ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lores, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lores, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, B. R.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 40, 464-468, Copyright © 1985 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Cardiovascular effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) after pneumonectomy in dogs

ME Lores, BA Keagy, T Vassiliades, GW Henry, CL Lucas and BR Wilcox

Little is known regarding the hemodynamic effect of positive end- expiratory pressure (PEEP) following pneumonectomy. To investigate this, 9 mongrel dogs underwent PEEP before and after lung resection. With the chest closed, the dog anesthetized, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide constant, PEEP was added in increments of 2 mm Hg until the animal's condition became hemodynamically unstable. At each level of PEEP, aortic, pulmonary, left atrial, and central venous pressures were monitored while aortic flow (cardiac output) was determined with an electromagnetic probe and airway pressure was measured with a Millar catheter in the respiratory tubing. Pneumonectomy was then performed, PEEP was again sequentially added, and the same measurements were recorded. Both before and after pneumonectomy, a strong positive linear correlation exists between the level of PEEP and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (r greater than 0.74; p less than 0.05). Also, there is a high negative linear correlation between the level of PEEP and cardiac output (r greater than -0.76; p less than 0.05). At 0 mm Hg of PEEP, the PVR is higher after pneumonectomy than before (p less than 0.02). The incremental elevation in PVR persists after pneumonectomy at each level of PEEP, and in 5 of the 9 dogs the slope of the linear regression line relating PVR to PEEP was steeper following resection (p less than 0.05), thereby demonstrating an exaggerated effect of PEEP on PVR. In addition, all animals had a lower cardiac output at each comparable level of PEEP following pneumonectomy (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. R. Polglase, C. J. Morley, K. J. Crossley, P. Dargaville, R. Harding, D. L. Morgan, and S. B. Hooper
Positive end-expiratory pressure differentially alters pulmonary hemodynamics and oxygenation in ventilated, very premature lambs
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1453 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.