ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Georges Fayad
Alain Prat
Henri Warembourg
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le Tourneau, T.
Right arrow Articles by Warembourg, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le Tourneau, T.
Right arrow Articles by Warembourg, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:2010-2015
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Ten-year echocardiographic and clinical follow-up of aortic Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular prosthesis: a case-match study

Thierry Le Tourneau, MDa*, André Vincentelli, MDb, Georges Fayad, MDb, Christine Savoye, MDa, Olivier H. Fabre, MDb, Alain Prat, MDb, Henri Warembourg, MDb

a Department of Echocardiography, Hôpital Cardiologique, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, 59037 Lille Cedex, France
b Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hôpital Cardiologique, Centre Hôpitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France

Accepted for publication July 12, 2002.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Le Tourneau, Department of Echocardiography, Hôpital Cardiologique, Boulevard du Professeur J. Leclerc, 59037 Lille Cedex, France.
e-mail: thletourneau{at}yahoo.fr

BACKGROUND: There are little comparative data on Carpentier-Edwards supraannular and pericardial second-generation bioprostheses. The aim of this work was to compare their hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 150 patients operated on for aortic stenosis between 1989 and 1993. Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with either a Carpentier-Edwards supraannular or pericardial prosthesis were matched for sex (49% male), age (72 ± 8 years), body surface area, valve size, associated procedures, and left ventricular ejection fraction.

RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 6.5 ± 3.3 years, giving a total follow-up of 983 patient-years. Thirty-day mortality and 10-year actuarial survival were, respectively, 8% and 51% in the supraannular group and 6.7% and 43.4% in the pericardial group. At 10 years, freedom from thromboembolism, structural failure, and all valve-related events were, respectively, 88.7%, 88.9%, and 68.7% in the supraannular group and 85%, 100%, and 82.2% in the pericardial group. There were four (5.3%) structural failures, and four (5.3%) reoperations for degeneration (n = 3) and endocarditis (n = 1) in the supraannular group. Freedom from structural dysfunction or reoperation was 87.3% in the supraannular group and 100% (p < 0.05) in the pericardial group. Echocardiographic review of 62 of 76 survivors (81.5%) demonstrated a trend toward a better hemodynamic profile of pericardial valves at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Ten years after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, Carpentier-Edwards pericardial prostheses give comparable and probably better results than Carpentier-Edwards supraannular prostheses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Narang, D. K. Satsangi, A. Banerjee, and M. A. Geelani
Stentless valves versus stented bioprostheses at the aortic position: midterm results.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2008; 136(4): 943 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Ali, J. C. Halstead, F. Cafferty, L. Sharples, F. Rose, R. Coulden, E. Lee, J. Dunning, V. Argano, and S. Tsui
Are Stentless Valves Superior to Modern Stented Valves?: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-535 - I-540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
O. Lund and M. Bland
Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 20 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Bottio, G. Rizzoli, G. Thiene, G. Nesseris, D. Casarotto, and G. Gerosa
Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the Biocor valve in the aortic position: An 8-year experience
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2004; 127(6): 1616 - 1623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.