ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oswalt, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oswalt, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S332-S335
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Autografts, allografts, and biological valves in children

Highlights of a ten-year experience with the Ross procedure

John D. Oswalt, MDa, Stephen J. Dewan, MDa, Michael C. Mueller, MDa, Suzi Nelson, RNa

a Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons, Austin, Texas, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Oswalt, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons, 1010 West 40th St, Austin, TX 78756
e-mail: nancy{at}ctvtexas.com

Presented at the VIII International Symposium on Cardiac Bioprostheses, Cancun, Mexico, Nov 3–5, 2000.

Background. A review of a 10-year experience with the Ross procedure as a root replacement by a single group of surgeons featuring specific highlights is presented. Highlights include our results from a subset of patients with endocarditis and their management and a comparison of outcomes in patients with aortic insufficiency based on technical changes made after 5 years’ experience.

Methods. The total patient group was 191, with 148 male and 43 female participants with an age range from 1 day to 69 years. Five of the patients in the 0-to-20 age group were newborns. Fifty-three of the adults were operated on for infectious endocarditis. In the total patient group 43% had aortic insufficiency, 28% had aortic stenosis, and 29% had mixed disease.

Results. Operative mortality was 5.2% with a late mortality of 2.6%. The actuarial survival was 90.2% at 10 years. Freedom from autograft explantation was 93.2% and freedom from homograft replacement was 98.4%. The endocarditis patients had an operative mortality of 3.8% with 100% cure of the infection. Freedom from reinfection on the autograft was 98.1%, and freedom from infection of the pulmonary homograft was 98.1%. The actuarial survival was 86.3%.

Conclusions. A specific review of the patients with aortic insufficiency resulted in a failure of the autograft in 7 patients among a cohort of 41 during the first 5 years of the study. After a change in technique in which the aortic annulus is narrowed and fixed to a measured size to match the body surface area, we have had no failures in the autograft. Although these results are early, we believe that these data support the use of the autograft as an excellent choice for replacement of the aortic valve in infective endocarditis. Finally, the use of the autograft for aortic insufficiency is reasonable with fixation of the aortic annulus so that subsequent dilation does not occur.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.