HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Roy G. Masters Kwan-Leung Chan Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tam, J. W. Articles by Chan, K.-L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tam, J. W. Articles by Chan, K.-L.

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1215-1219
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Management of Patients With Mild Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

^a University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Accepted for publication October 31, 1997.

Address reprint requests to Dr Chan, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
e-mail: (kchan{at}heartinst.on.ca)

Background. The management of mild aortic stenosis during coronary artery bypass grafting remains controversial.

Methods. We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients between January 1, 1977, and December 31, 1994, to identify 51 patients with mild aortic stenosis who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (group A), and 19 patients with mild aortic stenosis who underwent combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement (group B). Patients with more than moderate aortic regurgitation were excluded. Preoperative angiograms were reviewed to assess the severity of calcification and restricted mobility of the aortic cusps.

Results. In group A there were 11 deaths and 8 subsequent aortic valve replacements; in group B there were 5 deaths and 3 prosthetic valve-related complications. There was no difference in event-free survival between the two groups after adjusting for the difference in age. Among group A patients, the initial transvalvular gradient (p = 0.0005) and aortic valvular calcification (p = 0.06) identified patients who demonstrated progression to severe aortic stenosis during follow-up.

Conclusions. Our data suggest that routine aortic valve replacement during coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with mild aortic stenosis is not indicated, but concomitant aortic valve replacement may be appropriate in patients with higher transvalvular gradients and calcified valves.