HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Edwards, F. H. Articles by Barry, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Edwards, F. H. Articles by Barry, M.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 47, 646-649, Copyright © 1989 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

A quality assurance model of operative mortality in coronary artery surgery

FH Edwards, RA Albus, R Zajtchuk, GM Graeber and M Barry
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001.

Quality assurance in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery requires a comparison of operative mortality against an accepted standard of care. Raw mortality statistics are unacceptable in this context, and risk factor analysis is essential. However, this principle has not been adequately demonstrated in previous reports. Our goal in this study was to develop a risk model of accepted CABG mortality and illustrate its proper use in coronary artery surgery. The model was derived from a Bayesian analysis of 6,630 patients undergoing CABG in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. Age, sex, ventricular function, previous myocardial infarction, extent of coronary artery disease, unstable angina, and surgical priority were used by the model to sort patients into risk categories. From January 1984 through December 1987, 840 patients underwent isolated CABG at our hospital. With raw mortality data, the 3.9% (33/840) mortality of our patients was significantly different from the 2.3% (153/6,630) CASS mortality (p less than 0.001). When our patients were entered into the CASS model for risk stratification, however, our CABG mortality conformed to the CASS experience. These results illustrate the fallacy of using raw mortality statistics for interinstitutional comparisons. This type of risk model is a fundamental element of CABG quality assurance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Wang, J.-Y. Dupuis, H. Nathan, and K. Williams An Analysis of the Association Between Preoperative Renal Dysfunction and Outcome in Cardiac Surgery: Estimated Creatinine Clearance or Plasma Creatinine Level as Measures of Renal Function,* Chest, November 1, 2003; 124(5): 1852 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. V. Arom and F. L. Grover Adult cardiac surgery during the first 50 years of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(90050): S17 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Al-Ruzzeh, G Asimakopoulos, G Ambler, R Omar, R Hasan, B Fabri, A El-Gamel, A DeSouza, V Zamvar, S Griffin, et al. Validation of four different risk stratification systems in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a UK multicentre analysis of 2223 patients Heart, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 432 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Lippmann and D. M. Shahian Coronary Artery Bypass Risk Prediction Using Neural Networks Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1997; 63(6): 1635 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Use of a Bayesian Statistical Model for Risk Assessment in Coronary Artery Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 59(6): 1611 - 1612. [Full Text]

				K. E. Hammermeister Risk, Predicting Outcomes, and Improving Care Circulation, February 1, 1995; 91(3): 899 - 900. [Full Text]