ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louagie, Y. A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schoevaerdts, J.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Louagie, Y. A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schoevaerdts, J.-C.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1141-1149
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Operation for Unstable Angina Pectoris: Factors Influencing Adverse In-Hospital Outcome

Yves A. G. Louagie, MD, Jacques Jamart, MD, Michel Buche, MD, Philippe M. Eucher, MD, Didier Schoevaerdts, Edith Collard, MD, Manuel Gonzalez, MD, Baudouin Marchandise, MD, Jean-Claude Schoevaerdts, MD

Divisions of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Anesthesia, Intensive Care, Cardiology, and Biostatistics, University Hospital of Mont-Godinne (Catholic University of Louvain), Yvoir, Belgium

Accepted for publication January 24, 1995.


    Abstract
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of unstable angina is still associated with increased operative risk and postoperative morbidity. The impact of the extended use of arterial grafts on early results is incompletely defined. In a 7-year period (1986 to 1993), 474 patients (average age, 65 years; range, 34 to 85 years) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of unstable angina. Sixty-eight patients were operated on emergently and 406 urgently. They received an average of 3.0 distal anastomoses (range, 1 to 6). Seventy-nine patients had exclusively venous grafts, 316 had one internal thoracic artery graft, 79 had bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts, and 20 had inferior epigastric artery grafts. Sequential internal thoracic artery grafting was performed in 70 patients. Redo operations were performed in 26 patients. Thirty-four patients (7.2%) experienced a new myocardial infarction. Eighty-nine patients (18.8%) had an intraaortic balloon pump inserted preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively. Eight patients (1.7%) died intraoperatively and 24 patients (5.1%) died postoperatively. Seventy-seven patients (16.2%) had an adverse outcome, as shown by the need for an intraaortic balloon pump (intraoperatively or postoperatively) or hospital death, or by both. Forty variables were examined by multivariate analysis for their influence on the occurrence of an adverse outcome. Aortic cross-clamp time (p = 0.0004), transfer from the intensive care unit (p = 0.0023), female sex (p = 0.0023), operation performed in early years (p = 0.0041), left ventricular aneurysm (p = 0.0068), the number of diseased coronary vessels (p = 0.0312), and reoperation (p = 0.0318) were all found to be significant independent predictors of increased risk. Thus, aortic cross-clamp duration remains the main determining factor of postoperative hospital outcome, which suggests the need for improved myocardial protection techniques. Outcome was not found to be adversely affected by the extended use of arterial grafts.


    Introduction
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Despite substantial advances made in perioperative patient care, hospital mortality and morbidity remain significant in patients with triple-vessel disease and severe angina, as demonstrated by a recent series in which the operative mortalities ranged from 4.6% to 9.2% [16]. In addition, the percentage of patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting is increasing significantly, constituting as much as 48% of all the coronary artery bypass grafting procedures performed [7].

Besides the fact that the perioperative features of unstable angina need to be better understood, two main components of the surgical technique deserve further clarification: the extended use of arterial conduits and the myocardial protection techniques. Indeed, the techniques of myocardial protection seem to matter very much when dealing with cases of unstable angina [1, 8, 9]. Second, although arterial grafts have rarely been used in the setting of unstable angina [10, 11], it was suggested recently that the use of internal thoracic arteries (ITA) as grafts could be associated with a better hospital outcome than that associated with the use of venous conduits alone [1214].

The study described here was undertaken to analyze the factors associated with a poor hospital outcome, using as a primary end point postoperative mortality or the need for an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP). The influence on hospital survival of various techniques of myocardial protection and of an increased use of arterial conduits was evaluated specifically.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Inclusion Criteria and Definition of Terms
Unstable angina was defined as prolonged (more than 15 minutes) angina at rest, usually with reversible ischemic electrocardiographic changes, requiring surgical intervention during the same hospital stay because of a lack of response or an incomplete response to maximal medical therapy.

Between January 1986 and February 1993, 474 patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass for unstable angina at our institution were included in the study. Sixty-eight patients required emergency myocardial revascularization within 24 hours of catheterization. The remaining 406 patients were referred for surgical treatment during the same hospitalization. Patients undergoing valvular replacement or ventricular septum closure were excluded from this study. Also excluded from consideration were patients requiring an emergency operation for the management of complications from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. However, patients suffering unstable angina after recent myocardial infarction were included. During the study period, an upward trend (p < 0.0001) was seen in the percentage of patients requiring an operation for unstable angina (from 17.4% in 1986 to 36.2% in 1992).

Diabetes was considered to be present if the patient was being treated with oral medications or insulin. Obesity was defined as weight 15% or more than that expected according to height. Hypertensive patients were included if the patient had a history of high blood pressure, if the blood pressure frequently exceeded 140/90 mm Hg, or if the patient was taking antihypertensive medications. Renal dysfunction was defined by a preoperative serum creatinine concentration of 2.0 mg/ 100 mL or more.

Braunwald's classification [15] was used to separate patients into meaningful subgroups. This grouping focuses on three aspects of angina: (1) the severity of the clinical manifestations (from class I to III); (2) the clinical circumstances in which unstable angina occurs (class A, secondary unstable angina; class B, primary unstable angina; class C, postinfarction unstable angina [within 2 weeks from the onset of myocardial infarction]); and (3) the intensity of treatment (1, minimal therapy; 2, oral therapy; 3, maximally tolerated doses of antiischemic drugs, including intravenously administered nitroglycerin).

The coronary scoring system described by Leaman and colleagues [16] was applied to assess the extent of underlying coronary artery disease. Briefly, this system is based on the severity of the luminal diameter narrowing (taking into account a luminal diameter reduction of more than 70%) and is weighted according to the usual flow to the left ventricle in each coronary vessel. The resultant number indicates the overall severity of the obstructive coronary artery disease.

A perioperative myocardial infarction was defined as the appearance of a new Q wave on the electrocardiogram or a concentration of creatine kinase–myocardial band of at least 10%, or both findings. Hospital mortality was defined as death occurring either while the patient was in the hospital or, if the patient was discharged from the hospital, within 30 days of the operation.

Anesthesia and Surgical Procedure
A peripheral line and an arterial line were placed with the patient under local anesthesia. General anesthesia was achieved with fentanyl citrate (25 µg/kg) and pancuronium bromide (Pavulon; Organon, West Orange, NJ) (0.1 mg/kg). A Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter was introduced percutaneously through the internal jugular vein. Cardiac output was measured with a cardiac output computer (Hellige, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany). The results were rendered as a mean of three consecutive recordings. The aorta was cannulated in the standard fashion. Ascending aorta venting was performed through a catheter with a Y connector to the cardioplegic line. Cardiac drainage was realized through the atrial appendage using a No. 34 two-stage cavoatrial catheter (USCI Division of C.R. Bard, Billerica, MA). The cardiopulmonary bypass system was primed mainly with crystalloids and occasionally with banked blood to maintain a hematocrit value above 20%. The extracorporeal circulation was performed with a heart-lung machine (model 10-00-00; Stöckert Instrumente, Munich, Germany) using a membrane oxygenator. All distal anastomoses were done during a single interval of aortic cross-clamping; the aortic anastomoses were done during tangential aortic cross-clamping, while the heart was kept in the empty beating state. Moderate hemodilution (hematocrit, 20% to 25%) and systemic hypothermia (25° to 28°C) were maintained during cardiopulmonary bypass. Multidose cold nonoxygenated crystalloid cardioplegia was administered antegradely in 375 patients and retrogradely in 99 patients. Cold blood cardioplegia was introduced into use at our institution in December 1989 and its use was favored in the severe cases (117 patients). This method has been described elsewhere [17]. Briefly, the cardioplegic delivery system consists of disposable tubing to deliver blood and crystalloid cardioplegia at a 4:1 ratio (HE 100 heat exchanger; American Bentley Hospital Supply, Irvine, CA). The tubing was attached to a coronary cardioplegic adapter containing four limbs that allows simultaneous distribution of the cardioplegic solution into the aorta and the vein grafts (CDS-004; Research Medical, Midvale, UT). Thus, in the present study, blood cardioplegia was administered antegradely. The composition of the solution was as follows: Na, 138.9 ± 0.9 mEq/L; K, 8.5 ± 0.5 mEq/L; Ca, 7.0 ± 0.2 mEq/L; and HCO3, 19.3 ± 0.3 mEq/L. The following conditions were maintained in the blood cardioplegia: osmolarity, 305.2 ± 2.0 mOsm/L; pH, 7.34 ± 0.01; hemoglobin, 6.1 ± 0.4 g/100 mL; hematocrit, 0.17 ± 0.01; oxygen partial pressure, 248.3 ± 31.6 mm Hg; and carbon dioxide partial pressure, 33.1 ± 1.0 mm Hg. The temperature of the perfusate was 8.0° ± 0.3°C and the temperature of the septum was maintained at 11.1° ± 0.7°C. After each distal anastomosis the solution was infused through a roller pump into the aortic root at a rate of 250 mL/min over 2 minutes.

At five defined points, the cardiac index, left ventricular stroke work index, right ventricular stroke work index, systemic vascular resistance, and pulmonary vascular resistance were evaluated. The five defined points were before aortic cannulation (pericardial incision), at the end of operation after reversal of the heparin effects and before sternal closure, and at the arrival of the patient in the intensive care unit, 4 hours later, and 12 hours later.

Data Analysis
Perioperative data were collected and entered prospectively into the cardiovascular surgery clinical research database by the surgeon in charge of the patient. Values are presented as the mean ± the standard error of the mean. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements was used for comparisons between groups at specific points in time. Values of p were obtained for the overall group effect, overall time effect, and group–time interaction. Other clinical data were compared by the two-sample t test, {chi}2 test, or Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Linear tests of trend over surgical year category were done using the test proposed by Cochran. One-way analysis of variance was performed to analyze the effect of one qualitative factor on one response variable. Between-group differences were then compared by Scheffé's test. Multivariate analysis of the prediction of adverse outcome was performed by logistic regression, with backward selection of variables using the Wald test at the 0.05 level. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was deleted from the multivariate analysis because it correlated strongly with the cross-clamp time. Because logistic regression analysis requires that all variables be present for each patient, we could not include factors that were frequently missing. For example, ejection fraction, which was usually available for patients in stable conditions, was often not determined in patients in an unstable condition because of the increased risk associated with left ventricular angiography in such circumstances. Therefore we used the dichotomous variable reduced ventricular function if the left ventricular ejection fraction was shown to be less than 0.40 by angiographic or isotopic means, or if left ventricular contractility appeared to be severely reduced at the time of direct surgical examination. Statistical analysis was performed with use of the SPSS (SPSS, Chicago, IL) and Datasim (Desktop Press, Lewiston, ME) software packages.


    Results
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Patient Profile
The average age of the patients was 65 years (range, 34 to 85 years); 323 (68.1%) were men and 151 (31.9%) were women. Associated peripheral vascular disease was present in 57 patients (12.0%). In addition, 56 other patients (11.8%) had extracranial carotid disease. Diabetes mellitus was present in 52 patients (11.0%), lipid abnormalities in 171 patients (36.1%), obesity in 152 patients (32.1%), hypertension in 185 patients (39.0%), renal dysfunction in 10 patients (2.1%), obstructive lung disease in 47 patients (9.9%), and a history of smoking in 207 patients (43.7%).

The breakdown of patients into subgroups of unstable angina classified according to the Braunwald groupings is given in Table 1Go. A history of remote myocardial infarction was present in 180 patients (38.0%), whereas recent preoperative myocardial infarction (within 6 weeks of operation) had occurred in 120 patients (25.3%). Recent myocardial infarction was transmural in 24 patients and fibrinolysis was attempted in 69. Coronary operation was performed 14 days on average after a recent myocardial infarction. Ninety-six patients (20.3%) were treated for acute coronary insufficiency in the intensive care unit. Twelve patients (2.5%) experienced at least one episode of ventricular fibrillation and 24 patients (5.1%) were in cardiogenic shock. Twenty-seven patients (5.7%) required an IABP to achieve anginal relief (19 patients) or hemodynamic stabilization (8 patients) before urgent revascularization.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. . Classification of Unstable Anginaa
 
Coronary arteriography showed that 54 patients (11.4%) had one-vessel disease, 153 patients (32.3%) had two-vessel disease, and 258 patients (54.4%) had three-vessel disease. Left main coronary artery disease was documented in 138 patients (29.1%). The average coronary score computed according to the system of Leaman and associates was 14.6 ± 0.4 (range, 1 to 48). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction as determined angiographically was 0.57 ± 0.01 and that determined by isotopic means was 0.47 ± 0.01. A total of 79 patients (16.7%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 and 19 (4.0%) had a left ventricular dyskinesia or aneurysm.

Patients undergoing exclusive saphenous vein grafting, or single or bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafting were compared with regard to their operative risk factors (Table 2Go). Those having no arterial grafting were clearly at greater risk by virtue of the severity of their angina class, their coronary score, the finding of a reduced ejection fraction, the need for an IABP preoperatively, and transfer from the intensive care unit. Likewise, there were considerable differences in the risk characteristics associated with the two myocardial protection techniques (Table 3Go). Indeed patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass under cold blood cardioplegia were significantly older, more frequently needed intravenously administered nitrates, had more diffuse coronary artery disease, and had a lower ejection fraction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. . Risk Factors According to the Technique of Revascularizationa
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. . Principal Risk Factors According to the Type of Cardioplegia Useda
 
Intraoperative Data
Exclusively venous grafts were used in 79 patients (16.7%). One internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft was used in 316 patients (66.7%), both ITAs were grafted in 79 patients (16.7%), and an inferior epigastric artery was used in 20 patients (4.22%). The increasing frequency of single and bilateral ITA implantation during the study period is illustrated in Figure 1Go. Sequential ITA grafting was performed in 70 patients (14.8%). An average of 3.0 distal anastomoses per patient (range, 1 to 6) was done. Reoperative procedures were performed in 26 patients (5.5%). Myocardial revascularization was associated with carotid endarterectomy in 10 patients (2.1%). The duration of aortic cross-clamping was 77 ± 1 minutes and the cardiopulmonary bypass time was 137 ± 2 minutes. Intraoperative insertion of an IABP was necessary to wean the patient from bypass in 52 cases (11.0%).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. . Annual frequency of internal thoracic artery (ITA) and saphenous vein (SV) graft use for coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with unstable angina.

 
Hospital Mortality and Morbidity
Eight patients (1.7%) died intraoperatively and 24 patients (5.1%) died postoperatively, for an overall hospital death rate of 6.8% (32 patients). These deaths occurred after a mean interval of 15.6 ± 4.0 days, and 56.3% of the patients died within 3 days of their procedure. The low cardiac output syndrome was the direct cause of 69% of the hospital deaths and represented 10.2% of all nonfatal postoperative complications. Twenty-six patients (5.5%) experienced a new anterior myocardial infarction and 9 patients (1.9%) suffered a new inferior myocardial infarction; among these, 1 patient sustained myocardial necrosis in both locations. L-Renin was administered to 35 patients (7.4%). An IABP was inserted postoperatively in 10 patients (2.1%). Thus 89 patients (18.8%) had an IABP inserted either preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively. However, there was a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in the need for an IABP between 1986 (37.0%) and 1992 (11.7%) (Fig 2Go). Severe postoperative left ventricular failure requiring IABP insertion or leading to death, or both, occurred in 77 patients (16.2%). The mortality declined significantly (p = 0.0019) during the study period, as shown in Figure 3Go. Conversely, the overall hospital death rate did not change markedly (p = 0.2341). The results of univariate analysis of postoperative outcome according to the type and number of grafts used are shown in Table 4Go. Patients undergoing exclusive saphenous vein grafting were characterized by an increased incidence of hospital mortality, major adverse outcome, and low-output syndrome. Complications specifically related to ITA harvesting, such as diaphragmatic paralysis, bleeding requiring reoperation for control, hemothorax, and respiratory insufficiency, were not found to be significantly associated with single or bilateral ITA use.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. . Perioperative use of intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP). A downward trend was noted in the percentage of patients receiving an intraaortic balloon pump perioperatively (p < 0.0001). (CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass.)

 



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. . Major adverse outcome (postoperative left ventricular failure requiring intraaortic balloon pulsation and/or leading to death) and hospital mortality by year. The frequency of a major adverse outcome declined markedly (p = 0.0019), whereas the overall hospital mortality did not change significantly.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. . Postoperative Outcome According to the Technique of Revascularizationa
 
Hemodynamic Data
The hemodynamic trends are depicted in Figure 4Go. There was a significant intergroup difference in the left ventricular stroke work index and pulmonary vascular resistance (p < 0.0001) between the control group and the group of patients who experienced a poor hospital outcome. However, this difference existed before the start of cardiopulmonary bypass, which supposes a preoperatively reduced left ventricular performance. In contrast, no significant intergroup differences were observed for the right ventricular stroke work index, the system vascular resistance, and the cardiac index.




View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. . Serial determinations of cardiac index (CI), left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Closed circles indicate data relating to the normal outcome group and open circles indicate data relating to the major adverse outcome group (see text for further information).

 
Risk Factor Analysis
All preoperative and intraoperative variables tested by univariate analysis are listed in Appendix 1. Forty factors were subjected to stepwise logistic regression analysis, the dependent variable being hospital death or the need for IABP, or both. The results of multivariate analysis are summarized in Table 5Go. The aortic cross-clamp time was by far the most significant variable, and the correlation between the duration of aortic cross-clamping and the incidence of the need for IABP and of death combined is shown in Figure 5Go. Interestingly, operation performed in more recent years was associated with a declining incidence of poor hospital outcome, and this corroborates the data shown in Figure 3Go. Though the recency of myocardial infarction was not a significant risk factor according to univariate and multivariate analysis, analysis of the time intervals from the occurrence of myocardial infarction to performance of the procedure warrants further attention. Indeed, the interval was significantly longer in the favorable outcome group (15 versus 8 days; p = 0.040). Unfortunately, this variable could not be included in the multivariate analysis because precise determination of the onset of myocardial infarction was not possible in a considerable number of patients. Nevertheless, there was a marked increase in poor outcome for patients operated on from 1 to 2 days after the onset of myocardial infarction, whereas the risk of hospital death was absent for those operated on after 14 days and the risk of the need for an IABP was null for those operated on after 28 days (Fig 6Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. . Significant Determinants of Major Adverse Outcome: Results of Logistic Regression Analysis
 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. . The influence of aortic cross-clamping duration (in minutes) on the occurrence of a major adverse outcome.

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. . The major adverse outcome and operative mortality rates for the time between the occurrence of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) and the performance of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The data at the bottom indicate the number of patients by category.

 

    Comment
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
One consistent finding in studies of bypass operations for the treatment of unstable angina is that the operative mortality is at least twice that expected in patients who have stable angina pectoris preoperatively. In a review of 14 reports published from 1978 to 1988, Kaiser and associates [18] cited an overall operative mortality ranging from 1.2% to 8.5%, with a mean mortality of 3.7%. The mean age for the entire group of patients was 56.8 years, and patients who had suffered a recent myocardial infarction were excluded from the review. The patients included in the present study were markedly older (mean age, 65 years) and a significant number (25.3%) were operated on early after their myocardial infarction. At our institution the operative mortality for patients undergoing elective coronary surgical procedures during the past 5 years was 2.2%, and it averaged 6.4% for patients operated on for the management of unstable angina during the same interval. This overall hospital mortality rate is well in the range of actual data (varying from 2.8% to 9.2%) yielded by studies dealing with sicker and older patients, and including those who had had a recent myocardial infarction [1, 2, 46, 8, 9].

The focus of the present work was to identify the factors predictive of adverse major outcomes characterized by ventricular failure requiring insertion of an IABP or complicated by hospital death. Indeed, the combination of hospital mortality and the need for an IABP as a dependent variable leaves no room for subjectivity, and is strongly associated with a severe low-output syndrome.

The duration of aortic cross-clamping was the principal predictive factor, which partly corroborates the findings of Naunheim and associates [3] who demonstrated that the cross-clamp time was a predictor of hospital death and low-output syndrome in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. The fact that the global ischemic time remains the most important intraoperative variable in predicting a major adverse outcome raises the question of the adequacy of myocardial protection techniques. Patients with unstable angina represent the most extreme challenge in terms of intraoperative myocardial protection. Cold blood cardioplegia reduced the morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting for unstable angina, as was demonstrated by Teoh [1] and Christakis [9] and their associates. In a group of patients undergoing emergency surgical procedures for acute coronary occlusion, Beyersdorf and colleagues [19] showed that improved techniques of myocardial protection, including warm blood cardioplegic induction, multidose cold blood cardioplegia for maintenance, and controlled reperfusion, resulted in a decrease in the overall mortality despite an increased number of risk factors [19]. In our series, cold blood cardioplegia was administered predominantly to high-risk patients. Furthermore, techniques of warm induction and warm reperfusion, which have been shown to be advantageous in patients at high risk [19], were not used in these patients. Given the aforementioned limitations, analysis failed to show that the myocardial protection techniques had any influence on outcome in the overall group of patients. Nevertheless, some improved techniques of myocardial protection not currently in general use may be effective in further reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with unstable angina undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, and are currently being investigated. These include continuous cold blood retrograde coronary sinus perfusion and warm reperfusion.

Hemodynamic data obtained from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of unstable angina are not available. In our study, only the left ventricular stroke work index and pulmonary vascular resistance differed significantly among the groups. Interestingly these hemodynamic changes existed before the start of cardiopulmonary bypass. The more frequent preoperative occurrence of compromised left ventricular function and cardiogenic shock in the poor outcome group, as demonstrated by univariate analysis, probably explains these observations. Moreover, Leung and associates [20] demonstrated by continuous transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring that up to 20% of such patients have episodes of wall motion abnormalities indicating myocardial ischemia during the prebypass period.

The suitability of the ITA conduit for use in emergency situations is not uniformly accepted. Indeed, concerns about early reperfusion and adequacy of flow have rendered ITA an unacceptable choice for revascularization in the minds of many surgeons. Therefore, according to previous publications, arterial grafts have rarely been used in the setting of unstable angina [10, 11]. Conversely, it was demonstrated recently that ITA conduits were associated with a significant improvement in operative mortality compared with the operative mortality observed for the use of venous conduits alone [14, 21]. In patients undergoing emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, use of the ITA was not associated with an increase in complications [22], and it was even shown that nonuse of the ITA was among the predictors of operative mortality [12] and low-cardiac output [13]. Our findings confirm that the use of a single or bilateral ITA is not associated, as an independent risk factor, with an increased incidence of a major adverse outcome. However, despite the fact that the results of univariate analysis suggest that a ``protective'' effect was conferred by single ITA bypass grafts (Appendix 1), this is not confirmed by multivariate analysis. Indeed, when preoperative risk factors are correlated with the technique of revascularization (see Table 2Go), the resultant distribution shows the saphenous vein group to be adversely affected. We admit that an apparent ``superiority'' of arterial grafting from the standpoint of short-term survival may be explained by the surgeon selecting a less complex procedure for the worst cases in an attempt to shorten the aortic cross-clamp time and reduce the operative mortality.

Thus, during the study period we observed a gradual reduction in the need for an IABP, which contrasted with a constant operative mortality rate. The aortic cross-clamp time was the main determinant of postoperative outcome, which implies that the techniques of myocardial protection currently used need to be improved. More importantly, the increased use of arterial grafts was not found to have an adverse effect on early outcome.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Appendix 1. Results of Univariate Analysis
 

    Footnotes
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Address reprint requests to Dr Louagie, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Mont Godinne, 1 av Therasse, B-5530 Yvoir, Belgium.


    References
 Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Teoh KH, Christakis GT, Weisel RD, et al. Increased risk of urgent revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;93:291–9.[Abstract]
  2. Stuart RS, Baumgartner WA, Soule L, et al. Predictors of perioperative mortality in patients with unstable postinfarction angina. Circulation 1988;78:I163–5.[Medline]
  3. Naunheim KS, Fiore AC, Arango DC, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting for unstable angina pectoris: risk analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:569–74.[Abstract]
  4. Edwards FH, Cohen AJ, Bellamy RF, Thompson L, Weston L. Risk assessment in urgent/emergent coronary artery surgery. Chest 1990;97:1125–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Curtis JJ, Walls JT, Salam NH, et al. Impact of unstable angina on operative mortality with coronary revascularization at varying time intervals after myocardial infarction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:867–73.[Abstract]
  6. Fremes SE, Goldman BS, Christakis GT, et al. Current risk of coronary bypass for unstable angina. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991;5:235–42.[Abstract]
  7. Disch DL, O'Connor GT, Birkmeyer JD, Olmstead EM, Levy DG, Plume SK. Changes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: 1987–1990. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:416–23.[Abstract]
  8. Rankin JS, Newton JR, Califf RM, et al. Clinical characteristics and current management of medically refractory unstable angina. Ann Surg 1984;200:457–64.[Medline]
  9. Christakis GT, Fremes SE, Weisel RD, et al. Reducing the risk of urgent revascularization for unstable angina: a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:764–72.[Medline]
  10. Langou RA, Wiles JC, Cohen LS. Coronary surgery for unstable angina pectoris. Incidence and mortality of perioperative myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1978;40:767–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Luchi RJ, Scott SM, Deupree RH. Comparison of medical and surgical treatment for unstable angina pectoris. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med 1987;316:977–84.[Abstract]
  12. Fremes SE, Goldman BS, Weisel RD, et al. Recent preoperative myocardial infarction increases the risk of surgery for unstable angina. J Cardiac Surg 1991;6:2–12.[Medline]
  13. Elami A, Merin G, Shushan Y. Use of the internal mammary artery for urgent myocardial revascularization. Cardiovasc Surg 1993;1:276–9.[Medline]
  14. Edwards FH, Clark RE, Schwartz M. Impact of internal mammary artery conduits on operative mortality in coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:27–32.[Abstract]
  15. Braunwald E. Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation 1989;80:410–4.[Free Full Text]
  16. Leaman DM, Brower RW, Meester GT, Serruys P, van den Brand M. Coronary artery atherosclerosis: severity of the disease, severity of angina pectoris and compromised left ventricular function. Circulation 1981;63:285–92.[Free Full Text]
  17. Louagie YAG, Collard E, Gonzalez M, et al. Initial experience with low-potassium cold blood cardioplegia: a clinical comparative study. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:628–34.[Abstract]
  18. Kaiser GC, Schaff HV, Killip T. Myocardial revascularization for unstable angina pectoris. Circulation 1989;79(Suppl 1):I60–7.[Medline]
  19. Beyersdorf F, Mitrev Z, Sarai K, et al. Changing patterns of patients undergoing emergency surgical revascularization for acute coronary occlusion. Importance of myocardial protection techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:137–48.[Abstract]
  20. Leung JM, O'Kelly BF, Mangano DT, S.P.I. Research Group. Relationship of regional wall motion abnormalities to hemodynamic indices of myocardial oxygen supply and demand in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Anesthesiology 1990;73:802–14.[Medline]
  21. Kirklin JW, Naftel DC, Blackstone EH, Pohost GM. Summary of a consensus concerning death and ischemic events after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 1989;79(Suppl I):I81–91.[Medline]
  22. Edwards FH, Bellamy RF, Burge J, et al. True emergency coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:603–11.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. A. Horvath, T. B. Ferguson Jr, R. A. Guyton, and F. H. Edwards
Impact of Unstable Angina on Outcomes of Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization Combined With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2082 - 2085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Bonacchi, E. Prifti, M. Maiani, G. Giunti, and M. Leacche
Skeletonized bilateral internal mammary arteries for non-elective surgical revascularization in unstable angina
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 28(1): 120 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. A. G. Louagie, J. Jamart, M. Gonzalez, E. Collard, S. Broka, L. Galanti, and A. Gruslin
Continuous cold blood cardioplegia improves myocardial protection: a prospective randomized study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 664 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
V. Kohli, M. Goel, V. K. Sharma, Y. Mishra, R. Malhotra, Y. Mehta, and N. Trehan
Off-Pump Surgery: a Choice in Unstable Angina
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2003; 11(4): 285 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. T. Christenson, M. Cohen, J. J. Ferguson III, R. J. Freedman, M. F. Miller, E. M. Ohman, R. C. Reddy, G. W. Stone, and P. M. Urban
Trends in intraaortic balloon counterpulsation complications and outcomes in cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): 1086 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J.F. Baskett, W. A. Ghali, A. Maitland, and G. M. Hirsch
The intraaortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): 1276 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
U. Lockowandt and A. Franco-Cereceda
Off-pump coronary bypass surgery causes less immediate postoperative coronary endothelial dysfunction compared to on-pump coronary bypass surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 20(6): 1147 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Bonacchi, E. Prifti, G. Giunti, G. Frati, and G. Sani
Urgent surgical revascularization of unstable angina. Influence of double mammary arteries
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 747 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. Bjessmo, N. Hammar, E. Sandberg, and T. Ivert
Reduced risk of coronary artery bypass surgery for unstable angina during a 6-year period
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 18(4): 388 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. W. Emery, N. L. Mills, F. J. Teijeira, K. V. Arom, P. Baldwin, R. J. Petersen, L. D. Joyce, G. L. B. Grinnan, M. S. Sussman, J. G. Copeland III, et al.
North American Experience With the Perma-Flow Prosthetic Coronary Graft
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1996; 62(3): 691 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louagie, Y. A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schoevaerdts, J.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Louagie, Y. A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schoevaerdts, J.-C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS