ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
James S. Tweddell
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tweddell, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Litwin, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tweddell, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Litwin, S. B.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1329-1335
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Article: Cardiovascular

Aprotinin Improves Outcome of Single-Ventricle Palliation

James S. Tweddell, MD, Stuart Berger, MD, Peter C. Frommelt, MD, Andrew N. Pelech, MD, David A. Lewis, MD, Raymond T. Fedderly, MD, Michele A. Frommelt, MD, Terrence S. McManus, Ccp, Kathleen A. Mussatto, RN, Maryanne W. Kessel, RN, S. Bert Litwin, MD

Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background. Elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance as a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass may lead to failure of single-ventricle palliation. We reviewed our experience with aprotinin, a nonspecific serine protease inhibitor, to determine whether it could ameliorate the inflammatory effects of cardiopulmonary bypass and improve outcome of single-ventricle palliation.

Methods. Forty-six consecutive patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation using cardiopulmonary bypass were reviewed retrospectively. Aprotinin was used in 8 of 30 bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt and 10 of 16 Fontan procedures.

Results. Aprotinin use was associated with a decrease in the early postoperative transpulmonary gradient among patients undergoing Fontan and bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt procedures. The bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt aprotinin group had a higher oxygen saturation and a decrease in quantity and duration of thoracic drainage. Among patients receiving aprotinin there were no episodes of mediastinitis, thrombus formation, or renal failure.

Conclusions. Aprotinin use in single-ventricle palliation was associated with decreased transpulmonary gradient and increased oxygen saturation consistent with decreased pulmonary vascular resistance. This retrospective study suggests that aprotinin has a favorable impact on the early postoperative course of single-ventricle palliation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
See also page 1335.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can result in increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in the postoperative patient [1]. Patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation, either bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BDCPS) or the Fontan procedure, are exquisitely sensitive to acute elevation of PVR [2]. Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits the contact, neutrophil, and platelet activation system during CPB [3]. We speculated that aprotinin may ameliorate some of the adverse effects of CPB and improve the early postoperative course of patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
To determine the effect of aprotinin on the outcome of single-ventricle palliation, we reviewed retrospectively all patients with single-ventricle anatomy undergoing BDCPS and Fontan procedures between January 1994 (when aprotinin first became available at the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin) and December 1995. All patients undergoing Fontan procedures were included. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether aprotinin could ameliorate the adverse effects of CPB on patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation, and therefore 1 patient, aged 29 years, undergoing a BDCPS with a thoracotomy without CPB was excluded. A second patient, aged 6 years, also undergoing BDCPS with a thoracotomy with an incomplete mixing lesion and significant antegrade flow from the pulmonary artery was also excluded. All patients with single-ventricle anatomy underwent staged palliation to completion Fontan. The remaining groups include 30 patients who underwent BDCPS and 16 patients who underwent the Fontan procedure. All procedures used CPB and were performed on patients with complete mixing lesions with the intent that all pulmonary blood flow would be delivered either through the BDCPS or Fontan connection. Pulmonary artery closure was used in cases of significant antegrade pulmonary artery blood flow. Among patients undergoing the Fontan procedure, trivial antegrade blood flow persisted in 3 of 10 patients in the aprotinin group and 1 of 6 patients in the control group. Among patients undergoing BDCPS, trivial antegrade blood flow persisted in 1 of 8 patients in the aprotinin group and 7 of 22 patients in the control group. Aprotinin was used at the discretion of the surgeon, when the patient was thought to be at increased risk for hemorrhage. Aprotinin was used during operation in 8 of 30 patients undergoing BDCPS and in 10 of 16 patients undergoing the Fontan procedure. Patients were given a 1.4-mg test dose of aprotinin before receiving the full dose, which was 240 mg/m2 as a loading dose, followed by a continuous infusion of 56 mg • h-1 • m-2 with an additional 240 mg/m2 added to the pump oxygenator.

Sources of data included preoperative cardiac catheterizations, echocardiograms, and hospital records. We reviewed patient characteristics including age at operation, anatomy, previous procedures, type of incision (thoracotomy or sternotomy), and preoperative hemodynamic data. We compared outcome between those patients who received aprotinin and those who did not. Failure of the planned procedure was defined as death or takedown to a BDCPS after the Fontan procedure or, for the BDCPS procedure, takedown to a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt or the need for addition of a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt to maintain adequate arterial oxygen saturation. Postoperative superior vena caval pressure, transpulmonary gradient, and oxygen saturations were obtained by reviewing intensive care unit records, and comparisons were made at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. Thoracic drainage during the first 24 hours and duration of thoracic drainage were compared. Transfusions received after cessation of CPB between the two groups were compared. As an indicator of renal function we reviewed serum creatinine levels (BDCPS, days 1 to 3; Fontan, days 1 to 5) between the aprotinin and control groups.

Statistical comparison between the two groups was performed using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney rank sum, {chi}2, and Fisher's exact test. Analysis of variance on repeated measures was used to compare the postoperative hemodynamic and oxygen saturation data. A p value of less than 0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant. All data are expressed as mean ± the standard error of the mean.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Preoperative patient characteristics and hemodynamic characteristics are summarized in Table 1Go. There were no differences in the preoperative patient characteristics including age, hemodynamics, or oxygenation between either the BDCPS aprotinin and BDCPS control groups or the Fontan aprotinin and Fontan control groups. Single-ventricle anatomy is summarized in Table 2Go. Twenty-five patients had single left ventricular anatomy, 10 had single right ventricular anatomy, and 11 had indeterminate single-ventricle morphology. Previous incisions are summarized in Table 3Go. Among patients undergoing BDCPS, there was a significantly greater proportion of previous median sternotomies in the aprotinin group compared with the control group (p = 0.01, by Fisher's exact test). Previous procedures are summarized in Table 4Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Preoperative Patient Characteristics
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. . Single Ventricle Anatomy
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. . Previous Incisions
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. . Previous Procedures
 
The BDCPSs were constructed as either bidirectional Glenn shunts or using the hemi-Fontan technique. All Fontans were constructed using a lateral tunnel technique, with a single small fenestration (1.5 to 5 mm). In 5 of 6 control patients and in 8 of 10 patients receiving aprotinin, the fenestration was closed in the operating room using an extracardiac snare, after weaning from CPB.

There were two deaths among the 16 patients undergoing the Fontan procedure. Both were in the control group. The first was a 12-month-old female baby with Down syndrome and tricuspid atresia in whom worsening cyanosis developed despite a well-functioning BDCPS that had been constructed at 6 months of age. She underwent the Fontan procedure, which was complicated by decreased arterial saturation and low output. Cardiac catheterization demonstrated a thrombus in the lateral tunnel, and despite successful revision she eventually succumbed to sepsis. The second death was in a 7-year-old boy with a single ventricle of right ventricular morphology with systemic outflow obstruction who had undergone a coarctation repair and pulmonary artery banding through a left thoracotomy in the newborn period. He subsequently underwent two sternotomies for relief of subaortic stenosis as well as a BDCPS. He then underwent a Fontan combined with a Damus-Kaye-Stansel procedure. In the early postoperative period elevated superior vena caval pressure with low output developed, and he was placed on an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; he was subsequently weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support with the help of inhaled nitric oxide. He was hemodynamically stable, with mechanical ventilatory support, and succumbed to fungal mediastinitis.

There were three failures (no deaths) among the patients undergoing BDCPS; all were among patients who did not receive aprotinin. The first patient had a progressive increase in superior vena caval pressure and decreased oxygen saturation in the first 24 hours postoperatively and required takedown to a central systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt. Two patients required a 4-mm polytetrafluoroethylene systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt in addition to the BDCPS to achieve adequate arterial saturation to wean from CPB. There were no failures among the patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation who received aprotinin. These differences in failure rates between the aprotinin and control groups were not significant.

Hemodynamic parameters, superior vena caval pressure, and transpulmonary gradient were compared between the aprotinin and control groups. Measurements were compared immediately on arrival to the postoperative intensive care unit and 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the superior vena caval pressure between the aprotinin and control groups among either BDCPS or Fontan patients. However, superior vena caval pressure measurements were consistently lower in the Fontan aprotinin group compared with the Fontan control group (Fig 1Go). The transpulmonary gradient was significantly improved in the aprotinin-treated groups, both among patients undergoing BDCPS and the Fontan procedures (Fig 2Go). The Fontan aprotinin group demonstrated the greatest improvement, with a significant difference in transpulmonary gradient at 12 and 18 hours postoperatively compared with the Fontan control group. The BDCPS aprotinin group demonstrated an improvement at 6 hours postoperatively compared with BDCPS control group. Arterial oxygen saturations also showed improvement in the BDCPS aprotinin group compared with the BDCPS control group (Fig 3Go). Saturations were significantly greater in the BDCPS aprotinin group at 12 and 18 hours postoperatively. Although arterial saturations were consistently greater in the Fontan aprotinin group compared with the Fontan control group, this difference did not reach statistical significance.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Postoperative superior vena caval pressure in patients undergoing bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BDCPS) (top) and Fontan (bottom) procedures. There was no significant difference in the postoperative superior vena caval pressure (SVC) in patients undergoing bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt during the first 24 hours. There did appear to be a trend toward a higher superior vena caval pressure in the Fontan control group. The largest difference was at 18 hours when the p value reached 0.07.

 


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Postoperative transpulmonary gradient ( TPG) measured in patients undergoing bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt ( BDCPS) (top) and Fontan (bottom) procedures. Transpulmonary gradient was significantly decreased among bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt and Fontan patients who received aprotinin ( p <0.05 by analysis of variance on repeat measures).

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. . Postoperative arterial saturation (SaO2) in patients undergoing bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BDCPS) (top) and Fontan (bottom) procedures. Bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt patients receiving aprotinin had a significantly higher arterial saturation in the postoperative period (p <0.05 by analysis of variance on repeat measures).

 
Thoracic drainage (all mediastinal and pleural drainage included) during the first 24 hours and the duration of thoracic drainage were significantly reduced in the BDCPS aprotinin group (Table 5Go). There was no significant difference in the thoracic drainage during the first 24 hours or in the duration of thoracic drainage in the Fontan groups (Table 5Go). There were no significant differences in transfusions between the aprotinin and control groups, among patients undergoing BDCPS or the Fontan procedure (Table 5Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. . Transfusions and Thoracic Drainage
 
Serum creatinine level was measured in all patients preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 to 3 for BDCPS patients and postoperative days 1 to 5 for Fontan patients. There was no significant change in creatinine level in either the aprotinin-treated or control groups among patients undergoing the BDCPS or the Fontan procedure (Fig 4Go).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. . Postoperative creatinine level among patients undergoing bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BDCPS) (top) and Fontan (bottom) procedures. There was no difference in postoperative creatinine between the control and aprotinin groups among patients undergoing either bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt or Fontan procedures.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Despite being good candidates for single-ventricle palliation, some patients fail BDCPS or Fontan procedures [2, 4, 5]. Cardiopulmonary bypass can lead to an elevation of PVR attributable to the production of vasoactive substances or as a consequence of atelectasis, which can be worsened by increased capillary permeability and the resultant increase in extravascular lung water [1, 6, 7]. Failure of single-ventricle palliation in good-risk candidates may be due, in part, to acute elevation of PVR as a consequence of CPB. We hypothesized that aprotinin could improve the outcome of patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation by decreasing the inflammatory response to CPB. Aprotinin is a nonspecific serine protease inhibitor and diminishes the inflammatory response of CPB at the contact, neutrophil, and platelet activation systems [8]. Early studies with high-dose aprotinin infusion during cardiac operations were initiated with the intent to decrease postperfusion syndrome and improve lung function after CPB by inhibiting the kallikrein and complete systems and neutralizing neutrophil elastase [9]. However, the impact on perioperative blood loss was the predominant finding and has become the primary indication for the use of aprotinin during cardiac operations. Patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation are in a unique situation in which the antiinflammatory effects of aprotinin rather than solely the hemostatic effects may become more obvious.

Aprotinin-treated patients demonstrated evidence of decreased postoperative PVR. The transpulmonary gradient was significantly lower in the Fontan aprotinin group compared with the Fontan control group. This decrease in transpulmonary gradient was also seen in the BDCPS patients, but it was less sustained. Arterial saturation was significantly improved in the BDCPS aprotinin group. These findings are consistent with the effect lower PVR would have on BDCPS and Fontan physiology. Assuming normal lung function and minimal fenestration, all blood entering the systemic ventricle after the Fontan procedure will be nearly fully saturated. A small reduction in saturation may be seen as the results of coronary sinus return to the systemic circulation. As long as cardiac output can be maintained, the transpulmonary gradient will increase as the PVR increases. In the BDCPS patient, arterial saturation depends on the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow or Qp/Qs. Indeed, one of the benefits of staging single-ventricle palliation with a BDCPS is that acute elevation of PVR is tolerated as systemic cardiac output is maintained, albeit with some degree of systemic desaturation [2]. With increasing PVR the BDCPS patient will have a decrease in the Qp/Qs and a decrease in arterial saturation. The findings of a lower transpulmonary gradient among Fontan patients receiving aprotinin and increased arterial saturation among BDCPS patients receiving aprotinin are both consistent with a lower PVR in these two anatomic arrangements.

The initiation of CPB is associated with the production of a number of vasoactive substances [10]. The two agents most likely to be responsible for the acute elevation of PVR after CPB are thromboxane A2 and endothelin-1 [11–14]. The primary source of thromboxane A2 is the platelets [10]. Aprotinin prevents platelet activation by preserving platelet glycoprotein Ib [15]. Glycoprotein Ib is expressed in decreased quantity on the surface of platelets in children with cyanotic heart disease; therefore, they may be more susceptible to platelet activation on CPB and more likely to benefit from aprotinin [16]. Endothelin-1 is produced by endothelial cells [10]. Association of activated platelets or leukocytes with endothelial cells is thought to be necessary for release of endothelin-1. Strategies to decrease the number of circulating leukocytes or to prevent leukocyte activation are thought to be successful in decreasing PVR after CPB by decreasing release of endothelin-1 [17, 18]. By preventing activation of leukocytes and platelets, aprotinin may decrease release of endothelin-1. Further study will be needed to identify the exact mechanisms by which aprotinin lowers PVR.

Aprotinin has been shown to decrease transfusion requirements after pediatric and adult cardiac procedures [19–21]. In our study, patients undergoing BDCPS who received aprotinin were in a higher risk group for bleeding; 7 of 8 patients had undergone previous median sternotomies compared with 7 of 22 control patients. Despite the increased risk for bleeding there was no difference in number of transfusions between the BDCPS aprotinin and BDCPS control groups. Thoracic drainage was reduced in the BDCPS aprotinin group compared with the BDCPS control group. Duration of thoracic drainage was also decreased in the BDCPS aprotinin group compared with the BDCPS control group. All patients undergoing the Fontan procedure had undergone at least two previous operations including at least one median sternotomy. More patients in the Fontan aprotinin group had undergone three previous procedures (60%, 6 of 10 patients) compared with the Fontan control group (33%, 2 of 6 patients), but this difference was not significant. There was no significant difference in red cell transfusions, clotting factor transfusions, or total transfusions between the Fontan aprotinin group and the Fontan control group, although in all categories the Fontan aprotinin group averaged fewer transfusions. Likewise, thoracic drainage was not diminished either in the first 24 hours or in total duration.

These data suggest reduction in thoracic drainage and transfusion requirements in BDCPS patients who received aprotinin, but this reduction was not seen in the Fontan patients. The lack of difference in transfusions and thoracic drainage among Fontan patients may be attributable to the more extensive nature of the Fontan procedure in patients who had undergone (all cases) at least two previous operations. In addition, in the Fontan patient, thoracic drainage is a function of elevated venous pressure rather than solely a function of hemostasis [22, 23]. No attempt was made to alter transfusion strategy in this study. Transfusion of red cells and clotting factors was directed by the subjective interpretation of bleeding by the surgeon and anesthesiologist rather than by specific factor deficiency. Therefore, to a degree, transfusions were given based on previous institutional experience and this may account for the lack of larger differences between the aprotinin and control groups.

Aprotinin has been implicated in an increased incidence of thrombus formation, renal failure, and mediastinitis after cardiac operations [21, 24–26]. In our study, no adverse affects of aprotinin were identified. The only failed procedures occurred in the control group. A single episode of thrombus formation occurred in the lateral tunnel of a Fontan control patient. One episode of mediastinitis also occurred in a control Fontan patient. Renal failure was not seen in any patient and there was no difference in serum creatinine between the aprotinin and control groups. Profound hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 1 patient receiving aprotinin without adverse renal or neurologic events.

This was a retrospective study involving a limited number of patients with single-ventricle anatomy. Given the paucity of data concerning the use of aprotinin in this group of patients where reoperation is frequent and improved hemostasis as well as decreased PVR are of significant benefit, the data in this report may be useful. Additional prospective studies will be necessary to confirm these findings and identify the mechanism by which aprotinin improved the outcome of single-ventricle palliation.

In conclusion, in a retrospective study of patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation, aprotinin was associated with decreased thoracic drainage and evidence of lowered PVR. Aprotinin use was not associated with an increased failure rate and no complications could be related to aprotinin use. There was no incidence of thrombus formation, renal failure, or neurologic events in the aprotinin group. We conclude that aprotinin is safe in patients undergoing single-ventricle palliation and appears to improve the early postoperative outcome.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We acknowledge the contribution of Drs David Z. Friedberg and John B. Thomas to the outcome of this study. We are indebted to the expert secretarial support of Karen Reinhold.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Presented at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Orlando, FL, Jan 29–31, 1996.

Address reprints requests to Dr Tweddell, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, MS# 715, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, 9000 W Wisconsin Ave, PO Box 1997, Milwaukee, WI 53201.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Utley JR. Pathophysiology of cardiopulmonary bypass: current issues. J Cardiac Surg 1990;5:177–89.[Medline]
  2. Bridges ND, Jonas RA, Mayer JE, Flanagan MF, Keane JF, Castaneda AR. Bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis as interim palliation for high-risk Fontan candidates. Circulation 1990;82(Suppl 4):170–6.
  3. Westaby S. Aprotinin in perspective. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:1033–41.[Abstract]
  4. Hopkins RA, Armstrong BE, Serwer GA, Peterson RJ, Oldham HN Jr. Physiological rationale for a bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:391–8.[Abstract]
  5. Mayer JE Jr, Helgason H, Jonas RA, et al. Extending the limits for modified Fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:1021–8.[Abstract]
  6. Sladen RN, Berkowitz RN. Cardiopulmonary bypass and the lung. In: Gravlee GP, Davis RE, Utley JR, eds. Cardiopulmonary bypass. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1993, 468–87.
  7. Allison RC, Kyle J, Adkins WK, Prasad VR, McCord JM, Taylor AE. Effect of ischemia reperfusion or hypoxia reoxygenation on lung vascular permeability and resistance. J Appl Physiol1990; 69:597–603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wachtfogel YT, Kucick U, Hack CE, et al. Aprotinin inhibits the contact, neutrophil and platelet activation systems during simulated extracorporeal perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:1–10.[Abstract]
  9. Royston D, Bidstrup B, Taylor K, et al. Effect of aprotinin on the need for blood transfusion after repeat open heart surgery. Lancet 1987;2:1989–91.
  10. Downing SW, Edmunds HL Jr. Release of vasoactive substances during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1236–43.[Abstract]
  11. Komai H, Adatia IT, Elliott MJ, de Leval MR, Haworth SG. Increased plasma levels of endothelin-1 after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with pulmonary hypertension and congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:473–8.[Abstract]
  12. Cave AG, Manche A, Derias NW, Hearse DJ. Thromboxane A2 mediates pulmonary hypertension after cardiopulmonary bypass in the rabbit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:959–67.[Abstract]
  13. Friedman M, Wang SY, Sellke FW, Franklin A, Weintraub RM, Johnson RG. Pulmonary injury after total or partial cardiopulmonary bypass with thromboxane synthesis inhibition. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:598–603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kirshbom PM, Tsui SS, DiBernardo LR, et al. Blockage of endothelin-converting enzyme reduces pulmonary hypertension after cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Surg 1995;118:2:440–4.
  15. Huang H, Ding W, Su Z, Zhang W. Mechanism of the preserving effect of aprotinin on platelet function and its use in cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:11–8.[Abstract]
  16. Rinder CS, Gaal D, Student LA, Smith BR. Platelet-leukocyte activation and modulation of adhesion receptors in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:280–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Bando KO, Pillai R, Cameron DE, et al. Leukocyte depletion ameliorate free radical-mediated lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:873–7.[Abstract]
  18. Gillinov AM, Redmond JM, Zehr KJ, et al. Inhibition of neutrophil adhesion during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:126–33.[Abstract]
  19. Bidstrup BP, Royston D, Sapsford RN, Taylor KM. Reduction in blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with high-dose aprotinin. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:364–72.[Abstract]
  20. Hazan E, Pasaoglu I, Demircin M, Bozer AY. The effect of aprotinin (Trasylol) on postoperative bleeding in cyanotic congenital heart disease. Turkish J Pediatr 1991;33:99–110.[Medline]
  21. Penkoske PA, Entwistle LM, Marchak BE, Seal RF, Gibb W. Aprotinin in children undergoing repair of congenital heart defects. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S529–32.[Medline]
  22. Zellers TM, Driscoll DJ, Humes RA, Feldt RH, Puga FJ, Danielson GK. Glenn shunt: effect on pleural drainage after modified Fontan operation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98:725–9.
  23. Bridges ND, Lock JE, Castaneda AR. Baffle fenestration with subsequent transcatheter closure. Circulation 1990;82:1681–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cosgrove DM III, Heric B, Lytle BW, et al. Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: a placebo-controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:1031–8.[Abstract]
  25. Saffitz JE, Stahl DJ, Sundt TM, Wareing TH, Kouchoukos NT. Disseminated intravascular coagulation after administration of aprotinin in combination with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:1080–2.[Medline]
  26. Sundt TM III, Kouchoukos NT, Saffitz JE, Murphy SF, Wareing TH, Stahl DJ. Renal dysfunction and intravascular coagulation with aprotinin and hypothermic circulatory arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:1418–24.[Abstract]

Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996 62: 1335-1336. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. P. Eaton
Antifibrinolytic Therapy in Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1087 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. L. Backer, A. M. Kelle, R. D. Stewart, S. C. Suresh, F. N. Ali, R. A. Cohn, R. Seshadri, and C. Mavroudis
Aprotinin is safe in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2007; 134(6): 1421 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. L. Skidmore and A. Azakie
Aprotinin and Sevoflurane Do Not Affect Renal Function During Single-Ventricle Palliative Surgery
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1614 - 1615.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
D. Soetenga and K. A. Mussatto
Management of Infants With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Integrating Research Into Nursing Practice
Crit. Care Nurse, December 1, 2004; 24(6): 46 - 66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. D. B. Jaquiss, N. S. Ghanayem, G. M. Hoffman, R. T. Fedderly, J. R. Cava, K. A. Mussatto, and J. S. Tweddell
Early cavopulmonary anastomosis in very young infants after the Norwood procedure: Impact on oxygenation, resource utilization, and mortality
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 982 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Z. Amin, D. B. McElhinney, J. K. Strawn, J. D. Kugler, K. F. Duncan, V. M. Reddy, E. Petrossian, and F. L. Hanley
Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis increases postoperative morbidity after a modified Fontan operation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2001; 122(5): 856 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
L. A. Gramlich and S. D. Barnes
Aprotinin Use in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 117 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. C. Oz, D. M. Cosgrove III, B. R. Badduke, J. D. Hill, M. R. Flannery, R. Palumbo, and N. Topic
Controlled clinical trial of a novel hemostatic agent in cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2000; 69(5): 1376 - 1382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Pouard
Review of Efficacy Parameters
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(90060): S40 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
D. Royston
Hemostatic Drugs in Prothrombotic or Hypercoagulable States
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 1997; 1(4): 376 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
James S. Tweddell
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tweddell, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Litwin, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tweddell, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Litwin, S. B.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS