ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Milo Engoren
Anoar Zacharias
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engoren, M.
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Engoren, M.
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:661-665
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles

Variables predicting reintubation after cardiac surgical procedures

Milo Engoren, MDa, Nancy Fenn Buderer, MSb, Anoar Zacharias, MDc, Robert H. Habib, PhDc

a Department of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine, Saint Vincent Mercy Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA
b Department of Research, Saint Vincent Mercy Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA
c Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Saint Vincent Mercy Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA

Accepted for publication August 5, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Dr Engoren, Department of Anesthesiology, Saint Vincent Mercy Medical Center, 2213 Cherry St, Toledo, OH 43608
e-mail: engoren{at}pol.net


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. This study sought to determine patient characteristics, processes of care, and intermediate outcomes as predictors of reintubation after cardiac surgical procedures.

Methods. We performed a retrospective case-control study that included all patients undergoing cardiac surgical intervention who required reintubation and an equal number of control patients not requiring reintubation. Putative risk factors were analyzed univariately by {chi}2, Fisher exact, Student’s t, or Mann-Whitney tests. A logistic regression model was developed using data from patients requiring reintubation for cardiorespiratory reasons.

Results. Of the 1,000 consecutive patients reviewed, 41 (4.1%) required reintubation (30 [3%] for cardiorespiratory reasons and 11 [1.1] for unplanned operations). Univariate predictors of reintubation (p < 0.05) were older age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, New York Heart Association functional class IV, preoperative renal failure, lower arterial oxygen tension, insertion of intraaortic balloon pump, longer time in the operating room, longer duration of cardiopulmonary bypass times, positive fluid balance, postoperative renal failure, and worse pulmonary mechanics. Patients requiring reintubation also required a longer initial period of mechanical ventilation (median, 16.3 versus 6.0 hours; p < 0.05). Excellent prediction was found with a model consisting of four variables: operating room time, respiratory rate, vital capacity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Conclusions. Patients who required reintubation were sicker and had worse respiratory function and more comorbidity. Prompt extubation did not contribute to reintubation. Patients identified as having a high risk for reintubation should be followed up closely, and interventions should be directed to treating the problems leading to reintubation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Cardiac surgical intervention has become a common method of treating coronary artery disease and valvular dysfunction. More than 550,000 adult cardiac surgical procedures are performed annually in the United States [1]. Weaning from mechanical ventilation and endotracheal extubation usually proceeds straightforwardly. Failure of the patient to tolerate extubation may reflect premature extubation or may be a marker of a sicker patient. Few studies have looked at the incidence of reintubation (not just within 24 hours after extubation), the factors associated with reintubation, and patient outcome.

Premature extubation may lead to hypercarbia, hypoxemia, pulmonary hypertension, right heart failure, and myocardial ischemia [2]. Additionally, it subjects the patient to the physical risks of reintubation, including esophageal intubation, laryngeal trauma, and pulmonary aspiration [3]. The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence of reintubation, the variables associated with reintubation, and patient outcome.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Patients
After approval by the institutional review board of Saint Vincent Mercy Medical Center (November 13, 1995), 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass between January 1, 1994, and June 18, 1995, were retrospectively studied. The computerized database located 41 patients who had undergone reintubation. Control subjects not requiring reintubation were selected from the same sample of 1,000 patients. Selection was conducted using a computerized random number generator. Control patients and the 1,000 patients had the same characteristics: age, sex, times of mechanical ventilation and operation, and type of operation (p > 0.10).

All patients had undergone general anesthesia with diazepam (2.5 to 10 mg), fentanyl (10 to 25 µg/kg), pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg for induction, then 0.01 mg/kg as required), thiopental (0 to 250 mg for induction), and isoflurane for maintenance. They were monitored with electrocardiography, arterial catheter, pulse oximetry, capnography, and central venous and left atrial pressure catheters. During cardiopulmonary bypass, the heart was cooled with topical ice slush, but, the patient was actively heated to maintain urinary bladder temperature at 37°C.

