ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Delos M. Cosgrove, III
Joseph F. Sabik
José L. Navia
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Navia, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M., III
Right arrow Articles by Navia, J. L.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1535-1538
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original articles: cardiovascular

Minimally Invasive Valve Operations

Delos M. Cosgrove, III, MDa, Joseph F. Sabik, MDa, José L. Navia, MDa

a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Cosgrove, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (F25), 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195

Presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Feb 3–5, 1997.

Background. To reduce the morbidity from valvular heart operations, a right parasternal approach was introduced. We report our initial experience with the procedure.

Methods. From January 1996 through July 1996, 115 patients underwent primary isolated valve procedures. One hundred (85%) patients underwent the operation through a right parasternal incision.

Results. There was one hospital death secondary to a stroke on the fifth postoperative day. Three patients (two with aortic valve operations and one having a mitral valve procedure) required conversion to sternotomy. Mean aortic occlusion time was 71 minutes; mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 93 minutes. Mean stay in the intensive care unit was 27 hours and mean hospital postoperative stay was 5.7 days. Seventy-seven percent of the patients did not receive blood transfusions. Comparison with median sternotomy demonstrated a reduction in both postoperative length of stay and direct hospital costs.

Conclusions. We conclude that this minimally invasive approach is safe for a variety of valve procedures and is effective in reducing surgical trauma and cost.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.