HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Jacques A. M. van Son Norman H. Silverman Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Son, J. A. M. Articles by Haas, G. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Son, J. A. M. Articles by Haas, G. S. Related Collections Related Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1657-1663
© 1997 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Article: Cardiovascular

Predicting Feasibility of Biventricular Repair of Right-Dominant Unbalanced Atrioventricular Canal

Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Pediatric Cardiology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Accepted for publication December 3, 1996.

	Abstract

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Background. In right-dominant unbalanced atrioventricular (AV) canal, there are no criteria to judge adequacy of the left ventricle for biventricular repair. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that right ventricular volume overload in this condition results in right-to-left septal bowing and contributes to the appearance of a small left ventricle.

Methods. Five consecutive neonates and young infants (age range, 23 days to 5 months; median age, 3 months) with right-dominant unbalanced complete AV canal underwent biventricular repair. Preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic measurements of left (LV) and right ventricular size and AV valve component size were made. Potential LV volume was assessed preoperatively using a theoretic model that assumed a normalization of septal bowing.

Results. There was no perioperative mortality; 1 patient died 71 days postoperatively of problems related to the left AV valve. Preoperatively, all patients had severe LV hypoplasia, with a mean end-diastolic indexed true LV volume of 14.8 ± 9.1 mL/m², indexed potential LV volume of 32.0 ± 18.8 mL/m², left AV valve to total AV valve ratio of 0.30 ± 0.06, and LV to right ventricular long-dimension ratio of 0.65 ± 0.1. Postoperatively, all patients had indexed true LV volumes greater than 30 mL/m² (mean volume, 35.6 ± 3.9 mL/m²), and the left AV valve to total AV valve ratio and the LV to right ventricular long-dimension ratio increased to 0.42 ± 0.03 and 0.88 ± 0.11, respectively. Both preoperative potential and true LV volumes correlated well with postoperative true LV volumes: r = 0.90 (p = 0.040) and r = 0.93 (p = 0.023), respectively. Increases in LV length and left AV annulus size indicated contributions of volume loading and surgical patching to the right of the ventricular crest to the increase in LV size.

Conclusions. In our small series, preoperative indexed potential LV volume of 15 mL/m² or greater (present in all patients) allowed biventricular repair of right-dominant unbalanced AV canal. Any previous criteria for LV hypoplasia in this condition need to be reconsidered. This study also has implications for other right-sided volume-loaded lesions in which the left ventricle initially is judged to be hypoplastic but in which biventricular repair may be feasible.

	Introduction

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
See also page 1663.

Repair of complete atrioventricular canal (CAVC) has evolved from an often staged approach with a relatively high morbidity and mortality to one-stage complete repair in young infants with generally low morbidity and mortality [1–6]. Ventricular balance relates to the commitment of the left and right part of the atrioventricular (AV) junction to the respective ventricles. If the AV junction is connected preponderantly to either one or the other ventricle, then right ventricular (RV) or left ventricular (LV) dominance is considered to exist [7]; the ventricle associated with the smaller portion of the AV valve orifice is often correspondingly hypoplastic. Right dominance is considerably more frequent than left dominance [8–10].

In intermediate and even highly unbalanced cases of CAVC, there are no proven guidelines for deciding between biventricular repair or univentricular palliation. Cohen and co-workers [10] recently emphasized the importance of the relative sizes of the AV valve areas and of the ventricular septal defect size in the outcome of patients with unbalanced CAVC. However, the definition of "balance" as determined preoperatively remains unclear, and presumably, criteria are used that have been applied to other conditions with small left ventricles [11–13].

We challenge the notion that unbalanced CAVC may always require univentricular palliation and believe that biventricular repair, if feasible, remains the best option. For right-dominant unbalanced CAVC, we hypothesized that RV volume overload results in right-to-left septal bowing and contributes to the appearance of a small left ventricle, which can actually accommodate a greater potential volume. Therefore, surgical decision-making depends not only on the absolute LV volume but also on the potential LV volume preoperatively. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively analyzed our experience with 5 consecutive neonates and young infants with right-dominant unbalanced CAVC who all underwent biventricular repair.

	Patients and Methods

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Five consecutive neonates and young infants (3 boys and 2 girls) with right-dominant unbalanced CAVC seen during a 3-year period (December 1991 to December 1994) underwent biventricular repair; no patient with this lesion underwent univentricular palliation during this period. The median age at the time of CAVC repair was 3 months (range, 23 days to 5 months). In all patients, CAVC was associated with a large interatrial communication and a restrictive interventricular communication with little (n = 3) or no (n = 2) bridging of the superior component of the left AV valve. Associated cardiac anomalies are listed in Table 1.

	Echocardiographic Measurements

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 1. . (A) Various measurements made from apical four-chamber view. The ratio of left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) to total AV valve diameter was calculated as follows: LAVV/(LAVV + right atrioventricular valve [RAVV]). Left ventricular and right ventricular long dimensions are represented by arrows in left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV), respectively. (B) The hatched area shows left ventricular area as derived from apical four-chamber view. (C) The hatched area shows right ventricular area as derived from apical four-chamber view. (LA = left atrium; RA = right atrium.)

View larger version (41K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 2. . Hatched area shows cross-sectional true left ventricular area (LV) imaged just below level of atrioventricular valve. Left ventricular volume was estimated by modification of method used by Rhodes and co-workers [13] using the equation: volume = 0.83 x LV area x LV long dimension. (RV = right ventricle.)

View larger version (47K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 3. . In estimating preoperative potential left ventricular cross-sectional area, an imaginary line (A) is drawn from one end to the other of the crescent-shaped left ventricle (LV). The potential left ventricular area is approximated by twice the hatched area bounded by line A and the posterior left ventricular endocardium. (RV = right ventricle.)

Four patients underwent cardiac catheterization to further assess LV size, the reason for systemic arterial desaturation, or both; noninvasive testing could not clarify the contributions of intracardiac right-to-left shunting versus pulmonary venous desaturation. Patients 1, 2, and 4 had pulmonary hypertension and at least some bidirectional shunting at either the atrial or (less likely) ductal level (minimal postductal saturation, 97%). Patients 1, 2, and 3 had decreased pulmonary venous saturation causing systemic arterial desaturation.

	Surgical Technique

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
The repair was performed with aortic and bicaval cannulation using low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass at 24° to 26°C. Multiple-dose blood cardioplegic solution was used in all patients. For closure of the CAVC, a double-patch technique was used in 3 patients; to enlarge the orifice of the left AV valve, the ventricular septal patch was placed slightly more to the right of the ventricular crest than we usually do for repair of CAVC. In the other 2 patients, the ventricular component of the CAVC was so small that it was closed with one or two braided 5-0 sutures supported with felt pledgets; the atrial component of the CAVC was closed with a glutaraldehyde-preserved pericardial patch. The cleft between the left-sided superior and inferior bridging leaflets was closed in 1 patient and partially closed in 4 patients because of the presence of multiple left-sided obstructive lesions (n = 3) or tissue deficiency of the left AV valve (n = 1). The 3 patients with LV outflow obstruction underwent simultaneous membranectomy and myectomy of the left ventricular outflow tract; in 1 patient, the associated coarctation was repaired simultaneously, whereas in the remaining 2, the coarctation had been repaired previously. In the patient with associated cor triatriatum, a severely restrictive membrane in the left atrium was resected.

	Statistical Analysis

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
The data are expressed as the mean ± the standard deviation. Simple regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between preoperative potential LV volume and postoperative LV volume and between preoperative true LV volume and postoperative LV volume. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.

	Results

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Clinical Data
All patients survived the operation. Postoperative LV function was excellent as evidenced by a median systolic blood pressure of 85 mm Hg (range, 75 to 100 mm Hg) and a median left atrial pressure of 9 mm Hg (range, 7 to 11 mm Hg). Patients were weaned from inotropic support after 3 to 6 days. One patient subsequently underwent diaphragmatic plication for a right phrenic nerve palsy. Four patients were discharged in excellent clinical condition after 5 to 11 days.

One patient died (patient 4: Tables 2, 3). Morphologically, this patient had a marked tissue deficiency of the bridging leaflets of the left AV valve and a rudimentary posteromedial papillary muscle. The cleft between the left-sided bridging leaflets had been closed only partially, as complete closure would have resulted in undue tension on the edges of the leaflets. After a relatively uneventful early postoperative course, severe left AV valve regurgitation developed, necessitating further cleft closure and annuloplasty of the left AV valve 22 days after the initial operation. Because of residual left AV valve regurgitation, a 17-mm St. Jude Medical prosthesis was placed in the supraannular position. Despite adequate anticoagulation, recurrent thrombus formation on the prosthesis necessitated thrombectomy; ultimately, refusal of an additional operation led to the patient's death 71 days after the initial operation. In this patient, the left ventricle had been able to sustain the systemic circulation during the entire postoperative course despite the severe AV valve regurgitation; the unfavorable outcome was not related to LV inadequacy.

	Echocardiographic Data

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were 6% and 4%, respectively. Preoperative measurements showed severe LV hypoplasia, with an RV–forming apex and small left AV valve components in all patients (see Table 2). Three patients had indexed true LV volumes smaller than 10 mL/m². The preoperative indexed potential LV volumes ranged from 14.8 to 61.9 mL/m² (mean indexed potential volumes, 32.0 ± 18.8 mL/m²). Absolute aortic valve annulus size ranged from 5.4 to 8.8 mm. Notably, whereas the atrial components of the CAVC were large, averaging nearly 11 mm, the ventricular components were generally small, averaging less than 4 mm; moreover, the effective orifice area of the ventricular communications may have been overestimated by echocardiography, with chordal and leaflet attachments obliterating the true defect orifice. In all patients, we were able to document antegrade flow in the ascending aorta and aortic arch; all 3 patients with a patent ductus arteriosus at the time of CAVC repair had no major right-to-left ductal flow.

Postoperatively, all patients had indexed true LV volumes exceeding 30 mL/m² (see Table 3). All indices of relative LV size also increased substantially postoperatively. The increase in LV dimensions with reversal of septal bowing and the increase in LV long dimension were dramatic in most patients (Fig 4).

View larger version (164K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 4. . Preoperative echocardiographic views of right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV) in (A) short-axis and (B) apical four-chamber views demonstrating compressed and hypoplastic-appearing LV. After biventricular repair of right-dominant unbalanced atrioventricular canal, the LV is seen to assume relatively normal size in both (C) short-axis and (D) apical four-chamber views.

	Comment

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
This study demonstrates that hypoplasia of the left ventricle in right-dominant unbalanced CAVC is not necessarily absolute and that the left ventricle often has the capacity to expand to a size that is sufficient to support the systemic circulation. In right-dominant unbalanced CAVC, the volume-loaded right ventricle compresses the left ventricle, whereas after surgical correction of the CAVC, primarily because of reversal of septal bowing, the left ventricle is allowed to attain its full stature as a ventricle (see Fig 4). Estimation of both a theoretically derived potential LV volume and a true preoperative LV volume allows prediction of the postoperative LV volume. Although certain geometric assumptions may not be valid in distorted ventricular geometry, we believe the modification of Triulzi and colleagues [11] and Rhodes and co-workers [13], using measurements in orthogonal planes, provides a reasonably accurate representation of volumes; the quantitative and qualitative evaluations of LV size in this study were in good agreement. A second factor that contributed to the increase in LV size after operation was volume loading of the left ventricle, as evidenced by an increase in the LV long dimension, the LV short-axis dimension, and the potential LV area in excess of that predicted by the septal shift model. Thus, loading conditions may also play a role in apparent LV hypoplasia preoperatively.

Surgical manipulation is also a factor in the increase in LV size. The volume of the left ventricle can be increased by attachment of the ventricular septal patch slightly more to the right of the ventricular crest than is usually done in the repair of CAVC; in addition, if a single-patch repair is performed, the superior or inferior bridging leaflet, or both leaflets, can be divided more to the RV side than is usually done. Utmost discipline must be exerted in the sizing of the patch, as oversizing results in patch redundancy with the potential for left AV valve regurgitation. Although it is our bias to close the cleft whenever possible, closure of the cleft can lead to stenosis of the left AV valve orifice, especially in the setting of closely spaced or single papillary muscles. In the setting of a tissue-deficient left AV valve, pericardial patch augmentation of the superior and inferior bridging leaflets may be a valuable technique to restore a competent neo–septal leaflet [14]. In our opinion, corroborated by the findings of this study, the determinant of successful biventricular repair of right-dominant unbalanced CAVC appears to be related more to competence of the left AV valve than to LV size. Indeed, at a median follow-up of 33 months, 3 of our 4 surviving patients had no left AV valve regurgitation, and 1 had mild regurgitation; no patient had any restriction to inflow.

Because all 5 patients in this series underwent biventricular repair sustained by an adequate left ventricle postoperatively, we were not able to determine all the factors related to outcome. However, an RV–forming apex and the appearance of a small left ventricle on the preoperative echocardiogram were clearly not predictors of failure. Also, a left AV valve to total AV valve diameter ratio as low as 0.23 and an LV to RV area ratio as low as 0.14 did not preclude successful biventricular repair. Cohen and colleagues [10] recently emphasized the importance of the relative sizes of the AV valves and the size of the interventricular communication in relation to patient outcome. Although our findings cannot be compared directly with theirs, we agree that the preoperative true LV size may be misleading and that a small interventricular communication, present in all 5 of our patients, appears to carry a more favorable prognosis. Our series, however, does suggest that the size of the left AV valve may be less important because surgical manipulation may be able to alter the relative AV valve size.

Morphometric data, no matter how concerning, may be less important than physiologic data. In the presence of a restrictive interventricular communication, antegrade ascending aortic flow with left-to-right ductal flow or an obliterated ductus arteriosus and oxygen saturations in the upper and lower extremities matched at 100% indicate that biventricular repair can be accomplished. In contrast, when there is retrograde flow in the ascending aorta in the presence of right-to-left ductal flow, univentricular palliation is generally indicated because of inadequacy of the left ventricle to sustain the systemic circulation. All 5 patients in our series showed antegrade flow in the ascending aorta, and the 3 patients with a patent ductus arteriosus exhibited left-to-right ductal shunting. In situations of documented antegrade flow in the ascending aorta with ductal flow being right to left or bidirectional and a differential oxygen saturation between the upper extremities, the decision making may be more complex. In this situation, cardiac catheterization may be of value in differentiating between pulmonary venous desaturation and major intracardiac right-to-left shunting, as it did in 4 of our patients.

In summary, in this small series of patients with right-dominant unbalanced CAVC, biventricular repair was successfully accomplished despite severe LV hypoplasia with indexed true LV volumes as low as 7 mL/m² and indexed potential LV volumes as low as 15 mL/m². We do not believe that the criteria for absolute LV volumes in the setting of critical aortic stenosis or hypoplastic left heart syndrome [11, 13] are valid in the setting of LV compression by a volume-loaded right ventricle. We believe that the lower limit of LV size must be reconsidered in the context of ventricular geometry. The indexed potential LV volume of 15 mL/m², or higher, even in the presence of a relatively small aortic annulus, is nevertheless consistent with the lower limits on absolute LV size set by previous investigators [11, 13]. Surgical augmentation of the left AV valve annulus may also increase LV size and adequacy. Further studies with larger patient populations are needed to determine the value of preoperative echocardiography in predicting postoperative LV adequacy. This study has broad implications for the management of right-dominant unbalanced CAVC and other right-sided volume lesions in which the left ventricle initially is judged to be hypoplastic but for which biventricular repair may be feasible.

	Acknowledgments

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
This work was done in part during Dr Colin K. Phoon's tenure in a research fellowship from the American Heart Association, California Affiliate.

	Footnotes

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 
Address reprint requests to Dr Silverman, Echocardiography Laboratory, University of California at San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0214.

	References

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Patients and Methods Echocardiographic Measurements Surgical Technique Statistical Analysis Results Echocardiographic Data Comment Acknowledgments References

 

1. Studer M, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, et al. Determinants of early and late results of repair of atrioventricular septal (canal) defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;84:523–42.[Abstract]
2. Clapp SK, Perry BL, Farooki ZQ, et al. Surgical and medical results of complete atrioventricular canal: a ten-year review. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:454–8.[Medline]
3. Merrill WH, Hammon JW Jr, Graham TP Jr, Bender HW Jr. Complete repair of atrioventricular septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52:29–32.[Abstract]
4. Bailey SC, Watson DC. Atrioventricular septal defect repair in infants. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52:33–7.[Abstract]
5. Hanley FL, Fenton KN, Jonas RA, et al. Surgical repair of complete atrioventricular canal defects in infancy: twenty-year trends. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:387–97.[Abstract]
6. Bando K, Turrentine MW, Sun K, et al. Surgical management of complete atrioventricular septal defects: a twenty-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1543–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Bharati S, Lev M. The spectrum of common atrioventricular orifice (canal). Am Heart J 1973;86:553–61.[Medline]
8. Freedom RM, Bini RM, Rowe RD. Endocardial cushion defect and significant hypoplasia of the left ventricle: a distinct clinical and pathological entity. Eur J Cardiol 1978;7:263–81.[Medline]
9. Piccoli GP, Ho SY, Wilkinson JL, Macartney FJ, Gerlis LM, Anderson RH. Left-sided obstructive lesions in atrioventricular septal defects. An anatomic study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;83:453–60.[Abstract]
10. Cohen MS, Jacobs ML, Weinberg PM, Rychik J. Morphometric analysis of unbalanced common atrioventricular canal using two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1017–23.[Abstract]
11. Triulzi MO, Wilkins GT, Gillam LD, Gentile F, Weyman AE. Normal adult cross-sectional echocardiographic volumes: left ventricular volumes. Echocardiography 1985;2:153–69.
12. Parsons MK, Moreau GA, Graham TP, Johns JA, Boucek RJ. Echocardiographic estimation of critical left ventricular size in infants with isolated aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:1049–55.[Abstract]
13. Rhodes LA, Colan SD, Perry SB, Jonas RA, Sanders SP. Predictors of survival in neonates with critical aortic stenosis. Circulation 1991;84:2325–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Van Son JAM, Van Praagh R, Falk V, Mohr FW. Pericardial patch augmentation of the tissue-deficient mitral valve in common atrioventricular canal. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1117–9.[Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. M. Delmo Walter, P. Ewert, R. Hetzer, M. Hubler, V. Alexi-Meskishvili, P. Lange, and F. Berger Biventricular repair in children with complete atrioventricular septal defect and a small left ventricle Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 33(1): 40 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. De Oliveira, R. Sittiwangkul, B. W. McCrindle, A. Dipchand, T.-J. Yun, J. G. Coles, C. Caldarone, W. G. Williams, and G. S. Van Arsdell Biventricular repair in children with atrioventricular septal defects and a small right ventricle: Anatomic and surgical considerations J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 250 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Corno Borderline left ventricle Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 67 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Serraf, D. Piot, E. Belli, F. Lacour-Gayet, A. Touchot, R. Roussin, J. Zoghbi, J. Bruniaux, and C. Planche Biventricular repair of transposition of the great arteries and unbalanced ventricles J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2001; 122(6): 1199 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.-H. Kim, T.-Y. Lee, S. C. Kim, S. J. Kim, and Y. T. Lee Unbalanced atrioventricular septal defect with parachute valve Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1711 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Tworetzky, D. B. McElhinney, M. M. Brook, V. Mohan Reddy, F. L. Hanley, and N. H. Silverman Echocardiographic diagnosis alone for the complete repair of major congenital heart defects J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 228 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. I. Tchervenkov, S. A. Tahta, L. C. Jutras, and M. J. Beland Biventricular repair in neonates with hypoplastic left heart complex Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1998; 66(4): 1350 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Imamura, J. J. Drummond-Webb, G. E. Sarris, D. J. Murphy Jr, and R. B.B. Mee Double-outlet right ventricle with complete atrioventricular canal Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 942 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Abbruzzese, D. Montemurro, and M. T. Cascarano Small left ventricles and biventricular repairs Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1998; 66(1): 310 - 310. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.A.M. van Son, V. Falk, M.D Black, G.S. Haas, and F.W. Mohr Conversion of complex neonatal Ebstein's anomaly into functional tricuspid or pulmonary atresia Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 1998; 13(3): 280 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Jacques A. M. van Son Norman H. Silverman Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Son, J. A. M. Articles by Haas, G. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Son, J. A. M. Articles by Haas, G. S. Related Collections Related Article