ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lupinetti, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bove, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lupinetti, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bove, E. L.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 54, 467-470, Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Optimum treatment of discrete subaortic stenosis

FM Lupinetti, AK Pridjian, LB Callow, DC Crowley, RH Beekman and EL Bove
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor 48109.

Discrete subaortic stenosis typically appears as a well-defined membrane beneath the aortic valve. To assess the merits of alternative approaches to this problem, we have reviewed the results of operations for discrete subaortic stenosis from 1978 through 1990. Excision of the subaortic membrane alone was performed in 16 patients (group I). Excision of the membrane with resection of septal muscle was performed in 24 patients (group II). The groups were similar in age at operation, duration of follow-up, and preoperative and postoperative transvalvar gradients. There were no operative or late deaths. Reoperations for recurrent subaortic stenosis were performed in 4 group I patients (25%; 70% confidence limits, 16% to 38%) and 1 group II patient (4%; 70% confidence limits, 2% to 11%). Pacemakers were inserted for postoperative complete heart block in 1 group I patient (6%; 70% confidence limits, 2% to 16%) and 2 group II patients (8%; 70% confidence limits, 4% to 16%). We conclude that muscle resection combined with membrane excision in patients with discrete subaortic stenosis does not increase the risk of death or heart block, and does lower the risk of reoperation for recurrent subaortic stenosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. Talwar, S. K. Choudhary, and B. Airan
Reoperation after relief of congenital subaortic stenosis
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 700 - 700.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Karamlou, R. Gurofsky, A. Bojcevski, W. G. Williams, C. A. Caldarone, G. S. Van Arsdell, T. Paul, and B. W. McCrindle
Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors for Intervention in 313 Children With Subaortic Stenosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 900 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MMCTSHome page
V. Hraska, J. Photiadis, and C. Arenz
Surgery for subvalvar aortic stenosis resection of discrete subvalvar aortic membrane
MMCTS, July 23, 2007; 2007(0723): 2303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
R. Barkhordarian, H. Uemura, M. L. Rigby, B. Sethia, D. Shore, A. Goebells, and S. Yen Ho
A retrospective review in 50 patients with subaortic stenosis and intact ventricular septum: 5-year surgical experience
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2007; 6(1): 35 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
M. Ruzmetov, P. Vijay, M. D. Rodefeld, M. W. Turrentine, and J. W. Brown
Long-term results of surgical repair in patients with congenital subaortic stenosis
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 227 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
S. Atalay, S. Turkay, H. Gumus, A. Imamoglu, and H. Ercan Tutar
Echocardiographic, Morphologic, and Geometric Variations of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract: Possible Role in the Pathogenesis of Discrete Subaortic Stenosis
Angiology, March 1, 2000; 51(3): 213 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D. KITCHINER
Subaortic stenosis: still more questions than answers
Heart, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 647 - 648.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. T. Gurbuz, W. M. Novick, C. A. Pierce, and D. C. Watson
Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after partial atrioventricular septal defect repair
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1723 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. D. Lampros and A. Cobanoglu
Discrete subaortic stenosis: an acquired heart disease
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 14(3): 296 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. E. Delius, M. M. Samyn, and D. M. Behrendt
Should a bicuspid aortic valve be replaced in the presence of subvalvar or supravalvar aortic stenosis?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1998; 66(4): 1337 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.R. Bockoven, G. Wernovsky, V. L. Vetter, T. S. Wieand, T. L. Spray, and L. A. Rhodes
Perioperative conduction and rhythm disturbances after the Ross procedure in young patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1998; 66(4): 1383 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.