After transfer to the cardiovascular intensive care unit, patients were weaned from bypass by our standard protocol [4]. Ketorolac and morphine were used for analgesia. Diazepam was used for anxiolysis.

When patients were awake and hemodynamically stable, they were considered for extubation. They then underwent extubation if they met standard criteria: respiratory rate of 10 to 28 breaths/min, tidal volume greater than 5 mL/kg, vital capacity greater than 10 mL/kg, negative inspiratory force greater than -25 cm H2O, arterial carbon dioxide tension of 45 mm Hg or higher, and the ability to maintain adequate oxygenation with supplemental oxygen. If these criteria were not met, patients underwent extubation if they remained comfortable after a trial of continuous positive airway pressure without any pressure support.

Charts were abstracted for preoperative patient characteristics, processes of care, and intermediate outcome. The presence or absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was defined from clinical history as noted in the preoperative evaluation. Preoperative renal failure was defined as a serum creatinine concentration greater than 1.5 mg/dL and postoperative renal failure as a rise in creatinine concentration of 1.0 mg/dL or greater above baseline or the continued presence of preoperative renal failure.

Reasons for reintubation were obtained from the clinical notes. Patients were classified into three groups: Group RE-All included all 41 patients requiring reintubation for any reason. Group RE-Resp, a subset of RE-All, included 30 patients who required reintubation to support cardiorespiratory function. The remaining 11 patients in Group RE-All required reintubation solely for unplanned operations. The third group included 41 control patients.

Statistical analyses
Group RE-Resp and the control group were univariately compared with {chi}2 and Fisher’s exact tests for categoric variables, and the Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. A stepwise forward selection procedure was then used to develop a model predictive of reintubation to support cardiorespiratory function. Variables that were univariately significant at the 0.10 level were considered for inclusion in the model. A p value less than 0.05 was required for variables to enter and stay in the model. Improvement of models was judged by the Akaike information criterion, the Schwartz criterion, percent of pairs of observation with predicted probabilities concordant with outcome, and percent of observations correctly predicted by the model (SAS software, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Goodness of fit was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test [58].


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Of 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures, 982 underwent extubation. Of the 18 patients who never achieved extubation, 12 died, and 6 underwent tracheostomy (3 of whom later died). A total of 41 patients required reintubation, 30 of whom (group RE-Resp) required reintubation for the following cardiorespiratory reasons (Fig 1):
Respiratory fatigue/failure 7
Secretions 4
Hypoxemia 3
Congestive heart failure 3
Cardiorespiratory arrest 3
Bronchospasm 1
Pulmonary emboli 1
Arrhythmia 1
Seizures 1
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage 1
Pneumonia 1
Airway obstruction 1
Stroke 1
Adult respiratory distress syndrome 1
Severe agitation 1



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Time to extubation and reintubation for patients in Group RE-Resp. The lower point of each vertical line is the time in hours of extubation for each patient; the higher point is the time in hours of reintubation for each, so that the length of each line is duration of extubation before reintubation. Four patients intubated for the following reasons eventually died: patient 3 of pulmonary emboli, patient 10 of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, patient 19 of cardiac arrest, and patient 29 of increased work of breathing.

 
An additional 11 patients required reintubation for unplanned operations: bleeding requiring reoperation in 9, repeat coronary artery bypass grafting in 1, and laparotomy for perforated ulcer in 1. Four of the 30 patients in group RE-Resp died: 1 during the cardiac arrest for which he required reintubation, 1 of cardiac arrest from an exsanguinating gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 1 of pulmonary emboli, and 1 of later cardiac arrest after reintubation for increased work of breathing and carbon dioxide retention. None of the 11 patients requiring reintubation for unplanned operations died, nor did any of the control patients. The total perioperative mortality rate was 1.9% (19 of 1,000).

