ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Leonard Y. Lee
Shailen R. Patel
Charles A. Mack
O. Wayne Isom
Todd K. Rosengart
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Rosengart, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Rosengart, T. K.

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:14-23
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Focal angiogen therapy using intramyocardial delivery of an adenovirus vector coding for vascular endothelial growth factor 1211

Leonard Y. Lee, MDa,b, Shailen R. Patel, MDa,b, Neil R. Hackett, PhDb, Charles A. Mack, MDa,b, Dean R. Polce, BSa,b, Tarek El-Sawy, BSa,b, Rory Hachamovitch, PhDc,d, Pat Zanzonico, PhDc, Timothy A. Sanborn, MDd, Manish Parikh, PhDd, O. Wayne Isom, MDa, Ronald G. Crystal, MDb, Todd K. Rosengart, MDa

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
b Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
c Division of Nuclear Medicine, The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
d Division of Cardiology, The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Rosengart, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL 60201
e-mail: t-rosengart{at}nwu.edu

Presented at the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, Jan 25–27, 1999.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. Adenovirus (Ad) vector-mediated gene therapy strategies have emerged as promising modalities for the "biological revascularization" of tissues. We hypothesized that direct intramyocardial, as opposed to intracoronary, administration of an Ad vector coding for the vascular endothelial growth factor 121 cDNA (AdGVVEGF121.10) would provide highly focal Ad genome levels, and increases in VEGF, ideal for inducing localized therapeutic angiogenesis.

Methods. Persistence and regional distribution of the vector were assessed by TaqMan real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction technology and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, after intramyocardial AdGVVEGF121.10 in the rat, and either intramyocardial or intracoronary (circumflex territory) vector in Yorkshire swine. Based on these results, we assessed the focal nature of the improved cardiac blood flow in a previously reported porcine myocardial ischemia model.

Results. Intramyocardial delivery of AdGVVEGF121.10 in the rat resulted in local persistence of the Ad genome that decreased 1,000-fold over 3 weeks, with peak myocardial VEGF expression 24 to 72 h after vector delivery. After intramyocardial AdGVVEGF121.10 in the circumflex distribution of pigs, Ad vector genome and VEGF protein levels were more than 1,000-fold and more than 90-fold higher, respectively, in this distribution than in other myocardial regions. In comparison, intracoronary injection yielded maximum myocardial Ad genome and VEGF levels 33-fold and 9-fold lower, respectively, than that after intramyocardial delivery. Angiograms obtained 28 days after intramyocardial AdGVVEGF121.10 demonstrated rapid circumflex reconstitution via collaterals localized to the region of vector administration.

Conclusions. These studies demonstrate that direct intramyocardial administration of AdGVVEGF121.10 results in focal genome and VEGF levels, including focal angiogenesis, sufficient to normalize blood flow to the ischemic myocardium, findings that are relevant to designing human trials of gene therapy-mediated cardiac angiogenesis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Despite significant advances in its prevention, coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of death in the Western world, afflicting in excess of 6 million Americans [1]. Angioplasty and surgical bypass, the primary interventional therapies for these individuals, are temporally limited by the problems of native vessel restenosis and graft occlusions. "Angiogens," a class of proteins capable of inducing angiogenesis [2], are being evaluated in various animal studies to induce new blood vessel growth and thereby circumvent vascular obstructions, restoring blood flow to ischemic tissues [27].

One of the most widely studied angiogens is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a homodimeric 34- to 46-kDa heparin-binding glycoprotein [8]. As a result of posttranscriptional mRNA splicing, VEGF normally exists as four isoforms of 121-, 165-, 189-, and 206-amino acid residues [9]. Structurally related genes, designated VEGF-B, C, D, E, and F, have also recently been identified [1012]. VEGF is one of the most specific angiogens due to localization of its receptors almost exclusively to vascular endothelial cells [13]. Because of this selectivity, VEGF has attracted much interest as a therapeutic angiogen, allowing stimulation of new blood vessel formation while theoretically minimizing potential risks of fibrosis or intimal hyperplasia due to promiscuous stimulation or replication of fibroblasts or smooth muscle cells by angiogens that do not have the endothelial selectivity of VEGF.

Gene therapy for angiogenesis is a delivery strategy in which the cDNA for a selected angiogen, such as VEGF, is delivered to the target tissue. This strategy potentially allows prolonged, localized angiogen expression sufficient to induce angiogenesis and thereby provide "biological revascularization" of ischemic tissues, but avoids the potential toxicity associated with excessive or systemic angiogen dissemination [4, 7, 14, 15]. We have previously reported that the use of an adenovirus (Ad) vector coding for the VEGF 121 cDNA (AdGVVEGF121.10) yields improved myocardial perfusion, contractile function, and angiographically identified collateral vessels in a porcine model of myocardial ischemia [7].

In the present study, we have capitalized on the adaptation of the new TaqMan real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology to compare the distribution of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector after intramyocardial vs intracoronary administration, and we have compared the tissue levels of VEGF resulting from these alternative delivery strategies. Based on the striking focal distribution of the genome of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector and VEGF levels in the injected area after direct intramyocardial administration, we have reassessed the focality of collateral vessel development and improved cardiac perfusion in our prior study of the ischemic porcine myocardium [7]. The findings of this analysis, together with the quantitative demonstration of the highly focal nature of intramyocardial administration of AdGVVEGF121.10 angiogen, strongly support the strategy of direct intramyocardial administration of an Ad vector coding for VEGF121 to induce focal myocardial therapeutic angiogenesis in individuals with severe coronary artery disease.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Ad vectors
The replication-deficient vector AdGVVEGF121.10 is an E1a-, partial E1b-, partial E3- Ad vector based on human Ad5, into which an expression cassette is inserted into the E1 region containing the cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter/enhancer, an artificial splice sequence, the human VEGF 121 cDNA, and the SV40 polyA/stop signal [7]. The vector AdNull (containing no transgene) served as the control [16]. AdGVVEGF121.10-induced VEGF expression was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; R&D Systems Inc, Minneapolis, MN) assessment of tissue culture supernatant 48 h after in vitro infection of A549 and HeLa cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD).

Intramyocardial vector delivery in the rat
To assess the persistence of AdGVVEGF121.10 vector genome and levels of expressed VEGF protein, Sprague-Dawley rats (250 to 350 g; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA or Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY) underwent left parasternotomy, with the assistance of a rodent ventilator (Harvard Apparatus Inc, South Natick, MA), and apical myocardial injection of 1010 particle units (pu; 50 µL) of AdGVVEGF121.10 or the AdNull control vector diluted with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS). The animals were sacrificed at varying time points and the apex was homogenized (see below) with protein lysis buffer and subjected to TaqMan real-time quantitative PCR assessment and ELISA, to assess vector genome and VEGF protein levels, respectively (see below).

Porcine model of intramyocardial vs. intracoronary ad vector administration
To compare the effectiveness of intracoronary vs. intramyocardial Ad vector administration, castrated, male Yorkshire swine (28 to 30 kg; Tom Morris Farms, Wetherstown, MD) underwent left thoracotomy and administration of AdGVVEGF121.10 via direct intramyocardial injection, at 10 sites in the circumflex distribution (total dose 1012 pu, total volume 1,000 µL; each of 10 sites receiving 1011 pu in 100 µL PBS per injection), or intracoronary (circumflex artery) injection as 1012 pu in 1,000 µL PBS over 20 seconds. The sites of intramyocardial injection were marked with India ink (Eberhard Faber, Inc, Lewisburg, TN) for subsequent identification. Similar identification marks were made in the myocardium of the circumflex territory of pigs receiving intracoronary injections to standardize the regions from which subsequent samples were taken. For each method of administration, the pigs (n = 3, each method) were sacrificed 1 h after vector administration for evaluation of regional myocardial Ad vector genome by TaqMan analysis, and the remaining pigs (n = 6) were sacrificed 1 day after vector administration for analysis of regional myocardial VEGF levels by ELISA. At the time of sacrifice of each pig, 10 biopsies (1.0 to 1.5 cm diameter) were taken from the left ventricular circumflex territory around the previously marked sites, effectively dividing the entire circumflex territory into 10 samples, and two samples each were taken from the mid-right ventricle and from the mid-septum (1.0 to 1.5 cm diameter, each sample).

Tissue ad vector genome levels
To evaluate Ad vector genome levels, tissue biopsies obtained as described above were analyzed utilizing real-time quantitative PCR and the TaqMan chemistry [17]. The samples were immediately homogenized with protein lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 0.14 M NaCl, 0.025% NaN3, 2% Triton X-100, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl chloride; 2 mL/g tissue) before DNA extraction. DNA was extracted from the homogenate samples using the QIamp tissue kit (QIAGEN Inc, Santa Clarita, CA). Triplicate PCR reactions (50 µL each) were established with 5 µL of both 1:10 and 1:100 dilutions of the DNA in water. Amplification reactions were prepared using reagents from Perkin Elmer (Foster City, CA) and contained 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 0.01 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetate acid, 60 nM 5-carboxyrhodamine, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 nM each dCTP, dGTP, and dATP, 400 nM dUTP, 0.5 units urical N-glycosylase, (UNGase) 0.25 units AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase, 200 nM forward primer (5'-AATAAACAAGTTCCCGGATCGAT), 200 nM reverse primer (5'-GCACATAGGAGAGATGAGCTTCC), and 100 nM TaqMan central probe (5'-CCGCCTCGGCTTGTCACATTTTTC). The TaqMan probe was labeled with the reporter group FAM (6-carboxy fluorescein) on the 5' end and the quencher TAMRA (6-carboxy-N,N,N',N'-tetramethylrhodamine) on the 3' end. The primer and probe combination was designed using the PrimerExpress software (Perkin Elmer) and was directed towards the transgene/promoter junction region of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector [7]. The forward primer overlaps the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter while the probe and reverse primer are complementary to the VEGF121 cDNA. This design was chosen to ensure that the endogenous VEGF gene of any species, which would be adjacent to its own promoter rather than the CMV promoter (the promoter used in the vector expression cassette), would not be amplified by the chosen primer set. To construct a standard curve, the expression plasmid in which CMV drives transcription of the VEGF121 cDNA originally used to construct the Ad vector was used. Samples (standard or unknown) were amplified for 40 cycles in a Perkin Elmer 7700 sequence detection system after 10 minutes at 50°C for UNGase to degrade carryover contamination, and 10 minutes at 94°C to activate the AmpliTaq Gold. Cycling conditions were 15 seconds at 94°C followed by 1 minute at 60°C with continuous monitoring of the fluorescence. Data were processed by the SDS 1.6 software (Perkin Elmer) to generate standard curves and to determine the concentration of target in the unknowns by interpolation. A 25% difference in the vector amount adjusted for dilution in the 1:10 and 1:100 dilutions of the DNA was considered acceptable. Total DNA concentration was determined by measuring the A260 of dilutions of the DNA stocks. The vector levels from the TaqMan experiments were averaged and normalized to rat or pig genome level using the approximation that each diploid cell contains 6.6 pg of DNA. The mean Ad genome/cell genome value were then calculated for each tissue sample.

