HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Orringer, M. B. Articles by Stirling, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Orringer, M. B. Articles by Stirling, M. C.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 49, 35-42, Copyright © 1990 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Esophagectomy for esophageal disruption

MB Orringer and MC Stirling
Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109.

When esophageal disruption occurs in the presence of preexisting esophageal disease or is associated with sepsis or fluid and electrolyte imbalance, aggressive and definitive therapy often provides the only chance for patient salvage. Twenty-four adults (average age, 59 years) with intrathoracic esophageal perforations underwent esophagectomy: 15, transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy; and 9, transthoracic esophagectomy. Restoration of alimentary continuity with an immediate cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was carried out in 13 patients. Eleven underwent a cervical or anterior thoracic esophagostomy, and 10 of them had a subsequent colonic (7) or gastric (3) interposition from 4 to 32 weeks (average time, 8.6 weeks) later. The perforations were due to esophageal instrumentation (9 patients), acute caustic ingestion (2), emesis (2), intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic disruption (2), and other causes (9). Preexisting esophageal disease in 20 patients included chronic strictures (10 patients), reflux esophagitis (3), esophageal cancer (3), achalasia (2), diffuse spasm (2), and monilial esophagitis (1 patient). Ten patients were operated on within 12 hours after the injury; 3, within 12 to 24 hours; and 11, within three to 45 days (average interval, 6.6 days). There were three hospital deaths (13%). Nineteen of the 21 survivors were able to swallow comfortably until the time of death or latest follow-up. Aggressive diagnosis and aggressive treatment of life- threatening esophageal perforations are advocated. Conservative procedures (repair, diversion, or drainage) for a perforation with preexisting esophageal disease often inflict more morbidity than esophageal resection, which eliminates the perforation, the source of sepsis, and the underlying esophageal disease. The decision to restore alimentary continuity in a single stage must be individualized.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Linden, R. Bueno, S. J. Mentzer, L. Zellos, A. Lebenthal, Y. L. Colson, D. J. Sugarbaker, and M. T. Jaklitsch Modified T-Tube Repair of Delayed Esophageal Perforation Results in a Low Mortality Rate Similar to That Seen With Acute Perforations Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1129 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hasan, A. N.A. Jilaihawi, and D. Prakash Conservative management of iatrogenic oesophageal perforations -- a viable option Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 28(1): 7 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Brinster, S. Singhal, L. Lee, M. B. Marshall, L. R. Kaiser, and J. C. Kucharczuk Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1475 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Barkley, M. B. Orringer, M. D. Iannettoni, and J. Yee Challenges in reversing esophageal discontinuity operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 989 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Port, M. S. Kent, R. J. Korst, M. Bacchetta, and N. K. Altorki Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1071 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Zwischenberger, C. Savage, and A. Bidani Surgical Aspects of Esophageal Disease . Perforation and Caustic Injury Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2002; 165(8): 1037 - 1040. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Salo, J. K. Savola, V. J. Toikkanen, V. J. Perhoniemi, V. Y.O. Pettila, J. A. Klossner, and H. J. Toivonen Successful treatment of mediastinal gas gangrene due to esophageal perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 70(6): 2143 - 2145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Altorjay, J. Kiss, A. Voros, and E. Sziranyi The Role of Esophagectomy in the Management of Esophageal Perforations Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1998; 65(5): 1433 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Iannettoni, A. A. Vlessis, R. I. Whyte, and M. B. Orringer Functional Outcome After Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1606 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. Andrade-Alegre and K. A. Mansour Esophageal Perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1996; 62(6): 1891 - 1892. [Full Text]

				N. Wang, A. J. Razzouk, A. Safavi, K. Gan, G. S. Van Arsdell, P. M. Burton, B. L. Fandrich, M. J. Wood, A. C. Hill, E. E. Vyhmeister, et al. DELAYED PRIMARY REPAIR OF INTRATHORACIC ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION: IS IT SAFE? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1996; 111(1): 114 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. D. Wright, D. J. Mathisen, J. C. Wain, A. C. Moncure, A. D. Hilgenberg, and H. C. Grillo Reinforced Primary Repair of Thoracic Esophageal Perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1995; 60(2): 245 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. S. Weiman, W. A. Walker, K. M. Brosnan, J. W. Pate, and T. C. Fabian Noniatrogenic Esophageal Trauma Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1995; 59(4): 845 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. I. Whyte, M. D. Iannettoni, and M. B. Orringer Intrathoracic esophageal perforation: The merit of primary repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1995; 109(1): 140 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text]