For patients requiring reintubation for cardiorespiratory reasons, univariate patient characteristic predictors (p < 0.05) of reintubation were history of COPD, higher New York Heart Association functional class, preoperative renal failure, and lower preoperative room air arterial oxygen tension (Tables 1, 2). Processes of care that univariately predicted (p < 0.05) reintubation were insertion of intraaortic balloon pump, longer operating room time, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and greater intraoperative fluid balance (Table 3). Postoperatively, intermediate outcomes that univariately predicted (p < 0.05) reintubation were higher initial fraction of inspired oxygen, worse respiratory mechanics, postoperative renal failure, and longer mechanical ventilation time (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Demographics: Categoric Variables

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Patient Preoperative Demographics: Continuous Variablesa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Patient Intraoperative Factorsa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Patient Postoperative Factorsa

 
After multivariate analysis, four variables were sufficient to predict reintubation for cardiorespiratory reasons: operating room time, respiratory rate, vital capacity, and history of COPD (Table 5). Using the multivariate model, a calculated probability of 0.69 or greater predicted the need for reintubation, with 76% sensitivity and 100% specificity. (Fig 2). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated the model fit of the data for a test statistic of 8.5768, 7 degrees of freedom, and p = 0.28 [8].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Risk Factors for Reintubation: Multivariable Model

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Receiver operating characteristic curve shows that at a probability of reintubation of 0.69, the model has a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.91) and a specificity of 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.00). The area under the curve is 0.94.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Despite standard and accepted criteria for weaning from bypass and extubation [9, 10], 41 (4.1%) of the 1,000 patients required reintubation: 11 for unplanned operations and 30 for cardiorespiratory reasons. Fifteen patients (1.5%) required reintubation within 24 hours of extubation (8 for unplanned operations and 7 for cardiorespiratory reasons), which is within the range found in other studies of patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures. Gross [11] found no reintubation procedures in 47 selected patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures, but her population was limited to young, healthy patients. Prakash and colleagues [12] found a 4.1% reintubation rate in 123 selected patients undergoing extubation within 3 hours of completion of cardiac surgical procedures, but, again, the patients were relatively young (14 to 68 years old; mean, 48 years). Patients who had delayed extubation were excluded from their study [12]. Cohen and associates [13] found that 5 (13.5%) of 37 patients with COPD undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting required reintubation. Patients with a previous stroke who underwent cardiac surgery had a 9.9% reintubation rate [14]. London and colleagues [15] found a 7% reintubation rate in 290 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures but did not determine risk factors. Similar or higher rates have been found in a general surgical intensive care unit population [16, 17].

The goal of the present study was to identify variables that could predict reintubation at the time of extubation. We identified four variables by multivariate analysis that predicted reintubation. By univariate analysis, patients who required longer periods of mechanical ventilation were more likely to require reintubation; however, after we adjusted for the effects of operating room time, respiratory rate, vital capacity, and COPD, time on mechanical ventilation was not significant. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of our multivariable model was 0.94, indicating the model has a high probability of correctly identifying patients as needing or not needing reintubation (Fig 2). An area of 1 indicates perfect prediction ability; an area of 0.5 indicates that prediction with the model is no better than chance.

Of these four variables only vital capacity is considered a standard criterion for extubation. Operating room time is physician related but probably reflects sicker patients or patients with more complications and was highly correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass time (r = 0.81; p < 0.001) but not with fluid balance (r = 0.24; p = 0.03). Although fluid balance is a marker for prolonged mechanical ventilation [18] and is a univariate predictor of reintubation, it was not a multivariate predictor. Cardiopulmonary bypass has been shown to damage pulmonary vascular endothelium and to lead to increased lung water, which may not correlate with total body water [19, 20]. Increased lung water can decrease pulmonary compliance and hence lower vital capacity and raise respiratory rate [21]. Some evidence suggests that ß2-agonists may decrease excessive lung water [22], and a controlled study of ß2-agonists to evaluate their effectiveness may be worthwhile. Preextubation respiratory rate and vital capacity reflect both the patients’ underlying medical conditions and perioperative events. Left phrenic nerve dysfunction from topical ice slush is common after cardiac surgical procedures and may decrease vital capacity [23]. Although phrenic nerve function was not measured in the present study, efforts to protect it from frostbite may help preserve vital capacity. A history of COPD reflects the patient’s preoperative condition and is associated with a 13.5% rate of reintubation after coronary artery bypass grafting [13]. A limitation of our study is that the diagnosis of COPD was taken from the admitting records rather than by preoperative pulmonary function testing, which was not done. This choice might limit the generalizability of our findings to other institutions. Nevertheless, the admitting diagnosis of COPD was a strong predictor of reintubation.

Twenty three of the 30 patients who required reintubation for cardiorespiratory reasons had been extubated for more than 24 hours and were initially doing well before deteriorating and requiring reintubation; yet the model was predictive for these patients. This finding suggests that the model identifies sicker patients, those with less reserve, and those more likely to have cardiorespiratory problems when they have a postoperative complication.

Four (9.8%) of our 41 patients who required reintubation died. Other studies looking at reintubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures did not report mortality rates [9, 12]. In a general surgical intensive care unit, the overall mortality rate was 31% in patients requiring reintubation, which may be related more to the different patient populations than to any other factor [13].

Previous studies evaluating reintubation have either looked at the specific risk factors of COPD or stroke or merely determined the incidence without determining predictors. Our study found that four predictors can easily and accurately be used to predict reintubation. We are not suggesting that these patients not undergo extubation: Although the prediction model had high sensitivity and specificity, the incidence of reintubation was low. Thus, many patients would be maintained by mechanical ventilation for an unnecessarily long period, but it might not prevent the complications for which they required reintubation. We suggest that extubation be performed in these patients but that they be monitored closely. Future research should be directed toward determining whether interventions such as left phrenic nerve protection, ß2-agonists and ipratropium aerosols, diuresis, and more intensive chest physiotherapy would prevent reintubation by providing more respiratory reserve when complications develop.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This study was sponsored by the F. M. Douglass Foundation (grant 96-162) and by the Saint Vincent Mercy Medical Center. We gratefully acknowledge Don White, PhD, for statistical assistance.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Vital and Health Statistics. Detailed diagnoses and procedures, national hospital discharge survey, 1993. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics, October 1995.
  2. Mangano D.T., Siliciano D., Hollenberg M., et al. Postoperative myocardial ischemia. Therapeutic trials using intensive analgesia following surgery. Anesthesiology 1992;76:342-353.[Medline]
  3. Williamson J.A., Webb R.K., Szekely S., Gillies E.R., Dreosti A.V. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Difficult intubation: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993;21:602-607.[Medline]
  4. Engoren M. Efficacy of capnometry in ventilatory management of cardiac patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1993;7:538-540.[Medline]
  5. SAS/STAT user’s guide, vol 2, GLM-VARCOMP, version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1989:1088–94.
  6. SAS technical report P-229, SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements, release 6.07. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1992:246–8.
  7. Miller M.E., Hui S.L., Tierney W.M. Validation techniques for logistic regression models. Stat Med 1991;10:1213-1226.[Medline]
  8. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley, 1989:136-145.
  9. Venus B., Smith R.A., Mathru M. National survey of methods and criteria used for weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1987;15:530-533.[Medline]
  10. MacIntyre N.R., Stock C.M. Weaning mechanical ventilatory support. In: Kirby R.R., Banner M.J., Downs J.B., eds. Clinical applications of ventilatory support. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990:263-276.
  11. Gross S.B. Early extubation: preliminary experience in the cardiothoracic patient population. Am J Crit Care 1995;4:262-266.
  12. Prakash O., Jonson B., Meij S., et al. Criteria for early extubation after intracardiac surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 1977;56:703-708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cohen A., Katz M., Katz R., Hauptman E., Schachner A. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:574-581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Redmond J.M., Greene P.S., Goldsborough M.A., et al. Neurologic injury in cardiac surgical patients with a history of stroke. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:42-47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. London MJ, Shroyer AL, Jernigan V, et al. "Fast" vs "slow" track: factors influencing early extubation and length of stay [Abstract]. Anesthesiology 1996;85(Suppl):A127.
