ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jack G. Copeland, III
Francisco A. Arabía
Gulshan K. Sethi
Bryan Foy
James Long
Robert L. Kormos
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Copeland, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Copeland, J. G., III
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. G.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1662-1669
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

The CardioWest total artificial heart bridge to transplantation: 1993 to 1996 National Trial

Jack G. Copeland, III, MDa,1, Francisco A. Arabía, MDa, Mary E. Banchy, RNa, Gulshan K. Sethi, MDa, Bryan Foy, MDb, James Long, MDc, Robert L. Kormos, MDd, Richard G. Smith, MSEE, CCEa

a Cardiothoracic Surgery and Artificial Heart Program, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
b Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
c LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
d University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Accepted for publication May 20, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Dr Copeland, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Room 4402, Tucson, AZ 85724
e-mail: (jgc{at}u.arizona.edu)


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. We performed a controlled study of a total artificial heart in bridge to transplantation. We hypothesized that the CardioWest total artificial heart used in a selected population of decompensating cardiac transplantation candidates would result in improved survival compared with matched controls.

Methods. The CardioWest trial started in 1993 in six United States institutions under an investigational device exemption from the Food and Drug Administration. Four centers contributed 27 implant and 18 matched retrospective control patients.

Results. Of the implant patients, 25 (93%) received a transplant, 24 (89% of the total, 96% of those transplanted) were discharged and are currently surviving. In the control group, 10 patients died awaiting transplantation, 8 received a transplant, and 7 were discharged with 6 surviving (p = 0.00001). All adverse events were documented with respect to time. Thirteen serious adverse events occurred, 11 of which occurred in the 2 patients that died during implant.

Conclusions. In a selected group of patients with end-stage heart disease, use of the CardioWest total artificial heart is lifesaving. When compared with the series of matched retrospective controls, a significant improvement in survival was found in the CardioWest implant group.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
In January 1993, a trial of the CardioWest total artificial heart (TAH) began in the United States under an investigational device exemption from the Food and Drug Administration. The goal of this study was to gain approval for marketing this device for bridge to transplantation. The study was limited to six centers; of those, four contributed 27 patients meeting the study selection criteria. Simultaneously, a group of 18 matched historical controls was collected from these same centers for comparison.

The hypothesis of this study was that the CardioWest TAH could provide successful bridge to transplantation in a selected population of decompensating potential cardiac recipients and result in improved survival when compared with a control group. All implant and control patients met standard cardiac transplant selection criteria, had sufficiently large body and heart sizes, had clinical evidence of both left and right heart failure, and were hemodynamically decompensating despite inotropic and other forms of support considered to be beyond the usual.

Our TAH bridge-to-transplant trial that had begun in 1985 [1] and spanned 6 years [24] supported the hypothesis. In 1992, the Symbion (Tempe, AZ) registry reported the results of all 198 patients who received the TAH [5]. One hundred forty-three patients (72%) were transplanted and 85 (43%) discharged. Infections occurred in only 16 patients (9.4%). There were nine strokes (5.3%) and seven transient ischemic attacks (4.1%) during 170 months of the study. One center reported no neurologic events in 60 consecutive implants [6]. On the basis of this information, experience with sizing the device, and markedly improved implant hemostasis with the use of aprotinin and improved technique [7], we believed that TAH implantation could salvage critically ill transplant candidates. Further, we believed it offered these candidates excellent cardiac output and a chance for transplantation that was not available with either left ventricular assist devices or paracorporeal biventricular assist devices [8, 9].

With this in mind, we applied to the Food and Drug Administration for a new investigational device exemption to further study this device, formerly the Symbion TAH [10] renamed the CardioWest TAH. Two small device alterations had been made. The "skin button" on the transcutaneous drivelines was replaced with a Dacron (C.R. Bard, Inc, Billerica, MA) velour wrap, and a drop of silicone oil was added to the housing side of the diaphragm to prevent sticking.

Preliminary information on the international experience from 1993 to 1995 with the CardioWest TAH indicating outcome result parity with all other bridge-to-transplant devices has been published previously [11]. Presently, there have been 91 CardioWest TAH implants in the United States, Canada, and France. Sixty (69%) of those patients have received a transplant, 55 (92% of those transplanted and 63% of those implanted) have been discharged from the hospital after transplantation. The mean age of these patients was 45 years and the mean implant time was 30 days (range, 1–186 days).

We believe that the data in this study support the contention that the CardioWest TAH is not only efficacious when compared with matched controls, but also is the device of choice in a selected group of potential cardiac transplant recipients with hemodynamic decompensation, right heart failure, or early-onset low output syndrome.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Only approved sites were permitted to contribute data to this study. They included (in order of number of patients accrued) the University of Arizona, Loyola University Medical Center, LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah, and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Inclusion criteria included [11] age between 18 and 59 years; body surface area between 1.7 and 2.5 m2; accepted or acceptable for heart transplantation using standard criteria [12]; evidence of hemodynamic decompensation, including central venous pressure of 18 mm Hg or more, systolic pressure of 90 mm Hg or less, cardiac index of 2.0 L/min per m2 or less, or requirement for high-dose inotropic therapy with two inotropic agents (ie, dobutamine >10 µg/kg per minute and dopamine >10 µg/kg per minute), of need for one high-dose inotropic agent and intraaortic balloon pump; or difficulty weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Exclusion criteria included evidence of active infection, evidence of renal or hepatic failure, cytotoxic antibody level greater than 10%, or the presence of any recognized contraindication to cardiac transplantation. Both the implant group and the control group met these criteria. In all of the controls, a total artificial heart or other type of pulsatile blood pump was either not available or not desired by the patient (Table 1). A specific anticoagulation protocol was not mandated in the study; no attempt was made to control anticoagulation or coagulation tests. The University of Arizona and LDS Hospital protocols included warfarin, dipyridamole, and aspirin. The Loyola University Medical Center anticoagulation protocol was Coumadin and aspirin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of Implant and Control Patients

 
The matched controls were identified by chart review. The patients considered as possible controls were those listed as United Network for Organ Sharing status I between 1991 and 1993 at the four contributing institutions (n = 351). Of these, 343 had sufficient data for evaluation for eligibility, but 82 were eliminated due to age, 18 did not meet size criteria, 1 had cytotoxic antibodies, 42 had contraindications to transplantation as defined in our protocol, and 115 did not meet hemodynamic or support criteria (ie, were not sick enough). Of 85 eligible patients, left ventricular support devices were implanted in 67 patients, leaving 18 control patients matched by all study criteria with the 27 implant patients.

Comparisons of control and implant data were made using Student’s t test. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated for both groups and for all adverse events and tested for equality of survival distributions using log-rank, Breslow, and Tarone-Ware test statistics.

Adverse events are defined as follows. Bleeding is defined as excessive perioperative bleeding, any reoperation to control bleeding or treat tamponade, or any severe drop in hematocrit requiring transfusion as defined below. Any surgical procedure (implant, transplant, or other) requiring perioperative transfusion of eight or more units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or producing thoracic drainage of more than 200 mL per hour, 4 hours postoperatively, will be considered excessive bleeding. The perioperative period is defined to start at the initiation of a surgical procedure and end 48 hours after its completion. After 48 hours, transfusion of three units of PRBCs administered within a 24-hour period is also defined as bleeding.

Device malfunction is defined as any malfunction of the implantable device, including but not limited to valve failure or rupture of the diaphragm, driveline, or connections, which results in failure to pump blood or directs injury or potential injury to the patient. Also, any malfunction of the console, including but not limited to failure to respond to controls, failure to alarm appropriately during an emergency, or other component failure which results in failure to pump blood or directs injury or potential injury to the patient. This category includes all reoperation events to repair or replace the device. Injury is defined as the occurrence of an adverse event resulting from the malfunction.

Fit complication is defined as inadequate mediastinal space to accommodate the TAH as evidenced by compression of thoracic structures or impaired TAH performance. Compression of the thoracic organs or surrounding structures by the TAH is indicated by necrotic tissue, inability to close sternum, ascites, atelectasis, or low cardiac output resulting from kinked conduits or cuffs obstruction of venous return.

Hemodynamic insufficiency is defined as cardiac index less than 2.0 L/m2 per minute or systolic arterial blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg for more than 4 hours.

Hemolysis is defined as plasma-free hemoglobin levels greater than 30 mg/dL persisting for 72 hours after bypass or blood transfusion. The patient must have two consecutive levels greater than 30 mg/dL sampled 24 hours apart.

Hepatic dysfunction is defined as elevated total bilirubin higher than 5.0 mg/dL. A second event occurs only when the total bilirubin has been less than 5.0 mg/dL for 7 days.

Infection is defined as positive culture or clinical sign of sepsis with negative culture. One infection is defined as multiple organisms at one site, repeated positive cultures of one organism at one site, or multiple sites culturing one organism. Clinical signs may include elevated white blood cell count, hypotension, or fever. In this study, infections have been subdivided into serious and nonserious. Serious is defined as infections causing death, contributing to death, or delaying transplant. Nonserious infections are all others.

A neurologic event is defined as any new episode of focal or global neurologic dysfunction such as transient ischemic attack, cerebral vascular accident, or seizure activity. The nature of the neurological event is considered to be thromboembolic, hemorrhagic, ischemic, metabolic, or medication related.

Peripheral thromboembolism is defined as a noncerebral thromboembolic event resulting in motor, sensory, or ischemic impairment.

Renal dysfunction is defined as serum creatinine level higher than 5.0 mg/dL or any postimplant dialysis treatment. A second event is documented only when the serum creatinine remains below 5.0 mg/dL for 7 days (in an undialyzed patient). Renal dysfunction requiring dialysis is documented as a single event for the duration of the dialysis treatment.

Reoperation is defined as corrective or exploratory procedure of any kind after the implant surgical procedure. Causes for reoperation include bleeding, repositioning of the device, and events unrelated to the device but having a direct bearing on the patient’s condition.

Respiratory dysfunction is defined as postoperative ventilatory support required for 10 days or more, or reintubation for respiratory dysfunction.

Adverse events not classified by the definitions listed above and which in the investigator’s judgment are of comparable importance were categorized as miscellaneous.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
In the implant group, there were a total of 1,411 implant days with an average duration of 52 ± 42 days and a median duration of 35 days (range, 12–186 days). Twenty-five of the 27 (93%) patients received a transplant. One patient died from infection and multiple organ failure after 21 days of device support. This patient had received an implant 3 days after a failed coronary artery bypass procedure and within the first 9 days had Enterobacter cultured from the sputum, gram-negative rods and Serratia from mediastinal drainage, and Pseudomonas cultured from a chest tube site. The second death occurred on the 124th postimplant day secondary to device failure from diaphragm rupture. A tiny tear developed in the first of the four layers of the diaphragm of the left ventricle, leading to clot deposition between the first and second layers that, in turn, led to progressive left-sided low output, hemodynamic insufficiency, pulmonary congestion, and seizures presumably secondary to thromboembolism.

Of the 25 patients who received transplants, 24 survived (96%) and were discharged. One death occurred on the 15th posttransplant day from hemodynamic insufficiency secondary to multivessel coronary artery disease in the donor heart. Thus, the total survival was 24 of 27 (89%). The mean follow-up time has been 20 months (range, 3–48 months) with no other deaths.

During TAH support, all 27 implanted patients had at least one adverse event (median, 5 events per patient; range, 1–22). There were 175 adverse events (Table 2, Figs 1 and 2). In Table 2, the number of adverse events, number of patients, and the percentage of patients having specific events and device-related and nonrelated adverse events are shown. In Figure 1, the relationship of total specific adverse events to device-related adverse events are shown. Most adverse events were not device related. Only in the device malfunction (5 events in 3 patients), hemodynamic insufficiency (5 events in 3 patients), neurologic (17 events in 9 patients), and splenic emboli (2 events in 1 patient) groups were most events device related (21 of 29 device related). Of the two deaths during TAH support, the one secondary to diaphragm tear was device related. That patient also accounted for device-related adverse events in other categories, including 1 device malfunction, 3 hemodynamic insufficiency (3 of the 5 events), 1 hepatic dysfunction, 1 neurologic, 1 reoperation, general, and 1 respiratory dysfunction. His total number of adverse events was 23, including 8 device-related events. The other patient that died on TAH support died from infection and multiple organ failure. He had 8 adverse events including 5 infections (4 serious), 1 renal dysfunction, and 1 respiratory dysfunction. These 2 patients, in addition to representing the two deaths, accounted for 11 of the 13 complications that we called serious (causing death, contributing to death, or delaying transplantation). Another serious complication was an infected decubitus ulcer that was not sufficiently healed to allow transplantation for 75 days. The last serious infection was a driveline infection that prevented transplantation for 29 days (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Adverse Events Categorized by Event

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Adverse events. Shaded bars indicate percentage of events defined as device related. Unshaded bars indicate percentage of specific adverse events that were not device related. (Death: Includes one death after transplant and two deaths during implant [before transplant].)

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Adverse events by week.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Serious Adverse Events

 
The remaining 160 adverse events were judged not to have an effect on the patients’ clinical outcome. In general, the numbers of adverse events were greater in patients who had longer implant times.

In Figure 2, the percentage and number of patients with an adverse event is shown with respect to time. This summary figure shows that nearly all of the adverse events occurred in the first weeks after implantation. Time-related, event-specific analysis is shown in Table 4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Time–Event Relationship

 
Most adverse events (73%) occurred in the first 4 weeks. By the end of 9 weeks, 75% of patients were transplanted and by the end of 4 months, only 2 patients, both with positive cytotoxic antibody screens, remained on support.

All adverse events were reviewed and documented in detail. A summary of event-specific information follows. All events that met the bleeding definition were at 11 days or less after implantation. Five were associated with reoperation. None of the bleeding events influenced clinical outcome.

In all but one case, device malfunction refers to momentary changes in state of consciousness that did not affect outcome due to driveline kinks (2 patients), air tank change (1 patient), resetting the vacuum (1 patient), and to the one fatal diaphragm tear that led to death during the 17th week. In the first 4 weeks, the distribution over time appeared to be random (Table 3). Three of these events, weeks 11, 13, and 14 involved the first patient in the series.

Splenic emboli were documented by computed tomographic scan on two occasions in the same patient (weeks 7 and 16) when left upper quadrant pain was noted. Neither of these episodes affected clinical outcome.

The one fit complication required reoperation on the second day after implant. Lateral repositioning successfully relieved an inferior vena caval stenosis.

Hemodynamic insufficiency was attributed to medication effect while the patient was sleeping in one case and to hypovolemia in another case and was of no consequence in either situation. The other three occurrences of this event were in the same patient, who had the diaphragm tear with cardiac indices of 2.0 L/m2 per minute or less on days 115, 116, and 118 (all in the 16th week) before his death in the 17th week.

The patient with the fatal diaphragm tear had hepatic dysfunction as a consequence of his device malfunction during the 17th week after implant just before his death. The other 11 cases of hepatic dysfunction were in the first 3 weeks after implant. Ten events were residual from before implant, which resolved with device support. The episode in the third week was attributed to a septic episode. Neither the sepsis nor the hepatic dysfunction affected the outcome.

None of the 57 nonserious infection events in 24 patients affected clinical outcome. These events included 21 positive sputum cultures, 10 genitourinary infections, 6 positive blood cultures, 6 positive driveline cultures, 4 decubitus ulcers, 2 stool pathogens, and 1 each of the following: oral herpes, oral candida, great toe infection, and bronchial secretions.

The serious infection events were separated from other infections because they caused death, contributed to death, or delayed transplantation. As seen in Table 4, all occurred during the first month of implantation. Delay of transplant for 75 days was caused by a coccygeal decubitus ulcer. In another patient, delay of 29 days was caused by a medial driveline infection. Both patients underwent successful transplantations and are alive. The remaining three infections occurred in the patient who died of mediastinitis and sepsis during the third implant week. The infections were Pseudomonas from a chest tube site (day 9), Enterobacter from sputum (day 1), and gram-negative rods and Serratia from mediastinal drainage (day 2).

There were 17 neurologic events in 9 patients, most occurred in the first 2 months (Table 4). There were 9 transient ischemic attacks characterized by neurologic symptoms that resolved within 24 hours. In addition, there were 3 seizures, 2 impaired states of consciousness secondary to anoxic or metabolic causes, 1 retinal hemorrhage, 1 retinal embolus, and 1 stroke. The stroke, a hemiplegia, presumed due to a left middle cerebral artery embolus, occurred on the day of transplantation. All residual effects resolved within 3 months after transplantation.

All episodes of renal dysfunction occurred in the first and second weeks after implant and were attributed to the patients’ preoperative conditions. One event occurred in the patient who died of mediastinitis and sepsis during the third week after implant. No other renal events affected clinical outcome.

Eight chest reoperations in 7 patients were done for bleeding (n = 4), tamponade (n = 2), device repositioning (n = 1), and sternal debridement (n = 1). None of these events affected clinical outcome.

There were 31 general reoperations in 13 patients, with 24 procedures done in the first through third weeks after implant. The procedures included bronchoscopy (n = 12), nasal cautery (n = 9), endoscopic gastroduodenoscopy, thoracentesis (n = 3), arm fasciotomy (n = 1), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 1), and exploratory laparotomy (n = 1). Clinical outcome was not affected by any of these events.

There were 11 respiratory dysfunction events, all reintubations, in 7 patients including 2 events in the 2 patients who died. Ten events occurred in the first and second weeks after implant. Nine did not affect clinical outcome [13].

Eighteen control patients met entry criteria for the study and were similar to the implant group in demographics, risk factors, hemodynamics (the mean cardiac index for the implanted group was significantly lower than that of the controls), and laboratory values (Table 1). Ten of these 18 patients died before transplantation, after entrance criteria were met, 1 to 43 days (mean 7.64, median 3 days). All had hemodynamic insufficiency. Eight patients were transplanted after a mean waiting time of 23.1 days (range, 6–98 days). There was one immediate death because of donor heart failure and one late death during the first year after transplant. All 6 patients surviving at 1 year were also alive 2 years after transplant. Thus, 8 of 18 patients in the control group (44%) were transplanted, 7 of 8 (39% of the total) were discharged home, and 6 (33%) of 18 survived 1 to 2 years after transplantation.

Actuarial survival curves for these two groups are shown in Figure 3. They document a significant (p < 0.00001) survival benefit in the use of the CardioWest TAH.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Survival curves.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The control and implant groups were matched for age, size, and severity of cardiac failure. The cardiac indices and central venous pressures were indicative of cardiogenic shock despite greater than normal inotropic or mechanical support as required for entry into the study.

In this study, of the 27 patients implanted with the CardioWest TAH, 25 (93%) were transplanted and 24 (89%) were discharged home and are surviving to the present. The international experience with this device between 1993 and 1995 in 40 implants was a 65% discharge rate that compared favorably to those reported for other bridge-to-transplant devices, including the Novacor (Oakland, CA) and the TCI-Heartmate (Woburn, MA) [11]. That percentage, as noted in the introduction, has increased to 67% internationally. The difference in the CardioWest experience in this study and the international experience appears to be in patient selection. The careful selection criteria requiring that, at the time of device implantation, patients are acceptable for transplantation immediately excludes some patients with progressive hemodynamic deterioration. In addition, many patients are excluded because of age, size, and type of preimplant support. Thus, if one looks at the percentage of patients surviving transplantation, for this study 96% and for the international experience 92% to 93%, the difference in total outcome results from a greater attrition rate on device support in the international group. The selection criteria for device implantation possibly are not as tight in the international group, and the selection criteria for this study are not designed for what may be the eventual use of the device, but instead for the purpose of scientific comparison of the implant group with a matched control group.

The other striking finding in this study is the wide gap in survival rates between the implant and control groups. This finding confirms that, by using selection criteria in end-stage heart disease, we can with some certainty predict the imminent demise of a patient. Such a statement may sound elementary to the seasoned clinician, but is fundamental to obtaining FDA approval for the commercialization of any type of artificial heart. The wide gap in survival between patients who received implants and controls also confirms the efficacy of the CardioWest TAH. This efficacy is seen in a selected group of patients in imminent danger of dying and with evidence of right and left heart failure (mean central venas pressure 19.7 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance 233 dynes · sec/cm5).

Among the 175 adverse events in this study were 2 deaths and 13 serious adverse events that were the cause of death, contributed to death, or delayed transplantation. Eleven of these serious adverse events were in the 2 patients who died. The two other events included 1 decubitus ulcer and one driveline infection that delayed transplantation. The other 160 events were judged not to affect clinical outcome. Among those were 9 transient ischemic attacks, 1 retinal embolus, 1 stroke, and 2 splenic emboli. Most of these events occurred within the first or second week after implantation. The stroke occurred on the day of transplantation and might have been influenced by that procedure, but it has been counted as a device-related event. The linearized rate for stroke was 0.97% per patient-year; the linear rate for all emboli was 12.7%. None of the embolic events affected clinical outcome. One might infer that in a study with a fixed anticoagulant protocol, a lower rate might have been obtained. In addition, in a less rigorous study, some of these embolic events might have been missed.

One hundred four (59%) of the adverse events occurred within the first 2 weeks after implantation. Many of these were residual problems relating to the poor condition of the patient before implantation. All ten early cases of hepatic dysfunction and seven of the eight cases of renal dysfunction were reversed with device support. Several other early events were related to nonserious infections and to minor reoperations such as bronchoscopy and nasal cautery. Nearly all of these early problems were overcome, as were all but the 11 nonfatal events (6%) that contributed to the deaths of 2 patients.

The patient who died of device malfunction developed a tear in the first of four layers of the left ventricular diaphragm. This tear was eventually diagnosed by cardiac catheterization and transesophageal echocardiogram, but not before the patient had severe multiple organ failure. Reoperation to replace the ventricle was considered, but rejected because of his moribund state. This represents the only diaphragm tear in the history of this device dating back to the initial Jarvik-100 hearts and encompassing over 16 patient-years. Examination of the diaphragm by routine and scanning electron microscopic techniques failed to identify a cause. It is therefore assumed to be a random and rare event.

We believe that 89% survival to discharge of those implanted (25 of 27 patients) is remarkable. The reliability of this device as a biventricular blood pump provides a physiologic hemodynamic state that allows time for healing, nutrition, and improved general status so that a patient becomes a better risk for transplantation. In this study, 24 of the 25 transplanted patients are long-term survivors. This survival rate is considerably better than that in nonbridged patients of 80% at 1 year, which has been repeatedly published in the registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [14]. In our experience with 23 consecutive bridge-to-transplant patients with the CardioWest TAH, the posttransplant survival has been 100%. We believe that the CardioWest TAH is a valuable device for bridge to transplantation in patients who qualify as cardiac transplant candidates, have biventricular failure, large hearts, adequate body size (>1.7 m2), and are rapidly decompensating.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
1 Dr Copeland is a medical adviser to CardioWest. He does not sit as an official member of their board or receive any finanical consideration from CardioWest. Back


