|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:802-810
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
b Thoracic Surgery Directors Association, Arlington, Virginia
c Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado HSC, Denver, Colorado
d Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
e Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
f Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Accepted for publication March 7, 2005.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Gold, The Medical University of Ohio at Toledo, College of Medicine, Raymon H. Mulford Library, 3045 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH 43614-5805 (Email: jgold{at}mco.edu).
Presented at the Forty-first Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Tampa, FL, Jan 2426, 2005.
BACKGROUND: In 2001 the Thoracic Surgery Directors Association implemented a web-based curriculum for prematriculated TS residents containing 75 learning modules organized into 13 sections Each module contains an audio/video presentation, a summary, frequently asked questions, references, a self-assessment, and a critique. Curriculum content was provided as a randomized prospective trial one year prior to matriculation to residents matching into a TS program from 2001 to 2004.
METHODS: Over 3 years the utilization and impact of this curriculum was evaluated by 8 different methods including resident surveys, faculty surveys, web tracking, examination scores, and individual online learning module critiques. Each completed critique evaluated the residents perception of the relevance, content quality and presentation quality of the module on a scale corresponding to low, average and high.
RESULTS: A total of 11,117 learning modules were used through the end of 2004 with complete critiques available on 1458 (13%). Utilization and measured quality continue to increase over the 3-year interval. The average rating scores for relevance, content and presentation tracked together and were overall rated as good or excellent (92%). There were large variations in utilization and perceived quality by section subject. As the average module rating score improved, the utilization increased and the variability of the rating decreased substantially.
CONCLUSIONS: Module specific learner evaluation of educational content is one of several important feedback tools for monitoring ongoing curricular development and refinement. These studies, based upon web tracking, demonstrate increasing resident use and strong resident satisfaction. This educational format will hopefully lend itself to many important improvements in web-based Thoracic Surgery education.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. N. Hoofnagle, D. Chou, and M. L. Astion Online Database for Documenting Clinical Pathology Resident Education Clin. Chem., January 1, 2007; 53(1): 134 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Friedl, H. Hoppler, K. Ecard, W. Scholz, A. Hannekum, W. Oechsner, and S. Stracke Comparative Evaluation of Multimedia Driven, Interactive, and Case-Based Teaching in Heart Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1790 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gold Invited commentary. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1766 - 1766. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |