HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Tsvetomir Loukanov Christian Sebening Siegfried Hagl Matthias Karck Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Arnold, R. Articles by Gorenflo, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Arnold, R. Articles by Gorenflo, M. Related Collections Valve disease

---

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Outcome After Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Children and Young Adults

^a Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
^b Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
^c Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
^d Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
^e Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
^f First Department of Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany

Accepted for publication October 5, 2007.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Gorenflo, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Medical Center, INF 153, Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany (Email: matthias.gorenflo{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de).

Background: We asked whether aortic valve replacement using a mechanical prosthesis would allow normalization of left ventricular function and structure in children and young adults.

Methods: We performed a clinical follow-up examination in 30 patients with aortic valve replacement at 25 years of age or younger, including conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: Aortic valve replacement was performed at the median age of 14.3 years (range, 7.6 to 24.3 years) using a mechanical prosthesis (St. Jude Medical; median diameter, 23 mm; range, 17 to 27 mm). Indications were severe aortic stenosis in 6 of 30 patients, aortic regurgitation in 20 of 30 patients, or a combination of aortic stenosis and regurgitation (4 of 30 patients). Aortic valve replacement was a reoperation in 12 of 30 patients who primarily underwent aortic valvotomy at a median of 7.1 years (range, 1.0 to 11.3 years). In-hospital mortality was 0%. Follow-up was a median of 6 years (range, 1.2 to 14.5 years). Twenty-nine of 30 patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I without thromboembolic complications, cerebrovascular accidents, or major bleeding on oral anticoagulation. Left ventricular dilatation before aortic valve replacement was present in 20 of 30 patients but normalized in all but 4 patients on follow-up. Most patients showed a normal end-diastolic volume on magnetic resonance imaging, and 23 of 26 patients showed a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (median, 0.53; range, 0.33 to 0.75). Peak systolic strain of the left ventricular myocardium was a median of –13.3% (range, –0.5% to –31%), and was normal in 28 of 30 patients.

Conclusions: Aortic valve replacement in children and young adults offers a good treatment option and may lead to normalization of left ventricular size and function in most patients.