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Copeland J.G., Levinson M.M., Smith R., et al. The total artificial heart as a bridge to heart transplantation. A report of two cases. JAMA 1986;256:2991-2995.[Abstract]
  2. Copeland J.G., Smith R.G., Cleavinger M.R. Development and clinical use of the total artificial heart: a review of the current status of the CardioWest C-70 TAH (Jarvik-7). In: Lewis T., Graham T., eds. Mechanical circulatory support. London: Edward Arnold, 1995:186-198.
  3. Cabrol C., Gandjbakhch I., Pavie A., et al. Total artificial heart as a bridge for transplantation: La Pitié 1986 to 1987. J Heart Transplant 1988;7:12-17.
  4. Copeland J.G., Smith R., Icenogle T.B., et al. Orthotopic total artificial heart bridge to transplantation: preliminary results. J Heart Transplant 1989;104:569-578.
  5. Johnson K.E., Prieto M., Joyce L.D., et al. Summary of the clinical use of the Symbion total artificial heart: a registry report. J Heart Lung Transplant 1992;11:103-116.[Medline]
  6. Szefner J., Cabrol C. Control and treatment of hemostasis in patients with a total artificial heart: the experience of La Pitié. In: Pifarre R., ed. Anticoagulation, hemostasis, and blood preservation in cardiovascular surgery. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 1993:237-264.
  7. Copeland J.G. Aprotinin and the artificial heart. In: Piffare R., ed. Blood conservation with aprotinin. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 1995:325-330.
  8. Arabia F.A., Rosado L.J., Smith R.G., Copeland J.G. From balloon pumps to total artificial hearts. Congestive Heart Failure 1995;1:31-39.
  9. Lick S., Copeland J.G., Smith R.G., et al. Use of Symbion biventricular assist device in bridging to transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:283-287.[Abstract]
  10. Arabia FA, Copeland JG, Smith RG. Mechanical circulatory support: patient selection and implantation techniques. In: Baldwin JC, Bojar RM, Jacobs ML, eds. Cardiac surgery: principles and techniques. Cambridge: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1997 (in press).
  11. Copeland J.G., Pavie A., Duveau D., et al. Bridge to transplantation with the CardioWest total artificial heart: the international experience 1993 to 1995. J Heart Lung Transplant 1996;15:94-99.[Medline]
  12. Copeland J.G., Emery R.W., Levinson M.M., et al. Selection of patients for cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1987;75:2-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Copeland J.G., Tsau P.H., Arabia F.A., Xie T. Correlation of clinical embolic events with coagulability in a patient with a total artificial heart. J Heart Lung Transplant 1995;14:990-998.[Medline]
  14. Hosenpud J.D., Bennett L.E., Keck B.M., Fiol B., Novick R.J. The registry for the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: fourteenth official report 1997. J Heart Lung Transplant 1997;16:691-712.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. G. Copeland, R. G. Smith, R. K. Bose, P. H. Tsau, P. E. Nolan, and M. J. Slepian
Risk factor analysis for bridge to transplantation with the CardioWest total artificial heart.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1639 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
S. Aggarwal, F. Cheema, M. C. Oz, and Y. Naka
Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1609 - 1628.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. G. Copeland, R. G. Smith, F. A. Arabia, P. E. Nolan, G. K. Sethi, P. H. Tsau, D. McClellan, M. J. Slepian, and the CardioWest Total Artificial Heart Investigator
Cardiac Replacement with a Total Artificial Heart as a Bridge to Transplantation
N. Engl. J. Med., August 26, 2004; 351(9): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
D R Wheeldon
Mechanical circulatory support: state of the art and future perspectives
Perfusion, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 233 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. G. Copeland
Multicenter bridge to transplantation with the HeartMate assist device: Evaluation from another perspective
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2003; 125(2): 228 - 230.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
P. D. Simmons
Currents in Contemporary Ethics
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2001; 29(3-4): 401 - 406.
[PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. G. Copeland, F. A. Arabia, R. G. Smith, G. K. Sethi, P. E. Nolan, and M. E. Banchy
Arizona experience with CardioWest total artificial heart bridge to transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 68(2): 756 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Nose, K.-i. Nakata, M. Yoshikawa, G. V. Letsou, A. Fujisawa, E. Wolner, and H. Schima
Development of a totally implantable biventricular bypass centrifugal blood pump system
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 68(2): 775 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jack G. Copeland, III
Francisco A. Arabía
Gulshan K. Sethi
Bryan Foy
James Long
Robert L. Kormos
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Copeland, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Copeland, J. G., III
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS