ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1759-1765. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.079
© 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Robert J. Cerfolio
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerfolio, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Maniscalco, L. M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cerfolio, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Maniscalco, L. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Management of Subcutaneous Emphysema After Pulmonary Resection

Robert J. Cerfolio, MD*, Ayesha S. Bryant, MSPH, MD, Lee M. Maniscalco

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama

Accepted for publication December 31, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Cerfolio, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th St S, ZRB 739, Birmingham, AL 35294 (Email: rcerfolio{at}uab.edu).

Presented at the Fifty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Bonita Springs, FL, Nov 7–10, 2007.

Background: Subcutaneous emphysema (SE) after pulmonary resection is troublesome and has been poorly studied.

Methods: A retrospective review was made of a prospective database. Patients who underwent pulmonary resection and in whom clinically detected SE were studied.

Results: Of 4,023 patients between January 1999 and June 2006, 255 patients (6.3%) had clinically apparent SE. Predictors of developing SE by multivariate analysis were preoperative forced expiratory volume of air in 1 second (FEV1%) less than 50%, having an air leak, and having had a previous thoracotomy. Despite maximizing chest tube suction, 85 patients (33%) had recalcitrant SE. These patients with recalcitrant SE were more likely to have a lower median FEV1% (p = 0.037), a previous ipsilateral thoracotomy, and have undergone a lobectomy (p < 0.001). Recently, 64 of the 85 patients underwent single-incision, video-assisted thorascopic surgery with pneumolysis and chest tube placement, which successfully resolved the SE within 24 hours in all patients except 1. These 64 patients had a significantly shorter hospital stay (6 versus 9 days, p = 0.02) and less time with recalcitrant SE than the other 21 patients.

Conclusions: Subcutaneous emphysema is more likely in patients who have an FEV1% less than 50% and who undergo a redo thoracotomy. Recalcitrant SE emphysema (SE that persists despite increasing chest tube suction) is more likely in patients who undergo lobectomy and is best treated by video-assisted thorascopic surgery with pneumolysis between the leaking lung, which is usually partially adhered to the previously opened intercostal space. This directs the air leak back into the pleural space and out of the subcutaneous space. This procedure shortens the duration of SE and hospital stay.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.