ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tokunaga, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tokunaga, K.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 49, 973-978, Copyright © 1990 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Comparative study of cell saver and ultrafiltration nontransfusion in cardiac surgery

Y Nakamura, M Masuda, Y Toshima, T Asou, M Oe, K Kinoshita, Y Kawachi, J Tanaka and K Tokunaga
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyushu University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.

Hemoconcentration for the establishment of no-donor blood transfusion in open heart surgery was assessed in regard to both the saving of protein and platelets and the exclusion of free hemoglobin. Two different types of hemoconcentrator were compared: the ultrafilter (group I, 6 patients) and the Cell Saver (group II, 6 patients). The total serum protein level, expressed as the percent recovery of the preoperative value, after hemoconcentration was significantly higher in group I (group I versus group II: total serum protein, 118% versus 87% [p less than 0.05]; fibrinogen, 77% versus 50% [p less than 0.01]; immunoglobulin, 83% versus 60% [p less than 0.01]). The platelets also seemed to be well preserved after hemoconcentration in group I. Although the exclusion of free hemoglobin from plasma was inferior in group I compared with group II, the postoperative plasma free hemoglobin level did not increase in group I. We conclude that use of the Cell Saver in nontransfusion cardiopulmonary bypass might cause a severe depletion of various proteins and that the ultrafilter is both safer and more useful if employed routinely.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. T. Gurbuz, W. M. Novick, C. A. Pierce, and D. C. Watson
Impact of Ultrafiltration on Blood Use for Atrial Septal Defect Closure in Infants and Children
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1998; 65(4): 1105 - 1109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. W. Daggett, A. J. Lodge, J. E. Scarborough, P. J. Chai, J. Jaggers, and R. M. Ungerleider
Modified Ultrafiltration Versus Conventional Ultrafiltration: A Randomized Prospective Study In Neonatal Piglets
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1998; 115(2): 336 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. H. Friesen, D. N. Campbell, D. R. Clarke, and M. A. Tornabene
Modified Ultrafiltration Attenuates Dilutional Coagulopathy in Pediatric Open Heart Operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1787 - 1789.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
S. Naik and M. Elliott
Ultrafiltration and paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, January 1, 1993; 8(1): 101 - 112.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1990 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.