|
|
||||||||
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 41, 237-246, Copyright © 1986 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
DM Shahian, WB Neptune, FH Ellis Jr and E Watkins Jr
Extrathoracic esophagectomy for carcinoma is an acceptable substitute for
transthoracic resection if it can be shown to have comparable or superior
safety and no adverse effect on long-term survival. To test this
hypothesis, we employed extrathoracic esophagectomy in 30 consecutive
patients with carcinoma of the esophagus from January, 1978, to July, 1984.
During this period, 65 comparable patients underwent transthoracic
resection through a left thoracotomy for lower esophageal lesions or a
right thoracotomy and laparotomy for upper thoracic lesions. Only patients
with carcinoma limited to the gastric cardia were excluded from the study.
Overall morbidity was higher in the extrathoracic than in the transthoracic
group (13 of 30 or 43.3% versus 15 of 65 or 23.1%; p = 0.05), but the
differences in hospital mortality (4 of 65 or 6.2% for the transthoracic
group versus 4 of 30 or 13.3% for the extrathoracic group) and duration of
hospital stay (17.4 +/- 11.7 days for the transthoracic group versus 20.5
+/- 13.4 days for the extrathoracic group) were not statistically
significant. Considering all patients who either died or sustained a
postoperative complication, we found significant differences favoring
transthoracic resection in those subgroups of patients who were able to
undergo primary reconstruction at the time of resection (12 of 57 or 21.1%
versus 15 of 28 or 53.6%; p = 0.004), those with advanced Stage III lesions
(11 of 47 or 23.4% versus 12 of 20 or 60%; p = 0.006), those with tumor of
the lower esophagus (8 of 35 or 22.9% versus 6 of 10 or 60%; p = 0.04), and
those with tumor that could be resected through a left thoracotomy (2 of 18
or 11.1% versus 17 of 30 or 56.7%; p = 0.002). Actuarial survival curves
for all transthoracic and extrathoracic resections and separate analysis
for Stage I and Stage III tumors revealed no statistically significant
differences between these two techniques.
ARTICLES
Transthoracic versus extrathoracic esophagectomy: mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Law, D. T. K. Suen, K.-H. Wong, K.-F. Kwok, and J. Wong A Single-Layer, Continuous, Hand-Sewn Method for Esophageal Anastomosis: Prospective Evaluation in 218 Patients Arch Surg, January 1, 2005; 140(1): 33 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Hagen and T. R. DeMeester Esophageal adenocarcinoma Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 72(4): 1430 - 1432. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Kim, K. S. Lee, Y. M. Shim, K. Kim, P. S. Yang, and T. S. Kim Esophageal Resection: Indications, Techniques, and Radiologic Assessment RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1119 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Gupta and N. M. Gupta Transhiatal Versus Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Distal Esophageal Cancer Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2000; 8(4): 347 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Jougon, M. Ballester, J. Duffy, J. Dubrez, C. Delaisement, J.-F. Velly, and L. Couraud Esophagectomy for Cancer in the Patient Aged 70 Years and Older Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1423 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. T. Vigneswaran, V. F. Trastek, P. C. Pairolero, C. Deschamps, R. C. Daly, and M. S. Allen Extended esophagectomy in the management of carcinoma of the upper thoracic esophagus J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1994; 107(3): 901 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |