ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
John M. Snider
Lamar J. Bushnell
Louis A. Lanza
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snider, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lanza, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snider, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lanza, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1454-1459
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Article: General Thoracic

c-erbB-2/p185–Directed Therapy in Human Lung Adenocarcinoma

John M. Snider, MD, Lamar J. Bushnell, MD, Lih C. Chen, BA, Louis A. Lanza, MD

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. These experiments were conducted to determine whether p185 can be therapeutically targeted in adenocarcinoma of the lung using an anti-p185–gelonin conjugate. c-erbB-2/p185 is overexpressed in up to one third of non–small cell lung cancers. CALU-3 is a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line that overexpresses p185. muMoAb-4D5 is a murine anti-p185 monoclonal immunoglobulin G1. Gelonin is a potent type 1 ribosomal inhibitory protein.

Methods. 4D5 and gelonin were covalently modified and linked. Purification was confirmed by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Dose-dependent cytotoxicity was quantified using 3H-thymidine uptake by CALU-3 cells after incubation with 4D5-gelonin conjugate or with control substances (4D5, gelonin, unconjugated 4D5 + gelonin, or control antibody MOPC-21).

Results. The 4D5-gelonin conjugate showed a 50% inhibitory concentration of 3.5 x 10-10 mol/L, but 4D5 alone demonstrated no cytotoxic effect. Gelonin and the unconjugated 4D5-gelonin mixture had one tenth the cytotoxicity of the 4D5-gelonin conjugate (inhibitory concentration = 6.5 x 10-9 mol/L and 8.5 x 10-9 mol/L, respectively). The conjugate exhibited minimal toxicity against a p185-negative cell line (NIH3T3).

Conclusions. Selective and efficient killing of human lung adenocarcinoma cells can be achieved in vitro using c-erbB-2/p185–directed therapy.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
See also page 1459.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of deaths due to cancer in men and women in the United States, with nearly 180,000 new cases estimated for 1996 [1]. Most patients are not candidates for surgical resection at the time of diagnosis. Efforts to improve long-term survival using chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, have met with disappointment. Systemic therapy directed at tumor-specific molecular targets should demonstrate enhanced potency and reduced collateral toxicity.

The c-erbB-2 gene is overexpressed in numerous human cancers, including up to one third of all non–small cell lung cancers [2]. Its overexpression in lung cancer has been associated with decreased survival [3]. The protein product of c-erbB-2 is p185, a transmembrane glycoprotein with a cystine-rich extracellular domain [4, 5]. The intracellular domain is known to possess tyrosine kinase activity and to participate in signal transduction [6]. Its background expression in normal human tissues is low and known to occur infrequently [7]. As such, p185 potentially represents a viable candidate for targeted therapy in the treatment of lung cancer.

For many years, naturally occurring toxins have formed the backbone of our therapeutic arrmamentarium. Type 1 plant toxins appear ideally suited for targeted therapy because of their defined molecular structure, powerful enzymatic mode of action, and relative lack of collateral toxicity [8]. Gelonin, a well-characterized type 1 ribosomal inhibitory protein found in the seeds of the plant Gelonium multiflorum, potentially fulfills these criteria well [9].

This set of experiments was designed to determine whether c-erbB-2/p185 can be therapeutically targeted in human lung adenocarcinoma using an anti-p185–gelonin conjugate.


    Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Cell Lines
CALU-3 is a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line known to overexpress p185 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100-U/mL penicillin, 100-µg/mL streptomycin, and 2.5-µg/mL amphotericin. NIH3T3 is a murine fibroblast that does not express p185 in detectable levels. 3T3 cells were maintained in RPMI medium 1640 with 2-mmol/L L-glutamine and 10% fetal calf serum.

Antibodies
Purified muMoAb-4D5, an antihuman p185 (extracellular domain) IgG1 antibody from a murine hybridoma, was the kind gift of Genentech (South San Francisco, CA). MOPC-21, a mouse myeloma IgG1, was obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO).

Gelonin Preparation
Seeds of Gelonium multiflorum were purchased from United Chemical & Allied Products (Calcutta, India). Gelonin was extracted from these seeds by a micromodification of the method described by Stirpe and associates [10]. Briefly, shelled seeds were blended to a fine powder, then homogenized and dialyzed against 5-mmol/L sodium phosphate (pH, 6.5). The dialyzed extract was then applied to a sizing column and the adsorbed material eluted with a NaCl gradient. A bimodal peak was collected in fractions, and purity was confirmed using SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE analysis). The biologic activity of this fraction was confirmed using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate assay (Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, England) [11]. Uptake of 3H-methionine into synthesized protein was determined using standard liquid scintillation–counting techniques. Saline controls were compared with 50-ng/mL concentrations of control gelonin (Pierce, Inc, Rockford, IL) and two 50-ng/mL aliquots of experimental gelonin extract.

Preparation of Antibody-Gelonin Conjugate
Gelonin in 10-mmol/L potassium phosphate (pH, 7.2) containing sodium chloride (145 mmol/L) was mixed with 0.5-mol/L triethanolamine/HCl buffer (pH, 8.0) and 0.1-mol/L EDTA (ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid), so that the final concentrations of triethanolamine and EDTA were 60 mmol/L and 1 mmol/L, respectively. The solution was degassed and kept under nitrogen until being treated with 2-iminothiolane/HCl (1 mmol/L) at 0°C for 90 minutes. The excess reagent was removed by gel filtration on a column of cross-linked dextran equilibrated with 5-mmol/L bis-tris/acetate buffer (pH, 5.8) containing 50-mmol/L NaCl and 1-mmol/L EDTA.

The antibody to be conjugated to gelonin (4D5 or MOPC-21) was placed in 100-mmol/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH, 7.0) containing EDTA (0.5 mmol/L) and then mixed with a tenfold molal excess of N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate (SPDP). The mixture was incubated at 30°C for 30 minutes. The excess reagent was removed by gel filtration on a column of cross-linked dextran equilibrated with 5-mmol/L bis-tris/acetate buffer (pH, 5.8) containing 50-mmol/L NaCl and 1-mmol/L EDTA.

Modified antibody (4D5 or MOPC-21) in 100-mmol/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH, 7.0) containing EDTA (0.5 mmol/L) was mixed with an equimolal amount of modified gelonin in 5-mmol/L bis-tris/acetate buffer (pH, 5.8) containing NaCl (5 mmol/L) and EDTA (1 mmol/L). The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 7.0 by the addition of 0.5-mmol/L triethanolamine/HCl buffer (pH, 8.0) and then kept under nitrogen at 4°C for 20 hours. The conjugation was halted by a 1-hour incubation with of iodoacetamide (2 mmol/L).

Purification of Antibody-Gelonin Conjugates
The conjugation mixture underwent buffer exchange into 10-mmol/L sodium phosphate (pH, 7.0) containing NaCl (0.15 mmol/L). To remove unreacted gelonin, the unpurified conjugate was then applied to a Sephacryl S-200 column (1 x 30 cm) previously equilibrated with the just-mentioned buffer. The initial peak was collected and concentrated to approximately 1 mg/dL. This semipure conjugate was applied to a blue sepharose CL-6B column (2 x 10 cm) equilibrated with 10-mmol/L sodium phosphate (pH, 7.0) containing NaCl (0.15 mmol/L). The column was then washed with three column volumes of the starting buffer. The pure conjugate was then eluted with 10-mmol/L sodium phosphate (pH, 7.0) containing 1-mmol/L NaCl and fractionally collected.

Flow Cytometric Analysis
CALU-3 cells underwent flow cytometry against the 4D5-gelonin conjugate, 4D5, MOPC-21, and sterile phosphate-buffered saline solution as a control, using antimouse immunoglobulin G-FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer) conjugate as a secondary antibody-marker.

Cytotoxicity Assays
Cells in log-phase growth were plated onto 96-well plates (2.5 x 103 cells/well). Each plate contained a control group of ten wells treated only with sterile phosphate-buffered saline solution. Experimental groups were set up in quadruplicate wells and received either antibody-gelonin conjugate, a mixture of antibody and gelonin, gelonin alone, antibody alone, or an irrelevant antibody (MOPC-21) in doses ranging from 10-11 to 10-7 mol/L.

These cells were incubated at 37°C (90% humidity/5% CO2) until controls were 50% to 75% confluent, at which time they were pulsed with 3H-thymidine (0.001 µCurie/well) and allowed to incubate for an additional 48 hours. Cells were then incubated with trypsin-EDTA and harvested using a PHD Cell Harvester (Cambridge Technologies, Watertown, MA). The incorporation of 3H-thymidine was determined by liquid-scintillation counting.

Statistical Analysis
Results from each experiment were examined with a log-dose response model, using a nested analysis of covariance to determine statistical significance.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of gelonin extract was homogeneous, with a molecular weight of 28 kD, similar to that for control gelonin (Pierce, Inc), thereby validating the extraction and purification techniques. The biologic activity of this fraction was confirmed using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate assay. The commercially prepared gelonin and the gelonin purified in our laboratory both resulted in minimal to no 3H-methionine uptake, indicating that both treatments had completely inhibited ribosomally mediated protein synthesis.

Purity of the 4D5-gelonin conjugate was demonstrated by SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig 1Go). Image analysis of this gel revealed 94% to 99% purity (determined by NIH Image, version 1.53). Purified conjugate consisted of forms containing one, two, or three gelonin molecules per antibody. The yield averaged approximately 10% of starting products.



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of purified 4D5-gelonin conjugate. Lane A consists of molecular weight markers. Lane B is pure gelonin. Lane C is unpurified 4D5-gelonin conjugate. Lane D is semipurified 4D5-gelonin conjugate (unbound gelonin removed, free 4D5 remaining). Lane E is pure 4D5-gelonin conjugate. Lane F is pure 4D5.

 
The preservation of binding affinity was examined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis. The purified 4D5-gelonin conjugate showed binding characteristics similar to those of cell surface p185, as did the unmodified 4D5 (Fig 2Go).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Flow cytometric analysis of CALU-3 cells against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), MOPC-21 (control antibody), 4D5, and 4D5-gelonin conjugate, demonstrating preservation of binding affinity after conjugation.

 
Cytotoxic Effects of the Conjugates
The purified 4D5-gelonin conjugate demonstrated marked toxicity toward the CALU-3 cells. 3H-thymidine uptake for each experiment was determined and statistically analyzed. The immunoconjugate treatment in the two highest concentrations completely abolished 3H-thymidine uptake, and the intermediate dose brought about only one third the uptake of matched controls. Cells treated with a mixture of unbound 4D5 and gelonin as well as gelonin alone demonstrated some decreased uptake, an effect appearing to be at least an order of magnitude less than that of the immunoconjugate. Treatment with either 4D5 alone or MOPC-21 had no effect on 3H-thymidine uptake, as compared with that in controls (Fig 3Go).



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. . Results of a single experiment demonstrating marked cytotoxicity of 4D5-gelonin conjugate against CALU-3 cells.

 
The results of each treatment at each dose are also expressed as a percentage of the 3H-thymidine incorporated by the control cultures. Values in subsequent figures represent an average of at least three experiments. The incorporation of 3H-thymidine by control cultures was greater than 100,000 cpm in all experiments.

The potency of the 4D5-gelonin conjugate against CALU-3 cells is demonstrated by its IC50 (concentration resulting in a 50% inhibition of growth compared with the growth in controls) of 3.5 x 10-10 mol/L. The mixture of unconjugated gelonin and 4D5 as well as gelonin alone demonstrated much less toxicity, with an IC50 of 8.5 x 10-9 and 6.5 x 10-9 mol/L, respectively, and 4D5 and MOPC-21 had no effect (Fig 4Go).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. . Effect of 4D5-gelonin conjugate on CALU-3 cells. Values are averages of at least three experiments. Marked cytotoxicity is seen for 4D5-gelonin conjugate, as compared with the cytotoxicity exhibited by 4D5, gelonin, a mixture of 4D5 and gelonin, and MOPC-21.

 
NIH-3T3 cells subjected to the same conditions showed little cytotoxic effect from any of the treatments. Cells exposed to 4D5-gelonin conjugate, gelonin, 4D5, or the mixture showed no significant inhibition of 3H-thymidine incorporation, compared with that seen in saline controls (Fig 5Go).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. . Effect of 4D5-gelonin conjugate on NIH-3T3 cells. Values are averages of at least three experiments. No significant cytotoxicity was demonstrated by the 4D5-gelonin conjugate or any of the other treatments.

 
Finally, to determine if there was a nonspecific effect from an antibody-gelonin conjugate, CALU-3 cells were treated with MOPC-21–gelonin conjugate. Toxicity was observed only at the highest dose. This effect paralleled the nonspecific effect observed for all of the treatments involving the use of unconjugated gelonin (Fig 6Go).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. . Effect of MOPC-21–gelonin conjugate on CALU-3 cells. Values are averages of at least three experiments. No specific cytotoxicity was demonstrated. Cytotoxicity is evident with a high concentration of any of the treatments containing gelonin, suggesting nonspecific toxicity.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Current chemotherapeutic agents have limited activity against disseminated non–small cell lung cancer, and improvements in patient survival achieved with current agents have been modest at best. New agents and treatment approaches are urgently needed for the treatment of this cancer. It is unlikely that current agents used in the treatment of disseminated disease will have a significant impact on patient survival because of their low selectivity and high toxicity.

Developments in the field of molecular biology have revealed the identity of cellular genes that may play a role in the neoplastic process. Although this has begun to shed light on the mechanisms of neoplastic transformation, their therapeutic utility has yet to be realized. One such gene is the c-erbB-2/p185 protooncogene system. Amplification and overexpression of this gene in patients with non–small cell lung cancer has been correlated with disease recurrence and shorter survival [3]. The oncogene codes for a transmembrane protein (p185), which possesses tyrosine kinase activity and may act as a growth factor receptor. In other tumor systems, antibodies directed against the extracellular domain of p185 have been shown to suppress tumor growth in a murine model in a cytostatic fashion [12]. It may be possible to target cytotoxic agents to this protein because of its well-characterized nature and its unique pattern of distribution in vivo [13, 14].

Phase I clinical trials in humans have been completed for immunotoxins directed at hematologic cancers and solid tumors. Most of these trials have used native or modified ricin as the toxic moiety. The first immunoconjugate tried in patients was an anti–CD5-ricin A chain (RTA) construct. Transient clearance of CD5-positive cells was observed, but no significant clinical responses occurred [15]. Lack of efficacy was attributed to the presence of circulating free CD5. In another phase I trial [16], partial responses, with remission periods lasting 2 to 8 months, were achieved.

In the management of solid tumors, ricin A chain immunotoxins have been investigated in phase I trials against breast cancer, ovarian cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and small cell lung cancer. On the basis of on data from a murine xenograft model, Z60F9-RTA conjugate has been examined in clinical trials performed in breast cancer patients. Preclinical studies showed minimal toxicity in animals, and the conjugate prepared with recombinant ricin A chain was highly effective in inhibiting MX1 human breast cancer cell growth in athymic nude mice. Phase I evaluation of the conjugate was carried out in metastatic breast cancer patients at two centers [17, 18].

Using a phase I protocol, an anti–CD56-monoclonal antibody conjugated to chemically blocked ricin has been used to treat recurrent or refractory disease in patients with small cell lung cancer [19]. One partial response was observed. Based on the phase I results, a phase II trial with this conjugate is planned for patients with small cell lung cancer after chemotherapy induction.

Judging from the limited data available, it is clear that immunoconjugates may demonstrate biologic activity in vivo in selected patients with advanced cancers, including solid tumors. However, nonspecific toxicity has limited dosing in current constructs. Ricin A chain may not be optimal for use in vivo because of its nonspecific glycoprotein cell surface binding. To date, chemical modification has failed to eliminate collateral toxicity. It is likely that other cytotoxic agents with similar potency but reduced toxicity will produce improved results in vivo.

Gelonin is a small protein (molecular weight, 30 kD) extracted from the seeds of the plant Gelonium multiflorum, which belongs to the same family of proteins as ricin, known as ribosomal inhibitory proteins [10]. Like ricin, it possesses the capacity to enzymatically inhibit protein synthesis by inactivating cellular ribosomal systems. Also like ricin, gelonin catalytically hydrolyzes the glycosidic bond of adenosine residue 4324 in the 28S-RNA. Depurination of adenine residue from 28S-RNA results in irreversible inactivation of ribosomes and inhibition of protein synthesis, leading to cell death [20]. However, unlike ricin, which is a glycosylated heterodimer, the protein is a single-chain, nonglycosylated polypeptide. It is nontoxic to intact cells unless internalized, and cells lack the surface receptors needed to allow for internalization. When conjugated to a monoclonal antibody directed at a cell surface target, this protein has been found to be a highly potent cellular toxin. It may represent an ideal agent for in vivo targeting because of its high efficiency and minimal nonspecific toxicity. Although in animal models gelonin has shown significant antitumor activity when conjugated to targeting antibodies [21], to date there have been no human trials with constructs using this toxin.

Advances in the treatment of lung cancer will very likely result from a clearer understanding of the molecular biology of these tumors. The neu oncogene was first observed in neuroblastomas induced in a rat model through exposure to ethylnitrosourea [22]. Subsequently, three groups independently identified the human homologue of this gene [2325]. The clinical value of c-erbB-2 and other molecular targets may be in their future exploitation for directed therapies.

In this set of experiments, we have shown that the c-erbB-2/p185 system can serve as a therapeutic target in human lung adenocarcinoma. It is likely that, because of its relatively large size and immunologically active components, the current conjugate will require significant structural modification before it can be used in vivo. Ideal constructs likely will be composed only of the antigen-recognizing region of the targeting molecule, along with the chemically active portion of the toxin, synthesized as a single biologically active molecule. It should be possible to synthesize these constructs using currently available technology once appropriate molecular targets are defined.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Presented at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Orlando, FL, Jan 29–31, 1996.

Address reprint requests to Dr Lanza, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics: 1996. CA Cancer J Clin 1996;45:8–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Weiner DB, Norberg J, Robinson R, et al. Expression of the neu gene–encoded protein (p185neu) in human non–small-cell carcinomas of the lung. Cancer Res 1990;50:421–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kern JA, Schwartz DA, Nordberg JE, et al. p185neu expression in human lung adenocarcinomas predicts shortened survival. Cancer Res 1990;50:5184–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Schechter AL, Stern DF, Vaidyanathan L, et al. The neu oncogene: an erb-B-related gene encoding a 185,000-Mr tumour antigen. Nature 1984;312:513–6.[Medline]
  5. Bargmann CI, Mien-Chie H, Weinberg RA. The neu oncogene encodes an epidermal growth factor–related protein. Nature 1986;319:226–30.[Medline]
  6. Akiyama T, Sudo C, Ogawra H, Totoshima K, Yamamoto T. The product of the human c-erbB-2 gene: a 185-kilodalton glycoprotein with tyrosine kinase activity. Science 1986;232:1644–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Press MF, Cordon-Codo C, Slanon DJ. Expression of the HER-2/neu protooncogene in normal human adult and fetal tissues. Oncogene 1990;5:953–62.[Medline]
  8. Sivam G, Pearson JW, Bohn W, Oldham RC, Sadoff JC, Morgan AC Jr. Immunotoxins to human melanoma associated antigen: comparison of gelonin with ricin and other A chain conjugates. Cancer Res 1987;47:3169–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Barbieri L, Stirpe F. Ribosomal-inactivating proteins from plants: properties and possible uses. Cancer Surv 1982;1:489–520.
  10. Stirpe F, Olson S, Pihl S. Gelonin, a new inhibitor of protein synthesis, nontoxic to intact cells. J Biol Chem 1980;255:6947–53.[Free Full Text]
  11. Pelham HRB, Jackson RJ. An efficient mRNA-dependent translation for reticulocyte lysate. Eur J Biochem 1976;67:247–56.[Medline]
  12. Drebin JA, Link VC, Greene MI. Monoclonal antibodies specific for the neu oncogene product directly mediate anti-tumor effects in vivo. Oncogene 1990;2:387–94.
  13. Tecce R, Digiesi G, Natali PG. Production of immunotoxins to erbB-2 oncoprotein [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Can Res 1991;32:266.
  14. Press MF, Cordon-Cordo C, Slamon DJ. Expression of the HER-2/neu protooncogene in normal human adult and fetal tissues. Oncogene 1990;5:953–62.
  15. Hertler AP, Schlossman DM, Borowitz MJ, et al. A phase I study of T101-ricin A chain immunotoxin in refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Biol Res Modif 1988;7:97–113.
  16. Cobb PW, Le Maistre CF. Therapeutic use of immunotoxins. Semin Hematol 1992;29(Suppl 2):6–13.
  17. Weiner LM, O'Dwyer J, Kitson J, et al. Phase I evaluation of an anti-breast carcinoma monoclonal antibody Z60F9–recombinant ricin A chain immunoconjugate. Cancer Res 1989;49:4062–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gould BJ, Borowitz MJ, Graves ES, et al. Phase I study of an anti-breast cancer immunotoxin by continuous infusion: report of a targeted toxic effect not predicted by animal studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:775–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lynch TJ. Immunotoxin therapy of small cell lung cancer. N901-blocked ricin for relapsed small-cell lung. Chest 1993;103(Suppl):4365–95.
  20. Endo Y, Tsurugi K. RNA N-glycosidase activity of ricin A-chain. J Biol Chem 1987;262:8128–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hirota N, Ueda M, Ozawa S, Abe O, Shimizu N. Suppression of an epidermal growth factor receptor–hyperproducing tumor by an immunotoxin conjugate of gelonin and a monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody. Cancer Res 1989;49:7106–9.[Medline]
  22. Shih C, Padhy LC, Murray M, Weinberg RA. Transforming genes of carcinomas and neuroblastomas introduced into mouse fibroblasts. Nature 1981;290:261–4.[Medline]
  23. Coussens L, Yang-Feng TL, Liao YC, et al. Tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to EGF receptor shares chromosomal location with neu oncogene. Science 1985;230:1132–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Semba K, Kamata N, Toyoshima K, Yamamoto T. A v-erb–related protooncogene, c-erbB-2, is distinct from the c-erb-1/epidermal growth factor–receptor gene and is amplified in a human salivary gland adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:6497–501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. King CR, Kraus MH, Aaronson SA. Amplification of a novel v-erb–related gene in a human mammary carcinoma. Science 1985;229:974–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996 62: 1459. [Extract] [Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
John M. Snider
Lamar J. Bushnell
Louis A. Lanza
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snider, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lanza, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snider, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lanza, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS