ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Luiz T.B. Filomeno
Angelo Fernandez
Fabio B. Jatene
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Campos, J. R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jatene, F. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Campos, J. R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jatene, F. B.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1151-1154
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original articles: general thoracic

Repair of congenital sternal cleft in infants and adolescents

José Ribas M. de Campos, MDa, Luiz T.B. Filomeno, MDa, Angelo Fernandez, MDa, Raul Lopes Ruiz, MDa, Hélio Minamoto, MDa, Eduardo de Campos Werebe, MDa, Fabio B. Jatene, MDa

a Thoracic Division, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical Center, São Paulo, Brazil

Accepted for publication April 23, 1998.

Address reprint requests to Dr de Campos, Rua Almirante Soares Dutra n. 520, São Paulo 05654.000, Brazil
e-mail: (jribas{at}usp.br)

Abstract

Background. Clinical and surgical aspects of sternal cleft repair are presented. Primary repair in the neonatal period is the best management for this rare condition, but none of the patients in this report were referred to us during that period. Autologous repair is suitable for older patients because it avoids problems related to the implant of prosthetic materials.

Methods. This article reviews 8 cases of sternal cleft not associated with ectopia cordis in patients presenting between October 1979 and November 1997. Surgical repair consisted of three sliding chondrotomies, three posterior sternal wall repairs, one combination with the Ravitch technique for pectus excavatum repair, and one posterior sternal wall repair associated with total repair of Cantrell’s pentalogy.

Results. All patients who submitted to surgical correction had good aesthetic and structural results. The postoperative period was uneventful except that a subcutaneous fluid collection developed in 1 patient. The mean hospital stay was 5.8 days. The patients were followed up from 4 months to 18 years.

Conclusions. Whether dealing with older children or young adults, the technique of reconstructing a new sternum with a posterior periosteal flap from sternal bars and chondral grafts is a simple, quick, inexpensive, and effective option.

Since the 1850s, fascination with cleft of the manubrium has been evident because the heart and great vessels visibly beat under the skin. This produces an alternate protrusion and retraction movement upon respiration, specifically during coughing or the Valsalva maneuver. In this challenging anomaly, the underlying mediastinal structures (heart and great vessels) may easily be injured by external trauma. In addition, it is an unpleasant cosmetic deformity and quite alarming to the young patient’s family.

Congenital sternal cleft is rare, and hence it is usually reported as an isolated case presentation. The first surgical correction was reported by Lannelongue in 1888, as cited by Ravitch [1], but the first successful repair was published by Burton in 1947 [2]. It is postulated that the sternum has a common origin with the pectoral musculature, which develops from lateral plate mesoderm, and that isolated sternal clefts arise from a failure in either development or fusion of the mesenchymal elements as should normally occur by the eighth week of fetal life [3].

At one time this anomaly was erroneously known as "sternal agenesia," a complete misnomer because the two sternal bars exist in these patients but they are unfused. Little is known about its incidence and pathogenesis. No familial, teratogenic, or nutritional factors have been implicated. As mentioned, most cases are sporadic [4] and there is only one report of 2 cases in the same family [5]. Experimentally, Ramirez-Solis and colleagues [6] in 1993 reported that disruption of the Hoxb-4 gene in the mouse led to alterations in their paraxial mesoderm and that one of the animals presented a total sternal cleft.

This report describes our experience with sternal cleft repair in 8 patients, stressing the different surgical techniques required for each case and presenting another option for selected patients.

Patients and methods

Between May 1979 and September 1997, 8 patients (6 girls and women and 2 boys), ages ranging from 1.5 to 19 years (mean, 7.2 years), were treated. Five were asymptomatic and underwent the operation for cosmetic reasons as well as to shield the unprotected mediastinal structures. Although asymptomatic, the defect in an 11-year-old boy was associated with pectus excavatum. In another asymptomatic patient, the defect corresponded to Cantrell’s pentalogy. The eighth patient presented with congenital muscular subaortic stenosis; both cardiac and sternal defects were corrected at the same operation. The peculiar midline scar was present in 5 patients (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patients and Methods

 
The defect was corrected in 3 patients by sliding chondrotomies [7]. In 3 older patients the same technique was also attempted, but the sternal bars did not meet. We then decided to create a posterior sternal wall (PSW) with periosteal flaps from the sternal bars. The periosteum of each bar was incised on its lateral border and elevated from its anterior and medial surfaces. Both flaps were then turned upside down and sutured together in the midline with 3–0 absorbable sutures. This provided a thick and stable PSW. The gap between the two sternal bars was then filled with two or three chondral grafts removed subperichondrially, always attempting to preserve the perichondrial sheet’s integrity. After that, the distal end of the cleft (an existing bridge of cartilaginous tissue at the xiphoid area) was resected to facilitate the approximation of the sternal bars. The latter were approximated with heavy stainless steel wire. The chondral grafts were kept in position by these sternal wires. Then, all the perichondrial sheets were closed on both sides (Fig 1).



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. (A) Dissection of the anterior periosteum of the sternal bars which will be pulled medially and posteriorly, and dissection of the chondral grafts subperichondrially. (B) The posterior periosteal bed has been formed by suturing both periosteal flaps with interrupted absorbed sutures. The chondral grafts have been maintained in position by a stainless steel wire. The perichondrial sheets were closed on both sides.

 
In 2 patients (patients 6 and 8) (see Table 1), the pectoralis muscles could not be sutured together despite extensive dissection of their anterior and posterior surfaces. A small (2 x 3 and 2 x 4-cm) strip of Marlex mesh was sutured to the free edges of the pectoralis muscles in these cases. Finally, a suction drain was always used at this level and the subcutaneous tissue and skin were closed.

In 1 patient with associated pectus excavatum, this deformity was corrected by the Ravitch [1] procedure; because of the extensive resection of deformed cartilage, the two sternal bars could be easily approximated. For the patient with Cantrell’s pentalogy, a PSW was also used to reinforce the distal end of the cleft sternum.

Results

All patients who underwent surgical correction had good aesthetic and structural results. The follow-up period from 4 months to 18 years (average, 7.1 years) was uneventful except that a subcutaneous fluid collection developed in 1 patient. The mean in-hospital stay was 5.8 days.

Comment

A congenital sternal cleft not associated with cardiac defects or ectopia cordis is a rare and relatively benign malformation of the chest wall. It must be differentiated from thoracic or thoracoabdominal ectopic cordis, in which the heart is situated outside the chest cavity. The latter two conditions are associated with a high mortality rate because complex or uncorrectable cardiac anomalies are also present.

Congenital sternal cleft can be classified as complete or incomplete [8]. A complete cleft is the rarest form and fewer than 10 cases have been reported in the medical literature [3, 5]. Incomplete clefts are subdivided into superior or inferior ones. The latter may occur as an isolated entity, although it is usually associated with other developmental defects of the anterior chest wall such as ectopia cordis, or a combination of defects involving the abdominal wall, sternum, diaphragm, pericardium, and heart in Cantrell’s pentalogy. In the incomplete superior type, a bridge of bony tissue exists at the lower ends of the sternal bars, joining the two edges of the cleft in a U shape (proximal to the fourth cartilage) or V shape (reaching the xiphoid process). This is frequently an isolated entity [9].

There is no explanation for the marked female predilection in our series (2 boys and 6 girls) (see Table 1). However, it is similar to that of Gorlin and colleagues [10] and Heron and colleagues [11], who found the number of female patients was significantly greater when a sternal defect was accompanied by a supraumbilical raphe but not by a facial hemangioma. The unexplained association between cleft sternum and cervicofacial hemangiomas or vascular dysplasias, which has been reported by some authors in the literature [9, 12], was not confirmed in any of our patients. According to Firmin and coworkers [3], major defects of the sternum make the chest wall unstable, allowing the thoracic viscera to move paradoxically during respiration. Therefore, some infants could suffer attacks of cyanosis and develop recurrent chest infections. None of our patients suffered such attacks.

A considerable variety of procedures for sternal cleft repair have been reported in the literature [1, 2, 7, 1315], but it is an undisputed concept that sternal clefts should be corrected in the neonatal period within the first month of life [3, 8, 16]. At this stage, the sternal bars can be easily approximated by simple sutures, owing to the chest’s flexibility. This also permits approximation of the sternal bars with less danger of cardiac compression.

Nevertheless, patients who have not undergone repair during this period may require reconstruction later on. The increasing rigidity of the chest wall and the physiologic accommodation of the thoracic organs to a certain circumference of the chest determine that simple approximation is impossible without seriously compromising the heart and lungs. This distinguishes these patients from newborns. One of the earliest successful procedures for correction was devised by Sabiston in 1958 [7]. By using multiple bilateral sliding chondrotomies he was able to bring the sternal halves together while simultaneously increasing chest wall dimensions and flexibility. After that, miscellaneous techniques were developed, eg, split ribs, costal cartilage grafts, and segments of costal margin; stainless steel wire mesh [1]; segments of cartilage divided laterally and swung medially to cover the defect [17]; autogenous periosteal graft raised from the tibia in the lower limb [13]; and perichondral flap elevation and pectoralis muscle transposition [14]. In previous reports of repair in older patients, the use of prosthetic materials such as Marlex mesh, Teflon, silicone elastomer, or perforated acrylic plate has also been adapted by different authors [18, 19].

In addition to being effective, our procedure of building a PSW with periosteal flaps raised from the sternal bars, together with the chondral grafts, prepares a natural bed for new bone formation which, despite the reabsorption of the grafts, will provide a genuine bone sternum to protect the mediastinal structures. Our proposal lies between two techniques recently published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. Suri and colleagues [20] reported a case of complete sternal cleft in a 25-year-old man. Successful repair was accomplished using autogenous tissue (iliac bone and a V-Y myoplasty of the pectoralis major muscle) with "good cosmetic results and preservation of the already existing anatomic and mechanical sanctity of the thoracic cage, without using any synthetic material." Santini and associates [21], in a letter to the Editor regarding this technique, reported a 52-year-old man with a congenital total cleft sternum associated with an atrial septal defect, a large conoventricular septal defect, and pulmonary stenosis. This patient was successfully treated by direct approximation of the sternal bars. We agree with Santini and associates that repair should be accomplished by the simplest and least invasive procedure. However, direct closure in some cases seems impossible and even dangerous owing to the hemodynamic consequences as already well documented since 1983 [22]. In the same report, Santini and associates mentioned that surgical management of mediastinitis complicating cardiac surgical procedures offers "a model of the repair of a complete sternal cleft in adults." From our point of view, there is no comparison.

Whether dealing with older children or young adults, the rigidity of the chest wall and the lack of new space for accommodation of the intrathoracic organs must be considered, especially when the defect is too large to be closed directly. The heart is the least tolerant organ to reduced space inside the thoracic cage. Enlargement of the thoracic cage diameter is the main reason for our decision to use the PSW, apart from the fact that in older groups approximation of the sternal bars is almost physically and anatomically impossible. We also concur with Knox and colleagues [16], who in 1994 stated that "autologous repair with rib grafts can be accomplished safely without the use of prosthetic material which reduces the risk of infectious complications while allowing normal growth of the chest wall and providing sufficient strength and rigidity in the neosternum, with excellent cosmetic results." In 2 patients, however, small strips of Marlex mesh (2 x 3 and 2 x 4 cm) were used, not as a substitute for the chest wall, but as a bridge for the major pectoralis muscles that could not be sutured despite wide mobilization.

It was unnecessary in any of our patients to suture the sternohyoid and sternothyroid muscles or to slide the origins of the sternocleidomastoid medially to "stabilize the thorax aperture and avoid the tendency toward herniation of the lungs and pulsation in the neck," as proposed by Asp and Sulamaa in 1961, modified by Daum and Hecker in 1964 [1], and used by Greenberg and colleagues in 1991 [14]. On the other hand, we agree with the Greenberg and colleagues and with Salley and Stewart [23] regarding the advantages of contact between the cartilaginous tissue of the two sternal bars, as occurs when the periosteal flaps are raised to facilitate primary union. We also concur that mobilization of the pectoralis muscles may further protect the repair site, reducing site, reducing lateral tension of the advanced rib segments due to approximation of the sternal bars.

According to the literature [14, 16, 20] and our opinion, it is always better to avoid the use of prosthetic materials, considering the risks of infection and the inability of these inert materials to grow with the patient. Those techniques are described to emphasize the feasibility of the repair without resorting to the use of a prosthetic material, regardless of the patient’s age. Included in this report is a computed tomographic scan of patient 6 (see Table 1) taken 5 years after primary repair of an incomplete superior cleft sternum. The new sternum is shown protecting the mediastinal structures (Fig 2).



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Computed tomographic scan of the chest (patient 6) showing the "new sternum" protecting the mediastinal structures.

 
References

  1. Ravitch M.M. Congenital deformities of the chest wall and their operative correction. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1977:23-25.
  2. Burton J.F. Method of correction of ectopic cordis: two cases. Arch Surg 1947;54:79-81.
  3. Firmin R.K., Fragomeni L.S., Lenox S.C. Complete cleft sternum. Thorax 1980;35:303-306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kotzot D., Huk W., Pfeiffer R.A. Genetic counseling of cleft sternum. Genet Counsel 1994;5:147-150.
  5. Haque K.N. Isolated asternia: an independent entity. Clin Genet 1984;25:362-365.[Medline]
  6. Ramirez-Solis A.R., Zheng H., Whiting J., Krumlauf R., Bradley A. Hoxb-4 (Hox-2.6) mutant mice show homeototic transformation of a cervical vertebra and defects in the closure of the sternal rudiments. Cell 1993;73:279-294.[Medline]
  7. Sabiston D.C. The surgical management of congenital bifid sternum with partial ectopia cordis. J Thorac Surg 1958;35:118-122.
  8. Samarrai A.R., Charmolockly A.M., Attra A.A. Complete cleft sternum: classification and surgical repair. Int Surg 1985;70:71-73.[Medline]
  9. Opitz J.M. Editorial comment on the paper by Hersh et al. and Kaplan et al. on sternal cleft. Am J Med Genet 1985;21:201-202.
  10. Gorlin R.J., Kantaputra P., Aughton D.J., Muluken J.B. Marked female predilection in some syndromes associated with facial hemangiomas. Am J Med Genet 1994;52:130-135.[Medline]
  11. Heron D., Lyonnet S., Iserin L., Munnich A., Padovani J.P. Sternal cleft: case report and review of a series of nine patients. Am J Med Genet 1995;59:154-156.[Medline]
  12. Hersh J.H., Waterfill L.D., Rutledge J., et al. Sternal malformation/vascular dysplasia association. Am J Med Genet 1985;21:177-186.[Medline]
  13. Valla J.S., Bechraqui T., Belghith M., Daoud N., Grinda A. Fissure sternale congénitale. Chir Pediatr 1989;30:219-221.[Medline]
  14. Greenberg B.M., Becker J.M., Pletcher B.A. Congenital bifid sternum: repair in early infancy and literature review. Plastic Reconstr Surg 1991;88:886-889.[Medline]
  15. Snyder B.J., Robbins R.C., Ramos D. Primary repair of complete sternal cleft with pectoralis major muscle flaps. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:984-986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Knox L., Tuggle D., Knott-Craig J. Repair of congenital sternal clefts in adolescence and infancy. J Ped Surg 1994;29:1513-1516.[Medline]
  17. Meissner F. Fissura sterni congenita. Zentralbl Chir 1963;48:1832-1839.
  18. Daoud S., Jacob Y., Lefort G., Mourad H. Corretion de la bifidite sternale par une prothese en silastic. Chir Pediatr 1980;21:415-417.[Medline]
  19. Krontiris A., Tsironis A. Bifid sternum—successful repair by use of an acrylic plaque: report of a case. J Int Coll Surg 1964;41:301-307.[Medline]
  20. Suri K.R., Sharma K.R., Jha N.K., Sharma B.K. Complete congenital sternal cleft in an adult: repair by autogenous tissues. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:573-575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Santini F., Faggian G., Pessoto R., Mazzucco A. Repair of complete congenital sternal cleft in an adult [Letter]. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:918-919.[Free Full Text]
  22. Ravitch M.M. Disorder of the sternum and the thoracic wall. In: Sabiston D.C., Spencer F.C., eds. Gibbon’s surgery of the chest, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1983:318-360.
  23. Salley R.K., Stewart S. Superior sternal cleft: repair in the newborn. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:582-583.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Padalino, G. F. Zanon, F. Migneco, M. G. Rubino, F. Fusaro, and G. Stellin
Surgical Repair of Incomplete Cleft Sternum and Cardiac Anomalies in Early Infancy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2291 - 2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J. D. St. Louis
Pentalogy of Cantrell associated with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and herniation of the ventricular mass into the abdominal cavity
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 200 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Luiz T.B. Filomeno
Angelo Fernandez
Fabio B. Jatene
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Campos, J. R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jatene, F. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Campos, J. R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jatene, F. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS