|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1698-1703
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin
Accepted for publication July 18, 1995.
Background. Ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct size, but its effects on postischemic function are variable. Adenosine, which is thought to play a role in ischemic preconditioning, reduces both infarct size and postischemic dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to compare the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning and an adenosine A1 receptor agonist on recovery of function and infarct size in isolated rabbit hearts.
Methods. Krebs buffer-perfused hearts (at least 7 per group) were subjected to 60 minutes of global ischemia (37°C) and 60 minutes of reperfusion. Ventricular function was assessed by measuring left ventricular developed pressure, and infarct size (percentage of the left ventricle) was determined by tetrazolium staining.
Results. Control hearts exhibited 34% ± 6% infarct size and 56% ± 4% recovery of preischemic left ventricular developed pressure. Ischemic preconditioning reduced infarct size to 13% ± 1% but had no effect on recovery of function (65% ± 5%). Hearts treated with the adenosine A1 agonist R-phenylisopropyladenosine for 5 minutes immediately before ischemia exhibited both reduced infarct size (10% ± 2%) and enhanced postischemic recovery of left ventricular developed pressure (86% ± 3%). Termination of the R-phenylisopropyladenosine treatment before ischemia eliminated its beneficial effects. The adenosine A1 receptor antagonist DPCPX blocked both of the effects of R-phenylisopropyladenosine but did not block ischemic preconditioning.
Conclusions. These results demonstrate fundamental differences between the cardioprotective effects of adenosine A1 receptor activation and ischemic preconditioning.
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995 60: 1703.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Mentzer Jr, M. S. Jahania, and R. D. Lasley Myocardial Protection Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 443 - 464. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Mentzer Jr., M. S. Jahania, and R. D. Lasley Myocardial Protection Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 413 - 438. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
U. Sunderdiek, S. Schmitz-Spanke, B. Korbmacher, E. Gams, and J. D. Schipke Preconditioning: myocardial function and energetics during coronary hypoperfusion and reperfusion Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2147 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Kilpatrick, P. Narayan, R. M. Mentzer Jr., and R. D. Lasley Adenosine A3 agonist cardioprotection in isolated rat and rabbit hearts is blocked by the A1 antagonist DPCPX Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H847 - H853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Belhomme, J. Peynet, E. Florens, O. Tibourtine, M. Kitakaze, and P. Menasche Is adenosine preconditioning truly cardioprotective in coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 590 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Cohen, X.-M. Yang, T. Neumann, G. Heusch, and J. M. Downey Favorable Remodeling Enhances Recovery of Regional Myocardial Function in the Weeks After Infarction in Ischemically Preconditioned Hearts Circulation, August 1, 2000; 102(5): 579 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Dickson, M. Lorbar, W. A. Porcaro, R. A. Fenton, C. P. Reinhardt, A. Gysembergh, and K. Przyklenk Rabbit heart can be "preconditioned" via transfer of coronary effluent Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1999; 277(6): H2451 - H2457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. P. Perrault and P. Menasche Preconditioning: can nature’s shield be raised against surgical ischemic-reperfusion injury? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1988 - 1994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Cohen, X.-M. Yang, and J. M. Downey Smaller infarct after preconditioning does not predict extent of early functional improvement of reperfused heart Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1999; 277(5): H1754 - H1761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Jahania, R. D. Lasley, and R. M. Mentzer Jr ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING DOES NOT ACUTELY IMPROVE LOAD-INSENSITIVE PARAMETERS OF CONTRACTILITY IN IN VIVO STUNNED PORCINE MYOCARDIUM J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 1999; 117(4): 810 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Faris, J. Peynet, M. Wassef, A. Bel, C. Mouas, M. Duriez, and P. Menasche Failure of Preconditioning to Improve Postcardioplegia Stunning of Minimally Infarcted Hearts Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1735 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |