|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:115-120
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
Address reprint requests to Dr Shimamoto, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Mie University School of Medicine, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan
e-mail: jj6jdv{at}clin.medic.mie-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. The 32 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were divided into 3 groups: group A (n = 10), heparin-coated circuit with silicone-coated oxygenator; group B (n = 11), whole heparin-coated circuit; and group C (n = 11), whole untreated circuit. The plasma concentrations of the proinflammatory markers, made of inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-
, interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, interleukin-8), terminal complement complex (C5b-9), and polymorphonuclear elastase (PMN-E), were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay.
Results. All proinflammatory markers were significantly lower in groups A and B than in group C, especially C5b-9 and PMN-E concentrations, which were significantly lower in group A than in group B. The alveolar-arterial oxygen gradients (A-aDO2) and the respiratory index were significantly better in group A than in group C. In group B, however, only the A-aDO2 was significantly better than in group C. The duration of intubation and the length of stay in the intensive care unit stay were significantly shorter in groups A and B than in group C.
Conclusions. Silicone-coated oxygenators are biocompatible and prevent postoperative organ dysfunction.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[TNF-
], interleukin [IL]-1ß, IL-6, and IL-8), terminal complement complex (C5b-9), and polymorphonuclear elastase (PMN-E) concentrations following CPB to analyze the biocompatibility of the silicone-coated oxygenator with respect to its effect on the systemic inflammatory response. | Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The anesthesia and CPB techniques were standardized. After premedication, general anesthesia was induced and maintained with a high dose of fentanyl (0.1 mg/kg), nitrous oxide, and vecuronium bromide. The extracorporeal circuit and the oxygenator were primed with 1.6 L of 20% D-manitol (5 mL/kg), 6% hydroxyethyl starch (5 mL/kg), and Ringers lactate solution without blood. Nonpulsatile extracorporeal circulation was initiated at a perfusion index of 2.4 L/min/m2 body surface area using a roller pump (Mera MSH-15: Senko Medical Instrument Mfg, Tokyo, Japan or Gambro HL-10: Jostra Medizintechnik GmbH & Co KG, Hirrlingen, Germany). After administration of an initial prebypass bolus dose of heparin (300 IU/kg), whole blood activated clotting time was maintained at greater than 400 seconds for the entire duration of CPB with intermittent intravenous heparin administration. The operative procedures were performed under moderate whole body hypothermia, with the rectal temperature maintained between 28° and 32°C. Myocardial protection was provided by injecting cold blood cardioplegic solution (4°C) supplemented with ice slush for topical hypothermia every 20 minutes. After CPB, protamine sulfate (4.5 mg/kg) was administered.
Blood was withdrawn from an indwelling arterial cannula into a sterile tube containing EDTA (VACUTAINER 367661; Becton Dickinson VACUTAINER System, Rutherford, NJ) at the following times: before CPB; 5 minutes and 1 hour after the start of CPB; immediately after CPB; 1 hour, and 3 hours after the termination of CPB; and on the first postoperative days. Plasma samples were separated immediately by centrifugation (3000 rpm) for 15 minutes at 4°C. They were then stored at -80°C until measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (TNF-
and IL-1ß: BioSource Europe S.A., Nivelles, Belgium; IL-6 and IL-8: TFB Inc, Tokyo, Japan; C5b-9: Quidel, San Diego, CA; PMN-E: E Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The limits of sensitivity were 0.6 pg/mL (TNF-
), 6.3 pg/mL (IL-1ß), 3.8 pg/mL (IL-6), 1.1 pg/mL (IL-8), 16 ng/mL (C5b-9), and 20 ng/mL (PMN-E). All results reported means from duplicate measurements. Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines were corrected for hemodilution.
All parameters are expressed as the mean values ± the standard deviation. Repeated measures of the analysis of variance were performed to examine group differences over time. The students t-test was performed to evaluate differences at the same times between groups. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|

increased 1 hour after the start of CPB, reaching a peak 1 hour after the termination of CPB (Fig 1). Thereafter, the concentrations swiftly declined, and in groups A and B had decreased to levels similar to those measured before CPB by the first postoperative day. Concentrations were significantly lower in groups A and B than in group C at all times beginning 1 hour after the start of CPB (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between groups A and B at any time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cytokines act as mediators of CPB-induced injury by promoting neutrophil-related damage to the microcirculation. Production of IL-1ß stimulates the synthesis of the cell adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, promoting neutrophil and monocyte adhesion [3]. TNF-
promotes leukocyte adhesion in a manner similar to IL-1ß, which results in a marked activation of leukocytes resulting in degranulation [10]. Plasma TNF-
and IL-1ß have been detected during CPB in some studies [11, 12], but not in others [13, 14]. In our study, circulating TNF-
and IL-1ß were detected. The short half-life of TNF-
and IL-1ß, the presence of soluble receptors, and differences in the methods of cytokine measurement used may explain the discrepancies between studies [13].
IL-6 is a major promoter of the acute phase response and serum levels of it have been shown to be a marker for the severity of tissue damage [15]. In the present study, IL-6 release was significantly lower in the silicone-coated and heparin-coated groups compared with the uncoated group. No significant differences were noted between the silicone-coated and heparin-coated groups. This implies the induction of a less severe acute-phase response, and suggests a lesser degree of tissue trauma in the silicone-coated and heparin-coated groups compared to the uncoated group.
IL-8 is an extremely potent chemoattractant for neutrophils. Inducing pulmonary or myocardial sequestration of neutrophils could contribute to endothelial injury and capillary leak after CPB [16, 17]. IL-8 is thought to regulate the degree of neutrophil-mediated injury, thus giving it a potentially major role in the tissue damage seen during CPB [16]. As with IL-6, there were no significant differences in IL-8 release between the silicone-coated and heparin-coated groups, although the release was significantly less than that in the uncoated group.
It has been recommended that the biocompatibility of extracorporeal circuits be assessed by the degree of complement activation, particularly C5b-9 [18]. In some studies, the lower C5b-9 concentration in the heparin-coated CPB might be accounted for by direct binding to the heparin-coated circuit [19]. The C5b-9, however, could not be bound to the silicone-coated surface. In our study, therefore, the significant decrease in the C5b-9 concentration in the silicone-coated group suggests that the silicone-coated oxygenator is more biocompatibile in terms of surface activation.
As in C5b-9, the release of PMN-E was significantly lower in the silicone-coated group compared with the heparin-coated group. Polymorphonuclear elastase is released from activated neutrophils induced by IL-8 or C5b-9 [16, 20]. In our study, however, this difference failed to achieve significance in terms of IL-8 release, though the release of C5b-9 and PMN-E was significantly less in the silicone-coated group than in the heparin-coated group. This finding may be due to the fact that ischemia-reperfusion, the main stimulus for IL-8 release, occurred equally in both groups.
Heparin bonding to bypass circuits has been found to reduce bleeding complications. Here, this process is reviewed with special attention to markers of inflammation and clinical outcome. Indicators of inflammation are decreased when using heparin-bonded circuits compared with conventional bypass circuits [13, 14]. The decrease in the levels of these response modifiers appears minimal, while clinical outcomes using this technology, other than bleeding complications, have not been studied to any great extent [21, 22]. However, our study demonstrated that the use of heparin-coated bypass circuits, which were limited in the Duraflo, significantly reduced not only plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines but also duration of intubation or intensive care unit stay.
Of the components of the bypass circuit, the membrane oxygenator results in the greatest activation. Recently, a new membrane oxygenator (Mera Excelung Binding Prime) composed of microporous polypropylene hollow fibers, was developed by Senko Medical Instrument Mfg (Tokyo, Japan). It costs almost the same as a heparin-coated oxygenator in Japan. The blood contact surface of the hollow fiber is coated with a 0.2 µm ultra-thin silicone layer (cyclosiloxane) based on IVOX (intravenacaval oxygenator) fiber technology (Cardiopulmonics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT) [23]. Silicone has the best gas transfer properties for macromolecular compounds. However, the gas transfer ability of the silicone hollow fiber oxygenator is not adequate because of the thick homogenous membrane of the silicone fiber. Durability has been a problem with microporous polypropylene hollow fiber oxygenators with or without heparin coating because plasma leakage occurs with prolonged use. We have already evaluated gas transfer and hemolysis with the use of this new oxygenator on veno-arterial extracorporeal circulation in animals [4]. This new oxygenator is more durable than the previous generation of polypropylene hollow fiber oxygenators, and offers greater gas transfer capabilities than the previously developed silicone fiber oxygenators [5]. Theoretically, the silicone coating of the new oxygenator also could reduce the contact activation of blood-borne materials through two mechanisms. First, silicone itself has good biocompatibility. Gemmel and colleagues [24] have performed basic research to elucidate the biocompatibility of three different biomaterials (silicone, polyethylene, and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel). They have concluded that silicone is more biocompatible for platelets than the other biomaterials. Secondly, the silicone coating completely prevents contact between blood and gas. The direct blood and gas interface activates the complement system. We have also reported that silicone-coated oxygenator biocompatibility for platelets, the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, and granulocytes is at least as good as that of heparin-coated oxygenator [6]. We therefore designed this study to measure the clinical potential of a silicone-coated oxygenator to reduce proinflammatory markers during CPB.
Silicone-coated oxygenators suppress the release of proinflammatory markers as well or better than heparin-coated oxygenators. The preservation of postoperative respiratory function was equivalent with the silicone-coated and heparin-coated oxygenators. Moreover, silicone-coated oxygenators were associated with a short duration of intubation and a shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit compared to the control group. Silicone-coated oxygenators are biocompatibile, and prevent postoperative organ dysfunction.
We suggest that silicone-coated oxygenator which has better durability than heparin-coated oxygenator does is suitable for prolonged CPB and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support, and further evaluation of the performance of this oxygenator for prolonged use will be necessary.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Mangoush, S. Purkayastha, S. Haj-Yahia, J. Kinross, M. Hayward, F. Bartolozzi, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou Heparin-bonded circuits versus nonheparin-bonded circuits: an evaluation of their effect on clinical outcomes Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1058 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Taneja and D. C. Cheng Con: Heparin-Bonded Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits Should Be Routine for All Cardiac Surgical Procedures Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1370 - 1372. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G Raja and G. D Dreyfus Modulation of Systemic Inflammatory Response after Cardiac Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2005; 13(4): 382 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-C. Hsu Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: current status Perfusion, September 1, 2001; 16(5): 417 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Suhara, Y. Sawa, M. Nishimura, H. Oshiyama, K. Yokoyama, N. Saito, and H. Matsuda Efficacy of a new coating material, PMEA, for cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in a porcine model Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1603 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Li, S. Chen, E. Lu, and W. Luo Cardiac ischemic preconditioning improves lung preservation in valve replacement operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 631 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |