|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:217-219
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Chapman Lung Center, Chapman Medical Center, Orange, California, USA
Accepted for publication September 19, 1997.
Dr Fischel, Chapman Lung Center, Chapman Medical Center, 2601 East Chapman Ave, Orange, CA 92687.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. Fifty-seven patients underwent a bilateral thoracoscopic stapled operation with bovine pericardium (Peri-Strips) on one side and bovine collagen (INSTAT) on the contralateral side to buttress the staples.
Results. The average time to chest tube removal was 8.6 ± 7.2 days for Peri-Strips and 10.7 ± 8.7 days for INSTAT (p = 0.16). No significant differences were seen when right-sided and left-sided application were considered separately (p = 0.12).
Conclusions. Peri-Strips or INSTAT for buttressing staple lines in thoracoscopic stapled bilateral lung volume reduction operations were equally effective. Materials cost savings of up to 80% per case can be realized by using the less expensive but equally effective INSTAT for buttressing staple lines.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most common complication after operations for emphysema is a prolonged air leak. After an initial experience with large air leaks on the staple line, Cooper developed the bovine pericardium patch to reduce the air leak [6]. The Peri-Strip patch adds $3,000 to $4,000 to the cost of a bilateral staple operation. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and handling characteristics of a less expensive product (INSTAT; bovine collagen) with Peri-Strips (bovine pericardium), related to this ability to decrease postoperative air leaks.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During a single period of anesthetia, all patients underwent bilateral thoracoscopy for resection of areas of severe emphysematous change. The ELC 60 Stapler (Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH) was used with either Peri-Strips (bovine pericardium; Biovascular, Minneapolis, MN) or INSTAT (collagen absorbable hemostat; Specialty Products Division, Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) as buttressing material. In each case, one side was completed with a single type of buttressing material whereas the contralateral side used only the other buttressing material. In this manner, each patient acted as his or her own control. The INSTAT was attached to the stapler with Steri-Strips (3MMedical/Surgical Division, St. Paul, MN), which are easily removed thoracoscopically (Fig 1). The INSTAT is 2 mm thick so it significantly reduces the size of the opening of the endoscopic stapler. Therefore, after the INSTAT was attached to the stapler, it was closed to compress the collagen. This allowed more room to pull the lung tissue into the stapler. The collagen in the jaws was then wet slightly with water to facilitate advancing the lung tissue through the jaws of the stapler. After the stapler was fired, the Steri-Strips were wet with a suction-irrigator to loosen and remove them from the INSTAT (Fig 2). Peri-Strips were attached to the stapler using a paper sleeve preparation. The method of thoracoscopic application is outlined in detail elsewhere [7].
|
|
Statistical analysis was performed using a standard Students t test for paired variables with statistical significance occuring at values of p less than 0.05. Test power was calculated with greater than 95% power to detect a 30% difference in the buttressing material.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 1 shows the duration of chest tube drainage for the two materials, and Table 2 shows the cost per case related to the number of units of bovine pericardium or collagen used.
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initially, the collagen was more difficult to use than the pericardium because the former is thicker and lung tissue slides more easily across the pericardium than across dry collagen. This can be overcome if the stapler is closed after the collagen is in place before insertion of the stapler into the chest. This maneuver will compress the collagen so it does not take up so much of the limited space in the jaw of the stapler. Also, if the collagen is wet slightly with water, the lung slides easily over the materials.
In conclusion, the efficacy of bovine collagen appears to be similar to that of bovine pericardium when used as a buttress to reduce the air leak from a staple line on severely emphysematous lung. Although the physical properties of the pericardium are superior to those of the collagen, the cost is much greater.
In many cases air leaks occur on postoperative days after no air leak was present on leaving the operating room. Also, with direct inspection under thoracoscopic visualization many of the air leaks discovered at the time of the operation do not occur on the staple lines but at distant sites. Both of these occurrences suggest that many of the air leaks encountered in lung reduction operations are related to factors other than the buttress material used. Possible explanations include leaking due to tension placed on surrounding lung tissue, surgical technique, or the postoperative rupture of blebs in these severely emphysematous lungs. This may partially explain the lack of significant differences when using the two different buttressing materials. We have been able to significantly decrease the morbidity associated with prolonged air leaks and eliminate reoperation for air leak with the aggressive and outpatient use of Heimlich valves [8]. It should be noted that with the aggressive use of Heimlich valves to treat air leaks, the small differences seen between buttressing materials would most likely not result in an increased length of hospital stay for our patients.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Brenner, N. M. Hanna, R. Mina-Araghi, A. F. Gelb, R. J. McKenna Jr, and H. Colt Innovative Approaches to Lung Volume Reduction for Emphysema Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1): 238 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Adluri and J. M. Parmar Use the bulla for pneumostasis Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 19 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Maxfield New and Emerging Minimally Invasive Techniques for Lung Volume Reduction Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 777 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brenner, X. Gonzalez, B. Jones, R. Ha, K. Osann, R. McKenna, and J. Milliken Effects of a Novel Implantable Elastomer Device for Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in a Rabbit Model of Elastase-Induced Emphysema Chest, January 1, 2002; 121(1): 201 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Stirling, W. J. Babidge, M. J. Peacock, J. A. Smith, K. S. Matar, G. I. Snell, D. J. Colville, and G. J. Maddern Lung volume reduction surgery in emphysema: a systematic review Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 641 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Stammberger, W. Klepetko, G. Stamatis, J. Hamacher, R. A. Schmid, W. Wisser, L. Hillerjan, and W. Weder Buttressing the staple line in lung volume reduction surgery: a randomized three-center study Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 70(6): 1820 - 1825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Cagirici, S. Bilaceroglu, M. Cikirikcioglu, H. Posacioglu, Y. Atay, T. Yagdi, and O. Bilkay Parenchymal Stapling in Pulmonary Lobectomies: Is it Really Necessary? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1999; 7(3): 225 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |