutritional variables. The number of complication events was relatively low, and to limit the number of variables considered in the multivariate analysis, a stringent criterion was adopted (p < 0.05 in univariate analysis). The models obtained for estimating risk of death and reventilation need to be validated in other studies; however, calculation of the probability of reventilation using the coefficients obtained in the present study is illustrated below.

From the logistic regression equation, the estimated probability of reventilation (P_rv) is given by: . The model coefficients shown in Table 6 can be used to calculate C. Thus (The coefficient for operation type (7.454) is multiplied by one for pneumonectomy, or zero for lesser resection.) Thus if the patient has a BMI of 18 and MEP% is 80%, the estimated risk of needing reventilation after lobectomy is 76% compared to a risk of less than 0.01% if the patient has a BMI of 25 and the MEP% is 120%.

Other complications
Nutritional status did not appear to influence the occurrence of lesser complications. However, because of the modest numbers of patients and the rarity of some complications such as broncho-pleural fistula, an important effect may have been missed. In this regard it is noteworthy that the only subject with a broncho-pleural fistula in this series was severely nutritionally depleted before the operation (BMI, 16.8; FFMI, 14.2) and subsequently died. Bashir and colleagues [21] made a similar observation regarding the 4 patients in their series that developed broncho-pleural fistulas. Wound infections were particularly uncommon in our patients presumably reflecting good surgical and nursing practices, as well as the routine use of prophylactic antibiotics.

Intercostal drainage time
Apart from complications, the main factor causing delay in discharge after lobectomy was the need for lengthy intercostal drainage. Shorter drainage time was associated with higher preoperative lymphocyte count and better preoperative subjective global assessment score (a clinical nutritional assessment). The dominant influence of lymphocyte count on postoperative intercostal drainage time was unexpected and needs to be confirmed in other studies, but it is possible that this reflects the strength of the immune or inflammatory response needed to seal leaks in the lung. Immune function may be impaired by nutritional depletion and this may be manifest by a low lymphocyte count. A low lymphocyte count has been associated with postoperative complications in other series, and this has been interpreted as confirming the importance of immunocompetence in postoperative recovery [22].

Because surgical treatment of lung cancer is the only approach likely to achieve a cure, the number of patients successfully treated needs to be maximized. In the present study where patients were accepted for operations using conventional clinical and lung function criteria, we have shown that the assessment of nutritional status gives further valuable information about the risk of death and the likely need for reventilation after an operation. Simple nutritional assessment is easily and rapidly performed, and consideration should be given to incorporating measurements, such as BMI and FFMI, as well as MEP%, into the routine preoperative assessment of patients with lung cancer.

	Acknowledgments

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment Acknowledgments References

 
R. Thomas Jagoe is very grateful for the support of the Fight Against Cancer Trust (FACT) and the Sarah Veitch Caines legacy during this study. The authors also would like to thank the cardiothoracic surgeons at the Freeman Hospital for allowing access to their patients, Therese Small at the William Leech Center, Freeman Hospital, for help with the anthropometric tests and for performing the lung function tests, and Dr David Walshaw from the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne for his statistical advice.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment Acknowledgments References

 

1. Dempsey D.T., Mullen J.L., Buzby G.P. The link between nutritional status and clinical outcome: can nutritional intervention modify it?. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;47:352-356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Busch E., Verazin G., Antkowiak J.G., Driscoll D., Takita H. Pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung carcinoma. Chest 1994;105:760-766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Jagoe R.T., Goodship T.H.J., Gibson G.J. Nutritional status of patients undergoing lung cancer operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:929-935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. American Thoracic Society medical section of the American Lung Association. Standardization of spirometry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1107-1136.[Medline]
5. Wilson S.H., Cooke N.T., Edwards R.H., Spiro S.G. Predicted normal values for maximal respiratory pressures in caucasian adults and children. Thorax 1984;39:535-538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Kearney D.J., Lee T.H., Reilly J.J., DeCamp M.M., Sugarbaker D.J. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted lung function. Chest 1994;105:753-759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Mountain C.F. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest 1997;111:1710-1717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Warnold I., Lundholm K. Clinical significance of preoperative nutritional status in 215 noncancer patients. Ann Surg 1984;199:299-305.[Medline]
9. Guo C.-B., Ma D.-Q., Zhang K.-H. Applicability of the general nutritional status score to patients with oral and maxillofacial malignancies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;23:167-169.[Medline]
10. Klein J.D., Hey L.A., Yu C.S., et al. Perioperative nutrition and postoperative complications in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Spine 1996;21:2676-2682.[Medline]
11. Terry W.J., Bueschen A.J. Complications of radical cystectomy and correlation with nutritional assessment. Urology 1986;27:229-232.[Medline]
12. Ferguson M.K., Reeder L.B., Mick R. Optimizing selection of patients for major lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:275-283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Damhuis R.A.M., Schutte P.R. Resection rates and postoperative mortality in 7,899 patients with lung cancer. Eur Respir J 1996;9:7-10.[Abstract]
14. Ginsberg R.J., Hill L.D., Eagan R.T., et al. Modern thirty-day operative mortality for surgical resections in lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:654-658.[Abstract]
15. Nagasaki F., Flehinger B.J., Martini N. Complications of surgery in the treatment of carcinoma of the lung. Chest 1982;82:25-29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Markos J., Mullan B.P., Hillman D.R., et al. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;139:902-910.[Medline]
17. Pierce R.J., Copland J.M., Sharpe K., Barter C.E. Preoperative risk evaluation for lung cancer resection: Predicted postoperative product as a predictor of surgical mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:947-955.[Abstract]
18. Nomori H., Horio H., Fuyuno G., Kobayashi R., Yashima H. Respiratory muscle strength after lung resection with special reference to age and procedures of thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996;10:352-358.[Abstract]
19. Deslauriers J., Ginsberg R.J., Piantadosi S., Fournier B. Prospective assessment of 30-day operative morbidity for surgical resections in lung cancer. Chest 1994;106:329s-330s.
20. Au J., el-Oakley R., Cameron E.W. Pneumonectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma in the elderly. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:247-250.[Abstract]
21. Bashir Y., Graham T.R., Torrance A., Gibson G.J., Corris P.A. Nutritional state of patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracotomy. Thorax 1990;45:183-186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Yamanaka H., Nishi M., Kanemaki T., et al. Preoperative nutritional assessment to predict postoperative complication in gastric cancer patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1989;13:286-291.[Abstract]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. W. Smith, H. Wang, L. M. Gazoni, K. R. Shen, T. M. Daniel, and D. R. Jones Obesity Does Not Increase Complications After Anatomic Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1098 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Shaw Genetics of postoperative complications following thoracic surgery. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2006; 10(4): 327 - 345. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Schussler, M. Alifano, H. Dermine, S. Strano, A. Casetta, S. Sepulveda, A. Chafik, S. Coignard, A. Rabbat, and J.-F. Regnard Postoperative Pneumonia after Major Lung Resection Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2006; 173(10): 1161 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Shaw, A. A. Vaporciyan, X. Wu, T. M. King, M. R. Spitz, J. B. Putnam, and B. F. Dickey Inflammatory Gene Polymorphisms Influence Risk of Postoperative Morbidity After Lung Resection Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1704 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Fukuse, N. Satoda, K. Hijiya, and T. Fujinaga Importance of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Prediction of Complications Following Thoracic Surgery in Elderly Patients Chest, March 1, 2005; 127(3): 886 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Pilling, A. E. Martin-Ucar, and D. A. Waller Salvage intensive care following initial recovery from pulmonary resection: is it justified? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 1039 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.E. Martin-Ucar, R. Nicum, I. Oey, J.G. Edwards, and D.A. Waller En-bloc chest wall and lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Predictors of 60-day non-cancer related mortality Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 859 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Hollaus, G. Wilfing, P. N. Wurnig, and N. S. Pridun Risk factors for the development of postoperative complications after bronchial sleeve resection for malignancy: a univariate and multivariate analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 966 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Isowa, S. Hasegawa, T. Bando, and H. Wada Preoperative risk factors for prolonged air leak following lobectomy or segmentectomy for primary lung cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 951 - 951. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Carney and M. M. Meguid Current Concepts in Nutritional Assessment Arch Surg, January 1, 2002; 137(1): 42 - 45. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Novoa, G. Varela, and M.F. Jimenez Morbidity after surgery for non-small cell lung carcinoma is not related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 700 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Endo, Y. Sohara, F. Murayama, T. Yamaguchi, T. Hasegawa, K. Tezuka, and S.-i. Yamamoto Surgical outcome of pulmonary resection in chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 889 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Meguid and A. Laviano Malnutrition, outcome, and nutritional support: time to revisit the issues Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71(3): 766 - 768. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. T. Jagoe, T. H.J. Goodship, and G. J. Gibson Nutritional status of patients undergoing lung cancer operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71(3): 929 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jagoe, R. T. Articles by Gibson, G. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jagoe, R. T. Articles by Gibson, G. J. Related Collections Lung - cancer