ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Delos M. Cosgrove, III
Joseph M. Arcidi
James D. Thomas
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M., III
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. D.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:499-503
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Initial Experience With the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System

Delos M. Cosgrove, III, MD, Joseph M. Arcidi, MD, Leonardo Rodriguez, MD, William J. Stewart, MD, Kimerly Powell, PhD, James D. Thomas, MD

Departments of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiology, and Biomedical Engineering, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. The mitral valve has a nonplanar shape and a sphincter action. Pathologic dilatation occurs along the posterior annulus. To preserve the physiologic function and correct annular dilatation, we developed an annuloplasty system that is universally flexible and produces a measured plication of the posterior annulus (Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System).

Methods. The results of 150 consecutive mitral valve repairs using this system were analyzed. Mean age was 58 ± 13 years; 59% were men. The cause of the valve disease was degenerative in 75% of the patients, rheumatic in 13%, ischemic in 8%, and infectious in 4%. Associated procedures were performed in 61 patients (41%).

Results. Echocardiographic mitral regurgitation decreased from 3.7 ± 0.6 before repair to 0.2 ± 0.4 after repair (p< 0.0001). There were no hospital deaths and no cases of hemodynamically significant systolic anterior motion or other annuloplasty-related complications. Follow-up was 100% complete at a mean of 3.1 ± 3.6 months. There were three late deaths, three transient ischemic attacks, and one episode of endocarditis. Five patients (3.3%) have undergone reoperation for recurrent mitral insufficiency; no reoperations were related to the annuloplasty system. At a mean of 9 months, three-dimensional reconstruction of the mitral annulus from multiple echocardiographic images confirmed the nonplanar shape and sphincter mechanism of the annulus. Annular orifice area decreased 19% during the cardiac cycle from a mean of 10.3 cm2 in diastole to 8.6 cm2 in systole.

Conclusions. This annuloplasty system is effective for repair of insufficiency secondary to all causes, preserves physiologic annulus function, and is associated with a low incidence of valve-related complication.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
See also page 503.

Recently, our understanding of the physiology of the mitral annulus has increased. Echocardiographic studies have demonstrated that the mitral annulus is saddle-shaped, with its highest points anteriorly and posteriorly [1]. In addition, the entire annulus flexes throughout the cardiac cycle with a sphincter mechanism, causing the annulus to be smaller in systole than in diastole [2,3]. Pathologic studies have demonstrated that when dilatation of the annulus occurs, the distance between the fibrous trigones anteriorly remains stable and dilatation occurs along the attachment of the posterior leaflet [4]. This understanding of the normal physiology and pathoanatomy of the mitral valve led us to pursue the development of an annuloplasty system that is universally flexible and produces a measured plication of the posterior annulus. The Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System (Baxter Healthcare, Irvine, CA) is the result of this effort.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical results and postrepair function of the mitral annulus.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
From February 1993 to March 1994, 150 patients underwent mitral valve reconstruction that incorporated the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System as part of their repair. When this annuloplasty was attempted, there were no conversions to another type of annuloplasty to achieve valve competence. The mean age was 57.8 ± 12.7 years (range, 27 to 85 years). Eighty-eight patients (58.8%) were men. Fifteen patients (10%) were in New York Heart Association functional class I, 100 (66.7%) were in class II, 28 (18.7%) were in class III, and 7 (4.7%) were in class IV. The cause was degenerative disease in the majority of patients (Table 1Go). Mitral insufficiency was the principal pathologic anatomy present in 139 patients (93%). Mixed lesions were found in 11 patients (7%). Sixty-one patients (40%) had associated procedures: myocardial revascularization, 25; aortic valve replacement, 13; tricuspid valve repair, 14; aortic valve repair, 6; and other, 3. Appropriate repair techniques were directed to specific structures of the mitral apparatus (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Cause of Valve Disease
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. . Site of Repair
 
The Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System consists of a handle, frame, and flexible band. The band is made of polyester velour to ensure rapid endothelialization. It is flexible, has a radiopaque marker, and is held in place by a frame (Fig 1Go). To select the proper size, the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve is unfurled and a size is selected that most closely approximates the surface area of the anterior leaflet. Sutures are placed in the posterior annulus beginning at the fibrous trigone and proceeding along the posterior annulus to the opposite fibrous trigone. The annuloplasty sutures are passed through the properly selected device, and the Annuloplasty System is slid into position above the mitral valve (Fig 2Go). To facilitate tying, the handle is removed from the frame by cutting two sutures. The handle remains attached to the frame by a coiled lanyard to facilitate its removal (Fig 3Go). The sutures are sequentially tied, reducing the size of the posterior annulus by multiple small plications. After all the sutures are tied and cut, the band is released from its frame by cutting three sutures with a no. 15 blade. When the frame has been removed, the mitral annulus is universally flexible (Fig 4Go).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . The Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System consists of a handle, a rigid frame, and a polyester velour band.

 


View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Sutures are placed in the posterior annulus from fibrous trigone to fibrous trigone and then passed through the annuloplasty band.

 


View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. . The handle is removed to facilitate tying but remains attached to aid in removal of the frame.

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. . When the sutures have been tied the frame is removed.

 
Patient follow-up was 100% complete with no patients lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up was 8.1 ± 3.6 months and ranged from 1 to 17 months. The size distribution of the Annuloplasty System is shown in Figure 5Go. The sizes ranged from 26 mm to 38 mm, with 30 mm being the most commonly used.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. . The size distribution varied from 26 mm to 38 mm, with 30 mm being the most common.

 
Pairwise comparisons of preoperative, intraoperative, and early postoperative mitral regurgitation were performed via the Wilcoxon sign-rank test due to the possible violation of the normality assumption. Late event curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
There were no in-hospital deaths in this series. Perioperative complications are shown in Table 3Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. . Morbidity and Mortality
 
All patients were monitored intraoperatively with a transesophageal echocardiogram to assess mitral valve function before and after repair. Before repair, mean mitral insufficiency was 3.7 ± 0.7. After repair, mean mitral insufficiency was 0.2 ± 0.4 (p < 0.0001). Serial echocardiograms were available in 54 patients. Mean mitral regurgitation at discharge was 0.4 ± 0.7. Mean mitral regurgitation at a mean follow-up of 4 months was 0.6 ± 0.7 (p = not significant).

There were three late deaths, for an actuarial survival of 98% at 12 months. There were three thromboembolic events, for an actuarial freedom from thromboembolic events of 97% at 1 year. There was one episode of endocarditis, for an actuarial freedom from endocarditis of 98% at 1 year. Five patients required reoperation, for an actuarial freedom from reoperation of 97% at 1 year. Causes of failed repair were incomplete initial repair in 2; chordal transfer (dehiscence), 1; papillary muscle shortening, 1; and leaflet performation with a suture, 1.

It was possible to assess the size, shape, and motion of the mitral annulus using a computer-generated reconstruction from multiple echocardiographic images obtained via transesophageal echocardiograms in patients after mitral valve repair. The normal saddle shape of the mitral annulus is demonstrated in Figure 6Go obtained one year postoperatively. In 5 patients it was possible to compare changes in mitral orifice area during systole and diastole. Immediately postoperatively there was a 7% increase in valve orifice area from 8.9 ± 2.6 cm2 in systole to 9.6 ± 2.7 cm2 in diastole. At a mean of 9 months postoperatively, this same group of patients increased the change in their mitral annulus orifice area to 19% from 8.9 ± 4.0 cm2 in systole to 10.6 ± 4.9 cm2 in diastole (Fig 7Go).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. . Computer-generated reconstruction of the mitral annulus 1 year after repair demonstrates preservation of the saddle shape.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 7. . The mitral annulus remains flexible at 1 year, being smaller in systole than in diastole.

 
Constant changes in the valve orifice area occur throughout the cardiac cycle in a normal mitral annulus. This was compared with one that had undergone a mitral annuloplasty using a Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System 1 year previously. The changes in the mitral annular orifice closely parallel each other (Fig 8Go).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 8. . Changes in mitral valve annulus orifice area occur throughout the cardiac cycle. In the normal heart the annulus orifice area decreases in systole and increases in diastole. Almost identical changes occurred in the annulus of a valve repaired 1 year previously.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The sphincter mechanism of the mitral valve has long been recognized [2, 3]. This has the advantage of increasing the amount of coaptation of the leaflets during systole and improving the annular orifice area during diastole. The pathologic changes in the mitral annulus were recognized by Carpentier and associates [4], who pointed out that dilatation occurs along the posterior annulus of the mitral valve. This led them to plication of the mitral annulus using an annuloplasty. Recently, the mitral annulus has been recognized to be saddle-shaped, which is higher at the anterior and posterior locations and lowest at the commissures. This shape helps the mitral annulus surround the left ventricular outflow tract. The ideal annuloplasty would be one that corrects the dilatation of the posterior annulus in a measured fashion while maintaining a saddle shape and allowing a full range of motion of the mitral annulus.

Previous investigators have employed a device that was limited to the posterior annulus. Cooley and associates [5] described a collar that was sutured to the posterior annulus. This was flexible and did not cover the area between the two fibrous trigones anteriorly. This device was subsequently abandoned. A similar technique was described by Fundaro and colleagues [6], who used a 4-mm Gore-Tex graft through which multiple mattress sutures were placed. In the mid-1980s we experimented in a similar procedure with a strip of formaldehyde-treated bovine pericardium, doing more than 100 cases with satisfactory results using this method. These methods have the advantages of technical ease and avoidance of potential deformity of the aortic valve caused by placing sutures between the fibrous trigones. The repairs were flexible and avoided potential complications associated with the Carpentier-Edwards ring caused by malalignment of the anterior and posterior leaflets resulting in insufficiency. However, all three of these approaches failed to achieve measured plications of the posterior annulus. Each plication of the posterior annulus is dependent on the tension placed on the sutures at the time of tying. Therefore, it was possible to have too small a plication resulting in insufficiency or too large a plication resulting in obliteration of the posterior leaflet. The approach of tying down over a rigid frame eliminates the potential of plication of an inappropriate amount of the posterior annulus.

Surgeons are concerned that any nonrigid annuloplasty device can, in time, become rigid, negating the effect of placing a flexible device. When examining the three-dimensional reconstructions of the mitral annulus obtained from patients who had undergone annuloplasty with the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System a year previously, it is apparent that the annulus maintains its saddle shape and also has a sphincter action that is close to normal throughout the cardiac cycle. Of interest is the fact that serial studies of these same patients showed that the sphincter activity of the mitral annulus increases with time. This may be the result of improving left ventricular function or other factors that are not yet evident. It clearly confirms the continuing flexibility of the annulus a significant period of time after healing.

The major perceived advantage of a rigid annuloplasty is that it ensures long-term valve stability after repair. Because recurrent mitral insufficiency is one of the main concerns of surgeons performing mitral valve reconstructions, the potential for ensured long-term competence is an attractive feature [7]. To evaluate the relative incidence of reoperation for recurrent mitral insufficiency, we compared the results of this series with those with the rigid ring. Spencer and co-workers [8] reported an early reoperation rate of 2.9% using the Carpentier-Edwards annuloplasty ring. We [9] reported a similar incidence of 3.2% early reoperation. Deloche and associates [10] reported a 4.3% incidence of reoperation in 185 patients undergoing repair with the Carpentier-Edwards annuloplasty ring. None of these rates are significantly different from the current series, which notes a 3.3% incidence of early reoperation for recurrent mitral insufficiency. It is important to note that all of the reoperations in the current series were secondary to technical problems; none were secondary to dehiscence of the annuloplasty or the presence of systolic anterior motion or other annuloplasty complications.