Tissue VEGF levels
Tissue samples obtained for analysis of VEGF protein levels were immediately homogenized with protein lysis buffer, protein determinations were performed (Pierce, Rockford, IL), aliquots of protein lysate were analyzed in duplicate, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. The standard wells against which the samples were compared contained equal amounts of normal pig heart homogenate to correct for any background that might interfere with the absorbance. The concentration of VEGF was normalized to milligrams protein, and the mean value for the tissue sample was calculated. The lower limit of VEGF protein detection by this assay was 5.0 pg/mg of protein.

Porcine model of myocardial ischemia
Based on the striking focal localization of the Ad genome and VEGF levels in the myocardium (see Results), we reassessed data previously acquired in a porcine model of myocardial ischemia [7]. Further details of the model can be found in the original description of these animals in the study by Mack and associates [7]. The pigs were randomized to receive 10 injections (100 µL each) of the therapeutic vector AdGVVEGF121.10 (total dose 109 plaque-forming units [pfu]; n = 8) or the control vector AdNull (total dose 109 pfu; n = 7) injected at 10 sites in the circumflex distribution using a 0.5 mL U-100 insulin syringe with a 28-gauge needle (Beckton Dickinson & Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

At the time of sacrifice (28 days after vector administration), the hearts were perfusion fixed, and ex vivo coronary angiography was performed in a blinded manner [7]. Prior analysis of these angiograms demonstrated significant development of collateral vessels in the pigs treated with AdGVVEGF121.10 compared with those receiving the control AdNull vector [7]. For the present study, the angiograms were reassessed to evaluate focal parameters of collateral development, including: (1) an index of collateral flow to the circumflex artery, quantified in a blinded fashion as described by Gibson and associates [18], and (2) the presence and location of a focal vascular plexus. The frame at which contrast initially filled the left anterior descending artery was assigned as frame 0. The cinefilm was then advanced until contrast was seen to initially fill the circumflex or obtuse marginal arteries, and the number of frames advanced to this stage was recorded. The presence or absence and the location of a vascular plexus (defined as at least three collateral vessels per centimeter) within or outside the region of vector administration was also analyzed for each pig.

Regional myocardial perfusion was assessed during rest and stress (rapid atrial pacing 200 beats/min) at the time of vector administration (day 0) and 28 days later utilizing 99mTc-sestamibi (Cardiolite; DuPont Pharma, N. Billerica, MA) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as previously described [7]. Prior analysis of these scans demonstrated significant improvement of blood flow with stress in the circumflex distribution with AdGVVEGF121.10 compared with AdNull animals [7]. For the present study, these scans were reassessed to evaluate the focal nature (circumflex distribution vs. septum) of the improvement in flow. To accomplish this, a multi-level semiquantitative visual interpretation of the SPECT images was performed on a subset of AdGVVEGF121.10 (n = 6) and AdNull (n = 4) pigs at both time points, as described by Hachamovitch and associates [19]. Three short-axis views were analyzed at rest and stress, at days 0 and 28 postvector, for each pig. Each segment was scored, in a blinded fashion, on a scale from 0 to 4 (0 = absent, 1 = severe reduction, 2 = moderate, 3 = equivocal, 4 = normal radioisotope uptake). The two contiguous sections with the best score (corresponding to the septum in all cases), and the two contiguous sections from each of the three levels with the worst score (corresponding to the circumflex territory in all cases), from rest and stress imaging were added together to generate, respectively, a summed rest and summed stress score for the septum and circumflex territories (0 = no perfusion, 24 = normal perfusion). The differences between these scores were calculated for the septum and circumflex territory for each pig at each time point. This "summed difference" score ("regional ischemia score") provides a measure of the extent and the severity of ischemia in each of these territories (0 = no ischemia, 24 = maximal ischemia).

Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with the {chi}2 test for categorical data and analysis of variance or Student’s t tests for continuous data, as appropriate. A paired Student’s t test was used for comparison of the same group at different time points. The Mann-Whitney nonparametric test was used if the data were not normally distributed. All values reported were expressed as the mean ± the standard error of the mean.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Persistence of AdGVVEGF121.10 vector genome and VEGF levels in rat myocardium
Twenty-four hours after intramyocardial administration of 1010pu of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector to the rat myocardium, myocardial Ad genome levels averaged four genome copies/cell DNA copies (Fig 1A). A gradual decrease in AdGVVEGF121.10 vector genome levels was observed after vector administration, with a 10% value of the day 1 level at 3 days, and less than 1% of the day 1 level 21 days after vector administration. Peak VEGF levels of 1 ng/mg protein were observed 24 to 72 hours after vector delivery in the heart (Fig 1B). Consistent with the decrease in Ad vector genome levels, the VEGF levels thereafter rapidly decreased 100-fold by days 14 to 21.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Rat myocardial Ad vector genome levels and VEGF levels over time after intramyocardial administration of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector. (A) Ad vector genome levels in the apical myocardium, as assessed by TaqMan, relative to the copies of cellular genome. (B) VEGF protein levels in the apical myocardium determined by ELISA expressed as nanograms of VEGF per milligram tissue protein. Values are expressed as the means ± standard error of three animals per data point.

 
Intracardiac distribution of ad genome and VEGF after intramyocardial or intracoronary vector delivery
Based upon the time course of VEGF expression observed in the rat, experiments designed to evaluate the intramyocardial localization of angiogen delivery were conducted comparing intracoronary and intramyocardial delivery to the porcine heart. One hour after intramyocardial delivery of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector, Ad genome levels in the circumflex distribution were more than 1,000-fold greater than the genome levels in the right ventricle or septum (p < 0.002, both comparisons; Fig 2A). Strikingly, the Ad genome level in the circumflex distribution after intramyocardial administration was 33-fold greater than that in the same distribution after direct circumflex coronary artery administration (p < 0.003, Figs 2A, 2B). Further, while intramyocardial administration yielded a dramatic focal distribution of the Ad vector, not only were myocardial Ad genome levels far lower after intracoronary compared with intramyocardial administration, but intracoronary administration yielded a diffuse Ad genome distribution, with the Ad genome levels in the circumflex territory similar to the Ad genome levels in the right ventricle and septum (p > 0.9; Fig 2B).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Myocardial Ad vector genome levels in the pig heart 1 h after intramyocardial or intracoronary administration of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector. The data are presented as the Ad vector genome levels relative to the copies of cellular genome. Values are expressed as the means ± standard error for n = 3 animals in each group. (A) Intramyocardial; (B) intracoronary.

 
Consistent with myocardial Ad vector levels, myocardial VEGF levels 1 day after vector administration in the circumflex distribution were ninefold greater after intramyocardial compared with intracoronary administration (2.8 ± 0.2 versus 0.3 ± 0.2 ng/mg, p < 0.0001; Figs 3A, 3B). Importantly, intramyocardial administration resulted in VEGF levels in the circumflex distribution 93- to 280-fold greater than that in the septal and right ventricular myocardium, respectively (circumflex distribution 2.8 ± 0.2 ng/mg versus septal 0.01 ± 0.01 ng/mg, p < 0.0001; versus right ventricular myocardium 0.03 ± 0.03 ng/mg, p < 0.0001; Fig 3A). In marked contrast, intracoronary administration failed to generate differentially enhanced VEGF levels within the circumflex distribution of the myocardium compared with the septum or right ventricle (p > 0.1, all comparisons; Fig 3B).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Myocardial VEGF levels in the pig heart 1 day after intramyocardial or intracoronary administration of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector. Myocardial biopsies were taken for VEGF levels, measured by ELISA, and expressed as nanograms of VEGF protein per milligram tissue protein. Values are expressed as the means ± standard error. (A). Intramyocardial; (B) intracoronary.

 
Angiographic evaluation of cardiac vascularity
Based upon the focal intramyocardial distribution of the Ad vector after direct intramyocardial administration, we reevaluated data previously acquired in a porcine myocardial ischemia model to assess the ability of intramyocardial AdGVVEGF121.10 vector administration to induce regional angiogenesis [7]. The angiographic index of collateral vessel flow to the circumflex territory in pigs receiving intramyocardial administration of AdGVVEGF121.10 was significantly reduced (p < 0.02) compared with AdNull-treated pigs, indicating more rapid collateral flow in the AdGVVEGF121.10-treated animals (Figs 4A, 4B). AdNull-treated pigs characteristically demonstrated minimal collateralization and little or no reconstitution of the circumflex or obtuse marginal coronary arteries (Fig 5A), whereas remarkably, AdGVVEGF121.10-treated pigs demonstrated almost complete circumflex coronary artery reconstitution via a dense plexus of collateral vessels that developed exclusively in the region of vector administration (Fig 5B). A vascular plexus of collateral vessels localized to the region of vector administration was evident in five out of six angiograms of AdGVVEGF121.10-treated pigs but was not observed in any of the AdNull-treated pigs (p < 0.004, Table 1). Importantly, no vascular plexuses were observed in any angiograms outside the area of AdGVVEGF121.10 administration, supporting the localized nature of the collateralization induced by intramyocardial administration of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Quantitative angiographic assessment of collateral flow to the region of administration of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector by ex vivo angiography. (A) Shown are representative frames 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60. Small arrows represent circumflex coronary artery, white arrowheads represent the left anterior descending coronary artery, and black arrowhead represents ameroid constrictor. (B) Index of collateral flow. Values are expressed as the means ± standard error for each group.

 


View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Representative ex vivo angiograms of pig hearts 28 days after intramyocardial administration of AdGVVEGF121.10 109 pfu or AdNull 109 pfu. (A) AdNull; LAD = left anterior descending artery; (B) AdGVVEGF121.10.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Assessment of Angiograms for the Presence of Plexus Formation Within and Outside of the Region of AdGVVEGF121.10 Administration

 
Evaluation of myocardial perfusion
As previously reported [7], 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT images generated for pigs receiving intramyocardial delivery of AdGVVEGF121.10 or AdNull showed that both groups typically demonstrated almost normal resting myocardial perfusion at the time of vector administration at day 0, with a characteristic perfusion defect corresponding to the circumflex territory at stress (Figs 6A–C). However, while the AdNull-treated pigs demonstrated persistence of this stress-induced defect 28 days after vector administration (Fig 6A), the AdGVVEGF121.10-treated pigs exhibited almost complete normalization of the stress-induced perfusion defect (Figs 6B, 6C).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Representative 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT images 28 days after intramyocardial administration of the AdGVVEGF121.10 or AdNull vector to the circumflex territory of the ischemic pig myocardium. Images were obtained at the time of vector administration (day 0) and after 28 days. (A) AdNull; (B and C) AdGVVEGF121.10; (D) semiquantitative 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging regional assessment of circumflex versus septal territory. Values are expressed as the means ± standard error for each group at days 0 and 28 after vector administration. (C = circumflex distribution of the left ventricle; S = septum; * regional ischemia score of zero.)

 
Semiquantitative analysis of these images at the time of vector administration demonstrated no differences in the regional ischemia score for the circumflex territory in AdGVVEGF121.10 and AdNull-treated pigs at day 0 (the time of vector administration, p > 0.4; Fig 6D). In contrast, AdGVVEGF121.10-treated pigs demonstrated significantly lower regional ischemia scores 28 days postvector compared with AdNull-treated animals (p < 0.009; Fig 6D), indicative of significant improvement in ischemia throughout the circumflex myocardial territory. Correspondingly, the circumflex regional ischemia scores in AdGVVEGF121.10-treated pigs was significantly improved from days 0 to 28 postvector (p < 0.002), whereas it was only minimally improved in AdNull-treated pigs (p > 0.1). Interestingly, the regional ischemia score for the septum was zero for animals in both groups at day 0 and at day 28, indicating that there was no stress-inducible septal perfusion defect at either time point. These data suggest that the enhancement in circumflex perfusion did not result from a "steal phenomenon" affecting the left anterior descending territory.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
This study demonstrates that intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing the VEGF121 cDNA results in self-limited expression of VEGF protein over approximately 7 days, a period demonstrated in a porcine myocardial ischemia model to be adequate to produce significant collateral vessel development [7]. Intramyocardial Ad vector-mediated gene therapy localizes the Ad vector to the region of myocardium in which the vector is administered, and consequently results in striking focal expression of VEGF in that myocardial territory. In contrast, intracoronary administration of the same Ad vector dose results in 33-fold less vector delivery and, concomitantly, 10-fold less VEGF expression in the ischemic territory, and spread of vector and VEGF throughout the myocardium. Consistent with the localized nature of intramyocardial delivery of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector, analysis of 99mTc-sestamibi scan and angiogram data from a previously reported porcine myocardial ischemia model demonstrates that Ad-mediated transfer of the VEGF121 cDNA to the region of ischemia enhances myocardial perfusion throughout the ischemic territory, via a distinctive pattern of collateral plexus formation. Consistent with the inducement of myocardial collaterals in the region of vector administration, 99mTc-sestamibi scans of the myocardium show that improvement in blood flow with stress is localized to the area of ischemia, with no evidence of "steal" from nonischemic myocardium.

Angiogen delivery options: choice of vector
A number of experimental animal studies have demonstrated that delivery of angiogens to the ischemic myocardium will improve blood flow and viability of the heart [2, 4, 5]. Many of these strategies have utilized some means of sustained angiogen delivery, including somewhat cumbersome catheter/reservoir-based and continuous infusion techniques, or the use of angiogen-impregnated sustained release polymers or biologic substrates [6]. Other strategies have utilized one-time intravascular administration of a protein angiogen, but these strategies have been associated with significant systemic adverse effects, such as the hypotension associated with VEGF administration [20], and the theoretical risk of promiscuous angiogenesis elsewhere in the body.

With the confirmation of the capability to induce some degree of angiogenesis in these studies, it is important to determine a means of optimally inducing localized angiogenesis with minimal angiogen dissemination, thereby reducing potential remote toxicity. Gene therapy strategies, whereby the single administration of an appropriate angiogen induces the sustained expression of the relevant gene product after transfection of the target cells at the site of ischemia, may represent an ideal means of providing biologic revascularization.

Our choice of an Ad vector-mediated delivery strategy for the treatment of cardiac ischemia is based on the specific characteristics of Ad vectors in regard to efficiency of vector delivery to the myocardium and to vector pharmacokinetics. Ad vectors are 103- to 104-fold more efficient in vivo (per transgene) at transfecting target cells than plasmid systems, and do not require replicating cells for transfection, as is the case with retroviral vectors [21]. Because the Ad vector genome remains in an epichromosomal position after transfection without integration into the host genome, the use of an Ad vector avoids the theoretical risk of host cell mutagenesis, which may be a concern with vectors that integrate into the host genome, such as retroviral and adeno-associated virus vectors [21, 22]. For the angiogenic therapy of ischemic heart disease, the goal is to produce sufficient collateral blood vessels to normalize blood flow to the ischemic territory, but not to produce pathologic angiogenesis, and not to generate collaterals in regions of the myocardium where they are not needed. In this regard, studies in experimental animals, and our human experience using Ad vectors to treat cystic fibrosis, have demonstrated that the Ad vectors of the design used in the present study will very effectively express a transgene in an internal organ, but the vector genome is progressively lost, limiting transgene expression to 1 to 2 weeks [14, 23]. While this poses a challenge for the treatment of hereditary disorders where persistent expression is necessary, it is ideal for the purposes of therapeutic angiogenesis, where induction of therapeutic angiogenesis requires only a limited duration of expression of the therapeutic gene. In this context, recent studies by Springer and associates [24] have shown that prolonged expression of the VEGF cDNA in skeletal muscle induces the formation of hemangiomas. Finally, an added advantage of the Ad vector is that the high affinity of the Ad vector for its receptor on the cell’s surface helps to localize the vector to the area of administration.

The mechanism that limits Ad vector persistence in the myocardium is not known. While anti-Ad cellular immune mechanisms may play a role [23], studies in pigs with myocardial ischemia show that administration of the AdGVVEGF121.10 vector is likely not associated with significant inflammation nor necrosis of the myocardium [25], suggesting that the mechanisms of vector elimination are complex, and not associated with significant loss of the myocardial cells to which the vector genome has been transferred.

Angiogen delivery options: choice of route
To date, two methods of administration have been utilized to deliver an Ad vector coding for an angiogenic gene to the ischemic myocardium: intracoronary and intramyocardial. The intracoronary strategy has been utilized in a porcine model of myocardial ischemia to deliver an Ad vector coding for the fibroblast growth factor-5 cDNA [4], and direct myocardial administration has been employed in a similar model to deliver an Ad vector coding for the VEGF121 cDNA [7]. Both methods have demonstrated efficacy in terms of myocardial revascularization, and both are feasible techniques for utilization in individuals with coronary artery disease.

The present study demonstrates that vector administration directly to porcine myocardium results in far superior vector genome localization in the treated myocardium than does intracoronary injection of the Ad vector. This in turn leads to greater localized VEGF expression, as evidenced by the greater local VEGF levels after intramyocardial versus intracoronary administration of angiogen. In this context, for the same amount of vector, direct myocardial administration provides markedly higher levels of VEGF where it is needed, and limits the VEGF expression to the areas where new collaterals develop. Although it is not known what minimal myocardial concentration of an angiogen will translate into clinical efficacy, it appears that intramyocardial as opposed to intracoronary delivery represents a means of limiting the total dose used, as well as focalizing angiogenic therapy, and thus potentially avoiding promiscuous angiogenesis at other sites [26].

Characterization of focal angiogenesis mediated by intramyocardial administration of the AdGVVEGF121.10 angiogen
Direct administration of an Ad vector coding for the cDNA for VEGF121 to the ischemic porcine myocardium induces the development of a plexus of collateral vessels localized to the region of vector delivery, with an associated brisk reconstitution of blood flow to the territory of an experimentally occluded coronary artery. Perfusion scans confirm that this biologic revascularization improves blood flow during myocardial stress throughout the ischemic territory. Importantly, the observation of persistence of normal perfusion in the left anterior descending territory, the source of collateral flow to the circumflex territory, suggests that biological revascularization does not induce a "steal" phenomenon rendering ischemic the myocardial territory that is the source of collateral flow. The near-normalization of blood flow and myocardial function demonstrated in this, and our previous analysis [7] suggests that complete reconstitution of flow is possible with angiogenic therapy, and that intramyocardial AdGVVEGF121.10 delivery may represent an optimal strategy to accomplish this in the clinical setting.

In conclusion, the primary significance of the observations in the present study is that direct myocardial Ad vector administration produces greater regional myocardial Ad vector genome localization than intracoronary administration. Consequently, transgene expression follows a similar pattern, resulting in high local VEGF concentrations of the transgene product. Such a strategy induces angiogenesis on a scale that nearly normalizes blood flow. These findings may be of importance in considering human trials of gene therapy-mediated cardiac angiogenesis.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Philip L. Leopold for assistance with scanned images and Nahla Mohamed in help for preparing this manuscript. These studies were supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL 57318); Cornell University Medical College General Clinical Research Center (NIH M01RR00047); the Jeffry M. and Barbara Picower Foundation, Palm Beach, FL; Will Rogers Memorial Fund, Los Angeles, CA; GenVec, Inc, Rockville, MD; and The Thoracic Surgery Research Foundation, Chicago, IL.


    Footnotes
 
1 Ronald G. Crystal and Todd K. Rosengart contributed equally as senior investigators in this study. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in ischemic heart disease deaths—United States, 1990–1994. JAMA 1997;277:1109.[Medline]
  2. Rosengart T.K., Patel S.R., Crystal R.G. Therapeutic angiogenesis. J Cardio Vasc Risk 1999;8:29-40.
  3. Hockel M., Schlenger K., Doctrow S., Kissel T., Vaupel P. Therapeutic angiogenesis. Arch Surg 1993;128:423-429.[Abstract]
  4. Giordano F.J., Ping P., McKirnan M.D., et al. Intracoronary gene transfer of fibroblast growth factor-5 increases blood flow and contractile function in an ischemic region of the heart. Nature Med 1996;2:534-539.[Medline]
  5. Lazarous D.F., Shou M., Scheinowitz M., et al. Comparative effects of basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor on coronary collateral development and the arterial response to injury. Circulation 1996;94:1074-1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sellke F.W., Li J., Stamler A., Lopez J.J., Thomas K.A., Simons M. Angiogenesis induced by acidic fibroblast growth factor as an alternative method of revascularization for chronic myocardial ischemia. Surgery 1996;120:182-188.[Medline]
  7. Mack C.A., Patel S.R., Schwarz E.A., et al. Biologic bypass with the use of adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of the complementary deoxyribonucleic acid for vascular endothelial growth factor 121 improves myocardial perfusion and function in the ischemic porcine heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:168-177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gospodarowicz D., Abraham J.A., Schilling J. Isolation and characterization of a vascular endothelial cell mitogen produced by pituitary-derived folliculo stellate cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:7311-7315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Houck K.A., Ferrara N., Winer J., Cachianes G., Li B., Leung D.W. The vascular endothelial growth factor family. Mol Endocrinol 1991;5:1806-1814.[Medline]
  10. Olofsson B., Pajusola K., Kaipainen A., et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor b, a novel growth factor for endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:2576-2581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chilov D., Kukk E., Taira S., et al. Genomic organization of human and mouse genes for vascular endothelial growth factor c. J Biol Chem 1997;272:25176-25183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Shibuya M., Yamaguchi S., Yamane A., Ikeda T., Tojo A., Matsushime H., Sato M. Nucleotide sequence and expression of a novel human receptor-type tyrosine kinase gene (flt) closely related to the fms family. Oncogene 1990;5:519-524.[Medline]
  13. Ferrara N., Houck K., Jakeman L., Leung D.W. Molecular and biological properties of the vascular endothelial growth factor family of proteins. Endocr Rev 1992;13:18-32.[Medline]
  14. Magovern C.J., Mack C.A., Zhang J., et al. Direct in vivo gene transfer to canine myocardium using a replication-deficient adenovirus vector. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:425-434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Isner J.M., Pieczek A., Schainfeld R., et al. Clinical evidence of angiogenesis after arterial gene transfer of phVEGF165 in patient with ischaemic limb. Lancet 1996;348:370-374.[Medline]
  16. Hersh J., Crystal R.G., Bewig B. Modulation of gene expression after replication-deficient, recombinant adenovirus-mediated gene transfer by the product of a second adenovirus vector. Gene Ther 1995;2:124-131.[Medline]
  17. Heid C.A., Stevens J., Livak K.J., Williams P.M. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res 1996;6:986-994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gibson C.M., Cannon C.P., Daley W.L., et al. TIMI frame count. Circulation 1996;93:879-888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hachamovitch R., Berman D.S., Kiat H., et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion spect in patients without known coronary artery disease. Circulation 1996;93:905-914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Yang R.H., Thomas G.R., Bunting S., et al. Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor on hemodynamics and cardiac performance. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1996;27:838-844.[Medline]
  21. Crystal R.G. Transfer of genes to humans. Science 1995;270:404-410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Anderson W.F. Human gene therapy. Science 1992;256:808-813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wilson J.M. Adenoviruses as gene-delivery vehicles. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1185-1187.[Free Full Text]
  24. Springer M.L., Chen A.S., Kraft P.E., Bednarski M., Blau H.M. VEGF gene delivery to muscle. Mol Cell 1998;2:549-558.[Medline]
  25. Patel S.R., Lee L.Y., Mack C.A., et al. Safety of direct myocardial administration of an adenovirus vector coding for vascular endothelial growth factor 121. Hum Gene Ther 1999;11:1331-1348.
  26. Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nature Med 1995;1:27-31.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
Y. Zhou, Y. Jiang, and Y. J. Kang
A BRIEF COMMUNICATION: Copper Inhibition of Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Hypertrophy in Embryonic Rat Cardiac H9c2 Cells
Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2007; 232(3): 385 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-S. Choi, K.-B. Kim, W. Han, D. S. Kim, J. S. Park, J. J. Lee, and D. S. Lee
Efficacy of Therapeutic Angiogenesis by Intramyocardial Injection of pCK-VEGF165 in Pigs
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 679 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. M. Yau, C. Kim, D. Ng, G. Li, Y. Zhang, R. D. Weisel, and R.-K. Li
Increasing Transplanted Cell Survival With Cell-Based Angiogenic Gene Therapy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1779 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. A. Horvath, C. Y. J. Lu, E. Robert, G. F. Pierce, R. Greene, B. A. Sosnowski, and J. Doukas
Improvement of myocardial contractility in a porcine model of chronic ischemia using a combined transmyocardial revascularization and gene therapy approach
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1071 - 1077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
L.G Melo, M Gnecchi, A.S Pachori, K Wang, and V.J Dzau
Gene- and cell-based therapies for cardiovascular diseases: current status and future directions
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2004; 6(suppl_E): E24 - E35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
L. Ye, H. K Haider, S.-J. Jiang, and E. K. Sim
Therapeutic Angiogenesis Using Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2004; 12(2): 173 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
L. G. MELO, A. S. PACHORI, D. KONG, M. GNECCHI, K. WANG, R. E. PRATT, and V. J. DZAU
Gene and cell-based therapies for heart disease
FASEB J, April 1, 2004; 18(6): 648 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Schalch, G. F. Rahman, G. Patejunas, R. A. Goldschmidt, J. Carbray, M. A. Retuerto, D. Kim, K. Esser, R. G. Crystal, and T. K. Rosengart
Adenoviral-mediated transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor 121 cDNA enhances myocardial perfusion and exercise performance in the nonischemic state
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 535 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Hiraoka, H. Koike, S. Yamamoto, N. Tomita, C. Yokoyama, T. Tanabe, T. Aikou, T. Ogihara, Y. Kaneda, and R. Morishita
Enhanced Therapeutic Angiogenesis by Cotransfection of Prostacyclin Synthase Gene or Optimization of Intramuscular Injection of Naked Plasmid DNA
Circulation, November 25, 2003; 108(21): 2689 - 2696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Vassalli, S. Fleury, J. Li, J.-J. Goy, L. Kappenberger, and L. K. von Segesser
Gene transfer of cytoprotective and immunomodulatory molecules for prevention of cardiac allograft rejection
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 24(5): 794 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. H. Kown, T. Suzuki, M. L. Koransky, K. Penta, G. Sakamoto, C. L. Jahncke, A. J. Carter, T. Quertermous, and R. C. Robbins
Comparison of developmental endothelial locus-1 angiogenic factor with vascular endothelial growth factor in a porcine model of cardiac ischemia
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1246 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
M. Ruel, R. A. Kelly, and F. W. Sellke
Therapeutic Angiogenesis, Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization, and Cell Therapy
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 715 - 750.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Funatsu, Y. Sawa, S. Ohtake, T. Takahashi, G. Matsumiya, N. Matsuura, T. Nakamura, and H. Matsuda
Therapeutic angiogenesis in the ischemic canine heart induced by myocardial injection of naked complementary DNA plasmid encoding hepatocyte growth factor
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2002; 124(6): 1099 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. A. Horvath, J. Doukas, C.-Y. J. Lu, N. Belkind, R. Greene, G. F. Pierce, and D. A. Fullerton
Myocardial functional recovery after fibroblast growth factor 2 gene therapy as assessed by echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 74(2): 481 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. Leotta, G. Patejunas, G. Murphy, J. Szokol, L. McGregor, J. Carbray, A. Hamawy, D. Winchester, N. Hackett, R. Crystal, et al.
Gene therapy with adenovirus-mediated myocardial transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor 121 improves cardiac performance in a pacing model of congestive heart failure
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2002; 123(6): 1101 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. B. Freedman and J. M. Isner
Therapeutic Angiogenesis for Coronary Artery Disease
Ann Intern Med, January 1, 2002; 136(1): 54 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Lu, J. Shansky, M. Del Tatto, P. Ferland, X. Wang, and H. Vandenburgh
Recombinant Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Secreted From Tissue-Engineered Bioartificial Muscles Promotes Localized Angiogenesis
Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 594 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Su, R. Lu, and Y. W. Kan
Adeno-associated viral vector-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer induces neovascular formation in ischemic heart
PNAS, November 22, 2000; (2000) 250488097.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
S. L. Meyerson, C. L. Skelly, M. A. Curi, and L. B. Schwartz
Gene Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 289 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. Tanaka, N. Hattan, K. Ando, H. Ueno, Y. Sugio, M. U. Mohammed, S. A. Voltchikhina, and H. Mori
Amelioration of microvascular myocardial ischemia by gene transfer of vascular endothelial growth factor in rabbits
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2000; 120(4): 720 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. Baffi, G. Byrnes, C.-C. Chan, and K. G. Csaky
Choroidal Neovascularization in the Rat Induced by Adenovirus Mediated Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2000; 41(11): 3582 - 3589.
[Abstract]