  16. Demling R.H., Read T., Lind L.J., Flanagan H.L. Incidence and morbidity of extubation failure in surgical intensive care patients. Crit Care Med 1988;16:573-577.[Medline]
  17. Albrecht E, Naum S, Scholten D. Outcome of patients requiring airway management in surgical critical illness: use of computer database for quality assessment [Abstract]. Crit Care Med 1995;23(Suppl):A34.
  18. Habib R.H., Zacharias A., Engoren M. Determinants of prolonged mechanical ventilation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1164-1171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kirklin J.K., Westaby S., Blackstone E.H., Kirklin J.W., Chenoweth D.E., Pacifico A.D. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:845-857.[Abstract]
  20. Tennenberg S.D., Clardy C.W., Bailey W.W., Solomkin J.S. Complement activation and lung permeability during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:597-601.[Abstract]
  21. Stock M.C., Davis D.W., Manning J.W., Ryan M.L. Lung mechanics and oxygen consumption during spontaneous ventilation and severe heart failure. Chest 1992;102:279-283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Berthiaume Y., Broaddus V.C., Gropper M.A., Tanita T., Matthay M.A. Alveolar liquid and protein clearance from normal dog lungs. J Appl Physiol 1988;65:585-593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Curtis J.J., Nawarawong W., Walls J.T., et al. Elevated hemidiaphragm after cardiac operations: incidence, prognosis, and relationship to the use of topical ice slush. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:764-768.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
Z. I. Khalpey, R. B. Ganim, and J. D. Rawn
Postoperative Care of Cardiac Surgery Patients
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 465 - 486.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S.-W. Song, H.-S. Lee, J.-H. Kim, M. S. Kim, J. M. Lee, and J. I. Zo
Readmission to Intensive Care Unit After Initial Recovery From Major Thoracic Oncology Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1838 - 1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. C. Murthy, A. C. Arroliga, P. A. Walts, J. Feng, J.-P. Yared, B. W. Lytle, and E. H. Blackstone
Ventilatory dependency after cardiovascular surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 484 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Hernandez, R. Fernandez, E. Luzon, R. Cuena, and J. C. Montejo
The Early Phase of the Minute Ventilation Recovery Curve Predicts Extubation Failure Better Than the Minute Ventilation Recovery Time
Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5): 1315 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. G. Fuster, J. A. M. Argudo, O. G. Albarova, F. H. Sos, S. C. Lopez, M. B. Codoner, J. A. B. Minano, and I. R. Albarran
Prognostic value of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in coronary artery bypass grafting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 29(2): 202 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
K. Kirali, H. Ardal, V. Erentug, D. Mansuroglu, N. U Bozbuga, and C. Yakut
Surgical Outcome of Subtypes of Aortic Arch Dissection
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 300 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
R. Wynne and M. Botti
Postoperative Pulmonary Dysfunction in Adults After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Clinical Significance and Implications for Practice
Am. J. Crit. Care., September 1, 2004; 13(5): 384 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
U. Guller, K. J. Anstrom, W. L. Holman, R. M. Allman, M. Sansom, and E. D. Peterson
Outcomes of early extubation after bypass surgery in the elderly
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 781 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. E. Pilling, A. E. Martin-Ucar, and D. A. Waller
Salvage intensive care following initial recovery from pulmonary resection: is it justified?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 1039 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
N. R. MacIntyre
Evidence-Based Guidelines for Weaning and Discontinuing Ventilatory Support : A Collective Task Force Facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine
Chest, December 1, 2001; 120(6_suppl): 375S - 396S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Meade, G. Guyatt, D. Cook, L. Griffith, T. Sinuff, C. Kergl, J. Mancebo, A. Esteban, and S. Epstein
Predicting Success in Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
Chest, December 1, 2001; 120(6_suppl): 400S - 424S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Milo Engoren
Anoar Zacharias
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engoren, M.
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Engoren, M.
Right arrow Articles by Habib, R. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS