HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Harpole, D. H. Articles by Jones, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Harpole, D. H., Jr Articles by Jones, R. H.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 49, 866-873, Copyright © 1990 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Effects of standard mitral valve replacement on left ventricular function

DH Harpole Jr, JS Rankin, WG Wolfe, FM Clements, P Van Trigt, WG Young and RH Jones
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Recent studies have suggested that excision of the mitral valve apparatus during mitral valve replacement impairs left ventricular performance. However, functional measurements in humans have been difficult to obtain in a load-independent fashion. To investigate this concept, 12 patients (mean age, 65 +/- 8 years; mean New York Heart Association functional class, 3.3 +/- 0.7) with 4+ mitral regurgitation (n = 8) or mitral stenosis (valve area, 1.2 +/- 0.2 cm2) (n = 4) underwent prosthetic valve replacement using crystalloid cardioplegia. No patient required therapeutic inotropic support, every patient had at least the anterior mitral leaflet excised, and paced heart rate was maintained constant throughout. Left ventricular volume was measured with radionuclide angiocardiography, left ventricular pressure with a 3F micromanometer, and left ventricular wall volume with two- dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Left ventricular preload was varied over a mean end-diastolic pressure range of 9 to 20 mm Hg and an end-diastolic volume range of 134 to 170 mL to generate four to five steady-state pressure-volume loops before and ten minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass. Left ventricular performance was estimated with the stroke work/end-diastolic volume relationship, which is insensitive to load. After bypass, no significant change (p greater than 0.1) was noted in wall volume for patients with mitral regurgitation or mitral stenosis (175 +/- 68 to 189 +/- 63 mL/m2 and 130 +/- 22 to 127 +/- 19 mL/m2, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Milano, M. A. Daneshmand, J. S. Rankin, E. Honeycutt, M. L. Williams, M. Swaminathan, L. Linblad, L. K. Shaw, D. D. Glower, and P. K. Smith Survival Prognosis and Surgical Management of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 735 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Suri, H. V. Schaff, J. A. Dearani, T. M. Sundt III, R. C. Daly, C. J. Mullany, M. E. Sarano, and T. A. Orszulak Determinants of early decline in ejection fraction after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 442 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Sarnowski, A. Szyszka, Z. Oko-Sarnowska, P. Buczkowski, and W. Dyszkiewicz Mitral valvuloplasty with sutures used for aortic prosthesis implantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 1073 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Yun, C. F. Sintek, D. C. Miller, G. T. Schuyler, A. D. Fletcher, T. A. Pfeffer, G. S. Kochamba, S. Khonsari, and M. R. Zile Randomized Trial of Partial Versus Complete Chordal Preservation Methods of Mitral Valve Replacement : A Preliminary Report Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(90002): II-90 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Cesnjevar, R. Feyrer, F. Walther, F. O. Mahmoud, Y. Lindemann, and J. von der Emde High-risk mitral valve replacement in severe pulmonary hypertension--30 years experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 13(4): 344 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]