The final question to be answered is whether or not there is any advantage to a flexible mitral annulus. This topic has been explored extensively by two groups of laboratory investigators and one clinical study. The data on this topic are conflicting. In pig hearts, van Rijk and associates [11, 12] noted that the mitral annulus in systole was approximately 80% of its diastolic dimensions and that counter-clockwise rotation of the posterior annulus was observed. The Duran ring annuloplasty preserved normal annular motion and rotation and reduction in mitral valve area during systole. This was not observed with the Carpentier ring. Van Rijk and associates concluded that the hemodynamics were better in a flexible ring group because of less interference with diastolic filling of the left ventricle [11]. Publications by Rayhill, Castro, and their associates [13–15] failed to identify any differences in systolic function in the left ventricle whether patients had a rigid or flexible annuloplasty. The results of this carefully controlled study cast doubt as to the potential advantages of a flexible ring when measuring systolic function. The only report to clinically address this question is by David and colleagues [16]. In groups of patients with chronic regurgitation, left ventricular end-systolic volume fell significantly only in patients with Duran rings. This was thought to represent superior left ventricular pump performance. This difference in left ventricular systolic function, however, was not seen at the 1-year evaluation. The flexibility of the mitral annuloplasty device may or may not have an advantage in terms of left ventricular function, but no investigators have demonstrated any disadvantage to a flexible annuloplasty. With no proven disadvantages and with flexible annuloplasties approaching normal physiology, it seems logical to pursue an annuloplasty that results in a measured plication of the posterior annulus that is universally flexible.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Presented at the Thirty-first Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Palm Springs, CA, Jan 30-Feb 1, 1995.

This product has been jointly developed by The Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Baxter Healthcare. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation has entered into a licensing agreement with Baxter Healthcare relative to this invention.

Address reprint requests to Dr Cosgrove, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Levine RA, Triulzi MO, Harrigan P, Weyman AE. The relationship of mitral annular shape to the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1987;75:756–67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Tsakiris AG, von Bernouth G, Rastelli GC, Titus MU, Wood JL. Size and motion of the mitral valve annulus in anesthetized intact dogs. J Appl Physiol 1971;30:611–8.[Free Full Text]
  3. Powell KA, Rodriguez L, Patwari P, et al. 3-D Reconstruction of mitral annulus from 2-D transesophageal echocardiographic images. Presented at Computers in Cardiology, Bethesda, MD, Sep 25–28, 1994.
  4. Carpentier A, Deloche A, Dauptain J, et al. A new reconstructive operation for correction of mitral and tricuspid insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1971;61:1–13.[Medline]
  5. Cooley DA, Frazier OH, Norman JC. Mitral leaflet prolapse: surgical treatment using a posterior annular collar prosthesis. Bull Tex Heart Inst 1976;3:438–42.
  6. Fundaro P, Salati M, Cialfi A, Santoli C. Polytetrafluoroethylene posterior annuloplasty for mitral regurgitation [Letter]. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:165–6.[Medline]
  7. Carpentier A. Mitral valve annuloplasty [Letter]. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:508.[Medline]
  8. Spencer FC, Colvin SB, Culliford AT, Isom OW. Experiences with the Carpentier techniques of mitral valve reconstruction in 103 patients (1980–1985). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:341–50.[Abstract]
  9. Cosgrove DM, Chavez AM, Lytle BW, et al. Results of mitral valve reconstruction. Circulation 1986;74(Suppl 1):82–7.
  10. Van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Shipperheyn JJ, Huysmans HA, Bruschke AVG. Influence of mitral valve prosthesis or rigid mitral ring on left ventricular pump function. Circulation 1989;80(Suppl 2):7–20.
  11. Van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Mast F, Schipperheyn JJ, Huysmans HA, Bruschke AVG. Comparison of rigid and flexible rings for annuloplasty of the porcine mitral valve. Circulation 1990;82(Suppl 4):58–64.
  12. Deloche A, Jebara VA, Relland JYM, et al. Valve repair with Carpentier techniques-the second decade. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:990–1002.[Abstract]
  13. Rayhill SC, Castro LJ, Niczyporuk MA, et al. Rigid fixation of the mitral annulus does not change left ventricular contractility. Circulation 1991;83–84(Suppl 2):639.
  14. Rayhill SC, Castro LJ, Niczyporuk MA, et al. Rigid fixation of the mitral annulus does not impair left ventricular systolic function in the normal canine heart. Circulation 1992;85–86(Suppl 2):26–38.
  15. Castro LJ, Moon MR, Rayhill SC, et al. Annuloplasty with flexible or rigid ring does not alter left ventricular systolic performance, energetics, or ventricular-arterial coupling in conscious, closed-chest dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:643–59.[Abstract]
  16. David TE, Komeda M, Pollick C, Burns RJ. Mitral valve annuloplasty: the effect of the type on left ventricular function. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:524–8.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Lange, T. Guenther, B. Kiefer, C. Noebauer, W. Goetz, R. Busch, P. Tassani-Prell, B. Voss, and R. Bauernschmitt
Mitral valve repair with the new semirigid partial Colvin-Galloway Future annuloplasty band.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2008; 135(5): 1087 - 1093.e4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
J. Kwan, G.-C. Kim, M.-J. Jeon, D.-H. Kim, T. Shiota, J. D. Thomas, K.-S. Park, and W.-H. Lee
3D geometry of a normal tricuspid annulus during systole: A comparison study with the mitral annulus using real-time 3D echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2007; 8(5): 375 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. K. Ghanta, R. Chen, N. Narayanasamy, S. McGurk, S. Lipsitz, F. Y. Chen, and L. H. Cohn
Suture bicuspidization of the tricuspid valve versus ring annuloplasty for repair of functional tricuspid regurgitation: Midterm results of 237 consecutive patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2007; 133(1): 117 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. H. Adams, A. C. Anyanwu, P. B. Rahmanian, V. Abascal, S. P. Salzberg, and F. Filsoufi
Large Annuloplasty Rings Facilitate Mitral Valve Repair in Barlow's Disease
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2096 - 2101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T.-T. Ton-Nu, R. A. Levine, M. D. Handschumacher, D. J. Dorer, C. Yosefy, D. Fan, L. Hua, L. Jiang, and J. Hung
Geometric Determinants of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Insights From 3-Dimensional Echocardiography
Circulation, July 11, 2006; 114(2): 143 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Hartrumpf, U. A. Stock, R.-U. Kuehnel, and J. M. Albes
Fracture of colvin-galloway future band causing a tear in the anterior mitral leaflet.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1879 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J M Ferrao de Oliveira and M. J Antunes
Mitral valve repair: better than replacement
Heart, February 1, 2006; 92(2): 275 - 281.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Matsukuma, K. Eishi, S. Yamachika, H. Yamaguchi, T. Ariyoshi, Y. Hisata, K. Tanigawa, K. Izumi, and H. Takai
Risk Factors of Posterior Pericardial Annuloplasty for Isolated Posterior Leaflet Prolapse
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 820 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. Arita, S. Tono, H. Kasegawa, and M. Umezu
Multiple Purpose Simulator Using a Natural Porcine Mitral Valve
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 350 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
J. X. Qin, T. Shiota, H. Tsujino, G. Saracino, R. D. White, N. L. Greenberg, J. Kwan, Z. B. Popovic, D. A. Agler, W. J. Stewart, et al.
Mitral annular motion as a surrogate for left ventricular ejection fraction: real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging studies
Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2004; 5(6): 407 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. M. Parish, B. M. Jackson, Y. Enomoto, R. C. Gorman, and J. H. Gorman III
The Dynamic Anterior Mitral Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1248 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. A. Tibayan, F. Rodriguez, F. Langer, M. K. Zasio, L. Bailey, D. Liang, G. T. Daughters, N. B. Ingels Jr, and D. C. Miller
Does septal-lateral annular cinching work for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2004; 127(3): 654 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. M. McCarthy, S. K. Bhudia, J. Rajeswaran, K. J. Hoercher, B. W. Lytle, D. M. Cosgrove, and E. H. Blackstone
Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2004; 127(3): 674 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. A. Tibayan, F. Rodriguez, F. Langer, M. K. Zasio, L. Bailey, D. Liang, G. T. Daughters, N. B. Ingels Jr, and D. C. Miller
Annular remodeling in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: ring selection implications
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1549 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. H. Gorman III, R. C. Gorman, B. M. Jackson, Y. Enomoto, M. G. St. John-Sutton, and L. H. Edmunds Jr
Annuloplasty ring selection for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: lessons from the ovine model
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1556 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Kollar, V. Kekesi, P. Soos, and A. Juhasz-Nagy
Left ventricular external subannular plication: an indirect off-pump mitral annuloplasty method in a canine model
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2003; 126(4): 977 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
G. Gatti and P. Pugliese
Preliminary experience in mitral valve repair using the Cosgrove-Edwards annuloplasty ring
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, September 1, 2003; 2(3): 256 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
A. M. Gillinov and D. M. Cosgrove III
Mitral Valve Repair
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 933 - 950.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. M. McCarthy
Does the intertrigonal distance dilate? Never say never
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2002; 124(6): 1078 - 1079.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. C. Hueb, F. B. Jatene, L. F. P. Moreira, P. M. Pomerantzeff, E. Kallas, and S. A. de Oliveira
Ventricular remodeling and mitral valve modifications in dilated cardiomyopathy: New insights from anatomic study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2002; 124(6): 1216 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. A. Timek, P. Dagum, D. T. Lai, F. Tibayan, D. Liang, G. T. Daughters, M. Hayase, N. B. Ingels Jr, and D. C. Miller
Will a Partial Posterior Annuloplasty Ring Prevent Acute Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation?
Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(12_suppl_1): I-33 - I-39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Dagum, T. Timek, G. R. Green, G. T. Daughters, D. Liang, N. B. Ingels Jr, and D. C. Miller
Three-dimensional geometric comparison of partial and complete flexible mitral annuloplasty rings
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 665 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Gatti, G. Maffei, A. M. Lusa, and P. Pugliese
Tricuspid valve repair with the Cosgrove-Edwards annuloplasty system: early clinical and echocardiographic results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 764 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. A. Timek and D. C. Miller
Experimental and clinical assessment of mitral annular area and dynamics: what are we actually measuring?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 966 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
T. Chotivatanapong, C. Kasemsarn, V. Sungkahapong, P. Chaiseri, C. Yosthasurodom, and S. Cholitkul
Mitral Valve Repair With Autologous Pericardial Ring
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2001; 9(1): 10 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
R. P Akhtar, M. A. Cheema, R. P Akhtar, and M. A. Cheema
Rheumatic Mitral Valve Annuloplasty With Polytetrafluoroethylene Ring
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2000; 8(3): 227 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C.-K. Ng, C. Punzengruber, O. Pachinger, J. Nesser, H. Auer, H. Franke, and P. Hartl
Valve repair in mitral regurgitation complicated by severe annulus calcification
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 70(1): 53 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
V. Borghetti, M. Campana, C. Scotti, D. Domenighini, P. Totaro, G. Coletti, M. Pagani, and R. Lorusso
Biological versus prosthetic ring in mitral-valve repair: enhancement of mitral annulus dynamics and left-ventricular function with pericardial annuloplasty at long term
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2000; 17(4): 431 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. M. Gillinov, D. M. Cosgrove III, T. Shiota, J. Qin, H. Tsujino, W. J. Stewart, J. D. Thomas, M. Porqueddu, J. A. White, and E. H. Blackstone
Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System: midterm results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 717 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. F. Camilleri, B. Miguel, P. Bailly, B. J. Legault, M.-C. D'Agrosa-Boiteux, G. L. Polvani, and C. M. de Riberolles
Flexible posterior mitral annuloplasty: five-year clinical and Doppler echocardiographic results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1998; 66(5): 1692 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. S. Breburda, B. P. Griffin, M. Pu, L. Rodriguez, D. M. Cosgrove III, and J. D. Thomas
Three-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry of maximal regurgitant orifice area in myxomatous mitral regurgitation: intraoperative comparison with proximal flow convergence
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 432 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Dall'Agata, M. A. Taams, P. M. Fioretti, J. R. T. C. Roelandt, and L. A. Van Herwerden
Cosgrove-Edwards Mitral Ring Dynamics Measured With Transesophageal Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1998; 65(2): 485 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. F. McCarthy and D. M. Cosgrove III
Tricuspid Valve Repair With the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1997; 64(1): 267 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. M. Lee, L. M. Shapiro, and F. C. Wells
Midterm Results of Mitral Valve Repair With the Sculptor Annuloplasty Ring
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1340 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow