| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1155-1158
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China
b Department of Thoracic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Accepted for publication April 30, 1998.
Address reprint requests to Dr Yim, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, SAR, China
e-mail: (yimap{at}cuhk.edu.hk)
Abstract
Background. Few surgeons worldwide currently perform video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT) lobectomy. We conducted a questionnaire survey of this selected group of surgeons to gain insight into their current practice.
Methods. A survey with 25 questions on VAT lobectomy including operative approaches, techniques, its role in their practice, and limitations were mailed to 45 thoracic surgeons worldwide who are believed to perform this operation.
Results. Thirty-three completed questionnaires were analyzed. Among those surgeons practicing VAT lobectomy, the vast majority work in an academic or government institution and have at least 5 years of practice experience. Two thirds reported that at least 40% of all their thoracic procedures are currently performed using VAT techniques. However, considerable variations exist regarding preference for VAT lobectomy (one third uses VAT techniques in less than 10% of all lobectomies performed, whereas another third uses it in more than 40% of lobectomies), their approaches to mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes, and their operative techniques. The latter range from a purely endoscopic technique to one that is more appropriately termed minithoracotomy with video-assistance when the surgeons operate primarily by looking through the utility thoracotomy. There were no significant differences in the practices of surgeons working in different continents, except that Asian surgeons were more likely to use suture ligation as opposed to a staple-cutter on pulmonary vessels.
Conclusions. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is not a unified approach. Considerable variations exist among the small group of surgeons performing this procedure, in their approach to surgical oncology as well as the operative technique. Distinctions in these different operative approaches must be made before one can make a meaningful comparison of results. Different terms should probably be introduced to further clarify the exact techniques used.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Fukuhara, A. Akashi, S. Nakane, and E. Tomita Preoperative assessment of the pulmonary artery by three-dimensional computed tomography before video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 875 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Solli and L. Spaggiari Indications and Developments of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in the Treatment of Lung Cancer Oncologist, October 1, 2007; 12(10): 1205 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Shigemura, A. Akashi, S. Funaki, T. Nakagiri, M. Inoue, N. Sawabata, H. Shiono, M. Minami, Y. Takeuchi, M. Okumura, et al. Long-term outcomes after a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy approaches for clinical stage IA lung cancer: A multi-institutional study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 507 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. C. Detterbeck Subpleural Catheter Placement for Pain Relief After Thoracoscopic Resection Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1522 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. McKenna Jr, W. Houck, and C. B. Fuller Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy: Experience With 1,100 Cases Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 421 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Ohtsuka, H. Nomori, H. Horio, T. Naruke, and K. Suemasu Is Major Pulmonary Resection by Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery an Adequate Procedure in Clinical Stage I Lung Cancer? Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1742 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Nomori, T. Ohtsuka, H. Horio, T. Naruke, and K. Suemasu Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer With a Largely Fused Fissure Chest, February 1, 2003; 123(2): 619 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. Daniels, S. S. Balderson, M. W. Onaitis, and T. A. D'Amico Thoracoscopic lobectomy: a safe and effective strategy for patients with stage i lung cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 860 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P.C. Yim VATS major pulmonary resection revisited--controversies, techniques, and results Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 74(2): 615 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. W. L. Li, T. W. Lee, S. S. Y. Lam, C. S. H. Ng, A. D. L. Sihoe, I. Y. P. Wan, and A. P. C. Yim Quality of Life Following Lung Cancer Resection* : Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery vs Thoracotomy Chest, August 1, 2002; 122(2): 584 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Solaini, F. Prusciano, P. Bagioni, F. Di Francesco, and D. Basilio Poddie Video-assisted thoracic surgery major pulmonary resections. Present experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 20(3): 437 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
