|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:815-817
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
b Department of Anesthesiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
c Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
Accepted for publication August 17, 1998.
Address reprint requests to Dr Iwasaki, Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193 Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. The fold plication method was devised to prevent postoperative air leaks to avoid interstitial pneumonia, and to decrease cost. This technique was applied in 20 consecutive patients with emphysema who underwent a unilateral lung volume reduction operation via a thoracoscopic two windows approach.
Results. The operative time was approximately 1 hour. There was minimal postoperative bleeding, no persistent air leaks, and no evidence of pneumonia. Pulmonary function improved in all patients.
Conclusions. The unilateral fold plication method is an economical and safe alternative to bovine pericardial patching after lung volume reduction operation to prevent stump air leaks.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ideal surgical approach to pulmonary emphysema is currently a subject of much debate. Many authors have reported methods to treat pulmonary air leaks, but no standard has been established. Because the aim of the surgical treatment of emphysema is improvement of pulmonary function, attempts have been made to minimize the invasiveness of the procedure [4]. The most significant postoperative complication is a pulmonary air leak.
Overcoming or avoiding an air leak leads to early rehabilitation. Initially, bovine pericardium was used to prevent pulmonary leaks. However, some patients developed interstitial pneumonia at the pulmonary resection lines, resulting in subsequent loss of pulmonary function. We developed a surgical technique to prevent air leaks after LVRO that did not use bovine pericardium but involved fold plication.
A thoracoscopic two windows method [5] was used because it was less invasive than a median sternotomy. Swanson and associates [6] reported good results of the thoracoscopic plication method for LVRO. There are some differences between their plication method and our fold plication method.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The operative time, blood loss, period of continuous postoperative air leakage, length of hospital stay, and change in pulmonary function were assessed in each patient. The operation was performed thoracoscopically using the two windows method on one lung during unilateral pulmonary ventilation with the patient in the lateral position. A scalpelless END-S-GIA 60-4.8 automatic suture device (United States Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, CT) was used for fold plication. The target zone was determined on the basis of pulmonary ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and findings on computed tomography. Fold plication was performed by first exerting traction on the apex of the target zone. END-S-GIAs were positioned on the right and left so that there was no gap between the tips of the instruments. The staplers were then fired (Fig 1). The peripheral side was folded so that the staple line became the apex of the fold. After folding again, an END-S-GIA was fired at the more central target zone, including the folded margin (Fig 2).
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Complications occurred in only 1 patient who had sudden pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema on postoperative day 7. Reoperation revealed a ruptured pulmonary cyst in the lower lobe, unrelated to the operative site.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The fold plication method was devised for LVRO as an alternative to bovine pericardial patching after partial resection of the lung. Bovine pericardium was first used by Cooper and colleagues [3]. Initially we performed partial resection of the lung followed by bovine pericardial patching. However, in two of our patients intractable interstitial pneumonia developed at the location of the bovine pericardial patches 3 months postoperatively. By coincidence, in both patients a portion of the partial resection line was covered by bovine pericardium and a portion was not. High-resolution computed tomography revealed that the interstitial pneumonia occurred only along the partial resection lines covered by bovine pericardium. This complication occurred even though the pericardium was washed thoroughly to prevent the preservation fluid from causing a tissue reaction. In these patients, the initial improvements in pulmonary function were eventually lost as a result of the interstitial pneumonia. For this reason and because they are expensive, we no longer use bovine pericardial patches.
It was necessary to devise a method to perform LVRO at sites of pulmonary emphysema that are technically difficult to reach via median sternotomy. The fold plication method makes LVRO possible at virtually any target zone. Furthermore, fold plication is more economical than other methods with respect to equipment and prosthetic material costs, shorter hospital stays, and shorter rehabilitation periods. Lung volume reduction operations using the fold plication method is a simple technique that can be performed by any thoracoscopic surgeon. Moreover, we have shown the safety of fold plication in experimental models of lung transplantation in beagles since 1993. In those studies, the surfaces of the transplanted lungs that were subjected to fold plication became smooth and integrated with the adjacent tissue when the plicated lung was absorbed about 3 months later. The fold plication method, which prevents air leaks by mechanically sealing the peripheral lung from the central lung, is safe, effective, and economical. Because it is minimally invasive, it should become the method of choice for LVRO in patients with pulmonary emphysema.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Adluri and J. M. Parmar Use the bulla for pneumostasis Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 19 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Maxfield New and Emerging Minimally Invasive Techniques for Lung Volume Reduction Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 777 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Provencher and J. Deslauriers Late complication of bovine pericardium patches used for lung volume reduction surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 1059 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Oey and D. A. Waller Metalloptysis: a late complication of lung volume reduction surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1694 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |