ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greene, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greene, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, T. J.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 48, 38-42, Copyright © 1989 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Does hypothermic fibrillatory arrest improve myocardial protection during emergency revascularization?

PS Greene, DE Cameron, EM Griffiths, JM DiNatale and TJ Gardner
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Hypothermic fibrillatory arrest (HFA) was compared with conventional hypothermic cardioplegic arrest (HCA) in a model of acute regional ischemia. In 20 pigs, the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 30 minutes before cardiopulmonary bypass. In the HCA group (n = 10), the heart was arrested with a hyperkalemic cold crystalloid solution, whereas in HFA animals (n = 10), the heart was vented and allowed to fibrillate spontaneously without cross-clamping. Miniature pH probes monitored intramyocardial pH during 45 minutes of arrest (HCA or HFA, both with systemic and topical myocardial cooling) and during two hours of coronary reperfusion. Hypothermic fibrillatory arrest did not ameliorate the acidosis in the ischemic (left anterior descending) region; indeed, after two hours of coronary reperfusion, there was a trend toward more acidosis in the postischemic left anterior descending territory in the HFA group. However, HFA did prevent acidosis in the nonischemic (left circumflex) territory. Infarct size expressed as percent of region at risk was 18.1% +/- 3.2% (mean +/- standard error of the mean) in the HCA animals and 18.8% +/- 4.4% in the HFA animals. These results demonstrate that HFA offers no advantage over HCA in protection of regionally ischemic myocardium in a model with minimal collateral circulation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. Umakanthan, M. Leacche, M. R. Petracek, S. Kumar, N. V. Solenkova, C. A. Kaiser, J. P. Greelish, J. M. Balaguer, R. M. Ahmad, S. K. Ball, et al.
Safety of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamp.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1544 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1989 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.