|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:113-114
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Barner, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 3108 Queeny Tower, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63108
e-mail: barnerh{at}msnotes.wustl.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. We compared RA harvest using standard techniques (21 RA) with ultrasonic dissection (41 RA) in which all branches were divided between clips with scissors in the former and bleeding branches were clipped in the latter.
Results. Harvest times were not different. Conventional technique used 74 ± 18 (mean ± standard deviation) clips versus 3.2 ± 4.3 clips (p < 0.001). In situ free flow was 17.2 ± 20.7 mL/min for conventional technique versus 52.5 ± 48.1 for ultrasonic (p < 0.001). Free flow after the proximal anastomosis to the left internal thoracic artery was 38.5 ± 60.4 mL/min for conventional technique and 50.7 ± 29.6 for ultrasonic (p = 0.008). Free flow 10 minutes after intraluminal papaverine was 78.5 ± 45.9 mL/min for usual technique versus 102.8 ± 51.7 for ultrasonic (p = 0.016). No patient required reoperation for bleeding.
Conclusions. Ultrasonic dissection of the RA is associated with decreased RA spasm, good hemostasis, no additional harvest time, and has become our standard technique.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical technique
The RA was usually harvested from the nondominant arm after a negative (capillary refilling within 10 seconds) Allen test. The skin incision allowed harvest of the RA from its origin to the wrist crease. The skin was sharply incised, and low current electrocautery used for the subcutaneous tissue and the deep fascia in the proximal half of the incision, with the distal deep fascia incised with scissors. A self-retaining retractor was placed to separate the brachioradialis and flexor carpi radialis muscles and a silastic vessel loop was placed around the RA pedicle to include the RA venous comitantes and fatty areolar tissue. Placement of the vessel loop did not result in apparent spasm.
The subsequent dissection differed for the two groups. The 21 patients in the conventional harvest group underwent mobilization of the RA pedicle using a combination of blunt and sharp dissection with control of vessel branches using two clips and division of the branches with scissors.
The 41 patients with ultrasonic harvest had dissection of the RA pedicle with the hook blade (sharp pointed hook, HS2) using the variable mode at moderate intensity. RA branches that bled during or after transection were controlled with small clips.
Topical vasodilators were not used during RA harvest. After harvest, the RAs from both groups were placed in a 60 mL medicine glass containing 30 mL heparinized blood and 60 mg of papaverine for 5 minutes before anastomosis of the RA to the left ITA.
Data collection
The time from skin incision to complete harvest of the RA was recorded. The number of clip guns (20 clips per gun) used for each conventional harvest and the number of individual clips used for each ultrasonic harvest were recorded.
RA free flow was measured at three intervals: while in situ but completely mobilized with distal division; after completion of the proximal anastomosis to the left internal thoracic artery before cardiopulmonary bypass; and 10 minutes after filling the RA with heparinized blood containing papaverine 2 mg/mL blood, before cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood was collected for one minute at the initial measurement and for 30 seconds at the subsequent ones and measured with a syringe.
We also determined the need for clipping RA branches during later stages of the operation and the need for reoperation for bleeding.
Results
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviations. Harvest times were comparable for standard technique (48.4 ± 17.6 min) and ultrasonic dissection (43.6 ± 17.6 min), p = not significant.
Standard harvest required 3.7 ± 0.9 clip guns (20 clips per gun) for each conduit and ultrasonic harvest utilized 3.2 ± 4.3 clips (includes clips placed during harvesting and subsequently) for each RA (Table 1).
|
No patient required reoperation for bleeding. Hypoperfusion was not recognized intraoperatively or postoperatively.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Spasm occurs with harvesting of all arterial and venous conduits and appears to be related to mechanical and thermal trauma. Although ultrasonic dissection is associated with transformation of mechanical to thermal energy and protein denaturation there is less heat generated than with electrocautery. We carefully avoided use of electrocautery near the RA and used it minimally during the entire dissection. One would conclude from these data that dissection of the branches and clip application induces more trauma (and spasm) than does dividing of branches with the ultrasonic dissecting hook.
We had previously believed that intraluminal papaverine and 10 minutes of exposure would result in near maximal RA dilation [3]. Our data indicate that dilatation is not maximal, at least after conventional dissection, with this management. This would suggest that our pharmacologic management is not optimal or our technique of dissection can be improved.
We have never used calcium channel blocking agents for management of RA spasm, as we believe that their use emanated from the first report on an empirical basis [1]. There is now evidence to support nonuse of these agents [4, 5]. Similarly, we have not used hydrostatic dilation because intraluminal pressure is difficult to quantitate, and if excessive may lead to endothelial or mural injury [6]. This modality was used together with probe dilation in the early experience with the RA and may have contributed to conduit failure.
We believe there is indeed reduced RA spasm when the technique of ultrasonic dissection is utilized and this has become our standard practice.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. S. Brazio, P. C. Laird, C. Xu, J. Gu, N. S. Burris, E. N. Brown, Z. N. Kon, and R. S. Poston Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery for harvest of radial artery conduits: Reduced risk of spasm and intimal injury on optical coherence tomography. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1302 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gongora and T. M. Sundt III Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 599 - 632. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pektok, M. Cikirikcioglu, C. Engin, G. Daglioz, Z. Ozcan, and H. Posacioglu Does harvesting of an internal thoracic artery with an ultrasonic scalpel have an effect on sternal perfusion? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 442 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, O. Tagusari, K. Niwaya, T. Funatsu, A. Brik, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura Graft design strategies with optimum antegrade bypass flow in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 31(2): 276 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cikirikcioglu and H. Posacioglu HARMONIC SCALPEL HAS ACUTE BENEFICIAL EFFECTS DURING RADIAL ARTERY HARVESTING Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, February 1, 2006; 14(1): 89 - 90. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Shapira, B. R. Eskenazi, E. Anter, L. Joseph, T. G. Christensen, C. T. Hunter, H. L. Lazar, J. A. Vita, R. J. Shemin, and J. F. Keaney Jr Endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: Functional and histologic assessment of the conduit J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2006; 131(2): 388 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Patel, S. Asopa, and J. Dunning Does radial artery harvest with a harmonic scalpel result in fewer complications than standard electrocautery methods? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2006; 5(1): 36 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Luciani, A. Anselmi, M. Gaudino, G. Nasso, F. Glieca, L. Martinelli, F. Santarelli, M. Perisano, and G. Possati Harmonic Scalpel Reduces Bleeding and Postoperative Complications in Redo Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 934 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hata, M. Shiono, A. Sezai, M. Iida, A. Saitoh, T. Hattori, S. Wakui, M. Soeda, N. Negishi, and Y. Sezai Determining the best procedure for radial artery harvest: Prospective randomized trial for early postharvest complications J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2005; 129(4): 885 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Affleck, H. B. Barner, M. S. Bailey, L. A. Perry, H. Maniar, S. M. Prasad, and R. J. Damiano Jr Flow Dynamics of the Internal Thoracic and Radial Artery T-Graft Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1290 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Tagusari, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, H. Nakajima, T. Nakatani, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Revascularization of the Total Coronary System: Clinical Outcome and Angiographic Evaluation Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1304 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.P. Casselman, M. La Meir, G. Cammu, F. Wellens, R. De Geest, I. Degrieck, F. Van Praet, Y. Vermeulen, and H. Vanermen Initial experience with an endoscopic radial artery harvesting technique J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2004; 128(3): 463 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, O. Tagusari, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, and S. Kitamura Competitive flow in arterial composite grafts and effect of graft arrangement in Off-Pump coronary revascularization Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 481 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Moon, H. B. Barner, M. S. Bailey, J. S. Lawton, N. Moazami, M. K. Pasque, and R. J. Damiano Jr Long-term neurologic hand complications after radial artery harvesting using conventional cold and harmonic scalpel techniques Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 535 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Patel, A. C. Henry, C. Hunnicutt, C. A. Cockerham, B. Willey, and H. C. Urschel Jr Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 149 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rukosujew, R. Reichelt, A. M. Fabricius, G. Drees, T. D. T. Tjan, M. Rothenburger, A. Hoffmeier, H. H. Scheld, and C. Schmid Skeletonization versus pedicle preparation of the radial artery with and without the ultrasonic scalpel Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 120 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Maruo, C. E. Hamner, A. J. Rodrigues, T. Higami, J. F. Greenleaf, and H. V. Schaff Nitric oxide and prostacyclin in ultrasonic vasodilatation of the canine internal mammary artery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 126 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Connolly, L. D. Torrillo, M. J. Stauder, N. U. Patel, J. C. McCabe, D. F. Loulmet, and V. A. Subramanian Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: results of first 300 patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 74(2): 502 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Meharwal and N. Trehan Routine Use of the Radial Artery for Coronary Artery Revascularization Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2002; 10(1): 20 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Galajda, I. Szentkiralyi, and A. Peterffy Neurologic complications after radial artery harvesting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2002; 123(1): 194 - 195. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lamm, G. Juchem, A. Schutz, and B. Reichart Is the harmonic scalpel feasible in cardiac reoperations? Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2185 - 2185. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Meharwal and N. Trehan Functional status of the hand after radial artery harvesting: results in 3,977 cases Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): 1557 - 1561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Quigley, S. J. Weiss, R. Y. Highbloom, and J. Pym Creative arterial bypass grafting can be performed on the beating heart Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 793 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. CikirikcioGlu, M. Yasa, Z. Kerry, H. PosacioGlu, M. BoGa, T. YaGdi, N. TopcuoGlu, S. Buket, and A. Hamulu The effects of the Harmonic Scalpel on the vasoreactivity and endothelial integrity of the radial artery: A comparison of two different techniques J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2001; 122(3): 624 - 626. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Taggart, M. N. Mathur, and I. Ahmad Skeletonization of the radial artery: advantages over the pedicled technique Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 298 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |