ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoff, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Merrill, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoff, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Merrill, W. H.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 53, 572-577, Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Noninvasive detection of heart transplant rejection with positron emission scintigraphy

SJ Hoff, JR Stewart, WH Frist, RM Kessler, MP Sandler, JB Atkinson, J Votaw, JA Carey, MS Ansari and WH Merrill
Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Positron emission tomography has recently been used to evaluate ischemic heart disease through changes in myocardial blood flow and carbohydrate metabolism. Positron-emitting tracers were evaluated for their ability to detect acute allograft rejection after heterotopic cardiac transplantation in the rat. Sham-operated controls, nonrejecting isografts, and rejecting allografts were evaluated. Decay- corrected uptake of 13NH3 and 18F 2-fluoro 2-deoxyglucose (FDG) reflects blood flow and glucose flux, respectively. Histologic examination of rejecting allografts documented mild rejection at 4 days and severe acute rejection by 8 days. All isografts were free from rejection. Uptake of FDG is greater in rejecting allografts than in nonrejecting isografts during both severe rejection (2.4% +/- 0.8% versus 0.7% +/- 0.4%; p less than 0.02) and mild rejection (2.1% +/- 0.6% versus 0.4% +/- 0.1%; p less than 0.02). Uptake of NH3 in severely rejected grafts is reduced compared with nonrejecting grafts (0.6% +/- 0.3% versus 1.7% +/- 1.1%; p less than 0.02). There is no difference in NH3 uptake during mild rejection (1.8% +/- 0.7% versus 1.3% +/- 0.3%; p greater than 0.05). Uptake of FDG and NH3 in native hearts of animals from all experimental groups is not significantly different from that in sham-operated controls. Glucose may be a preferred metabolic substrate during rejection. Our data support a humoral mechanism for substrate preference during transplant rejection and a potential diagnostic role for positron emission tomography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. E.R. Weller, E. Lu, M. M. Csikari, A. L. Klibanov, D. Fischer, W. R. Wagner, and F. S. Villanueva
Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1
Circulation, July 15, 2003; 108(2): 218 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.