|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:699-706
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
b Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Address reprint requests to Dr Lytle, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, F25, Cleveland, OH 44195
Presented at the Thirty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Jan 2628, 1998.
Background. As the population ages, more octogenarians become candidates for aortic valve replacement. Many octogenarians, particularly women, have a small aortic annulus and there is uncertainty as to the optimal management of this situation in that age group.
Method. To examine this issue, we reviewed 248 octogenarians (mean age, 82.6 ± 2.3 years; 58% men) who underwent primary isolated aortic valve replacement (n = 99), or aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularization (n = 149), between 1980 and 1995. Nineteen-millimeter valves were used in 26% of the patients.
Results. In-hospital mortality was 8.9%, 5% for aortic valve replacement alone and 11.4% for aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularization. It was 12.5% for the 19-mm size valves compared with 7.7% for the bigger size valves (p = 0.24). Follow-up (mean interval, 4.4 years) demonstrated survival for all patients of 85%, 60%, and 30% and survival free from cardiovascular events of 80%, 45%, and 21% at 1, 5, and 10 postoperative years, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified triple-vessel disease and preoperative congestive heart failure as associated with increased risk for both in-hospital and late mortality (p < 0.05). Valve size did not influence late survival or event-free survival regardless of body surface area.
Conclusions. The use of small aortic valve prostheses in octogenarians does not adversely affect the incidence of early or late mortality or cardiac events.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Mihaljevic, E. R. Nowicki, J. Rajeswaran, E. H. Blackstone, L. Lagazzi, J. Thomas, B. W. Lytle, and D. M. Cosgrove Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Implications for decision making. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2008; 135(6): 1270 - 1279.e12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Melby, A. Zierer, S. P. Kaiser, T. J. Guthrie, J. D. Keune, R. B. Schuessler, M. K. Pasque, J. S. Lawton, N. Moazami, M. R. Moon, et al. Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians: Risk Factors for Early and Late Mortality Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1651 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Kobayashi, J. A. Williams, L. Nwakanma, V. L. Gott, W. A. Baumgartner, and J. V. Conte Aortic Valve Replacement and Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass: Assessing the Impact of Multiple Grafts Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 969 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-U. Kuehnel, R. Puchner, A. Pohl, M. O. Wendt, M. Hartrumpf, M. Pohl, and J. M. Albes Characteristic resistance curves of aortic valve substitutes facilitate individualized decision for a particular type Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Amarelli, A. Della Corte, G. Romano, G. Iasevoli, G. Dialetto, L. S. De Santo, M. De Feo, M. Torella, M. Scardone, and M. Cotrufo Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in isolated aortic stenosis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 512 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Albes, M. Hartrumpf, V. Rudolph, T. Krempl, E. Huttemann, R. Vollandt, and T. Wahlers Are mechanical valves with enhanced inner diameter advantageous in the small sized aortic annulus? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1564 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tasca, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo, A. Amaducci, Z. Mhagna, G. Troise, and E. Quaini Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1107 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Blackstone, D. M. Cosgrove, W.R. E. Jamieson, N. J. Birkmeyer, J. H. Lemmer Jr, D. C. Miller, E. G. Butchart, G. Rizzoli, M. Yacoub, and A. Chai Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2003; 126(3): 783 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Florath, U. P. Rosendahl, A. Mortasawi, S. F. Bauer, F. Dalladaku, I. C. Ennker, and J. C. Ennker Current determinants of operative mortality in 1400 patients requiring aortic valve replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 75 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ghosh, M. Djordjevic, R. Schistek, R. Baier, and F. Unger Does Gender Affect Outcome of Cardiac Surgery in Octogenarians? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2003; 11(1): 28 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Freed, J. W. Tam, M. C. Moon, G. E.J. Harding, E. Ahmad, and E. A. Pascoe Nineteen-millimeter prosthetic aortic valves allow normalization of left ventricular mass in elderly women Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2022 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Willmann, D. Weishaupt, M. Lachat, R. Kobza, J. E. Roos, B. Seifert, T. F. Luscher, B. Marincek, and P. R. Hilfiker Electrocardiographically Gated Multi-Detector Row CT for Assessment of Valvular Morphology and Calcification in Aortic Stenosis Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 120 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawachi, A. Nakashima, Y. Toshima, S. Kimura, and K. Arinaga Outcome of Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Operation in Patients Over 80 Years Old Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2002; 10(1): 12 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Babin-Ebell, C. Schuster, O. Elert, R. Bergemann, D. Horstkotte, and GELIA Study Group Influence of valve size on morbidity and mortality for patients with mechanical valve replacements (GELIA 8) Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2001; 3(suppl_Q): Q73 - Q77. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Z. Bloomstein, I. Gielchinsky, A. D. Bernstein, V. Parsonnet, C. Saunders, R. Karanam, and B. Graves Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients: determinants of in-hospital mortality Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 597 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Alexander, K. J. Anstrom, L. H. Muhlbaier, R. D. Grosswald, P. K. Smith, R. H. Jones, and E. D. Peterson Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients age >=80 years: results from the National Cardiovascular Network J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2000; 35(3): 731 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Ghosh Small aortic valve prostheses in octogenarians Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1999; 67(5): 1543 - 1544. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |