HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swartz, M. T. Articles by Pennington, D. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swartz, M. T. Articles by Pennington, D. G.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 58, 1142-1145, Copyright © 1994 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Risk stratification in patients bridged to cardiac transplantation

MT Swartz, TV Votapka, LR McBride, DP Lohmann, DA Moroney and DG Pennington
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, MO.

Patient selection is considered one of the most important factors influencing success in bridge to transplant procedures. However, to date it has been difficult to identify predictors of mortality in this population using univariate or multivariate analysis. In 1988, we developed a scoring system using 21 clinical variables that could be calculated rapidly at the bedside while evaluating potential candidates. Points were designated to these variables using a scale of 1 to 3, 1 having the least adverse effect on survival and 3 the most. Patients received a value of 0 for each variable that did not apply. This scoring system was used in a retrospective analysis for 15 bridge to transplant patients. The results showed a significant difference (p < 0.003) between the 8 survivors (mean score, 5.75 +/- 2.19) and the 7 nonsurvivors (mean score, 11.71 +/- 3.45). Since 1989, we have prospectively calculated the scores in an additional 27 patients. Based on the score, all 42 patients were divided into three groups: group I had scores of 1 to 5; group II, 6 to 10; and group III, 11 to 16. The mean score for group I (16 patients) was 3.69 +/- 1.25. All group I patients survived. Group II patients (n = 15) had a mean score of 7.87 +/- 1.36 and a survival rate of 53%. The mean score for group III (n = 11) was 13 +/- 1.73. Thirty-six percent of these patients survived. Comparison of survival and mean scores among the three groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Reinhartz, D. J. Farrar, J. H. Hershon, G. J. Avery Jr, E. A. Haeusslein, and J. D. Hill Importance of preoperative liver function as a predictor of survival in patients supported with Thoratec ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 1998; 116(4): 633 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. E. Richenbacher and W. S. Pierce Mechanical Circulatory Support Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1558 - 1559. [Full Text]