ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Cameron D. Wright
Douglas J. Mathisen
John C. Wain
Ashby C. Moncure
Hermes C. Grillo
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Grillo, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wright, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Grillo, H. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:245-248
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Reinforced Primary Repair of Thoracic Esophageal Perforation

Cameron D. Wright, MD, Douglas J. Mathisen, MD, John C. Wain, MD, Ashby C. Moncure, MD, Alan D. Hilgenberg, MD, Hermes C. Grillo, MD

General Thoracic Surgical Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Background. Treatment of esophageal perforation, especially when diagnosed late, remains controversial.

Methods. Twenty-eight patients were treated for thoracic esophageal perforation with reinforced primary repair regardless of time of presentation.

Results. Fifteen patients were treated early (<24 hours) with no deaths. Two had contained postoperative leaks, which healed. Thirteen were treated late (mean, 5.5 days) with four deaths (3 with healed repairs). Postoperative leaks occurred in 7 patients; of the leaks, 4 healed, 2 became a controlled fistula, and 1 required reoperation. Primary healing with preservation of the native esophagus was achieved in 25 patients (89%). Among the 18 patients without evidence of sepsis preoperatively, postoperative leaks developed in 2 (11%). Ten patients had evidence of sepsis preoperatively, and postoperative leaks developed in 7 (70%).

Conclusions. Patients who present with sepsis have an increased risk of postoperative leak and therefore should have the repair buttressed. Overall mortality was 14% and no deaths were due to persistent leaks or mediastinal sepsis. Reinforced primary repair retains the native esophagus and avoids the need for later reconstructive operations. In the absence of a nondilatable stricture or cancer, reinforced primary repair should be performed for most thoracic esophageal perforations, early or late.


Related Article

Discussion
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995 60: 248-249. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. S. Cho, Y. D. Kim, H. I, S. K. Lee, and Y. J. Jeong
Treatment of mediastinitis using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 520 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. W. Kim, M. J. Liptay, N. Snow, P. Donahue, and W. H. Warren
Utility of silicone esophageal bypass stents in the management of delayed complex esophageal disruptions.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 1962 - 1967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. K. Freeman, J. M. Van Woerkom, and A. J. Ascioti
Esophageal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Iatrogenic Intrathoracic Esophageal Perforation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2003 - 2008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. A. Linden, R. Bueno, S. J. Mentzer, L. Zellos, A. Lebenthal, Y. L. Colson, D. J. Sugarbaker, and M. T. Jaklitsch
Modified T-Tube Repair of Delayed Esophageal Perforation Results in a Low Mortality Rate Similar to That Seen With Acute Perforations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1129 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Fischer, O. Thomusch, S. Benz, E. von Dobschuetz, P. Baier, and U. T. Hopt
Nonoperative Treatment of 15 Benign Esophageal Perforations With Self-Expandable Covered Metal Stents
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 467 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. J. Brinster, S. Singhal, L. Lee, M. B. Marshall, L. R. Kaiser, and J. C. Kucharczuk
Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1475 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. L. Port, M. S. Kent, R. J. Korst, M. Bacchetta, and N. K. Altorki
Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1071 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. A. Gaissert, C. L. Roper, G. A. Patterson, and H. C. Grillo
Infectious necrotizing esophagitis: outcome after medical and surgical intervention
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 342 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. B. Zwischenberger, C. Savage, and A. Bidani
Surgical Aspects of Esophageal Disease . Perforation and Caustic Injury
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2002; 165(8): 1037 - 1040.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Jougon, O. Cantini, F. Delcambre, A. Minniti, and J.F. Velly
Esophageal perforation: life threatening complication of endotracheal intubation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 20(1): 7 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. Nehoda, K. Hourmont, R. I. Whyte, R. Gopalan, C. G. Cooke, and D. P. Harley
Boerhaave's Syndrome
N. Engl. J. Med., January 11, 2001; 344(2): 138 - 139.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
J. A Odell
The trauma patient - critical decision making - when to explore the chest?
Trauma, April 1, 1999; 1(2): 125 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. D. Iannettoni, A. A. Vlessis, R. I. Whyte, and M. B. Orringer
Functional Outcome After Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Perforation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1606 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. L. Bufkin, J. I. Miller Jr, and K. A. Mansour
Esophageal Perforation: Emphasis on Management
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1447 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Tasdemir, D. S. Kucukaksu, H. Karagoz, and K. Bayazit
Beneficial Effects of Fibrin Glue on Esophageal Perforation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1589 - 1589.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Wang, A. J. Razzouk, A. Safavi, K. Gan, G. S. Van Arsdell, P. M. Burton, B. L. Fandrich, M. J. Wood, A. C. Hill, E. E. Vyhmeister, et al.
DELAYED PRIMARY REPAIR OF INTRATHORACIC ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION: IS IT SAFE?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1996; 111(1): 114 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.