ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zelano, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zelano, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, K. H.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 53, 30-36, Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Evaluation of an extraaortic counterpulsation device in severe cardiac failure

JA Zelano, W Ko, R Lazzaro, WD Lazenby, S Topaz, WJ Kolff, OW Isom and KH Krieger
Department of Surgery, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, NY 10021.

A valveless, single-orifice polyurethane ventricle with a maximum stroke volume of 60 mL was implanted on the brachiocephalic artery just above the aortic arch in sheep (n = 14) to act as an extraaortic counterpulsation device. In parallel, an intraaortic balloon was placed in the descending thoracic aorta. Both devices were pneumatically driven with an intraaortic balloon pump console that was gated by the electrocardiogram to provide aortic diastolic augmentation at a stroke volume of 40 mL. To compare the efficacy of counterpulsation for each device during severe cardiac failure, biventricular block was induced by continuous infusion of esmolol (100 to 600 micrograms.kg-1.min-1), titrated to reduce aortic flow and pressure to less than 75% of baseline. Pulsatile coronary and aortic flows were recorded with ultrasonic flow probes placed around their respective vessels. Aortic root and left ventricular pressures were recorded using micromanometers. The enhancement of hemodynamic variables for both devices were compared for optimal timing conditions, which were defined as inflation set just before the dicrotic notch and deflation bordering on isovolumetric systole. The extraaortic counterpulsation device was able to significantly augment aortic and coronary flows while simultaneously decreasing left ventricular tension time index and aortic end-diastolic pressure (p less than 0.02). The intraarotic balloon pump was able to significantly reduce only tension time index (p less than 0.002) to a lesser extent that the extraaortic counterpulsation device. All analysis was performed with the paired- samples t test. The extraaortic counterpulsation device greatly improves the myocardial oxygen supply-consumption ratio of the left ventricle by increasing diastolic coronary flow and reducing left ventricular wall tension during systole.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. N. Nanas, C. T. Lolas, C. E. Charitos, S. N. Nanas, Z. J. Margari, E. V. Agapitos, and S. D. Moulopoulos
A VAVLELESS HIGH STROKE VOLUME COUNTERPULSATION DEVICE RESTORES HEMODYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE AND INTRACTABLE CARDIOGENIC SHOCK AWAITING HEART TRANSPLANTATION
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1996; 111(1): 55 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.