HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kalil, R. A.K. Articles by Ludwig, F. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kalil, R. A.K. Articles by Ludwig, F. B.

Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:614-617
© 1999 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles

Predictive factors for persistence of atrial fibrillation after mitral valve operation

^a Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Accepted for publication July 22, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Dr Kalil, Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Unidade de Pesquisa, Av Princesa Isabel, 395 - Santana, 90.620-001 Porto Alegre - RS, Brazil

	Abstract

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
Background. The majority of patients operated on for mitral valve disease with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) do not recover sinus rhythm with conventional postoperative treatment. The maze procedure may be used in these circumstances. To define the precise indications for the maze procedure, it would be necessary to identify those patients based on preoperative factors.

Methods. A retrospective study was undertaken on 100 consecutive patients operated on for mitral valve disease in chronic AF. The return to sinus rhythm was analyzed with relation to age, gender, AF duration, left atrial size, left ventricular ejection fraction, lesion type, valve procedure, associated procedures, and reoperation.

Results. At late follow-up (more than 1 year) 26 (26%) patients presented sinus rhythm and 74 (74%) remained in AF. Statistical single parametric analysis demonstrated that mitral stenosis was a risk factor for maintaining AF, whereas regurgitation was more associated to sinus rhythm recovery. There was no relation with the other parameters with return to sinus rhythm. It should be noted, however, that 96% of this series had AF for more than 6 months preoperatively.

Conclusions. The majority of patients with mitral valve disease remain in AF and this may justify the association of maze procedure. Pure regurgitation may be a single predictor for return to sinus rhythm after mitral valve operation in chronic AF.

	Introduction

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
It is well known that the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) secondary to mitral valve disease do not recover sinus rhythm (SR) postoperatively [1, 2]. Chronic AF compromises, on the other hand, late results after mitral valve operations [3]. The maze procedure could be well indicated in this setting [4–7]. An argument against routine association of maze procedure with mitral repair or replacement is that some patients recover SR and therefore, in those patients a more complex technique would add risk and no benefit. It is generally accepted that small left atrium and short duration could be associated with SR recovery [8–11]. However, at this time, this association has not been demonstrated after mitral procedures.

This study was undertaken for the purpose of identifying predictive preoperative parameters for late postoperative rhythm and help in identifying patients that could benefit more from a maze and mitral procedure.

	Material and methods

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
A historic cohort of 618 medical records of patients operated for mitral valve disease between 1990 and 1994 at the Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul/Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, was analyzed to find 100 patients who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement in chronic AF with more than 1 year of follow-up and whose records fitted in the previously established protocol. We determined the criteria of age, gender, type of mitral valve lesion (stenosis, regurgitation, mixed), associated aortic valve lesion, previous cardiac operation, left atrial size and left ventricular ejection fraction measurements by two-dimensional echocardiogram, the duration of preoperative AF, type of procedure (repair or replacement), and type of prosthesis implanted (biological or mechanic). As for duration of AF, a limit of 6 months was established to differentiate recent onset from chronic AF, as it is thought that those patients are more prone to recovery than those with longer duration AF.

All patients had been operated on by the same surgical team, under moderate hypothermia and cardiopulmonary bypass, established by ascending aorta and bicaval cannulation after median sternotomy. Aortic cross-clamp and crystalloid cardioplegic solution infusion was done previously to a left atrial incision parallel to the interatrial groove. Mitral repair or replacement was performed accordingly to each patient. After rewarming, bypass was terminated, the cannulas withdrawn, chest tubes and temporary pacing wires placed in the right ventricle, and the sternotomy closed. In the immediate postoperative period no special treatment was undertaken regarding the cardiac rhythm. Patients with persistent AF were anticoagulated and discharged usually on the eighth postoperative day. Follow-up was scheduled for 1 or 2 months after operation, when electrical cardioversion was attempted and amiodarone administration initiated. Those patients refractory to electrical cardioversion and amiodarone were maintained with rate-control medication and anticoagulation.

The 100 patients studied were 66 women and 34 men. Age ranged from 16 to 75 years (46.0 ± 11.9 years); 43 patients were less than 45 years and 13 more than 60 years of age. The lesions were 36 stenosis, 18 regurgitation, and 46 mixed. Aortic valve disease was present in 31 patients. Previous cardiac operation had been done in 53 patients, almost exclusively for mitral valve repair. Left atrial size varied from 40 to 80 mm, mean 55.5 ± 10.4 mm, with 29 patients with less and 71 more than 50 mm. Atrial fibrillation was present for more than 6 months in 96 patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction varied from 38.2% to 80.6%, mean 63.6% ± 12.6%, with 5 patients with less and 92 with more than 40% (in 3 patients, ejection fraction was not determined). Mitral repair was performed in 30 and replacement in 70 patients with 15 mechanical and 55 biological prostheses. The clinical data are summarized in Table 1.

Comparisons of patients in AF or SR after operation were made using the ² test for categoric variables and the t test for continuous variables. In these comparisons, a critical alpha value of 0.05 was considered significant. The EPI-INFO program was used to calculate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals.

	Results

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
There were 74 (74%) patients in chronic postoperative AF and 26 (26%) in SR. Mean left atrial size was 55.2 ± 10.9 cm for those in SR and 55.6 ± 10.3 cm for AF (p = 0.87, not significant [NS]). Left atrial size was less than 50 cm in 29 patients and the return to SR was 34% as opposed to 22% returning to SR when the atria were more than 50 mm in diameter, but this tendency was not significant (p = 0.21).

The preoperative duration of AF was less than 6 months in 4 patients, 2 returned to SR and 2 remained in AF. Of the remaining 96 patients 24 (25%) presented SR and 72 (75%) AF (p = 0.12, NS). But this analysis carries the bias of a very small number of patients with less duration of AF.

Left ventricular ejection fraction was 63.2% ± 13.7% for SR and 63.7% ± 12.3% for patients remaining in AF (p = 0.86, NS), low ejection fraction (less than 40%) was present in 5 patients; of those, 2 (40%) presented SR and 3 (60%) AF, whereas 92 had ejection fraction more than 40%, 23 (25%) in SR and 69 (75%) in AF (p = 0.45, NS). This parameter was missing in 3 patients. Age at operation was 43.3 ± 13.9 years in the group returning to SR and 46.9 ± 11.1 years when AF persisted (p = 0.18, NS). Forty-three patients were less than 45 years, 12 (28%) in SR and 31 (72%) in AF, whereas 57 were more than 45 years of age, 14 (25%) in SR and 43 (75%) in AF (p = 0.70, NS).

Previous cardiac operation had been performed in 53 patients, of whom 14 (26%) returned to SR and 39 (74%) remained in AF. Of the 44 patients who had not undergone previous operation, 11 (25%) were in SR and 33 (75%) in AF (p = 0.87, NS). In 3 patients this information was missing. The relative risk for remaining in AF after mitral reoperation was 0.98, with 95% confidence limits of 0.77 to 1.24.

The surgical procedure was a valve repair in 30 patients; 8 (27%) returned to SR and 22 (73%) remained in AF. Valve prosthesis was implanted in 70 patients, 18 (26%) went to SR and 52 (74%) were in AF at follow-up control (p = 0.92, NS). The relative risk for remaining in AF after prosthesis was 0.98 with 95% confidence limits of 0.76 to 1.27.

Mechanical prostheses were implanted in 55 patients; 14 (25%) returning to SR and 41 (73%) in AF. Bioprothesis were used in 15 patients, 4 (27%) in SR and 11 (73%) in AF. There was no difference with the type of prosthesis (p = 0.99, NS).

Regarding the type of lesion, 36 patients were diagnosed with mitral stenosis, 6 (17%) went to SR and 30 (83%) maintained AF, compared to 46 patients with mixed lesions (12 [26%] went to SR and 34 [74%] maintained AF; p = 0.30, relative risk of 0.64, 95% confidence limits 0.27 to 1.54). When comparing mitral regurgitation to mixed lesion, there were 18 patients, 8 (44%) in SR and 10 (56%) in AF (p = 0.15, relative risk 1.70, 95% confidence limits 0.84 to 3.46). Comparing the groups of mitral stenosis versus regurgitation we found a significant difference, as 44% of patients with regurgitation returned to SR, compared to 17% of those with stenosis (p < 0.05, relative risk 0.38, 95% confidence limits 0.15 to 0.92).

Associated aortic valve lesion was present in 31 patients, 5 (16%) were in SR at follow-up and 26 (84%) in AF; this was not statistically different from patients with isolated mitral disease, 69 patients, 21 (30%) in SR and 48 (70%) in AF (p = 0.13, relative risk 0.82, 95% confidence limits 0.66 to 1.03).

The results are summarized in Table 2.

	Comment

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

In recent years, many centers are combining mitral and maze procedures with a success rate of 85% to 98% of recovering atrial rhythm after mitral valve operation [5, 6, 13–15]. It is reasonable to expect that some of those patients would recover SR with only the mitral procedure, and a common critique for the association with maze is that some patients would have additional morbidity with no increased benefit. To address this subject, it is necessary to identify precisely those patients who would maintain AF despite mitral valve correction and conventional medical therapy postoperatively.

In a previous paper [15] studying a cohort of 50 patients, we were able to identify size less than 52 mm associated to valve regurgitation as present in a statistically significative portion of patients recovering SR, but we did not demonstrate single factors as predictive of postoperative rhythm. In this study, we extended the retrospective analysis for 100 patients to look for more evidence of predictors for late atrial rhythm.

In a recent paper, Obadia and colleagues [3] found that operation for AF could be of value in patients with a long history of AF and that postoperative AF was associated with reduced long-term survival after mitral valve operation.

Previously, Flugelman and associates [16] reported evidence that restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm after mitral valve operation for mitral stenosis was not achieved in patients with symptoms lasting more than 3 years, with a left atrial size more than 52 mm and recommended avoidance of cardioversion postoperatively in those patients.

The best subset of predictors of successful cardioversion included left atrial size, functional capacity, duration of symptoms, and left ventricular fractional shortening.

Chua and colleagues [17], studying the outcome of mitral valve repair in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation, reported 80% persistence of AF in those patients with preoperative AF and 0% in the subset of recent onset AF, therefore, suggesting early operation for better long-term atrial rhythm. Large left atrial size correlated weakly with late AF. No other factors correlated with late postoperative rhythm. The 5-year survival rate however, was similar in groups with SR and AF. They suggested that concomitant operation for supraventricular arrhythmia must have negligible morbidity and no adverse effect on operative mortality to be justifiable.

Reports of our results with the maze procedure, alone or associated to mitral repair or replacement, show an acceptable mortality and low morbidity. It seems that the long-term benefit of maintaining sinus or atrial rhythm might outweigh the small increase in morbidity when the maze procedure is used.

This study was able to identify mitral valve regurgitation, when compared to stenosis, as a possible predictor for SR recovery postoperatively. However, it failed to identify other lone predictors for return to sinus rhythm. All preoperative factors included in the protocol were evenly distributed among patients with SR or AF postoperatively, with the exception of regurgitation versus stenosis. As for duration, the small number of patients presenting AF with less than 6 months’ duration does not permit to draw conclusions from this sample.

Regarding our findings and those of other investigators, it seems reasonable to recommend the maze procedure associated to mitral valve operation in every patient presenting chronic AF with the exception of those with pure regurgitation and atrial size less than 50 mm in diameter.

In conclusion, the majority of patients operated on for mitral valve disease in chronic AF maintain the arrhythmia at late postoperative follow-up, in addition to conventional therapy. There was no difference regarding recovering atrial rhythm or relation to preoperative sex, age, previous cardiac operation, left atrial size, left ventricular ejection fraction, type of repair, or prosthesis implanted. Mitral regurgitation seems to be more prone to correlate to SR recovery than stenosis.

	Footnotes

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 
This article has been selected for the open discussion forum on the STS Web site: http://www.sts.org/section/atsdiscussion/

	References

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Material and methods Results Comment References

 

1. Yang S.S., Maranhão V., Monheit R., et al. Cardioversion following open heart valvular surgery. Brit Heart J 1966;28:309-315.[Free Full Text]
2. Kahn D.R., Krish M.M., Ferguson P.W., Sloan H. Cardioversion after mitral valve operations. Circulation 1967;35(suppI 1):182-185.
3. Obadia J.F., El Farra M., Bastien O.H., Lièvre M., Martelloni Y., Chassignolle J.F. Outcome of atrial fibrillation after mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:179-185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Hioki M., Ikeshita M., Iedokoro Y., et al. Successful combined operation for mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:776-778.[Abstract]
5. Jatene A.D., Sosa E., Tarasoutchi F., Jatene M.B., Pomerantzeff P.M.A. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation with maze procedure: initial experience. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 1992;7:107-111.
6. Gregori F., Jr, Cordeiro C.O., Couto W.J., da Silva S.S., de Aquino W.K., Nechar A.J. Cox maze operation without cryoblation for the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:361-363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Kosakai Y., Kawaguchi A.T., Isobe F., et al. Cox maze procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation with mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:1049-1054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Renekov L., McDonald L. Apraisal of electroconversion in treatment of cardiac dysrhythmias. Brit Heart J 1968;30:786-811.[Free Full Text]
9. Bailey G.W., Braniff B.A., Hancock E.W., et al. Relation of left atrial pathology to atrial fibrillation in mitral valvular disease. Ann Intern Med 1968;69:13-20.
10. SanFilippo A.J., Abascal V.M., Sheenan M., et al. Atrial enlargement as a consequence of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1990;82:792-797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Acar J., Michel P.L., Cormier B., et al. Features of patients with severe mitral stenosis with respect to atrial rhythm. Acta Cardiol 1992;47:115-124.[Medline]
12. Cox J.L., Schuessler R.B., D’Agostino H.J. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:569-583.[Abstract]
13. Sandoval N., Velasco V.M., Orjuela H., et al. Concomitant mitral valve or atrial septal defect surgery and the modified Cox-Maze procedure. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:591-596.[Medline]
14. Melo J.Q., Neves J.P., Abecasis L.M., Adragão P., Ribeiras R., Seabra-Gomes R. Operative risks of the maze procedure associated with mitral valve surgery. Cardiovasc Surg 1997;5:112-116.[Medline]
15. Maratia C., Kalil R.A.K., Sant’Anna J.R.M., et al. Predictive factors to sinus rhythm recover after mitral valve surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 1997;12:17-23.
16. Flugelman M.Y., Hasin Y., Katznelson N., Kriwisky M., Shefer A., Gotsman M.S. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm after mitral valve surgery for mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:617-619.[Medline]
17. Chua YL, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Morris JJ. Outcome of mitral valve repair in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:408–15.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Hazel, H. S. Paterson, J. R.M. Edwards, and G. J. Maddern Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation via Energy Ablation Circulation, March 1, 2005; 111(8): e103 - e106. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Chiappini, R. Di Bartolomeo, and G. Marinelli Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Different Approaches Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2004; 12(3): 272 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Choo, N. H. Park, S. K. Lee, J. W. Kim, J. K. Song, H. Song, M. G. Song, and J. W. Lee Excellent results for atrial fibrillation surgery in the presence of giant left atrium and mitral valve disease Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 26(2): 336 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. G. de Lima, R. A. K. Kalil, T. L. L. Leiria, D. M. Hatem, C. L. Kruse, R. Abrahao, J. R. M. Sant'anna, P. R. Prates, and I. A. Nesralla Randomized study of surgery for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation as a result of mitral valve disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2089 - 2094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N.M. Sankar, K. Suresh, R. Agarwal, and K. M. Cherian Pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial reduction for chronic atrial fibrillation secondary to mitral valve disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 75(5): 1680 - 1680. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A.K. Kalil, G. G. Lima, T. L. L. Leiria, R. Abrahao, L. M. Pires, P. R. Prates, and I. A. Nesralla Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 75(5): 1680 - 1680. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Benussi, S. Nascimbene, E. Agricola, G. Calori, S. Calvi, A. Caldarola, M. Oppizzi, V. Casati, C. Pappone, and O. Alfieri Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation using the epicardial radiofrequency approach: mid-term results and risk analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): 1050 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, O. Tagusari, Y. Sasako, T. Nakatani, and S. Kitamura The Effect of Cryo-Maze Procedure on Early and Intermediate Term Outcome in Mitral Valve Disease: Case Matched Study Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(12_suppl_1): I-46 - I-50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A.K. Kalil, G. G. Lima, T. L.L. Leiria, R. Abrahao, L. M. Pires, P. R. Prates, and I. A. Nesralla Simple surgical isolation of pulmonary veins for treating secondary atrial fibrillation in mitral valve disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 73(4): 1169 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Benussi, S. Nascimbene, and O. Alfieri Reply to Veloso Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 19(2): 233 - 234. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Large and A.-R. Hosseinpour Predictive factors for persistence of atrial fibrillation after mitral valve operation Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2000; 69(5): 1647 - 1648. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kalil, R. A.K. Articles by Ludwig, F. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kalil, R. A.K. Articles by Ludwig, F. B.