HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Keith S. Naunheim Frank E. Johnson Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Naunheim, K. S. Articles by Johnson, F. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Naunheim, K. S. Articles by Johnson, F. E.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1612-1616
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles: General Thoracic

Clinical Surveillance Testing After Lung Cancer Operations

Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center and John Cochran Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri

Accepted for publication August 1, 1995.

Background. Although routine clinical surveillance testing after lung cancer operation has important clinical implications for patients and financial implications for society, the ideal surveillance strategy is unknown.

Methods. We surveyed The Society of Thoracic Surgeons membership by questionnaire to characterize the current practice of follow-up among experts in lung cancer treatment. There were 2,009 responses (54% return) from the 3,700 members; 768 of those responding both operate on and provide long-term follow-up for lung cancer patients. These responses form the basis of this study.

Results. The follow-up methods most frequently used during a 5-year follow-up include clinic visit, chest roentgenography, complete blood cell count, liver function testing, and chest computed tomography. Sputum cytology, head computed tomography, bone scanning, chest magnetic resonance imaging, and bronchoscopy are used infrequently. Although there is wide variation in the frequency of use of these ten methods, there is significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the frequency of testing over time for all tests except sputum cytology and chest magnetic resonance imaging. The survey also requested information regarding motivation behind routine clinical surveillance testing. Although the presumed rationale for such follow-up includes probable clinical benefit for the patient, fewer than half of respondents believe that such surveillance testing would yield a survival benefit for either stage I (44% of respondents) or advanced-stage patients (17% of respondents) after lung cancer resection. Only 1 of 4 respondents believe that the current literature documents any survival benefit. Other reasons for follow-up include maintenance of rapport with colleagues or patients and medicolegal liability concerns.

Conclusions. This survey provides direct evidence regarding current surveillance practices among thoracic surgeons. There appears to be marked variation among members of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons in frequency of and rationale for routine clinical surveillance testing.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Rubins, M. Unger, and G. L. Colice Follow-up and Surveillance of the Lung Cancer Patient Following Curative Intent Therapy: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 355S - 367S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-H. Chiu, M.-S. Chern, M.-H. Wu, W.-H. Hsu, Y.-C. Wu, M.-H. Huang, and S.-C. Chang Usefulness of low-dose spiral CT of the chest in regular follow-up of postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients: Preliminary report J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1300 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Colice, J. Rubins, and M. Unger Follow-up and Surveillance of the Lung Cancer Patient Following Curative-Intent Therapy Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 272S - 283S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Westeel, D. Choma, F. Clement, M.-C. Woronoff-Lemsi, J.-F. Pugin, A. Dubiez, and A. Depierre Relevance of an intensive postoperative follow-up after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 70(4): 1185 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Naunheim The right person for the job Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1653 - 1654. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Gilbert, K. R. Reid, M. Y. Lam, and D. Petsikas Who should follow up lung cancer patients after operation? Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1696 - 1700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Downey Follow-up of Patients With Completely Resected Lung Cancer Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1487 - 1489. [Full Text] [PDF]